The Censorious Left Marches On; Far Left Hopes to Destroy Fox News

Reporting on yesterday’s “Take Back America” liberal conference, CNSNews.com’s Randy Hall shows how the organized Left is mounting a full-fledged campaign to delegitimize Fox News and other non-liberal media outlets. The Leftists are especially gleeful that they managed to persuade Democratic candidates to boycott any debates that would be aired on the Fox News Channel, with MoveOn.org’s Adam Green boasting about how the successful scuttling of Fox debates provides "a blueprint for things that we can continue to do now and in the future, which is finding key leverage points to achieve victories against our opponents."

Next up on the agenda, according to these Leftists, is an attempt to block the sale of the Wall Street Journal to NewsCorp’s Rupert Murdoch.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Hall took down the details of the censorious Left’s enthusiastic efforts to silence a news outlet, beginning with a lengthy description of how MoveOn.org, various left-wing bloggers, and Robert Greenwald, director of the propagandistic anti-Fox screed “Outfoxed,” worked together to pressure the Democratic candidates to reject a debate on Fox:

When the debate was canceled, Greenwald said his reaction was "joy, screaming out loud."

However, as Cybercast News Service reported earlier, Fox News Channel later announced plans to partner with the Congressional Black Caucus Political Education and Leadership Institute to present two 2008 presidential debates.

At that point, a grassroots group of black Americans calling itself ColorOfChange.org launched a letter-writing campaign, again using Greenwald's videos and urging the Congressional Black Caucus to drop Fox News from consideration.

[MoveOn.org’s Adam] Green announced during Tuesday's panel that although the Fox/CBC debates are still scheduled to go on, Edwards, Obama, Clinton, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson have said they will not take part in them.

He also called the anti-Fox efforts "a blueprint for things that we can continue to do now and in the future, which is finding key leverage points to achieve victories against our opponents."

"If we put in a thousand phone calls to [Fox host] Bill O'Reilly, he would absorb that and really not care," Green acknowledged. "He might even be enthusiastic about the fact that MoveOn is doing that to him."

In these campaigns, by contrast, "we were able to score a huge branding victory against Fox by having the New York Times, ABC News and the Washington Post all write about Fox's right-wing bias by having our friends concede that Fox is a right-wing spin machine."

Greenwald stated that his goal in the project had not initially been about the debate - "because I certainly didn't think we could win in the beginning" - but had instead been "to debrand Fox for the long haul."...

"The more Democrats legitimize Fox as a neutral or credible source of news, the easier it is for Fox to swiftboat Democratic candidates and progressive ideas in the future -- elevating smears and misinformation into the mass media during the 2008 election," it says.

Green from MoveOn.org told the audience Tuesday his next campaign would be to try convince the owners of the Wall Street Journal not to sell the newspaper to FNC founder Rupert Murdoch. He accused Murdoch of wanting to buy the WSJ "to legitimize Fox" and to get "a seat at the gentlemen's table."

Noting that the Bancroft family are majority shareholders, Green said, "Fortunately, they actually care about journalism, and their news pages aren't as bad as their editorial page. The big question in their minds is: Can Rupert Murdoch be trusted?”

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wait until the msm (Lsm) say

Wait until the msm (Lsm) say or dare I hope, actually report something that the wako left disagrees with - and the powers that be at the lame media outlets find themselves the target of the censorists. I wonder how long it would take them to roll over and show us exactly how biased they are.

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

MoveOn.org moron admits MSM on their side.

"we were able to score a huge branding victory against Fox by having the New York Times, ABC News and the Washington Post all write about Fox's right-wing bias by having our friends concede that Fox is a right-wing spin machine."

Hmm. I wonder if Mr Green realizes what he (perhaps inadvertently) is admitting to here?

And these are the same peop

And these are the same people who shout from the roof-tops that the Bush administration is "silencing its critics".

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington

The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain

The reason Libs think FOX wou

The reason Libs think FOX would "swiftboat"* (a word they use incorrectly)some person or idea is because that's what they do (their definition).  That's what they think the media is for - destroy political ideas or people.  There is NOTHING liberal about Liberals.

* 'swift-boat (v.t.) 1) :to tell the truth about a Left wing peacenik trying to portray himself as a war hero. 2) to expose Liberal hypocrisy and lies.

oh please, let's all just adm

oh please, let's all just admit that ALL 24 hr news stations are absolute crap. all network television stations are crap. the only think that people can rely on is to find outlets on the web that espouse rhetoric form both sides, check both against historical research on the web, and make a decision for themselves. that's all we got people.

right now i'm trying to watch fox news and theyre covering a missing pregnant OH lady..in addition to the 10 other networks trying to fill gap time. isn't there better gap time information? isn't there somekind of EDUCATIONAL information segment they can be doing? or should we all be looking for this pregnant lady..

