Chris Matthews couldn’t contain his giddiness, first noted here, when he praised Michael Moore’s Sicko movie on tonight’s Hardball. After he sent his correspondent, MSNBC’s David Shuster, to chase down Moore on Capitol Hill and get an exclusive rant from Moore against the "rackets" that are American health care companies Matthews yelped: "You know I gotta agree with him on this stuff. I gotta agree with him. He's got a case and health care in this country is not working."
The following is the full segment including Shuster’s interview with Moore as it occurred on the June 20th edition of Hardball.
Chris Matthews: "Welcome back to Hardball. Today Left wing or liberal filmmaker Michael Moore is unveiling a controversial new documentary about the poor state of health care in this country and certainly that's a fat target. He's already stirred great passions with his films on both the left and the right. Earlier today Hardball's David SHuster, who is sitting across from me, caught up with Michael Moore on Capitol Hill. It's not too hard to catch that guy. He's a big guy. He doesn't move too fast, doesn't he?
David Shuster: "No you just have to corner him. Especially today, we were able to corner him but the name-"
Matthews: "I love his interviews he does on the Hill, when he grabs congressmen and said, ‘Are your kids gonna fight in this war or not, or you just gonna vote for this war?'"
Shuster: "It was great and the members of Congress, the members of Congress were lined up today. But the name of the movie, Chris, is Sicko, as you know. It opens tonight for a viewing for a variety of members of Congress. But, as you know the controversy has been building for months. In this film Michael Moore calls for the end, the end of for-profit health care. And he filmed part of this movie in Cuba, where he brought some people who volunteered on 9/11 at Ground Zero who are suffering from health problems. He brought them to Cuba, to Guantanamo Bay where they could do this little shtick where they walk up to the gates and Michael Moore can make this point about the health care that's available for detainees that is not available for Americans. In any case Michael Moore's being called everything from ‘unpatriotic.' Fred Thompson, who's mulling a run for President, has also produced a youtube video in which, he essentially declares that Michael Moore should be like a Cuban filmmaker who has been thrown in a mental institution by Fidel Castro. So, in any case, with the groundswell of antagonism that is being launched at Michael Moore as well as a lot of support, we cornered Michael Moore on Capitol Hill and here's the interview."
[Begin clip]
David Shuster to Michael Moore: "You're about to into a buzz-saw of criticism. What are you anticipating? Is there anything out there that bothers you about what's coming?"
Michael Moore: "I expect no criticism. I think millions of Americans have been suffering through this system dealing with these lousy HMOs. You've got 47 million who don't have insurance. I think that there will be a groundswell of support to fix this very broken system. I, I'm not expecting anything but support for that."
Shuster: "There's been some call for you to go to jail because of what you did in Cuba. How do you react to those, to those claims?"
Moore: "Well the Bush administration is upset because I took a group of 9/11 rescue workers, that the Bush administration will not provide health care for, to our Naval base in Guantanamo Bay, in Cuba. And I wanted them to receive the same free health care that we're giving the al Qaeda detainees. The Bush administration provides free dental, free eye-care and free medical for all the people that are accused of plotting 9/11. The people who ran down to Ground Zero to save lives, don't have health care. I think that is a travesty."
Shuster: "Fred Thompson has been particularly critical of you. What's your response to him and the complaints that he has made, both about you and about the film?"
Moore: "He is one of my favorite TV actors and I, I can't wait to see the next video."
Shuster: "Was there anything in putting this together, though, that really struck you as standing out? That really inspired you or motivated you to push forward with this issue?"
Moore: "The level of greed in our insurance companies. They actively set out to try and not cover people who are paying them a premium every month. This is amazing. I mean people should read their policies. They'd be surprised how man in's and out's these insurance companies have, where they can get away with not paying the doctor bill, not paying the hospital bill. If you get a serious illness, watch them try to dump you from their rolls. This should be illegal, it's a crime. They're a racket and I want the private insurance companies out of the equation."
