CNN’s Amanpour Exemplifies Bias, Even With Honor ‘For Services to Journalism’

Photo of Matthew Balan.

Christiane Amanpour is a leading example of biased mainstream media journalism, particularly with regard to the Iraq war. She appeared on Monday's "American Morning" program on CNN with co-host John Roberts, and repeated the platitude that mainstream media reports "without fear nor favor... giving voice to those who don't have a voice, and just simply trying to tell the truth..." As she continued, she revealed her own bias. "...[W]e must always remember that our job is not to be part of the propaganda campaign, but to report without fear nor favor, because if we don't, we can get really into a big disaster. And I, as you know, feel strongly that that's what happened in the lead-up to the Iraq war."

Video (1:14): Real (2.00 MB) or Windows Media (2.26 MB), plus MP3 audio (346 kB).

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Amanpour is repeating the revisionist claim that the media did not pursue the Bush administration and other proponents of action against Iraq aggressively in the run-up to the war, a claim that the MRC refuted in May. Also, in using the word "disaster," she points to her own view of not just the run-up to the Iraq war, but the entire war itself.

Christiane Amanpour was actually ahead of many of her mainstream media peers in this view. On September 10, 2003, during an appearance on CNBC, Amanpour slammed the media's supposed cowtowing to the Bush administration on Iraq.

I think the press was muzzled, and I think the press self-muzzled. I'm sorry to say, but certainly television and, perhaps, to a certain extent, my station was intimidated by the administration and its foot soldiers at Fox News. And it did, in fact, put a climate of fear and self-censorship, in my view, in terms of the kind of broadcast work we did....The entire body politic...did not ask enough questions, for instance, about weapons of mass destruction. I mean, it looks like this was disinformation at the highest levels.

Besides recognizing Amanpour's honor, Roberts went out of his way to portray Amanpour in the best possible light, mentioning how Time magazine once called her "the most influential foreign journalist since Edward R. Murrow."

Amanpour was among those honored with the Order of the British Empire from Queen Elizabeth II, besides noted author and Iranian target Salman Rushdie. The citation included with her recognition was "for services to journalism."

Here follows the relevant excerpt from Christiane Amanpour's appearance on Monday's "American Morning."

JOHN ROBERTS: You have seen her in virtually every war zone on the planet, from Bosnia to Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Rwanda. Once it was said the sun never sets on the British empire. And so, it would seem, on our own Christiane Amanpour. She's not just CNN's chief international correspondent, she has just been named a Commander of the British empire by the queen of England. Christiane joins us now from London. Christiane, congratulations. And I'm wondering, what are you thinking about all of this?

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: You know, I'm really, really thrilled, and I'm really proud. It's a long tradition. They set this up back in 1917. And it really is an amazing thing to be part of this. But I think I'm really proud of the simple citation which says 'for services to journalism.' And I really do feel, really genuinely from the bottom of my heart, feel that I share this with all of our colleagues and friends who believe in this kind of journalism, and, of course, with all of my colleagues and some of my best friends who've been killed, who've been wounded on the front lines of what we pursue, because we're so passionate about the real meaning of this profession."

 

ROBERTS: "Well, you've certainly let nothing stand in your way as you have toured around the world to all of these hot spots, trying to shine the bright light of truth on some very dark places. You know, 'TIME' magazine once called you the most influential foreign correspondent since Edward R. Murrow. I mean, that's a pretty great thing to have said about you.

 

AMANPOUR: You know, it's really nice, but I really strongly feel -- and I feel more and more -- that our job is simply to stick to the basics of what this profession is about. It's about reporting without fear nor favor. It's about recognizing the serious in this world and going out and telling the stories, giving a voice to those who don't have a voice, and just simply trying to tell the truth, because our viewers really want it, they really deserve it. And, you know, whether it's against dictators, or whether it's in elected governments, we must always remember that our job is not to be part of the propaganda campaign, but to report without fear nor favor, because if we don't, we can get really into a big disaster. And I, as you know, feel very strongly that that's what happened in the lead-up to the Iraq war.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The MSM has raised Amanpour t

The MSM has raised Amanpour to Goddess of Gravitas Level and I've never been sure exactly why. Because she reports in Dan Rather-like safari suits, maybe? Help?

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Amanpour began covering confl

Amanpour began covering conflicts when very few MSM elites would even travel to the locations.  She would spew out acronyms and talk about military equipment and doctrine like she knew what she was doing,  This made her a "War correspondent' in the eyes of the MSM, and shw's been bathing in that light ever since.

