OpinionJournal.com's James Taranto on Wednesday proposed that New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is the preferred presidential “candidate of the media, ideologically as well as professionally,” a supposition demonstrated by media excitement over his separation from the Republican Party in preparation for a possible independent bid. “The presidential race just got a whole lot more interesting,” gushed Today co-host Meredith Vieira in plugging Wednesday's top story while, on CBS, Early Show co-host Harry Smith excitedly relayed how “we want to get right to our top story, and that's a bombshell from New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.” On ABC's Good Morning America, Diane Sawyer enthused about how “the hugely popular Mayor of New York City ditches the Republican label and declares independence, asking if other Americans are ready for a change.” Robin Roberts insisted that “many are asking now whether he is destined to be a contender.”
All day Wednesday the cable networks were full of speculation over Bloomberg and in the evening all three broadcast network newscasts ran full stories on his possible candidacy. An on-screen graphic on ABC's World News asked “Will He Run?” and the NBC Nightly News looked at the possibility of three candidates from New York. But the CBS Evening News was the most promotional. Katie Couric highlighted how a poll “found more than one out of three Democratic primary voters and more than half of Republicans want more choices. So how about an independent? Today a certain Mayor of New York was the talk of the town and a lot of the country.” More likely, the talk of America's newsrooms. Noting how Bloomberg is “sparking imaginations,” Jim Axelrod recited some of Bloomberg's liberal positions: “So no one really knows what this 65-year-old billionaire who favors gun control, gay marriage, and abortion rights is up to, aside from sparking the imaginations of those uninspired by the current field.”
Diane Sawyer announced at the top of the June 20 GMA:
“This morning, who needs Washington? The hugely popular mayor of New York City ditches the Republican label and declares independence, asking if other Americans are ready for a change. Has the presidential race just been thrown a giant curve ball?”
Robin Roberts added:
“The race to ‘08 is getting a shot of adrenaline this morning from someone who is not even in the race. No, New York City's Mayor Michael Bloomberg did not throw his hat in the ring. But he did declare his independence from the Republican Party. That move, along with his multi-billion dollar bank account, well, many are asking now whether he is destined to be a contender.”
This week's Time magazine also hyped Bloomberg, putting him on the cover with Arnold Schwarzenegger, touted in the cover story as “The New Action Heroes.” Michael Grunwald's idolatrous first sentence: “On an unseasonably hot May day in Central Park, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg -- the pint-size billionaire whose last name needs no elaboration for anyone who knows anything about finance or the media -- was talking about saving the planet.”
In his lead item Wednesday for his “Best of the Web Today” compilation, James Taranto of OpinionJournal.com outlined why the media are excited about a Bloomberg candidacy:
New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg "announced Tuesday that he has left the Republican Party and become unaffiliated," the Associated Press reports. The AP notes that Bloomberg was a "lifelong" Democrat until 2001, when he opportunistically switched parties to get a clear shot at the mayor's office. It also itemizes some of his views, and they sound as if they're lifted from the Democratic Party platform:
Throughout his five years as mayor, Bloomberg often has been at odds with his party and [President] Bush. He supports gay marriage, abortion rights, gun control and [federal funding of embryonic] stem cell research and hiked property taxes to help solve a fiscal crisis after the Sept. 11 attacks.Bloomberg is so out of step with the GOP that he opposed the confirmation of John Roberts as chief justice. He is term-limited and thus cannot seek re-election, which means that the Republican line is no longer of any use to him. So why is it news that he is abandoning his Republican affiliation?
Because, according to the AP's Sara Kugler, "many believe [it] could be a step toward entering the 2008 race for president."
To make sense of this assertion, you need to be fluent in the dialect of American English known as Journalese. In Journalese, many can be either singular or plural, and it is a first-person pronoun.
Which is to say, Bloomberg is the candidate of the media, ideologically as well as professionally. The positions Kugler enumerates are all very popular among journalists. And while they are also popular among Democrats, Democratic politicians do not necessarily support them, or support them sincerely.
The Dems have of late been playing down gun control, figuring that they have more to lose than to gain from a strong anti-gun stand. They would do the same with abortion if they thought it would profit them politically. (The list of Democrats who have gone from anti- to pro-abortion is a long one, as of course is the list of Republicans who've moved in the other direction.) John Kerry in 2004 said he opposed same-sex marriage, though everyone assumed he didn't really mean it, and he was one of only 14 senators to vote "no" on the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996.
Bloomberg, by contrast, is a conviction politician, and his convictions match those of the liberal media....
The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video for the June 20 CBS Evening News story:
KATIE COURIC: Stem cell research is sure to be an issue in the upcoming presidential campaign, and while there may be a lot of candidates, apparently the current field is leaving some people hungry for more. A recent CBS News/New York Times poll found more than one out of three Democratic primary voters [35%] and more than half of Republicans [57%] want more choices. So how about an independent? Today a certain Mayor of New York was the talk of the town and a lot of the country. Here's Jim Axelrod.
JIM AXELROD: Michael Bloomberg made front-page news when he said he's no longer a Republican. Today he tried to cool the flames -- sort of.
MICHAEL BLOOMBERG: I'm not running for President, and I'm going to be mayor for the next 925 days. But there's a reason why my picture was there-
AXELROD: The reason, he says, is widespread dissatisfaction with the highly partisan political landscape.
BLOOMBERG: Today you're a piranha if you are seen having coffee with somebody from the other party, in many cases.