I wasn't defending FOX, I was

I wasn't defending FOX, I was criticizing the lefty hypocrites who are critizing FOX...so "oh please" yourself...

Way to tackle the issue, Tomm

Way to tackle the issue, Tommy. Good for you! You really have a firm grasp on the thread.

the point is that each news

the point is that each news station critiques each other when they all have no credibility to stand on.

and roger, i can already see your contribution to the thread. 0.

Pot calling kettle black?

the point is that each news station critiques each other when they all have no credibility to stand on.
and roger, i can already see your contribution to the thread. 0.

Pot calling kettle black?

George W. Bush is not a full-fledged conservative, but I still support his presidency. I'd rather have him as president than ANY of the Democrats. (Although I am rethinking this position daily!)


Merry Christmas 2007.

and how exactly is that sta

and how exactly is that statement hypocritical? 

tthomas5

I don't necessarily deny your point about the "news" stations being crap, but the object of the post is the hypocritical stance of those on the left for calling Bush a dictator, silencing those he doesn't agree with and not listening to people that have a different view than he does, when they are doing the very same thing here and on a much grander scale. 

Whether you think Fox is crap or not, it is the the left here that are acting like communist dictators on a worse scale than anything Bush has done.

Joe Stalin would love these p

Joe Stalin would love these people on the far left. So would Joseph Goebbels. They're so blinded by their sheer hate for "Buscho" that they want to censor other peoples' free speech.

Heaven help us if they regain total power in 2008.

You condemn news networks for

You condemn news networks for criticizing their competitors, and then you criticize a fellow NBer. Shouldn't you refrain from that, since you believe that a news network should refrain from critiquing their fellow news channels?

George W. Bush is not a full-fledged conservative, but I still support his presidency. I'd rather have him as president than ANY of the Democrats. (Although I am rethinking this position daily!)


Merry Christmas 2007.

How dare you attack the vener

How dare you attack the venerable and respected Shrubbsters "contribution."

Especially as your "contribution" contains such stellar gems as "TV news is crap;" a weird call for enforced "education," perhaps in a TV camp somewhere in the Massachusettes gulag; an an inference that there is something wrong with rhetoric.

You'll laugh. You'll cry. You'll talk jive! Just check out  my latest YouTube video Hillary Clinton Talks Jive

Yeah, Massachusetts could enh

Yeah, Massachusetts could enhance the educational value of TV by teaching all of us the re-definition of "mariage"; or showing Teddy's uh idears about uh how to safely drive uh caas over um bridges; or it could showcase the effieciencies brought forth by the DMV; or we could take lessons on how to tax, and then tax more; how to increase a $3B "Big Dig" to a $14B extended-year project that ends up with leaky tunnels and falling concrete; and finally, we could have several hours worth of driving lessions from some of Boston's finest drivers. All sorts of opportunities for learning something from Massachusetts.

TnT -- thanks for showing u

TnT -- thanks for showing up my mispelling of Massachusetts. I need more edukayshon!

You'll laugh. You'll cry. You'll talk jive! Just check out my latest YouTube video Hillary Clinton Talks Jive

I think we both mispelled it.

I think we both mispelled it. Should be "Taxachusetts", shouldn't it?

Bingo... And all the lights

Bingo...

And all the lights went out in Taxachusetts/The Bee Gees

You'll laugh. You'll cry. You'll talk jive! Just check out my latest YouTube video Hillary Clinton Talks Jive

Well, it looks to me that mor

Well, it looks to me that more than handful of my NB brethren understood what I said, and explained very easily to you, nice and slow, so you can understand it.

Any other questions? Good. Then my job is done. I have helped (with the help of some of my much-worthier-than-me NB amigos) the liberal du jour learn something today, and, to me, that makes my contribution VERY worthwhile.

Have a nice day, Tommy.

The left's refusal to openly

The left's refusal to openly debate in all legitimate forums is what killed the American CommunIst Party . They had no one left to talk to but themselves,and being the party uber all, no one gave a shit what they were talking about.

Kind of like the tower of academic departments today - cloistered and stupid - yet dangerous when cornered,

big·ot

Steven Green should do a little reading and soul searching.

Bigot. big·ot n.   One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. (source: American Heritage Dictionary.)

Green needs to be greened...A

Green needs to be greened...

After-all he and all his ilk are green-eyed monsters....

Seriously...what fools these people are....they are only hurting themselves as to getting their messages out...

FOX has the biggest viewership...

That so-called Debate yesterday morning on msnbc with Matthews as moderator was a fiasco...

On top of that...Hillary and her paid clones in the audience ran her own time clock...and the questions she desired.

Oh this makes alot of sense.

Oh this makes alot of sense. A cable news service with higher ratings than all other cables news services combined, whose ratings actually closed in on the alpahbet broadcast morning news stations during the first few weeks of the war in Iraq, is going to be squashed by a few pip squeek brain damaged morons who only have alot of free time, telephone lines, lice, mind decaying drugs, and a fat sow pumping them with cash.

