That’s right, a food police group has turned cereal killer. What's worse, the media don't see any foul play.
Fruit Loops cereal’s brightly colored mascot Toucan Sam, along with Sugar Smack’s Dig ‘Em and Rice Krispies’ Snap, Crackle and Pop are likely to be axed due to an agreement between Kellogg Company and the food police group Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI).
“Early Show’s” Hannah Storm was happy about the announcement. She called getting rid of the popular cartoon figures a “great idea” on June 14.
Video (0:57): Real (1.55 MB) or Windows (1.82 MB), plus MP3 audio (275 kB).
“[B]ecause you can’t even take your child to the grocery store because they’re clamoring for the products with characters on them. When are we going to see them disappear?” Storm asked correspondent Nancy Cordes.
NBC’s “Today” called the agreement to stop advertising cereals during children’s programming a “partnership,” but that’s like saying if I give my wallet to a mugger at gunpoint it was voluntary.
CSPI as well as the liberal Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC) and two parents threatened to sue Kellogg’s for marketing sugary cereals to kids. I have a question, who exactly should they be marketed to? The demographic of Sex and the City perhaps?
Kellogg’s told ABC’s “Good Morning America” the products that can’t be reformulated to meet the manufacturer’s self-imposed nutritional criteria for television commercials will be either marketed to an older group or they’ll stop advertising it altogether.
Which basically means the death of Toucan Sam and his friends. May they rest in peace.
—Julia A. Seymour is an assistant editor for the Business & Media Institute.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
So, will Hannah Storm call fo
June 14, 2007 - 14:27 ET by GalvanicSo, will Hannah Storm call for the removal of cereal advertisments from CBS's Satruday morning programming? I'm sure they can sell the ad slots to the marketers of Viagra and its clones.
From what I understand, yes.
June 14, 2007 - 14:31 ET by nnptcgradFrom what I understand, yes. Unless it meets the heath requirements.
Because don't you know Toucan Sam is just as dangeous to your child's health as Joe the Camel?
/sarc
Mother nature is a bitch - Ninth Corollary of Murphy's Law
Lucky Charms and the Keebler
June 14, 2007 - 23:30 ET byLucky Charms and the Keebler Elf are both slated for a reunion with the Frito Bandito?
Hannah, there's a magic word you can use with your kids, it's called NO.
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
You know, if I were still i
June 14, 2007 - 14:39 ET by sarcasmoYou know, if I were still in high school and thinking about a band, I'd definitely want to call it: "The Erections Lasting 4 Hours Or Longer," just for the consternation it would cause. Then, if/when that name got banned, I'd shorten the name to just "Priapism" to continue the fun.
JMR
Then, if/when that name got b
June 14, 2007 - 15:47 ET by GalvanicThen, if/when that name got banned, I'd shorten the name to "Priapism" to continue the fun.
Or just call the band Stiffy.
Back in the early Seventies, my friend's dad had a jazz combo that went by the name of The Bearded Clam. We had a lotta laughs when the local newspaper listed it in the community events & entertainment sections.
Band Names
June 14, 2007 - 18:57 ET by BlondeYeah, well...
Down in the Florida Keys, on a lovely bit of coral named Islamorada (purple island) there is a great bar called the Lorelei.
And the house band, forever and ever, is Big Dick & the Extenders.
And that, is the truth.
Band Names
June 14, 2007 - 21:42 ET by steve2526When I was in college in Toronto back in the 70s, we had a local bar band called "Bolt Upright and the Erections."
There was a hilarious website
June 14, 2007 - 21:47 ET by balboaThere was a hilarious website somewhere that had strange names of bands. Some were disgusting, but some were hilarious, such as Biff Hitler and the Violent Mood Swings.
Band Names
June 14, 2007 - 21:48 ET by BlondeFun stuff, yes?
Big Dick & the Extenders is a really, really good band....they've been at this bar in the Keys forever....which is a nice place, but like any other. The attraction of watching the sunset, with a nice drink in hand...has always been the great band.
Okay, Tourist Board of the Florida Keys is done for the evening.
As a poster, though....fab band, fab bar, fab food, fab fun!
deleted
June 14, 2007 - 21:54 ET by mandrakedeleted
LMAO!!!
June 14, 2007 - 18:25 ET by drillanwrLMAO!!!
