On ABC's World News Sunday, during a story about the release of classified information regarding the CIA's "cloak and dagger" past, correspondent Liz Marlantes suggested that the Bush administration engages in abuses that are worse than the illegal activities detailed in the documents. Marlantes: "But this all comes when the CIA is under fire for an alleged array of current abuses, including the use of secret prisons and torture. Some say the activities of the past may look mild by comparison."
As anchor Dan Harris set up the report, he conveyed that the documents "detail 30 years of illegal CIA operations, from assassination plots to experiments on humans." Marlantes listed some of the activities that included "assassination conspiracies against foreign leaders like Fidel Castro, the infiltration of anti-war groups, and screening of private mail, including letters to actress and antiwar activist Jane Fonda," and "putting journalists under surveillance." (Transcipt follows)
As Marlantes relayed CIA director Michael Hayden's comments that the documents detail activities of "a very different time and a very different agency," the ABC correspondent saw it differently. Marlantes: "But this all comes when the CIA is under fire for an alleged array of current abuses, including the use of secret prisons and torture. Some say the activities of the past may look mild by comparison."
After showing a clip of Bush administration critic James Bamford complaining that some of the controversial actions that were done "in a very mild degree" decades ago are now being done "wholesale," Marlantes concluded: "A look back at a controversial history, whose lessons may be more relevant than ever."
Below is a complete transcript of the report from the June 24 World News Sunday on ABC:
DAN HARRIS: The CIA is going to release some of its deepest, darkest secrets tomorrow, documents detailing 30 years of illegal CIA operations, from assassination plots to experiments on humans. Not only is the spy agency disclosing this long-hidden information, it is also doing it voluntarily. ABC's Liz Marlantes has the story.
LIZ MARLANTES: They are known as the "family jewels," documents so secret and so potentially damaging that the CIA has fought to keep them classified until now.
THOMAS BLANTON, National Security Archive: The "family jewels" are a series of CIA officers going into the confessional and saying, "Forgive me, father, for, I have sinned."
MARLANTES: Then-CIA director James Schlesinger ordered the 700-page dossier in 1973, compiling decades of illegal activities by the agency. Many details were later revealed in newspaper reports and congressional hearings. It is the stuff of spy novels. Among the abuses, assassination conspiracies against foreign leaders like Fidel Castro, the infiltration of anti-war groups, and screening of private mail, including letters to actress and antiwar activist Jane Fonda. The CIA also put journalists under surveillance, like columnist Jack Anderson and his then-assistant Brit Hume.
MICHAEL GETLER, Former Washington Post reporter: It was very spooky, very spooky. I mean, this is America. And you don't expect that.
MARLANTES: Former Washington Post reporter Michael Getler was monitored by a team of agents around the clock.
GETLER: They were watching who I was talking to. They took pictures of who I was having lunch with. They actually took pictures through the picture window of our home.
MARLANTES: The CIA would have had to release the documents eventually under the Freedom of Information Act. But the decision to do it now may reflect a new openness on the part of the agency about its cloak and dagger past. CIA director Michael Hayden described the documents as a glimpse of a very different time and a very different agency. But this all comes when the CIA is under fire for an alleged array of current abuses, including the use of secret prisons and torture. Some say the activities of the past may look mild by comparison.
JAMES BAMFORD, Author of Body of Secrets: A lot of the things that were done in a very mild degree back in the '50s, '60s and '70s are now being done on a whole scale basis.
MARLANTES: A look back at a controversial history, whose lessons may be more relevant than ever. Liz Marlantes, ABC News, Washington.
—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"But this all comes when
June 25, 2007 - 06:12 ET by richflanj"But this all comes when the CIA is under fire...."
Under fire from you and your leftist ilk only. God only knows how many "incidents" hav been avoided because of the intelligence generated by the CIA, NSA, DOD, etc., etc. I personally do not give a rat's behind if some idiot paranoid leftist is "concerned" that Carl Rove might be listening into his Saturday night phone call to the local pizza delivery service because the eeeevil Republicans have to know if he wants extra cheese.