Shuster: "What do you say to those who say that you are unpatriotic? What's your response to those that question your patriotism?"
Moore: "Name three people who say that."
Shuster: "Fred Thompson, Bill O'Reilly."
Moore: "When, when you love America you stand up and you ask questions. That's the most patriotic thing to do."
Shuster: "Thank you very much, we appreciate it."
[End clip]
Shuster: "Michael Moore. There's really only one person, I suppose, like him. But in any case, Chris, a lot of controversy generated but also a lot of Democrats today showed up at that hearing room and were happy to stand next to him and praise him and try to use this film as part of the debate that is coming in Congress over health care reform and some of the plans that Democrats are now floating."
Matthews: "You know I gotta agree with him on this stuff. I gotta agree with him. He's got a case and health care in this country is not working."
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
And I`m sure Matthew`s takes
June 20, 2007 - 17:51 ET by chessplayerAnd I`m sure Matthew`s takes himself and his family to Cuba or Canada for better health care. Uh, huh.
I thought Moore's point wasn'
June 20, 2007 - 17:56 ET by balboaI thought Moore's point wasn't that Cuba had better health care, but that the detainees at Guantanamo had better health care than American citizens?
If that is true then why a
June 20, 2007 - 17:58 ET byIf that is true then why all the hoopla over the mistreatment at Gitmo?
I don't know. Did Moore bring
June 20, 2007 - 18:02 ET by balboaI don't know. Did Moore bring that up?
So you think the allegations
June 20, 2007 - 18:09 ET bySo you think the allegations of mistreatment/torture at Gitmo are unfounded?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
I have no idea. But that's no
June 20, 2007 - 19:03 ET by balboaI have no idea. But that's not the point. The point was, I thought, that Moore was saying it's not Cuba's system that's better, it's the healthcare of the Gitmo detainees that's better.
Don't know about thatI got a
June 20, 2007 - 19:12 ET byDon't know about that
I got a copy of F-911 at Big Lots for 99cents after watching one long misrepresentation by Mikie, I haven't paid attention to what he says again cuz he flat out lies.
You really don't know about Gitmo?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
I know the controversy about
June 20, 2007 - 19:16 ET by balboaI know the controversy about Gitmo, sure. But I don't know if we're mistreating the people there or not. I would assume not. I think there were some that were unfairly incarcerated, but hopefully most of those have been released.
ThanksSupreme Court, Nation
June 20, 2007 - 19:29 ET byThanks
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
As I recall several got relea
June 20, 2007 - 19:39 ET by Del DolemonteAs I recall several got released in the past couple of weeks, but I don't remember the details.
It's important to remember, however, that we've captured-in various places like Tora Bora, etc-al Qaeda training manuals, all of which specifically devote a lot of time to what the AQ person should do if caught and thrown in the pokey.
One of their most important instructions is to claim that you were tortured, even if you never were.
I'm sure that all such allegations have been duly investigated, but we don't seem to see too many stories about any of them being "true".
What happened at Abu Ghraib was regrettable, but the "torture" in that sad spectacle pales in comparison to what went on in Saddam's prisons, or in Nazi Germany, the Gulags or in Chinese prisons, etc.
What happened at Abu Ghraib w
June 20, 2007 - 19:43 ET by balboaWhat happened at Abu Ghraib was regrettable, but the "torture" in that sad spectacle pales in comparison to what went on in Saddam's prisons, or in Nazi Germany, the Gulags or in Chinese prisons, etc.
True, but that doesn't mean it was OK for it to occur.
True that's why the participa
June 20, 2007 - 19:46 ET byTrue that's why the participants were court martialled
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
yes it does, OK by me
June 20, 2007 - 19:47 ET by Semperrightyes it does,
OK by me
Well, if it's OK by _you_, th
June 20, 2007 - 19:52 ET by balboaWell, if it's OK by _you_, then I guess we're covered. Can't argue with the screenname "Semperright"...
