The Associated Press reported Thursday that the executive director of the NAACP’s Hollywood bureau is displeased with “Grey’s Anatomy” star Isaiah Washington being fired for making anti-gay slurs.
Yet, the NAACP was strongly in favor of Don Imus being terminated by CBS and MSNBC in April for his statements concerning the Rutgers women’s basketball team.
Double standard? You be the judge.
This is what the AP reported today concerning Washington (h/t NB reader Shawn Pecze, emphasis added):
If he's being let go because of that incident, I'm not sure the punishment fits the crime," said Vic Bullock, executive director of the Hollywood bureau of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The NAACP has asked ABC for "further clarity," Bullock said.
Yet, this was the NAACP’s view on Imus (emphasis added):
The NAACP commends CBS and MSNBC for removing Don Imus from their networks and also recognizes that further action is needed to eradicate such hurtful speech from our popular culture.
"The announcement by CBS and MSNBC that they will no longer carry Don Imus' show is a welcome first step in removing this scourge from the airwaves," said NAACP National Board of Directors Chairman Julian Bond.
It appears that the NAACP isn’t quite as appalled by the F-word as it is the H-word. That should be refreshing to gay rights groups around the country.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
This blog's comparison is dee
June 14, 2007 - 18:12 ET by j. frank wilsonThis blog's comparison is deeply flawed in that Mr. Imus had a long, long history of making very stupid remarks. At one point he was quoted that the job of his producer was to tell "n----r jokes." He at first denied making that statement and when it was proven that he did, complained that the conversation was supposed to have been "off the record" and therefore he shouldn't have been quoted.
Mr. Washington was hardly a repeat offender.
Don't believe Sheer Insanity's wild claims that those who went after Mr. Imus "lacked context." Indeed, they had plenty of context. Mr. Washington doesn't.
So how many "get out of
June 14, 2007 - 18:20 ET by NewsbusterbrownSo how many "get out of jail free" cards does everyone get for offensive statements?
Rush get out of slur card
June 14, 2007 - 20:26 ET by SportPoliticsRush got exactly ZERO, since the network had their agenda exposed... so even if it's the truth, and you're a conservative, you get the ax the first time... like
Macaca.
IMUS really screwed
June 14, 2007 - 18:21 ET by LionKingImus was really screwed. It was his JOB to be outrageous.
[In the end, Imus will laughing all the way to bank.]
I agree with you, LionKing.An
June 14, 2007 - 18:24 ET byI agree with you, LionKing.
And on the Isaiah Washington firing, I think that is outrageous as well. It is outrageous that people are being fired for speaking out against homosexuality. It really is time those of us who have had enough of the homo-agenda, shun the heck out of them all.
Debra...
debra...hypocrisy
June 14, 2007 - 18:34 ET by LionKingI agree about the hidden agenda. I am also how they have no problem firing people because they speak their minds...such proponents of FOS.
I am not IMUS fan, ever, but I am about fair treatment. IMUS was just the cause of the day for Sharpton and Jackson.
Exactly...
June 14, 2007 - 20:07 ET byExactly...
WOW. Can we start burning wit
June 14, 2007 - 20:11 ET by balboaWOW. Can we start burning witches, too?
I thought you wer VEGAN
June 14, 2007 - 20:13 ET by LionKingI thought you were a VEGAN? What do witches tast like ... chicken?
hmm...That's not a bad idea,
June 14, 2007 - 20:15 ET byhmm...
That's not a bad idea, balboa.
I know a few witches that we could start with. umm... unless you'd like to be first.
Debra...
I'm actually a warlock, but I
June 14, 2007 - 20:17 ET by balboaI'm actually a warlock, but I guess I need to be burned at the stake, too.
And you ask yourself, "H
June 14, 2007 - 20:19 ET byAnd you ask yourself, "How did Debra know that?"
:o)
I imagine you've got some kin
June 14, 2007 - 20:21 ET by balboaI imagine you've got some kind of evil meter that sniffs out 99.9999999999% of the earth's population.
Actually, balboa, I also happ
June 14, 2007 - 20:30 ET byActually, balboa, I also happen to know that most people who consider themselves of the accult world, are also homosexual. But those who are not homosexual are under a type of pledge to defend homosexuality at all costs.