In the immortal words of OBI-WAN : "You can't win, Darth. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine."

Give them enough rope...

I love this! The left-coast, bleeding-heart, 'do as we say, not as we do' liberals are so freakin' scared of the influence of Fox News that now they feel they have to wage a media war against them!

It is driving them absolutely nuts to know that Americans are getting sick and tired of their negativism and drive-by media attitude but don't know how to combat it except by attacking free speech. 

Always remember the battle cry of liberalism: "Our minds are made up - don't confuse us with the facts!"

In '08, this is going to come back and bite them in their collective buttinskis! 

Help control the game show host population by having Bob Barker spayed or neutered.

I think the Dems should serio

I think the Dems should seriously think about which is worse: getting spun by a right-wing news channel's questioners, or having the low-rung Democrat candidates, who have nothing to lose, sitting on a national stage and trashing the front liners with no way for the big dogs to respond. 

Do they want the day after headline to read: Democrats Cry Foul at FNC or Democrat Front Runners Attacked by Fellow Dems?

Fox Derangement Syndrom...

The thing that ultimately pisses off the left is that FoxNewsChannel beats the crap out of CNN & MSNBC in the ratings, every day, every week, year after year. Those in the far left who have seized power in the DNC are hellbent on trying to succede where McGovern & Carter failed. Their problem is despite how unpopular Bush is, the people have no desire for "PROGRESSIVES" when they realize that is a fancy way of saying entry level marxist. Nobody wants to go back to the high tax, high interest rate, high unenployment, & an America that is weak to the world. Since FoxNews does'nt push that agenda the way the rest of the MSM does, the left goes over the edge.

 "A goverment big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away"        Barry Goldwater

Then of course there's the Ne

Then of course there's the New York Observer story of the hit team the New York Times has assembled to "investigate" NewsCorp.  The team is headed up by the smuggest of the smug, the insufferable Jill Abrahamson.

http://www.observer.com/2007/times-undertakes-multi-bureau-rupert-murdoch-investigation

fair and balanced?

Cwg,

And you know that will be unbiased reporting, right?

Wow, I wonder if they'll add

Wow, I wonder if they'll add Frankie Rich and Paulie Krugman to the team? Too much.

Speaking of "too much", read some of the hallucinogenic comments following that Observer article. When one poster dared to suggest that the NYT should also investigate George Soros, he was met by this brilliant response, from a marijuana-soaked birdbrain named "smokedgouda"

"Soros? Apples and oranges. What mainstream news outlet does he own? None. Murdoch "informs" hundreds of millions of morons everyday.

As for the Times investigating his corrupt practices, I say go after him. If anyone has as much to do with the last 6 years of idiocy on the right, it's Murdoch and his right-wing propaganda."

I did see some sanity in the comments, though-including this recent one:

"If any news organization needs to be investigated, it would be the New York Times "

Simply put for the commies

Simply put for the commies this is FNCDS, which means

Fox

News

Channel

Derangement

Syndrome

These fools don't like to see competition--they want their own liberal monopoly--THEY HAVE ABCCBSNBCPBSNPRAPMSNBCCNN! What in the bloody hell are they p-o'd at?!??!

Remember...

Nothing is as important to the left-wing socialistic loonies as shutting down all opposition viewpoints and information outlets. They cannot stand toe to toe and debate because they lose. They MUST be the only opinion expressed in order to sound even halfway logical.

They hate Fox because it often allows all sides in a debate to express themselves. Imagine their horror at watching Hanity and Colmes where a conservative and a liberal get equal air time.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic

One would think perhaps they'

One would think perhaps they're afraid of the few tough questions.  Seems to me the left is still hiding.  I agree with your assessment.  Maybe with borader exposure on FOX and a larger viewership, we have a chance to see more conservatives win in 2008.    

Liberalism is a convenient lie.

Said before

It has been said before by myself and others, but bears repeating again...if the Democrats are afraid of FOX News, how can we trust them to not be afraid of the true enemies of the USA?

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.
Thompson/Rice

I'm not sure that's an honest

I'm not sure that's an honest comparison. That's like saying if Gonzalez doesn't have the stones to answer questions before a senate committee honestly, how is he going to have the stones to be America's "top cop"?

Alberto testified before the

Alberto testified before the Senate AND i don't think you can say it was not honest else he'd be up on 'contempt of congress' if you had said evasive i'd of bought it.

A non-evasive honest answer to some of the senators would have been "Your on a political witch-hunt"

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.   

Maybe the Democrats don't &

Maybe the Democrats don't & Gonzalez also-doesn't, Bal. (Yeah, trust me to gravitate to the bipartisan-annoying answer, but I've had recent personal experience with the "competence" of the US "Justice" Department.)
JMR