It's settled then
June 20, 2007 - 19:55 ET by SemperrightIt's settled then
SemperI didn't see this liste
June 20, 2007 - 19:55 ET bySemper
I didn't see this listed as another web site for you must be an oversight?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
I just checked it out,I'll ge
June 20, 2007 - 20:01 ET by SemperrightI just checked it out,
I'll get some time over the next week read deeper.
Thanks for the link
It looks good so far.
What happened at Abu Ghraib w
June 20, 2007 - 19:43 ET byWhat happened at Abu Ghraib was regrettable, but the "torture" in that sad spectacle pales in comparison to what John Kerry reported (later) in first-person narrative. Why wasn't he indicted as accessory after the fact, doesn't the UCMJ call for disclosure?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
}}----> Wrong Balboa
June 20, 2007 - 18:13 ET by Cool ArrowMoore's message is that the Cuban People get better care from the Castro Government than we have in the US.
The "Gitmo 20" though, refers to the extra pounds prisoners have put on since being thrown into their squalid surroundings.
Didn't Cuba's healthcare system almost kill Castro?
June 20, 2007 - 18:19 ET by RJDidn't Cuba's healthcare system almost kill Castro? Thought I read/heard something about a badly done procedure....had to call in outside help to correct it?
}}----> Bingo RJ
June 20, 2007 - 18:21 ET by Cool ArrowCastro was the victim of a botched abortion.
So was Moore
June 20, 2007 - 18:46 ET by general companySo was Moore
Uncle Fidel was in fact almos
June 20, 2007 - 19:43 ET by Del DolemonteUncle Fidel was in fact almost offed by the incompetence of his doctors, and had to fly in specialists (from Spain I think) to help him out.
The type of problem he has (gastro intestinal/colon etc) is real tricky. Even the best specialists in such cases are of little help.
That's what I thought, Del
June 21, 2007 - 14:49 ET by RJThat's what I thought, Del. I emember the Spanish doctor being brought in. thanks
BTW, I look forward to THAT little episode in Moore's movie
June 21, 2007 - 21:33 ET by RJBTW, I look forward to THAT little episode showing up in Moore's movie....anyone wanna lay odds on that happening?
"The "Gitmo 20"
June 20, 2007 - 22:11 ET by stratman"The "Gitmo 20" though, refers to the extra pounds prisoners have put on since being thrown into their squalid surroundings."
The cells, dining and recreation areas are not squalid when the prisoners are first incarcerated. They are spartan (Simple, frugal, or austere). They become squalid (foul and repulsive, as from lack of care or cleanliness; neglected and filthy.) after the prisoners urinate, defacate, vomit, spit and masturbate and spread their excretions and secretions around to harass and injure the guards. Then our men and woman have to clean it up while the prisoner gloats.
CNBC is now playing a hooray
June 20, 2007 - 18:06 ET by bigtimerCNBC is now playing a hooray for this at the top of their newscast too...
Wow...they must htink they have a lot of viewers along with msnbc.
Cram it already....
He and algore along with Carter and Clinton all fit in the same category...
Empty-suits....filled with hollow leftist views ad nauseam.
If the argument being made
June 20, 2007 - 18:36 ET by blogonatorIf the argument being made is: "healthcare in this country is not working," then yeah, I agree with Michael Moore, too. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
How is it not working? Are yo
June 20, 2007 - 18:53 ET by general companyHow is it not working? Are you saying that you cant see a Dr. , or pay the bill? Will paying higher taxes and watching Moores movie fix this? There are better ways to lowering Medical bills.
I know a piece of legislation
June 20, 2007 - 18:59 ET by VT Con ManI know a piece of legislation that would eliminate about 12 million reasons for our high healthcare costs...
Tort Reform? How about lose
June 20, 2007 - 19:03 ET byTort Reform? How about loser pays in frivolous lawsuits?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
hey botg, that'll help, but i
June 20, 2007 - 19:15 ET by VT Con Manhey botg, that'll help, but i was referring to the 12 million or so people who may not be in the country legally, who love to get their healthcare for free and are protected from any responsibility for the cost...eventhough they are here ,illegally, shall we say.