Debra...
As long as we're confessing,
June 14, 2007 - 20:35 ET by balboaAs long as we're confessing, the closest I've gotten to the "accult" is "It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown!"
What do you think witchcraft
June 14, 2007 - 20:37 ET byWhat do you think witchcraft is, balboa?
"Actually, balboa, I als
June 14, 2007 - 21:04 ET by QueenMum"Actually, balboa, I also happen to know that most people who consider themselves of the accult world, are also homosexual. But those who are not homosexual are under a type of pledge to defend homosexuality at all costs."
I presume you're joking, Debra.
BTW, the correct spelling is "occult". I guess you're not much of an expert after all.
We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. - Queen Victoria
I presume you're joking, Debr
June 14, 2007 - 21:07 ET by balboaI presume you're joking, Debra.
I dunno. This is Theodoric of York territory.
Clapping, bal.That was great!
June 14, 2007 - 21:14 ET by BlondeClapping, bal.
That was great!
bal you got you mords wixed
June 16, 2007 - 12:46 ET by misterbillbal you got you mords wixed--- didn't you mean Theoyoric of Dork????
bal you got you mords wixed
June 16, 2007 - 12:46 ET by misterbillI am a doofus!
::: TYPO Police ALERT! :::Whe
June 14, 2007 - 21:27 ET by::: TYPO Police ALERT! :::
When all one has is a TYPO to go after someone with, clearly one has no real leg to stand on.
Debra...
That's actually just one of t
June 14, 2007 - 21:44 ET by balboaThat's actually just one of the many, many legs.
I'm with Bal on this one.
June 14, 2007 - 21:48 ET by Free StinkerI'm with Bal on this one.
I guess I have to "spell
June 14, 2007 - 21:44 ET by QueenMumI guess I have to "spell it out" for you, Debra. You see, when you make such a glaring error in spelling (not a typo - a and o are on opposite sides of the keyboard), you end up damaging your credibility. Someone who was well-versed in the finer points of the occult would know the correct spelling. Ergo, you don't know what you're talking about. However, you're certainly entitled to pretend you do. It does add to the entertainment value of your commentary.
We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. - Queen Victoria
QueenMum,What does that have
June 14, 2007 - 22:30 ET byQueenMum,
What does that have to do with anything? A typo is a typo. If it is a spello, who the heck cares? loll.. grow up...
:::: Falling down laughing ::::
:o)
Debra
June 14, 2007 - 22:33 ET by BlondeAh, there you are, little emoticon Deb.
Care to get into a debate here?
Or are you just going to continue trolling?
Which is it Debra?
Care to take me on?
And I am not a Mormon...but I hate your Mormon bashing....
You are a TROLL, Deb.
Are you a lesbian?
June 14, 2007 - 22:38 ET byAre you a lesbian?
No, but you are an idiot.Did
June 14, 2007 - 22:59 ET by BlondeNo, but you are an idiot.
Did you really think that was a clever comeback, Deb?
You are feeeeeeeble.
She ran for the exit...yes?
June 14, 2007 - 23:07 ET by BlondeShe ran for the exit...yes?
No, "She" has a lif
June 14, 2007 - 23:17 ET byNo, "She" has a life and is not always sitting at her computer.
:o)
You are way to obsessed with
June 14, 2007 - 23:19 ET byYou are way too obsessed with me. How about a mental disorder? Do you have one of those?
when did you---
June 16, 2007 - 12:48 ET by misterbillwhen did you---stop beating your children?????
Debra: Don't hurt yourself ro
June 14, 2007 - 22:38 ET by QueenMumDebra: Don't hurt yourself rolling around on the floor.
Evidently you never learned that sometimes one's intelligence is judged by one's skill in written communication. In your case, one need look no further than the sort of comment above.
Good night, Debra. It's been fun.
We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. - Queen Victoria
"Come back! Come back!&q
June 14, 2007 - 23:21 ET by"Come back! Come back!"
::: Cried out like Rose from the Titanic movie. :::
Who will check my spelling/typo/bad keyboard errors.... hehe...
Mostly homosexual? Really, Church Lady?
June 15, 2007 - 16:09 ET by RJMostly homosexual? And under a type of pledge to defend homosexuals at all costs?
Really, Church Lady? And you "happen" to know this how?
