ABC Derides America: ‘U.S. Doesn't Make it Easy’ For Working Parents

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

For the third time in 2007, ABC has used its "Good Morning America" program to deride the United States for not being generous enough in providing paid leave for employees. On the Thursday edition of the show, reporter David Wright complained that "the U.S. doesn't make it easy" for working parents. He used a 2007 study to claim that, on this issue, America is no better then several Third World nations.

At no point did the ABC reporter mention that countries who provide generous leave, such as France, also have extremely high taxes and high unemployment. (The French are currently at 8.7 percent.)

[Related post by Mark Finkelstein available here]

After an introduction by host Robin Roberts that explained how Congress is considering legislation to expand federal and medical lave, Wright cited a recent Harvard-McGill study that lumps the U.S. in with third world countries such as Swaziland:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

David Wright: "A recent Harvard-McGill study of more than 170 countries found that only four of them do not require paid leave for new mothers: Liberia, Papua New Guinea, Swaziland, and the U.S. The study also found that 145 countries provide paid sick days."

The linkage of America to these countries is, perhaps, intended to provoke gasps in the audience. But Mr. Wright left out important differences in quality of life, such as the fact that Swaziland has 40 percent unemployment, almost 70 percent of the country lives in poverty and has a per capita GDP of only $5,200. (Comparatively, the U.S. is at $44,000.)

Additionally, "Good Morning America" made this exact same point about the study in February. Back then, reporter Elizabeth Vargas even used the same phraseology:

Elizabeth Vargas: "In fact, a study out this week from Harvard and McGill University, shows that of 173 countries surveyed, only five provide no form of paid maternity leave: Papua New Guinea, Lesotho, Swaziland, Liberia, and the United States."

The intent seems clear: America is very backwards on paid leave. Perhaps an indicator of where the network would like the U.S. to ultimately go is the fact that Wright described the legislation as "baby steps."

Other instances of GMA touting the progressive leanings of various nations include an April segment on the welfare system of Denmark and how it "provides security and comfort."

In fact, in February, Diane Sawyer appeared impressed by aspects of the dictatorial regime of Syria. She approvingly commented that Syrian women have "safety on the streets, family to help with children, and the government helping too."

A transcript of the June 21 segment, which aired at 7:14am, follows:

Robin Roberts: "This morning, Congress is going to hear about a battle on the home front, one that goes on inside millions of American homes. It's the battle to not only balance work and family but also try and make ends meet, a juggling act that is quickly becoming part of the American experience. Our David Wright has more from Washington. David."

ABC Graphic: "Can Govt Help Working Parents? More Paid Leave For Moms?"

David Wright: "Good morning, Robin. It's something that every parent struggles with, how to balance work and family. And the U.S. lags far behind other countries in helping parents to cope. Well, here on Capitol Hill today, Congress will take the first baby steps to try and address that situation. Missy Quarberg of Amery, Wisconsin recently quit her job at Wal-Mart to stay at home and care for her two kids. She says she liked the job, she simply couldn't afford to keep it."

Missy Quarberg: "I was getting to the point where I was going to have to take– and get a part-time job to pay for the gas to go to my full-time job to pay for day care."

Wright: "She also says her boss wasn't so sympathetic about her needs to take time off whenever her kids had doctors appointments. Today she's coming to Capitol Hill to tell her story. She's not alone. In roughly 80 percent of two-parent families, both parents have jobs . All of them struggle to juggle and the U.S. doesn't make it easy. A recent Harvard-McGill study of more than 170 countries found that only four of them do not require paid leave for new mothers: Liberia, Papua New Guinea, Swaziland, and the U.S. The study also found that 145 countries provide paid sick days. The U.S. requires only unpaid family and medical leave and not all workers are covered."

Janet Currie (Columbia University): "I don't think the hearing is going to magically produce legislation that's going to cover all of these issues. But I think it's very important to keep attention focused."

Wright: "Why is Congress paying attention now? Quite possibly because more moms are on Capitol Hill than ever before. They too, struggle to juggle. A struggle for every parent. Today's meeting of the Workforce Protection Subcommittee is the very first step in trying to address the work-family balance. And among the bills they're considering are a measure that would expand family and medical leave and also a bill that would amend the Civil Rights act of 1964 to protect women who breast feed. Diane?"

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Who the hell decides what makes a family "working?"

Selectivity at its finest. If we're so backward, why are all of those good folks at the Republic of Backwashistan kicking, screaming, walking, running, swimming, lying, deceiving to get in here so bad?

"Hard on working families" starts with immigration reform...as the so-called "working families" seem to be the ones most affected by depressed wages brought on by the 12m+ folks who are cutting in line.

Not Easy

With apologizes to ABC, it is not the role of government to make life easy for people.

Frankly I doubt the veracity of the Harvard Study. Tell me about paid family leave programs in Iraq, Syria, North Korea, China, Brazil, Mexico etc. There are not 170 countries in the world will fully functioning economies.