I knew that,What's the differ
June 20, 2007 - 19:18 ET byI knew that,
What's the difference between a lawyer and a catfish?
One's a bottom dwelling scum sucker and the other's a fish.
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
A lot of the crisis in health
June 20, 2007 - 19:47 ET by Del DolemonteA lot of the crisis in health care these days is the lawyer's fault, but believe it or not there's another factor that has sent things out of control, namely the increase in claims for lung cancer due to cig smoking. I actually lost coverage by one of the Blues directly because of this several years ago-they had 1700 or so people in the coverage pool and the ones with lung cancer sucked them dry.
It's very easy to say "
June 20, 2007 - 19:03 ET by motherbeltIt's very easy to say "health care in this country is not working" without giving any specifics. That's a drive-by shot. And usually when someone does say something, it's along the lines of "44 million people don't have health insurance."
We all know that doesn't mean they don't have health care. ANd they neglect to mention that some of those 44 million are without insurance by choice: namely the young and healthy who choose not to buy it; some are only without for a couple of months when they change jobs.
When was the last time you heard about someone in the US dying while on a waiting list for a heart catheterization? Or an MRI? There are major cities in the US that have more MRI machines than entire Canadian provinces. People come across to the Cleveland Clinic all the time from Canada for treatment rather than wait. So whose health care system "is not working"???????
A coworker with the exact s
June 20, 2007 - 19:33 ET by blogonatorA coworker and friend with the exact same plan as mine (the best of all the teirs offered) had a serious car accident. He couldn't go to one of the leading treatment centers out of state for a cutting age procedure to save his leg and ended up losing it while his family tried to negotiate with the company. Then he couldn't pick a respectable rehab center that was covered. When he came home, he needed home health care, which wasn't covered, so he had to go on medicaid. Of all the agencies, medicaid has been the most reliable and consistent, but many doctors don't accept it. This guy was a 50 year old regional account vp for a large distribution company, not some welfare case.
If that is healthcare working than I guess I'm just whining over nothing.
Seems to me that if your frie
June 20, 2007 - 19:46 ET by SemperrightSeems to me that if your friend (I'll call him Santa Clause if you get my drift) was smart enough to become a VP he would also be smart enough to:
1) Get a suplimental policy to cover what your crappy plan doesn't
2) Come off his wallet to save his leg with this cutting EDGE procedure
3) Keep his damn hands off my tax dollars
I'm gonna call bullsh1t on you.
"Seems to me that if y
June 20, 2007 - 20:10 ET by ckc1227"Seems to me that if your friend (I'll call him
Santa Clause if you get my drift) was smart enough to become a VP he
would also be smart enough to:
1) Get a suplimental policy to cover what your crappy plan doesn't
2) Come off his wallet to save his leg with this cutting EDGE procedure
3) Keep his damn hands off my tax dollars
I'm gonna call bullsh1t on you."
Good call.
Semperright,1) He (and I) f
June 20, 2007 - 20:18 ET by blogonatorSemperright,
1) He (and I) figured our plans would cover everything in the event of a castrophe. His case actual cause our company to enroll in Aflack's suplemental. Even with supplemental, it would replace lost income, but not his medical needs.
2) He couldn't gather the kind of money necessary. He's smart and successful, but not loaded. He probably makes around 90-100k a year. If I remember correctly (this was 3 or 4 years ago), just the medical jet to the facility, would cost $8-9000.
3) Wake up. Catestrophic injuries who require home care always ultimately end up on medicaid. My friend, Santa Clause if you prefer, also had brain injury and requires daily care. Private healthcare can't and is not willing to handle life-long care.
loginator1) You both figured
June 20, 2007 - 20:34 ET by Semperrightloginator
1) You both figured wrong. That being said what have you done since then to ensure you are covered? hold the whine
2) Cutting edge i.e. experimental procedures are not covered under most policies even in Canada.