Church lady knows
June 15, 2007 - 16:13 ET by Cool ArrowA little birdie told her. Probably a stool pigeon
or a cuckoo....
June 15, 2007 - 16:22 ET by RJor a cuckoo....
Definitely not a cuckoo
June 15, 2007 - 16:25 ET by Cool ArrowMaybe a cockertwo
Jeepers! Grow up, boys!
June 15, 2007 - 17:33 ET byJeepers! Grow up, boys!
Oops. Church Lady is talking to herself.
June 16, 2007 - 12:34 ET by RJOops. The Church Lady is talking to herself....
@balboa: Probably more like
June 15, 2007 - 15:28 ET by j. frank wilson@balboa: Probably more like 666.6666666666666666666%
I'm actually a warlockEasy th
June 14, 2007 - 20:21 ET byI'm actually a warlock
Easy there Dirwood
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
OK, apparently I'm not as hip
June 14, 2007 - 20:23 ET by balboaOK, apparently I'm not as hip as I thought I was. "Dirwood"?
Samantha's mother's pet name
June 14, 2007 - 20:26 ET bySamantha's mother's pet name for Darrin
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
::: Laughing at botg :::
June 14, 2007 - 20:33 ET by::: Laughing at botg :::
More treacly emoticons.Sheesh
June 14, 2007 - 20:36 ET by BlondeMore treacly emoticons.
Sheesh.
::: Rolls eyes :::
June 14, 2007 - 20:38 ET by::: Rolls eyes :::
Ah. Which Darrin? I thought i
June 14, 2007 - 20:37 ET by balboaAh. Which Darrin? I thought it might have something to do with Derwood Kirby.
umm... They were both homo.:o
June 14, 2007 - 20:39 ET byumm... They were both homo.
:o)
Why don't you go trash a Morm
June 14, 2007 - 20:44 ET by BlondeWhy don't you go trash a Mormon, Deb?
Other than posting the treacly emoticons, that's all you're good at.
Go back to your own bashing blog.
You are as much of a troll as Tumbler was.
Enough is enough. Now back to
June 14, 2007 - 23:27 ET byEnough is enough. Now back to ignoring you for another month. Seriously, get some help.
tata...
Debra...
<Homer Simpson Voice> M
June 15, 2007 - 02:05 ET by liberal_bug_zapper<Homer Simpson Voice> Mmmmmmmmmm Steeeeak!
How do we know who's a witch....?!?....
Ooooo I know...
BEDEVERE: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
VILLAGER #2: Burn!
VILLAGER #1: Burn!
CROWD: Burn! Burn them up! Burn!...
BEDEVERE: And what do you burn apart from witches?
VILLAGER #1: More witches!
VILLAGER #3: Shh!
VILLAGER #2: Wood!
BEDEVERE: So, why do witches burn? [pause]
VILLAGER #3: B--... 'cause they're made of... wood?
BEDEVERE: Good! Heh heh.
CROWD: Oh, yeah. Oh.
BEDEVERE: So, how do we tell whether she is made of wood?
VILLAGER #1: Build a bridge out of her.
BEDEVERE: Ah, but can you not also make bridges out of stone?
VILLAGER #1: Oh, yeah.
RANDOM: Oh, yeah. True. Uhh...
BEDEVERE: Does wood sink in water?
VILLAGER #1: No. No.
VILLAGER #2: No, it floats! It floats!
VILLAGER #1: Throw her into the pond!
CROWD: The pond! Throw her into the pond!
BEDEVERE: What also floats in water?
VILLAGER #1: Bread!
VILLAGER #2: Apples!
VILLAGER #3: Uh, very small rocks!
VILLAGER #1: Cider!
VILLAGER #2: Uh, gra-- gravy!
VILLAGER #1: Cherries!
VILLAGER #2: Mud!
VILLAGER #3: Uh, churches! Churches!
VILLAGER #2: Lead! Lead!
ARTHUR: A duck!
CROWD: Oooh.
BEDEVERE: Exactly. So, logically...
VILLAGER #1: If... she... weighs... the same as a duck,... she's made of wood.
BEDEVERE: And therefore?
VILLAGER #2: A witch!
VILLAGER #1: A witch!
CROWD: A witch! A witch!...