BOYCOTT in the making
June 14, 2007 - 14:32 ET by LionKingAll I can say is they better leave Tony the Tiger alone !!!
If not, we could be talking boycott time.
Tony the Tiger
June 14, 2007 - 14:39 ET by Julia A. SeymourIronically, Tony survives because his cereal has one less gram of sugar than the max (per serving). I think that's funny because Frosted Flakes (my favorite) tastes so much sweeter than Fruit Loops to me.
Julia...kindred spirits
June 14, 2007 - 14:52 ET by LionKingFrosted Flakes are indeed my favorite !!!
[Tony and I are also kindred spirits...in a feline kind of way.]
So when are they going to att
June 14, 2007 - 14:34 ET by Conservative in the ArtsSo when are they going to attack Disney for marketing to kids? Disney now has a princess cereal, princess gummies, princess vitamens, princess play cloths....ect....
And how do I know this? I've got all of them for my 2 year old daughter (well, not the cereal) And why not go after Barbie for....oh wait..they have, nevermind.
I like the background lib the
June 14, 2007 - 14:41 ET by TruthMongerI like the background lib themes in all the kids films now...
Toucan Sam just wasn't subtle enough - old school - didn't know what he was doing...Disney et al eat, sleep and drink modern media manipulation...leave it to the pros!
Incredibles save the day
June 14, 2007 - 15:48 ET by RiharNot all the kids films. Consider "The Incredibles" from a couple of years ago. Some lines included (paraphrasing) "It's a kindergarden graduation! What could they possibly be celebrating?" -Mr. Incredible, and don't forget "When everyone is special, no one will be" -Syndrome.
Those sound like logical statements to me. Maybe it's rare but by no means liberal themes.
When a liberal speaks, the truth is busy elsewhere.
well that's nice...groovy!
June 14, 2007 - 16:01 ET by TruthMongerwell that's nice...groovy!
Holy crap - this is stupid.
June 14, 2007 - 14:35 ET by Darth DutchHoly crap - this is stupid. If they take the "mascots" off of the boxes, they'll still have bright colors and attractive lettering. Should they just market the cereals by colors so there is a red box cereal, blue box cereal, etc.?
And where does it stop? Why not do the same with other things that are targeted to children, like other toys?
Perish the thought that parents actually say "no" to their children and refuse to buy the cereal; no, we have to have the government step in, or put pressure on the big, bad corporations who produce the cereal.
Dutch
Al Roker Cereal
June 14, 2007 - 14:38 ET by Cool ArrowCereal boxes so colorful they sport a picture of Al Roker having an epileptic fit.
Riled, That one was goooooood
June 14, 2007 - 18:59 ET by BlondeRiled,
That one was goooooood. Over the top, but good.
All cereal must be in a gray
June 14, 2007 - 14:40 ET by nnptcgradAll cereal must be in a gray box with Helvetica font spelling out it's name and only decorated with the nutritional information. That'll stop kids from wanting it!
/sarc
Mother nature is a bitch - Ninth Corollary of Murphy's Law
Not if they can still put a t
June 14, 2007 - 15:06 ET by taznarNot if they can still put a toy inside!
Here's one of the rare mome
June 14, 2007 - 14:37 ET by balboaHere's one of the rare moments...
I'm with you! This is the dumbest thing ever. You know what you say to your kid that wants the sugar cereal? "No." Suck it up, be the parent, and say "No."
You're darn right Balboa.
June 14, 2007 - 14:42 ET by The Wicked ConservativeYou're darn right Balboa. Ok parents say it with me. NNNNNNNNNNOOOOOO!!!! Oh help me my kid is fat! It's Not Toucan Sams fault that you can't control your five year old. I've never seen a kid out behind a dumpster eating a bowl of fruity pebbles. Which leads me to believe the parents must be complicit in this new form of child abuse. Personal responsibility is dead in this country. It's over. We're dead. Why? Because EVERYTHING is someone elses job.
NOT MY JOB!!!
The man with an experience is not at the mercy of a man with an argument.
Too bad there are so many pol
June 14, 2007 - 14:50 ET by mattmToo bad there are so many politicians (on both sides of the aisle) who consider it their job to be our parents.