3) Most policies have long term disability suplimentals if you choose to pay for it. My guess is that your buddy St. Nick may have gotten a fat DUI when Rudolph hopped the median and his insurance wouldn't cover his ass.
I'm not going to continue t
June 20, 2007 - 21:10 ET by blogonatorI'm not going to continue this. I'm not trying to "win" a debate with you. I don't understand why you are so upset with everything I say (even doubting the veracity of my story). Yes, we both figured wrong, but then about 90% or more of the people I work with have. Since then, we've added suplemental. I can't understand your callousness . This guy is in constant pain, his wife says he's always in and out of the hospital with infections and other issues, not to mention the brain damage that has changed his personality, slowed and muddied his speech, and prevents him from being very mobile. I used his story to illustrate how a reasonably educated person wasn't able to get the care he needed, not to debate you.
Don't bother blogonator. He's
June 20, 2007 - 21:30 ET by balboaDon't bother blogonator. He's too busy with the tough guy act.
Catestrophic injuries who r
June 20, 2007 - 20:38 ET by motherbeltCatestrophic injuries who require home care always ultimately end up on medicaid. My friend, Santa Clause if you prefer, also had brain injury and requires daily care. Private healthcare can't and is not willing to handle life-long care.
I don't know why people think that if we go to a single-payer system like Canada, that everything will be covered and free.
NO health insurance plan covers long-term custodial care. (That's why they have started to sell long-term care policies.) I worked in nursing homes in two different states. Medicaid requires justification for nursing care to pay for a nursing home...not custodial, not dementia, not Alzheimer's.
Even Tricare, the military's civilian coverage, does NOT cover custodial care. I know...my husband has a brain injury and is a veteran, and I have been checking into the VA to see what services are available for him. No custodial care.
Here is the problem...
June 20, 2007 - 19:56 ET by c5thenAnything after that is not about the Health insurance industry, because in almost every state, a car accident is covered under the auto insurance policy, not the health insurance that a person might have. Many auto insurance companies have special deals with various hospitals and rehab centers to save them money, not to get the best care for the patient.
If Congress would repeal the law that protects HMOs from liability from bad or late decisions in patient care, and mandate that the patient chooses which carrier to use in the event of an auto accident, most of the "problems" would disappear.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
He couldn't go to one of th
June 20, 2007 - 20:26 ET by general companyHe couldn't go to one of the leading treatment centers out of state for a cutting age procedure to save his leg and ended up losing it while his family tried to negotiate with the company.
Call me skeptical, but how much time passed after the accident and the amputation? How was he referred to this cutting edge treatment. And why would the insurance Co. rather have his leg off when it wouldn't be cost effective. I have had close connections to many accidental injuries, being involved with many safety programs. Maybe we have been lucky but I haven't heard any thing like this, and of course your friend indeed has reason to be upset. Why, if this treatment was available would he allow them to cut off his leg, I would pay for it out of pocket to keep my leg.
But the big question is: do you honestly think the Federal Gov would had saved his leg, do you think that the cutting edge treatment would had even been available under their watch?A tragic story. I feel for
June 20, 2007 - 23:09 ET by stratmanA tragic story. I feel for your friend and his family.
I know you may not have all the facts, but, I'll touch on a several things.
"the best of all the teirs offered": This is the first problem. Your company choose from a variety of plans and settled on a small sampling for their employees to pick from. The company most likely excluded higher end plans since they would cost more than desired for either themselves, their employees (don't want them grumbling about chipping in too much for their own medical care) or both. This is the first breakpoint and the results can be calamatous, like with your friends. The situation is worsened when the employees don't understand the consequences of this less expensive health plan and what they might do to supplement it. Unfortunately, companies do not want to point out these inequities as it might anger their workers to begin with.