>>builds scale to weigh ducks and witches<<
____________________________________________________
"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine
No we can't balboa
June 14, 2007 - 21:53 ET by SportPoliticsNo we can't balboa, Wicca is one of those new(old) lefty fangled religions that must be embraced and given golden accolades. In fact you need to do a willow wisp in the direction of the mid solstice, like right now, or at least before the next moon.
Ahhhh. The "long history" argument.
June 14, 2007 - 18:25 ET by c5thenDon Imus' job was to be controversial and get noticed. That's why he makes those comments all the time. He also used the same terms that many in the "African-American" community use quite regularly. He just happened to be "picked" as the one to get the 10,000 lb weight of the hypocritical liberals (probably because he is white).
Washington was simply stating a personal opinion that everybody is allowed to have in this country. We have a guarenteed right of freedom of speech, there is no right that guarentees freedom from offense.
Neither one of these gentlemen deserve to lose their jobs because some people are upset with them.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
I'm not sure he even went so
June 15, 2007 - 09:04 ET by Hero SquadI'm not sure he even went so far as to state an opinion. I think he just made an off-handed remark that was blown way out of proportion. To fire him over this is absolutely absurd. I wish I actually watched this show so that I could proclaim that I'm going to stop watching it. But I'm giving up on ER after this past season finale, so I guess that'll have to do. No Medical Dramas in 2007-08.
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
j. frank
June 14, 2007 - 18:34 ET by Noel SheppardFrank,
I've got to tell you that I find you to be a huge disappointment at this website. Given your well-above average writing ability, it seems reasonable to expect great logic and reason out of your comments. Instead, yours are as full of mindless, vitriolic, netroots talking points as the folks who can't spell, punctuate, or compose a consistently intelligible written remark.
Why is that? Can you please explain, because I've watched this nonsense for months and don't get it.
Take this detritus above for example. It was in Imus' contract to be controversial, and, as even you admit, he'd been doing this schtick for decades. As such, when CBS and MSNBC hired him, they knew exactly what they were getting.
In reality, your point here would only hold water if prior to Imus signing with CBS and MSNBC, he had been pure as the driven snow, and he suddenly changed this modus operandi after being hired. As this isn't the case, your comment here though well-written is thoroughly devoid of logic. How truly sad. ns
Yes, quite perplexing isn't it.
June 14, 2007 - 21:58 ET by SportPoliticsYes, quite perplexing isn't it. I believe some embrace lies, and figure all figures lie, so go figure.
Either that or the indoctrination causes the blindness.
It's quite obvious that Imus
June 14, 2007 - 23:04 ET by mattmIt's quite obvious that Imus wasn't fired for his remarks, only the Jackson/Sharpton reaction to his remarks.
It looks like the same thing is happening to Washington - he just angered the wrong people.
You could ask this of all lib
June 15, 2007 - 14:48 ET by TruthMongerYou could ask this of all libs Noel...
I think they do know better - but they have an agenda to push/defend...
And let us not forget the bro
June 14, 2007 - 18:35 ET by BlondeAnd let us not forget the brouhaha over Anne Coulter's reference to this incident (prior to the actor being fired) about referring to (obliquely of course) the so-called gayness of John Edwards. What was it that she said? Something along the lines of "If I called John Edwards gay, I'd have to go to rehab"?
Having to go to rehab? What a crock!
If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
Unreal.
Don't get me wrong...I watch Grey's Anatomy...(well, okay, may have to change that to "used to")....but the Burke character is far more integral to the story than the George character. Bad move, IMO.
I think I shall have to delete it from my watch list next year....and I think it's the only network show I bothered to follow.
Vote your viewing preferences, friends. Or better yet, turn the idiot box off.
Blonde, I realize this is g
June 14, 2007 - 21:24 ET by motherbeltBlonde, I realize this is going OT, but I gotta tell you, I'm giving Grey's Anatomy only a couple of new episodes. I think all the characters and realtionships were just getting downright weird at the end....like they were trying way too hard to keep up the drama and leave hanging threads to draw viewers back. I didn't even finish the last episode. If it doesn't improve when it starts up again, I'm dumping it.
Hmmh, so opinions can no longer be said?