"It takes a village"
June 14, 2007 - 16:37 ET by vrwc13"It takes a village" hrc
Or a mob of angry villagers!_
June 15, 2007 - 03:52 ET by liberal_bug_zapperOr a mob of angry villagers!
____________________________________________________
"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine
The Center for Science in t
June 14, 2007 - 16:30 ET by motherbeltThe Center for Science in the Public Interest involves neither science nor public interest, according to the website Activistcash. They have villified Chinese food, movie popcorn, FettucineAlfredo ("a heart attack on a plate") as if you will die from eating it once, ice cream ("Just know you are going to be killing yourself"), soda, and many other foods. They claim that salt kills 150,000 Americans every year. They will not be happy until they convince the government to regulate everything we can eat.
CSPI Agenda
Balboa,"Dumb" thing
June 14, 2007 - 15:56 ET by Chris NormanBalboa,
"Dumb" things like this are the end result of a lot of the liberal ideas that you don't usually have a problem with. They are just extensions of the root stupidity.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
true, chris
June 14, 2007 - 15:59 ET by Cool ArrowAnd a strong indication there are no ideas on the real issues.
I am going to be honest here.
June 14, 2007 - 14:42 ET by mostlymoderateI am going to be honest here. I don't think getting rid of the cartoon character's is necessarily a good idea; however, we do have a major problem with diabetes in this country. I figure, if they can legislate tobacco and alcohol, why not sugar too.
Okay fine. Let's see them go
June 14, 2007 - 14:47 ET by nnptcgradOkay fine. Let's see them go after EVERY FREAKIN' restaurant with the huge wonderful sweet gooey desserts in them (Cheesecake Factory anyone?). That makes as much sense. Parents can say no, right? Or are they forced at gunpoint to buy this stuff?
Mother nature is a bitch - Ninth Corollary of Murphy's Law
Cheescake attack
June 14, 2007 - 14:51 ET by Julia A. SeymourCSPI has gone after the Cheesecake Factory too. They've gone after practically everyone. It's absolutely ridiculous.
Diabetes is a big problem bec
June 14, 2007 - 16:29 ET by HypocriteHaterDiabetes is a big problem because people's eating habits are out of control. I eat sweet desserts and I don't suffer from diabetes, because I use self-control and eat sweets in moderation. Now libs want to try to take away MY rights to eat what I want because the people who WON'T control themselves look to blame everyone else for their weaknesses and want government to regulate everything for them. That's not what American is about, folks!!
They shouldn't legislate eith
June 15, 2007 - 03:51 ET by liberal_bug_zapperThey shouldn't legislate either!!!! It's called choice. If you want to smoke... you suffer the consequences if any. If a pub wants to ban smoking indoors, they should be able to do so, if they want to allow it... non-smokers have the choice NOT to go their.
If I want to buy a sugary cereal for my child... that's my right damn it... and if I want to put cute cuddly little teddy bears on the box of the cereal I sell... that's also my right... if I want to put 10 grams of sugar for ever 20 grams of product into my cereal.... that's my right... and if you want that much sugar... you can buy my cereal.
There are plenty of brands with NO SUGAR!!! We have choice... but what the Nazis on the left want to do is take away our choices. God I hate these Liberals who don't know the FIRST thing about Liberty!!! Ironic eh???
____________________________________________________
"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine
Oh great another big corporat
June 14, 2007 - 14:43 ET by bigtimerOh great another big corporation being bullied by the PC Police...and bending to them....AGAIN.
When is enough going to be enough...my gawd...this is outrageous.
It is up to We the People...not you the PC police and Big Govt.
Enough already....
I agree, bt....people have
June 14, 2007 - 16:37 ET by motherbeltI agree, bt....people have the right to make their own decisions...even stupid ones. And if someone is going to play the "we all have a stake in the costs of health care" like they do with motorcycle helmet laws, then why not mandatory targets and limits for weight, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, you name it? There would be no end to what the government could regulate and control, in the name of forcing us to conform to their definition of "healthy."
Here's another example of the
June 14, 2007 - 14:45 ET by Mica the MagnificentHere's another example of the 'we know what's good for you' socialist police being embraced by the libs.
Hannah Storm loves it because it would help her be a good lib parent.
Libs fear disciplining their children, they want to be their friend.
Instead of saying to the kid, "No! You cannot have that cereal - pick another!"