"cutting age procedure": Good luck getting nearly any insurer be they for profit, not for profit or socialized medicine to go for what sounds like unproven procedures. Insurance company bean counters are interested in keeping money in the pocket of investors/owners and if cutting off a leg is cheaper overall versus an experimental or as yet unaccepted by the surgical world as standard of care, then cutting of the leg it is. Socialized medicine would not think twice in doing this either.
"respectable rehab center that was covered": This is a subjective decision. I don't know if you mean respectable to your friend, his doctor or you. Below the knee amputation rehab is much easier than above the knee amputation from your friend's point of view. Nearly any rehab center should be able to handle rehab for these surgery, though, of course, some centers are better and more palatable than others. Another factor is that rehab continues after discharge on an outpatient basis, so costs are kept lower by allowing you to convalesce at home. Leg amputation rehab is a wel thought out and well known process as it has been done for hundreds of years. Some rural centers may not be as good because they have less experience. Also, high tech artificial limbs may not be available based on his insurance or financial situation. If he can back up his claims with documentation and his physician's assistance, Medicaid might let him go to a different facility. By that time, his rehab may have progressed (or regressed) such that the best prognosis needs to be downgraded. These would be arguments against socialized medicine since Medicaid has a lot of restrictions and requirements.
"home health care, which wasn't covered": That's some crummy health insurance. Home health care is a real money saver to insurance companies. It is cheaper to convalesce at home than in a hospital or rehab center, even if home nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy and durable goods representatives visit your friend in the home.
"had to go on medicaid": At least he was covered by insurance. The system did work though not as well as you or he had hoped. Fifty years ago he would have been much worse off. This would be an obvious argument in favor of socialized medicine.
"many doctors don't accept it": This is one of the reasons socialized medicine would be a problem. Medicaid and Medicare are are financial blackholes for many physicians. It is not uncommon for doctors to actually lose money by taking care of these patients. How long would you go on spending/losing your own money to treat these patients?
I know this all sounds callous but these are realities, at least how I see it. If it were me or my family I would fight as long and as hard as I could to get appropriate medical care as I'm sure your friend did. I feel for your friend and wish him better days ahead. They will come.
uh, blog, by "not workin
June 20, 2007 - 19:10 ET by VT Con Manuh, blog, by "not working", do you mean too expensive, or the quality is not up to par. Because they are two very different things.
of course, most of the reason for high healthcare cost in the US of A is government regulation, but you will NEVER here a politician/liberal say it, as it is part of their job security/big gov belief. Free markets for healthcare, will drastically reduce the cost. Competition and coverage options is so simple, even I see the huge cost savings ,and it truly is simple economics. Many states have tons of regulation that drives up the cost of health insurance, (the goal being to drive the insurers out of the state so they can go "single payer" aka, big governmet nightmare coverage via taxes. ala VT)
if you are saying the quality is not up to par, show me a better quality health operation in the world...there is not one., eventhough mr moore wants his next labotomy in Cuba...
It seems that Mikey Moron, Ch
June 20, 2007 - 19:03 ET by Trix RabbitIt seems that Mikey Moron, Chrissy's favorite media skunk, targets Kaiser Permanente as greedy and profit-driven.
In his typical duplicitous maneuvers, Mikey Moron fails to mention that Kaiser Permanente is a non-profit organization.
He also failed to say if Cuban health care could have provided him with liposuction to remove all the fatty tissue that has collected in his cranium.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
I would never see a Mikey Moo
June 20, 2007 - 20:03 ET by Del DolemonteI would never see a Mikey Moore movie, but I can't believe I am agreeing with him on what you're claiming he said about Kaiser Permanente. A very good friend of mine living in Mexifornia has been screwed to the Equator and back by those people repeatedly over the past few years.
By the way, I lived on Oahu from 1963 til 1966. At the time, many people considered Henry Kaiser the biggest a-hole living on the island. He had an incredibly ugly pink mansion out in the Portlock area by Koko Head...