June 14, 2007 - 18:48 ET by terrigYou know, it's funny that liberals want free speech as long as it's "their kind" of free speech. I don't think what Mr. Washington said was very nice but it's his opinion and he should not have been fired because of it. I just don't get it. I have never watched this show so I don't know what kind of actor he even is but why is it okay to hate conservatives and call them every name in the book but when one person calls a member of the "protected class" a "slur", it's grounds for firing. As for Imus, he's always been an idiot but was this idiotic statement any worse than anything else he's said (I really don't know because I made it a point not to listen to him either) but it was the cause celeb for Sharpton and Jackson for the month and got someone fired. Who's next???? You know it's sad but it's just another example of free speech for me but not for thee.
Rush, BOR, Hannity
June 14, 2007 - 18:52 ET by LionKingThe libs were chomping at the bit at the thought of using the Imus precedent to bring down Rush, Bill O'Reilly, and Hannity...and others, of course.
Dangerous territory.
I don't understand where peop
June 14, 2007 - 19:23 ET by KhyrisI don't understand where people got the ideas that:
#1 They have the right to go through life without ever hearing anything they find offensive
#2 They have the right to be free of social repercussions of their actions and words.
The sad part is, we wouldn't even need to be concerned with #2 if people stopped believing #1.
Firing someone for speaking thier mind, in most cases, is a retarded reason. An intelligent employer employs the most qualified person for the job, regardless of race, religion, gender, age, sexual preference, or personally held beliefs. It's about getting the best return (in work product) for your investment (in salary). Now, I can understand a media boss firing a celebrity class individual if something they do causes a decline in viewership, and thereby sponsorship, and thereby revenue. That said, I don't think it's entirely fair when the audience chooses to take that route.
I can't really understand why people get so emotionally riled up over "something said." If I enjoy watching the show, but disagree with what Washington said, I would continue watching the show and ignoring what he says on the side.
People have the right to say what they want, and that's so incredibly important, but we often forget that we have the right to ignore them when we find their message worthless.
Some would argue that you should "vote with your dollar" or viewership to discourage those like the Dixie Chicks who would say stupid things. Honestly, all you really have to keep in mind is that they're just some performer who knows next to nothing about what they're talking about. If you're the kind of person that values their word against... oh letsee, the morality your parents taught you, or an expert scientist... chances are you're just as dumb as they are... the sheep that will believe whatever lame editorial or junk science the MSM puts in front of you. If you don't value their word.... whatever... they'll get back to singing, and if you enjoy the music then support that.
I love Rush Limbaugh... I find him entertaining. Sometimes he goes over the top, heck that's what satire's all about right? But just because my sense of humor only fits perfectly with his 95% of the time, doesn't mean I'm going to boycott him because of that 5% of his personality I don't care for. That's like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
People may actively try to offend you, but ultimately, the choice of whether you become offended or not lies within yourself. There are idiots in the world... that's just a fact of life... and life is too short to spend it offended by each of them.
Argue with them, educate them, plead with them if you have to, but never be the first one to take a difference of opinion personally.
"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Khryis,This was probably the
June 14, 2007 - 20:15 ET by BlondeKhryis,
This was probably the only "network" show I would stay home and watch, last season.
But the fact that they fired "Burke" for his statement of his free speech, to which he is entitled, and then got beaten up over...sent to "rehab" etc.
Is disgusting.
I'll not watch that show again. No matter how hunky I find McSteamy (really, the reason I watched that show).
It's the political correctness police gone mad....and I, for one, won't be a part of it. I'd rather read, surf the internet, or, well,.....never mind.
I really think it was the bad
June 14, 2007 - 20:19 ET by balboaI really think it was the bad blood Washington had created that ultimately cost him job.
To fire or not to fire a mino
June 14, 2007 - 19:14 ET by Chris NormanTo fire or not to fire a minority actor for making anti-homosexual remarks. I just love the cunundrums Liberals get themselves into. They must have sweated bullets over this one...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Two different situations. I d
June 14, 2007 - 19:38 ET by balboaTwo different situations. I don't think Washington should have been fired if his dust-up was the only cause.
Not really Balboa. If there i
June 14, 2007 - 20:10 ET by NortonalecNot really Balboa. If there is to be true equality, Washington has to be judged by the same standards that the majority is judged by.