As I recall, Amanpour was act

As I recall, Amanpour was actually working at CNN's London bureau as a secretary or something, and the only way out of that job was to volunteer to go cover a war!

Speaking of "bathing in the light", don't forget another "war correspondent", namely "CBS News' " former swimsuit model, Lara Logan. 

I heard about this today too.

I heard about this today too....

Doesn't surprise me a bit....CBS, CNN, what's the difference....let's also remember her husband is Jamie whatzhizname(Ruben sp?)...Madeline-not-so bright No. #2 guy....always sniffling during press conferences....a real man's man or I always wondered if he had a coke problem....anyway, another political marriage of convenience.

LOL....

I see that woman or hear her leftist voice I run for the clicker to turn the station.

Ahmanpour? Is it just me?

Is it just me, or does it seem like maybe somebody is reading these socialists the riot act?

Is CNN shifting course or has CNN directed it s "journalists" to pay momentary lip service to the tenets of good journalism?

}}}------------> thanks botg

" . giving a voice to th

" . giving a voice to those who don't have a voice . . " - so when will THAT start? When do es the taxpayer get to say he's being taxed too much? People in the military getting to voice their views, on a regular baises?

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

The press' incapacity to see the future and even the present

I guess the press is all down on itself, having been unable to see within the confines of Iraq prior to the Bush war-- err.. except for the LYING that CNN did covering up the slaughter of it's reporters at the Bagdad bureau...tsk, tsk you pre-war sexer uppers of Saddam.

Hey C. A. , none of you, nor anyone alive knew Iraq didn't have WMD, and unfortunately you nor anyone else can to this day prove for or against in that area.

 What the Iraq war has proven to me is you, the press, will lie, and lie often, and lie large about yourselves, and your political enemies, before, during, and after many large events, especially ones concerning war.

 What you have achieved is not the ability to witness your own failed responses or non responses in the lead up to the war and swear upon correcting them, but your failure to cover up how incompetent and pathetic you actually are by lying even about the lead up to the war now, to a degree which exceeds even the "Bush administration", and how you so often spin and twist nearly all the information you even allow yourselves to "release" to the public, corrupted with your hindsight left wing whining glasses.

 The more you wince and moan about your past failures, the more your current failures become ever clearer and certainly supported still by yourselves, tainted by that very agenda of self-professed assessment of your recent past, which is clearly nothing more than buyers remorse and lies, but carries with it the excuse to lie about Bush and Iraq today, tomorrow, and into the future.

 "Going along with" too much, then afterwards with enough self-deception "realizing it" and therefore "going against too much" currently is a shameful mode of behavior, and you have achieved it, far and wide.

In your opinion, does the MSM

In your opinion, does the MSM or the federal government lie more? IMO, it's the feds, hands down. Every bill passed or action taken is spun to show how it's a benefit to the people, when in reality the bill or action is primarily a corporate benefit, bought and paid for by big business, e.g. Medicare prescription, the (failed) Immigration bill, etc.

Watch this Trend of MSM

It is never coincidence when the MSM starts phrasing stories in the same manner. The BBC today admitted "the BBC is biased and liberal".

For Amanpour to be stating the liberal agenda has to be pushed, the "committee" of talking points appears to "Helen Thomas" a new agenda in now telling the public that they are biased, not going to change, a bunch of bigots and the public can just stuff it.

For the MSM to be starting this tact instead of lying about it, is a trend to watch as if these unbearable trolls start acting like the British snotty press pushing ridicule instead of the Peter Jennings smirk they are going to come out for battle and be even more deplorable.

*A final strange observance, was Katie Couric's weekend fill in. It appears CBS has a clone of perky down to those gramma pearls she wears. The clone though has a problem in not knowing how to pronounce "fatah". Odd that CBS has decided that people who can not stand Couric all week are going to desensitize with more of her clone on the weekends.

Maybe CBS thinks that a festering sore all week will not seem so bad with watching a worse version on the weekend. More wonderful psychology from the liberal world of maniacs.

Tune in as Hillary proves she is nurturing and human waving her hands around like GlobAL Gore claps like a seal.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Matthew:Great piece, just o

Matthew:

Great piece, just one editorial comment: it's kowtow, not cowtow.

I was just thinking the other day about Amanpour -- everytime I see her on tv, I get a sick feeling...she is so full of it. She is completely and utterly biased, no objecivity at all. She covered the recent troubles in Gaza, and wouldn't you know it, it was US and Israeli failures that led to the violence, not the disgusting value system of Hamas. Sad, oh very sad.