Del,Don't get me wrong, I nev
June 20, 2007 - 20:35 ET by Trix RabbitDel,
Don't get me wrong, I never was nor never will be a fan of Kaiser. My point was just that Mikey Moron is - so he says - an anti-capitalist and accuses Kaiser of profiteering when in fact he is a millionaire himself by making shoddy movies and scribbling dopey books...a profiteer and a liar to boot.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
Can someone explain to me how
June 20, 2007 - 19:17 ET by KhyrisCan someone explain to me how healthcare is not working?
When I have a problem, I go see a doctor, they fix the problem.
When I'm a full time employee, I have coverage provided by my company that pays for most of it.
When I'm working as a contractor, I have the personal responsibility to save out of pocket to pay for a coverage policy.
Somehow that money manages to cover highly trained medical staff, expensive facilities, high-tech equipment, high-risk pharmaceuticals, and who-knows how many who are treated in the ER for free.
I mean, other than scare stories I see in the MSM, I've never MET anyone who's had a problem with their paid coverage, including treatment for MS, and this is in L.A. where malpractice suits abound. Met plenty of the lazy and irresponsible though who are happy to complain that they don't get it for free.
Does anyone have any facts or figures of the percentage of tax revenues slated for medical subsidies, which actually make it into the hands of doctors? How much do we lose to Federal bureaucracy?
I think one of the problems i
June 20, 2007 - 19:20 ET by balboaI think one of the problems is what is "covered" and what isn't, right? That and shrinking benefits.
Another problem is the liabil
June 20, 2007 - 19:31 ET byAnother problem is the liability insurance costing us all
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Sicko Sh*t
June 20, 2007 - 21:32 ET by jerseydevelAnd you, Mr. Matthews advocating a bufoon like Moore and the crap he works to espouse only adds to the great pile! Since you're simply contributing, were you to remove youself from the airwaves you too will help save our planet from the growing pile of sh*t. Hey you will also be decreasing the overall volume of BS bloviators and the volume of hot air entering our atmosphere... Just think you'll be helping us reverse "global warming" too!
Add for Dope: Chris Matthews
June 20, 2007 - 22:18 ET by Lame CherryI was just contemplating how does a normal person actually work for people like Michael Moore, Chris Matthews, Charlie Gibson, Chris Cuomo without going absolutely insane? These dolts would drive any normal person to run away screaming about 3 hours into their first day at work.
Goodness, then consider the poor women who are married to them. They must be in a resident coma or so doped up they are Stepford Wives.
Ah Chris Matthews, when your children are abused would you like Michael Moore to put them on camera, haul them to Thailand and on a blow horn ask, "Where is the whore house?" to somehow link crime against children being Bush's fault.
If you wouldn't want your children so abused by Moore, then how can you agree to abusing 9 11 sick people which is just as inhumane.
There are just things moral humans do not do. Columbine, picking on Charleton Heston who is ill, taking advantage of a soul raped nation for profit off of 9 11 and using sick people.
If Cuba is so great Mr. Matthews, I recommend this US government getting more a really big convoy of ships and you 40 million comrade loons can all go exist in Fidels paradise.
You Mr. Matthews with "our screwed up health care system" which was screwed up by Teddy Kennedy and the ilk you support would soon find yourself in Cuba with a rat for a cell mate and Cuban health care being a broom shoved up your rectum to take your temperature.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Is the U.S. healthcare system
June 21, 2007 - 02:46 ET by maggieqpublicIs the U.S. healthcare system working? I would say no… but that certainly doesn’t mean I want the government to step in and take control. No, no, no, no, no. However, my monthly medical premium (including spouse, both aged 55, self-employed) is approximately $900. The annual deductible per person is $2,500 before benefits kick in at 80%… In other words, we pay the medical premium and we pay for our medical care. Americans are in need of creative ideas to help the private sector reduce these rapidly-rising costs. But just because some of us are not happy with the healthcare status quo does not make us proponents of Michael Moore’s socialist state. I don’t feel like trading in a significant personal expense for an even-more-significant tax increase in order to pay for an inferior product.