European socialists have implemented paid family leave. It comes at a high economic cost.  Its results are obvious. Low productivity, higher prices, higher taxes and jobs lost to other nations more intent on providing goods and services instead of social services.

There is a hard economic cost to paid family leave.

In most western European coun

In most western European countries, paid maternity leave is an incentive to have children, and not just a generous or compassionate policy.  Norway, for instance, concerned with low birth rates and low marriage rates,  actually pays woman healthy salaries to stay home and raise children.

Why?  Because to sustain a population at a constant level in a Western population, the population must average 2.2 births per woman.  In most western European countries, the rates are well below 2.0.  I believe Italy's is about 1.3.

What this means is that there are fewer and fewer people entering the work force, to pay taxes, to sustain the nanny-state and its hand-out programs.   It's analogous to our Social Security dilemma, only many times worse.

So, the paid maternity leave -- while costly -- is desperately necessary to save the nanny-state.

allan, you are showing your

allan, you are showing your insensitivity! Of course it's the government's role to make life easy. They should pass laws mandating a year's paid leave after childbirth, then allow parents to work at their previous salary, reducing hours to whatever they comfortable with  being away from their kids (who are in free day or after-school care), with days off for school plays, dentist appointments, teacher conferences, whatever. Oh, and none of the time off should be taken into account when promotions and raises are considered.

}}----> Life Choices

We will apparently never be free from supporting the dumbed down tarted up Americans who made all their life choices with their sex organs and none with their intellects.

What the heck does family leave have to do with breastfeeding?  Why should I decide whether a woman can breastfeed?  Seems nature already did that.  Are we Radical Islam that we can't control ourselves when a mother feeds her baby?  Oh, I see, they want to offer leave for the duration of the feeding months?

Congress and the MSM can try to kill the cow that is American work ethic, but the jobs we do are easily moved.  See NAFTA

Why must the MSM follow San Francisco whither it goeth?

You know, it's been pretty easy for me to hold down a job all my life.  My wife wanted to stay home after our first was born so we've managed to stay within that budget.  Now it turns out hard I'm the fool.

Same old socialist song and d

Same old socialist song and dance from the 90's.  Force employers to pay people to not work, force people into government-funded health care, raise taxes to pay for all these "solutions" etc. etc.

When people have to work until May, just to cover their tax bill, the solution is NOT to create more bureaucracy!

As usual, GMA completely igno

As usual, GMA completely ignored the real issue here: taxes. The woman made the comment that she needed a second job to pay for the gas to get to her first job, which was what funded her childcare. Why would she? Because, as a spouse, she is taxed at her husband's rate of income. The government is taking more of her money, because she pays based on her husband's salary.

American families are getting screwed because we have a tax system based on the one-income, mom-stays-home model. Change that, and eliminate the AMT, and we won't be subjected to this ridiculous "news" stories.

fairtax would solve this

fairtax would solve this

One more step towards sociali

One more step towards socialism.

It's not taxes, nor stay-at-home/not stay-at-home, nor breastfeeding vs. bottle.

It's simple ecomonics.  Simply look at how much you make, subtract out how much you pay in taxes (tithing too if you do that first) then live on the rest, less putting away some for savings. 

May have to live without widescreen tv, or Starbucks, or spinning wheel covers for awhile though.

Commom sense isn't very common anymore

And, if you're unlucky enou

And, if you're unlucky enough to be like me, compare the tithe-pile with the tax-pile & actually think about it...
JMR

Sarc, I sure know which one I

Sarc, I sure know which one I would like to increase and which one to decrease, but nonetheless both are required.

Commom sense isn't very common anymore.

Convince vs coerce

Amen, brother, but the requirement for one comes freely through convincing, and for the other (the bigun...Sigh....) is through coercion, so even though I like to talk about relating them, in the end they're morally 180 degrees apart, IMO.
JMR

Don't mind taxes for military

Don't mind taxes for military, roads, etc.  It's all the social programs like welfare, planned parenthood, and Social Security.  I believe in both "if you don't work you don't eat" and I am very capable of planning my own retirement but for those how can't or don't let them sign up for it.

Seems if the government took less of our money for these social programs we could all be putting more into our tithes and let the charities cover the "social" needs.

Common sense isn't very common anymore.

That's fine with me.

Being at the bottom of a list for the most socialist country is A OK with me!

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic

Actually, we're at the top of

Actually, we're at the top of the list if you phrase it another way.

"The U.S.A. is among the top in countries who cut wasteful and economically dangerous social leave programs.  Even countries such as Papa New Guinea, Liberia, and Swaziland have followed the U.S. example and put such allegedly civilized countries as France to shame for their policies which reward sloth and endanger their competitiveness in a global market."

Where in the Constitution d

Where in the Constitution does it say government is supposed to make life easier? Government's job is to govern, not baby sit.

As far as leave is concerned, I think that should be left up to the employer. You dont like the bennies your job offers, there are other jobs. The government should have absolutely nothing to do with this.

I'm really sick of the MSM, day after day, pushing the idea that government has to get further into your shorts.