Hannah wants the 'police' to remove anything from the grocery shelves that may make her act like a real parent, instead of a 'friend.'
I have a real problem with what that beak on Toucan Sam symbolizes! - - Another out-of-touch '70's era feminist writing in her journal, waiting for a call, once again, from Johnny Carson
Thomas the Train Hygeine spray
June 14, 2007 - 14:49 ET by Cool ArrowSee, these cartoon characters need to branch out.
Instead of saying to the ki
June 14, 2007 - 17:02 ET by motherbeltInstead of saying to the kid, "No!
It didn't take long before my kids figured out there was no point in asking for the sugar-loaded cereals because they simply were not going to get them. But nowadays parents want someone else to be the bad guy. And therein lies the problem.
Parents want government to make rules so they don't have to: from taking the candy out of supermarket checkout aisles to community curfews so they don't have to argue with their kids by setting their own. That way they can play the "it's not my decision, it's the law" card.
"[B]ecause you can’t
June 14, 2007 - 14:57 ET by ckc1227"[B]ecause you can’t even take your child to the grocery store because
they’re clamoring for the products with characters on them. When are we
going to see them disappear?” Storm asked correspondent Nancy Cordes."
You mean like parental responsibility, Hannah?
Hannah, Hannah.....cute as a button, and almost as smart.
She was an FM DJ for quite so
June 14, 2007 - 15:51 ET by RiharShe was an FM DJ for quite some time remember. They are not known for their brilliance.
When a liberal speaks, the truth is busy elsewhere.
Maybe we should bring back Nancy Reagan
June 14, 2007 - 14:58 ET by Queasy“[B]ecause you can’t even take your child to the grocery store because
they’re clamoring for the products with characters on them. When are we
going to see them disappear?”
What's wrong with parents just telling their kid no? My 5-year old clamors for every product in the store with a cartoon or movie character on it and I just say...No. Is it really that hard? Do we really need legislation, lawsuits, and bureucracy to take over for this very simple two letter word?
Nanny state indeed.
Poor Hannah Storm doesn't w
June 14, 2007 - 17:05 ET by motherbeltPoor Hannah Storm doesn't want to say NO to her kid, so she prefers the government take away everything that her kid might want so that she doesn't have to. What will she do when the government takes away something that she actually wants her kid to have????
I hope they have lots of Al Gore ads
June 14, 2007 - 15:02 ET by Carl KolchakI don't know about the rest of you, but I sure hope that all ads that were originally for Froot Loops, will be replaced with ads for Al Gore's movies and rock concert events during these children's programs.
"Honey, ah sugar sugar" 'Sugar Sugar'
The Archies yeah. Nuke em t
June 14, 2007 - 17:36 ET by Dan The Man 2The Archies yeah.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
..ahhh.... Honey Honey....Sug
June 14, 2007 - 17:46 ET by bigtimer..ahhh.... Honey Honey....
Sugar...
Honey...
Sugar...
ah Honey....
LOL...I loved that tune...still do.
I hear that Kellogg sometime
June 14, 2007 - 15:04 ET by FAQsI hear that Kellogg sometimes put TOYS in their cereal boxes too. Boycott BIG CEREAL now!
Agenda Cereals
June 14, 2007 - 15:07 ET by Cool ArrowHow about QUEERIOS? Pour them in the bowl and they eat each other.
In that case, make mine hot
June 14, 2007 - 15:15 ET by sarcasmoIn that case, make mine hot Lesbos! "The self-wetting cereal that comes with plenty of its own milk!"
JMR
And low in fat
June 14, 2007 - 15:19 ET by Cool ArrowThis cereal would be high in leche thin, I presume?
Sarcasmo: It took a while, bu
June 14, 2007 - 16:04 ET by Mica the MagnificentSarcasmo: It took a while, but finally someone on this blog grossed me out!
Well Done!
Good one! How about Fru
June 14, 2007 - 16:06 ET by winston smithGood one! How about Fruit-y Loops?
Oot-fray Oops-lay
June 15, 2007 - 05:16 ET by Cool ArrowThis is just sad.The libera
June 14, 2007 - 15:12 ET by dabalThis is just sad.
The liberals can't say no to their kids, because the kid will throw a tantrum, which can be quickly rectified with a spanking, or slowly rectified with "timeouts", both of which will be hate crimes before the end of the decade.