Nortonalec
There's a totally different c
June 14, 2007 - 20:16 ET by balboaThere's a totally different context in the two situations. One was comments on-air. The other was, from what I can tell, a heated comment in private, inappropriate yes, but Washington took steps that his employers asked him to, to remain employed. And they still fired him.
I think ultimately Washington was fired because this whole thing was going to be a huge disruption to the show.
Yes and no. The comment was m
June 14, 2007 - 20:42 ET by NortonalecYes and no. The comment was made off-air, but it made it on-air. The PC culture has made sure that we choose our words carefully. Mr. Washington obviously was not too careful.
Nortonalec
I think Washington got fire
June 14, 2007 - 21:29 ET by motherbeltI think Washington got fired because after making the comment, TR Knight was "uncomfortable" around him on the set. And heaven forbid that a homosexual should feel uncomfortable. For those who are uncomfortable around open homesexuals, tough twinkies.
But...maybe it is just a litt
June 14, 2007 - 21:45 ET by NortonalecBut...maybe it is just a little in-fighting amongst the Left. Love it!
Nortonalec
How about this. If the privat
June 15, 2007 - 02:30 ET by liberal_bug_zapperHow about this. If the privately owned and operated companies want to fire them for looking at them funny. I support that right. I would have not fired them, but that's my preference.
The market works. If it impacts their bottom line, and firing those who are the cause of that impact will help improve the bottom line, then it's goodbye Sally!
Bal, I'm for freedom. I'm for the freedom anyone has to turn the channel. The freedom to NOT buy a product they see supporting the thing they find distasteful. But mandating someone be fired, or someone be disciplined when you don't employ them is going too far. Exercise your liberty by boycotting their product. Don't try and take away someone else's liberty by helping to further the PC mentality that has already started to unravel the fabric of our society.
People can't talk any more! People can't speak their minds without the fear that they'll be turned in to the PC Police or that someone nosey will demand they lose their job or they'll sue. Holy crap people.... who ever said that you have the right to 'not' be offended. You don't have that right! You do however have the right to walk away. To not read what I write or to kick me off your property. But you don't have the right to shut me up.
A quick caveat here; I believe that those who are actively and openly bashing our country and pretty openly supporting our enemy should be shut down and shut up. There are sometimes that the worse thing that can happen is the loss of the only country that actually guarantees more freedom than any other country in the world. And this must be prevented. The second part is that if you talk to me in private about the same things, and our enemy cannot read it or hear it... I would not think you treasonous at all. In private, it's between Americans and that is what America is about... but if you openly show our division to our enemy and let them believe they are winning... you are an enemy of the State and an enemy of me.
Anyhoo, the PC environment that is being created in our country will soon be a very wide net, and it will catch as many liberals as it does conservatives, and while liberals will get forgiven more often, because of the new information age, the PC zealots will soon not even let that happen without causing a stink. Don't you think it's time we take that one lesson from Kindergarten which actually meant something and apply it to our daily lives???
And all I have to say to the offended is - grow up and get the hell out of my face!
____________________________________________________
"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine
NAACP
June 15, 2007 - 02:37 ET by Cool ArrowOf course we've already conceded Blacks get a free pass on the N word. With a bar that high, It must be OK for them to use every other vile word in the slanguage.
In their Demand for "special freedoms" the NAACP seeks to extend the stereotype that Blacks are socially incapable of engaging in inoffensive conversation.
Honestly, I think the NAACP actually believes the stereotypes they defend.
Another NAACP note
June 15, 2007 - 06:28 ET by Cool ArrowWhere's the NAACP stand on the issue of that racist Judge Roy Pearson who hates Koreans. (see also Rodney King riots)
So the Judge's pants are worth $54 million and J Lo's total butt is only worth $27 million.
Go figger.
pink trumps black in hollywood
June 15, 2007 - 11:31 ET by ivymurrSeems that Hollywood cares more about the pink community than the black community. The role that Isaiah Washington plays on Grey's is a strong, intelligent high profile surgeon...what many would consider a very positive role model for young blacks as well as a great opportunity for a black actor. Now it's gone. How sad is that! For once the NAACP has a valid complaint.
There are two other strong
June 15, 2007 - 11:48 ET by balboaThere are two other strong black role models on the show, though.