AXELROD: So no one really knows what this 65-year-old billionaire who favors gun control, gay marriage, and abortion rights is up to, aside from sparking the imaginations of those uninspired by the current field.
GERALD RAFSHOON, UNITY08: The politics of polarization has hurt the country quite a bit. The two parties don't talk to each other. At the same time, 40 percent of the people consider themselves independents. There is not that much party loyalty.
AXELROD: Of course, if he were to run, it would set up this place, Times Square, as the crossroads of the political world. Imagine New York's top three political heavyweights -- Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg -- all duking it out. But for Mayor Bloomberg it may be even bigger than that. Maybe he wants to measure the appetite for a third party. But it certainly didn't sound that way when asked if he and Arnold Schwarzenegger ran together, who'd get the top spot.
BLOOMBERG: There would be a fight to see who would be the presidential candidate and who would be the vice presidential candidate. He would want to arm wrestle for the top spot. I would want to check the Constitution.
AXELROD: The Constitution says the foreign-born Schwarzenegger is not eligible, so maybe Bloomberg was joking. Or maybe it's just one less rival to be concerned about. Jim Axelrod, CBS News, New York.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





KATIE COURIC: Stem cell research is sure to be an issue in the upcoming presidential campaign, and while there may be a lot of candidates, apparently the current field is leaving some people hungry for more. A recent CBS News/New York Times poll found more than one out of three Democratic primary voters [35%] and more than half of Republicans [57%] want more choices. So how about an independent? Today a certain Mayor of New York was the talk of the town and a lot of the country. Here's Jim Axelrod.
AXELROD: Of course, if he were to run, it would set up this place, Times Square, as the crossroads of the political world. Imagine New York's top three political heavyweights -- Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg -- all duking it out. But for Mayor Bloomberg it may be even bigger than that. Maybe he wants to measure the appetite for a third party. But it certainly didn't sound that way when asked if he and Arnold Schwarzenegger ran together, who'd get the top spot.













Editor at Large
Comments Policy
This guy's a life-long Democr
June 20, 2007 - 21:08 ET by ThisnThatThis guy's a life-long Democrat; he only ran on the Republican ticket in 2001 and he didn't change his liberal spots after he won that election. Why isn't the media reporting this? When they say he is rejecting the Republican party, that's only partially true. He never did embrace the Republican party or conservative prinicipals in the first place.
"'So no one really knows
June 20, 2007 - 21:12 ET by saw the light"'So no one really knows what this 65-year-old billionaire who favors gun control, gay marriage, and abortion rights is up to, aside from sparking the imaginations of those uninspired by the current field.'"
He favors gun control, abortion rights, and gay marriage. Then he decides to leave the Republican Party, and this is news? It seems to me that he never was a member to begin with.
"Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb (insert terrorist-supporting nation here)"
It seems to me that he neve
June 20, 2007 - 21:33 ET by Free StinkerIt seems to me that he never was a member to begin with.
He wasn't.
As I recall (watching from NJ) he ran on the GOP ticket since he knew the corrupt New York City Democrat Machine would never allow him to get their nomination.
He's no conservative, but he is honest. I cannot deny him that. However, I want an honest leader that doesn't believe in failed socialist policies either.
What is a Bloomberg?
June 20, 2007 - 22:05 ET by Lame CherryAsk anyone outside of enclave New York or the recycled air million dollar offices of propandists what a Bloomberg is and the answers will be two:
1 WHO CARES!
2 Isn't a bloomberg what an iceberg does in flowering season.
The press being so gorbasm over this makes no sense as all it does is hurt their guys in Hillary and her VP Richardson. Except of 3 Republicans like John McCain, Bloomberg is going to get no votes from normal Americans. His votes will come from the lunatic fringe which pants over Rosie and thinks crazy Cindy Sheehan makes sense.
I welcome Mr. Bloomberg and urge him to Ross Perot run daddy run and since he is throwing his billions away, please contact this site as they have my email Mr. Bloomberg where you can then work out mailing me a check for a few million too.
Hey if you burning money like Mark Dayton did to become a Senator in nowhere Minnesovietsota, I would like to burn a few hundred dollar bills lighting camp fires for roasting marshmellows. Would accomplish more than you are Bloomberg.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Most are saying Bloomberg wi
June 20, 2007 - 22:50 ET by Gat New YorkMost are saying Bloomberg will syphon off GOP voters which I am sure he will. But his appeal is more on the Dem side. Depending on who the candidates are, Bloomberg may be able to win. He can outflank certain Republicans on issues of fiscal responsibility and taxes. More importantly he can outflank Democrats on issues such as environment/global warming, gun control, healthcare, education, and gay rights. And not because of his stances but because of his actions. While HillObEd talk about doing something, Bloomberg has already done it. He also has the money. One other factor that is important is that he is the only New York City mayor who has managed to appeal to all groups in the city and maintain a high popularity throughout. That is a first. I can see him winning Florida, New York, Massachusetts, and California. The number of independents are far greater now than they were when Perot ran. He has a real shot which the MSM has yet to figure out.
Guess what, no one in the s
June 20, 2007 - 23:01 ET by kebamGuess what, no one in the south could give a rat's behind about him, and it doesn't matter how much he spends. He will take dem votes at best. yankee libs lol
There are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Chuck Norris lives in Oklahoma.
Today, Rush Limbaugh announce
June 21, 2007 - 08:00 ET by AlgerHissToday, Rush Limbaugh announced he was leaving the Comminist Party...
Rochester, Minnesota: A Fem_Leftist City!