I watched an obviously liberal parent (bumper sticker gave her away) allow her 5 year old kid to throw a tantrum in the aisle without doing a damn thing about it.
I walked up to her and said, "You need to discipline your child, right now. You're in a public place and your kid is throwing things at you." She stared at me for a few seconds, then went back to shopping as if nothing was happening. Once more...I spoke, "Lady, if you let him get away with that, what's to stop him from doing that to my kid in school?" Another blank stare.
I knew it was time for me to give up and walk away before I did something she could sue me for.
All of my kids have done thi
June 14, 2007 - 19:14 ET by general companyAll of my kids have done this once (tantrum in store), I simply picked them up took them to the car drove them home and went back later by myself. I would not allow them to go with me anywhere for about a month and until they promised never to do this. None ever repeated. I new this would work, because this is what my Father had done with me 30yrs prior.
I once told this to a young Dad and Mom in a store at their wits end with their daughter throwing a fit . They looked at me not knowing what to say. As I looked back rounding the aisle I saw the child in Dads arms heading for the door.
The Center For Science in the
June 14, 2007 - 15:14 ET by kathleenirishThe Center For Science in the Public Interest (or whatever they're called) has WAY too much say in a democratic society...it's like one guy and his minions. "Food Police" is right. "Food Nazis" is even more apt. Go away, killjoys.
What a crock..taking away a few colorful and cute mascots from advertisers is going to somehow change the way kids eat. If I'm not mistaken, these cereals have been on the market for 50 years WITH mascots. Childhood obesity is a more recent problem. The two are not related then really.
Kellogg's: Please, why do you cave to these idiots???
Cereal is one of the greatest inventions in the world.
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
True. Cereal was invented
June 14, 2007 - 15:48 ET by winston smithTrue. Cereal was invented by some smart adults to get kids to consume more milk which is essential during the growing years.As a kid growing up in the early 60s, I ate all kinds of cereal and I was never, ever fat. Same for the rest of my childhood "crew". I think there was one chubby kid among our crowd and even he was active. In fact, I was a real skinny kid. But I ate well and I got the normal amount of exercise you would expect a normal 10 or 11 year old to get, running, playing tag, see-saws, swings, stickball, the park, hide 'n seek, riding all over the map on my speedy Schwinn stingray (with the extra-high sissy bar and banana seat). Kids today sit around all day snacking and playing video games with no fresh air, exercise or sunlight slowly becoming obese and diabetic. And now "big cereal" is supposed to take the rap? CSPI is truly out of touch with reality. Don't these guys have kids, too?
You hit the nail on the head,
June 14, 2007 - 16:04 ET by GalvanicYou hit the nail on the head, W-S. Like you, I was a kid back in the early Sixties, eating Frosted Flakes, Sugar Pops, Sugar Smacks, Cap'n Crunch, Wheat Honeys & Rice Honeys, Fruit Loops, Honeycombs, Lucky Charms, and everything else that was marketed to us. But we didn't get fat, probably because we were always active playing tag, playing ball, climbing trees, riding bikes, and swimming. The problem lies less with calorie intake and more with inactive children, whose parents let them sit around indoors all day, playing computer games and watching DVDs. Then they eat pizza for lunch and/or dinner to compound the problem. Even our public schools have offered alternatives to the traditional balanced cafeteria lunch; these alternatives include pizza, hot dogs, brand-name soft drinks, and candy.
So, the self-appointed watchdog groups step in to act as the parent.
Yeah, I ate a variety of the
June 14, 2007 - 16:37 ET by winston smithYeah, I ate a variety of the sugar cereals, too. Over all, I'd say Cocoa Puffs was my all-time favorite with Cap'n Crunch a distant 2nd. (will CSPI next be demanding the removal of the Koo-Koo bird from the Cocoa Puffs cereal box?) But I liked the healthier ones too like Wheat Chex, Country Corn Flakes (great, memorable tv commercial) and the perennial standy by, Cheerios. But as you pointed out, eating these products in conjunction with an active childhood, by 11am you burned off all that sugar and then it was time for lunch --- fluffer-nuttter sandwiches with a little green bottle of Coke!