"Some say the activities of the past may look mild by comparison."
Ahhh, the old "some say" statement the left pulls out more often than a drunk gambler in Vegas whips out his ATM card. C'mon!! WHO says it? NAMES, dammit!!! And (honestly) if ANY of the left wings "concerns" were valid, would CNN, ABC, MSNBC, etc. still be broadcasting?
When is this idiot going to realize that she would be among the first to be executed in a Muslim-controlled society?
Self Flagulation
June 25, 2007 - 06:37 ET by allanfThere are some Islamic rituals that involve self flagulation on certain holidays. Aparently, CIA Director Michael Hayden has adopted this practice. The decision shows poor judgement.
We are indeed fortunate the the security of the nation is not left to simple thinking people like Elizabeth Marlentes who sprout "trite catechisms' such as "secret prisons and torture" with the fervent hope that repetition will help the public repeat and remember their "holy" words.
Problems at the CIA.
June 25, 2007 - 08:08 ET by acaiguanaProblems at the CIA.
I agree that there are problems at the CIA. But it isn't that the CIA has done some pretty covert stuff.
It is that they failed in a great number of their brilliant ideas.
First, opening private mail during war time is not a crime. In fact, there was an army of censors at work during WWII and all private international mail from each end of the pipe was opened and censored.
Second, 'secret prisons' off-shore are not crirminal acts during war. We maintained a number of 'interrogation centers' during WWII that were not public.
Third, when the CIA crosses the line from International operations to Domestice spying that would be illegal. No one that I know is arguing that case.
The bottom line regarding the CIA is that they have had mediocrecy in staffing since the Church Commission. Not the brightest bulbs in the room, as it were. Hence a twit like Valarie Plame gets to sit on the WMD desk. Duh.
The lack of human assets on the ground led to the entire WMD silliness and gave the Left a straw man to use to beat the Bush Administration about the head.
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
So, the CIA did such horrible
June 25, 2007 - 13:46 ET by zfSo, the CIA did such horrible things like plan to kill a wretched tryant like Castro, infiltrate radical "anti-war" groups who were often fronts for violent anti-US activity and read "Hanoi" Jane's mail at a time when she was coddling with the enemy who were killing American servicemen and posing with her hands wrapped around the weapons being used to do so.
That dastardly CIA!
I guess the MSM would prefer the toothless and meek CIA we have today. I also suppose the concept that the CIA is not exactly supposed to be a bunch of nice guys to begin with flies right over their heads. The idea that spying can be a nasty business probably sends libs crying to their mommies.
this woman and her friends ar
June 25, 2007 - 23:43 ET by PKthis woman and her friends are fools. by the looks of her she is not old enough to have seen the "old" cia in action.
one thing about the old bunch (pre Jimmy Carter) is that they were so secretive that if you were around them all you saw or heard was a kind of whisper in the wind.
they did things that boggled the mind (like building a ship, and a barge, then using the combination to pick a russian submarine off of the bottom of the sea {more than 20,000 feet down} and bringing it back stateside to look at the atomic intercontinental ballistic missiles that were in the sub) and then successfully keeping it a secret for 15 more years.
one of the heads of the bunch was in hot water with congress. the congress critters really wanted to question him under oath about some various sins. he was in the hospital. they served the supena and he died on them forthwith. their whole house of cards investigation collapsed within the hour.
they were like the cheshire cat in alice in wonderland sitting on the tree branch and gradually fading away until all you saw at the end was the smile disappearing.
senators and congressmen did not leak stuff out of closed hearings in those days.
we need a lot more of that bunch.
c
PK..senators and congressmen
June 26, 2007 - 00:00 ET by bigtimerPK..
senators and congressmen did not leak stuff out of closed hearings in those days.
we need a lot more of that bunch.
I just do not see that happening anytime soon...I sure agree with the sentiments though..and then some...the leaks have been horrendous to put it politely here.
Thanks for the eye-opening info though....bet you could write a book...that you couldn't put down.