I got the normal amount of
June 14, 2007 - 17:14 ET by motherbeltI got the normal amount of exercise you would expect a normal 10 or 11
year old to get, running, playing tag, see-saws, swings, stickball, the
park, hide 'n seek, riding all over the map on my speedy Schwinn
stingray (with the extra-high sissy bar and banana seat)
But 10 and 11 year olds aren't allowed that kind of exercise any more. Schools have outlawed running, tag, seesaws, stickball, dodgeball, swings, and in some cases, recess altogether. And they're not outside playing hide 'n seek and riding bikes after school either..they are playing video games, watching TV, spending time on MySpace and AIM.
"I have a question, who
June 14, 2007 - 15:16 ET by winston smith"I have a question, who exactly should they [sugary cereals] be marketed to? The demographic of Sex and the City perhaps? "
How about to the demographics of Michael Moore, Rosie and Al Roker!
CSPI gets hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations annually from wealthy liberals, foundations and corporations. With all of this money and notoriety the best they have come up with was an attack on KFC, Theatre popcorn (if you remember this farce from several years ago) and now a brave and valiant effort to remove Toucan Sam from the innocent eyes of our precious youth. And wouldn't you know, the reigning ditz queen of morning news shows, Hannah Storm has given her unwavering support. To my knoweledge, CSPI has yet to come out with an "official statement" on violent rap music and "artists" like 50 cent, Li'l Kim, and Eminem who probably have way more of a detremental impact on the health and longevity of our youth than a KFC drumstick or a freakin' cereal box cartoon. How in blazes is a cereal box cartoon a more pressing issue than the vile rap filth pumped into our children's ears on a daily basis? It is now undoubtedly clear that CSPI has way too much money and time on it's hands as well as glaring credibility issues.
These people would've had hys
June 14, 2007 - 15:46 ET by nnptcgradThese people would've had hystronics if they had seen what my parents did when I was four. They would set up the night before a covered bowl of cereal, a glass of milk in the fridge and the tv to whatever channel had cartoons on it. Also, if I was good I got to choose some candy from a store that sold it in bulk, with a limit on price. They did this for several years. When I was seven I was shopping like mad on those Fridays "Let's see, I can get a 1/8 of a pound of Jelly Bellies or 1/4 a pound of Now and Laters. Decisions, decisions."
In return I had to let my parents sleep until they got up, unless there was an emergency, and stay quiet until then.
Mother nature is a bitch - Ninth Corollary of Murphy's Law
Great Idea
June 14, 2007 - 17:35 ET by exLibI am usually against letting my kids eat sweets but we do give them a candy treat for certain things.
This is a great idea, I"ll run it by the wife!! She'll love it.
I wonder if the PC food polic
June 14, 2007 - 15:56 ET by midnight cowboyI wonder if the PC food police will go after a good socialist company who donates tons of money to socialist causes like Ben & Jerry's ice cream who co-incidently have the highest percentage of artery clogging milkfat in their product with bright colorful hippie induced packaging. What will the libs say if they can't get their "Cherry Garcia" ice cream? Needless to say B&J will most likely be off limits with the food nazi's.
In regards to Ben and Jerry's
June 14, 2007 - 16:10 ET by Roger the ShrubberIn regards to Ben and Jerry's, I have 5 words for you:
From my cold dead hands!
Rog you could pull an angelin
June 14, 2007 - 16:13 ET by TruthMongerRog you could pull an angelina jolie and boycott b+j for their politics...
But as a conservative you couldn't be so intolerant now could you?
I'm sorry. I read "Angel
June 14, 2007 - 20:12 ET by Roger the ShrubberI'm sorry. I read "Angelina Jolie" and "B J" in the same sentence and my thoughts drifted away.
Could you repeat the question?
Funny dude.Nice to see you'
June 14, 2007 - 20:19 ET by Jack BauerFunny dude.
Nice to see you've come more out of the shadows since el tumbler departed so (un?)expectedly.
I amTumbler!!
June 14, 2007 - 20:21 ET by Roger the ShrubberI
am
Tumbler!!
No..IAm Tumber!(For crying ou
June 14, 2007 - 20:25 ET by Jack BauerNo..
I
Am
Tumber!
(For crying out loud careful with those nails, they're really arggggggghhhhhh)
Hold on, let me check.Whoops.
June 14, 2007 - 20:32 ET by Roger the ShrubberHold on, let me check.
Whoops. Today is Thursday. That means FastEd is Tumbler today. You were Tumbler on Tuesday. I am not Tumbler until Sunday.
Soryy about the mix-up. This summer schedule has me all messed. It also looks like Bigtimer forgot to clock out last night. No wonder we are all confused...
That's cruel.Walk a mile in
June 14, 2007 - 20:34 ET by Jack BauerThat's cruel.
Walk a mile in Tumber's shoes .. (Tijuana to San Diego is a fave.)
Hey I never said there crap w
June 14, 2007 - 17:13 ET by midnight cowboyHey I never said there crap wasn't awesome. Their phishfood will give you a woody. However, sometimes it doesn't go down so easy knowing with each bite some lib whackjob is benefitting from it.
I bet if Toucan Sam and Snap,
June 14, 2007 - 15:56 ET by mikejI bet if Toucan Sam and Snap, Crackle and Pop were for abortion or against the war there wouldn't be a word being said!
mikej: . .and if Snap, Cr
June 14, 2007 - 16:06 ET by Mica the Magnificentmikej: . .and if Snap, Crackle, Pop were kissing each other. Or Toucan Sam lived in a nest with a properly decorated foyer, if you know what I mean.
Rice Crispy's are not a sug
June 14, 2007 - 19:26 ET by general companyRice Crispy's are not a sugar cereal, why are they picking on them?
Rice Krispies
June 18, 2007 - 17:35 ET by Julia A. SeymourRice Krispies were knocked out because of sodium content.
New Lawsuits
June 14, 2007 - 16:14 ET by allanfI have some ideas for new lawsuits.
First off I want to sue the Today Show because Al Roker is a bad influence during the breakfast hour. He rotundness makes me eat too much at the breakfast table. Also it sets a bad example for millions of children.
Next I want to sue CBS News and the Morning Show. Hannah Storm influence has given my wife an eating disorder. Also my wife spends too much on makeup trying to look like Hannah. Those are quantifiable monetary damages I've suffered.
What’s worse, she uses words like "conflict resolution", "consensus" and "good idea". She got that from Hannah too!!! It is ruining my marriage.
Can anyone at NB recommend a crusading attorney?
allanf...LOL...I have the per
June 14, 2007 - 16:41 ET by bigtimerallanf...
LOL...
I have the perfect man for your job request....
"What’s worse, she use
June 14, 2007 - 16:47 ET by winston smith"What’s worse, she uses words like "conflict resolution", "consensus" and "good idea". She got that from Hannah too!!! It is ruining my marriage."
C'mon! You forgot "role-model" and "strong woman" !
why not just ban children's programming?
June 14, 2007 - 16:32 ET by Debbie_SMy children never "clamored" for these products.
Why not? They didn't watch children's programming on TV -- we're just not big on TV watching. I did most of my grocery shopping without them. And when they did make a stink, I simply told them, "no."
Seems so simple! I was a PARENT.
Not something well understood on the left.
Debbie_s: It's hard to bel
June 14, 2007 - 16:43 ET by Mica the MagnificentDebbie_s: It's hard to believe that your common sense statement is lost on so many!
So what's the difference betw
June 14, 2007 - 16:36 ET by Agnostic frontSo what's the difference between CSPI and the Family Media Research Center? Both want the government to police the world for "the children."
Are you confusing the Family
June 14, 2007 - 16:56 ET by winston smithAre you confusing the Family Research Council, The Media Research Center and Focus On The Family?
Probably. I guess I meant the
June 14, 2007 - 17:11 ET by Agnostic frontProbably. I guess I meant the Media Research Center. They clamor that the FCC should stop the children from seeing violence, hearing "bad" words, or displays of sexual promiscuity. Sugar's probably worse for kids than seeing crap on television.
MRC...that's us
June 14, 2007 - 17:13 ET by LionKingMRC...that's us...sort of
[btw...I hate TLA's]
You work for the MRC? I tho
June 14, 2007 - 17:18 ET by LeonYou work for the MRC?
I thought you were just an anonymous poster on a website run by the MRC.
I didn't know you were on the payroll.
That changes everything.
I wish !!!
June 14, 2007 - 17:22 ET by LionKingI wish I was on the MRC payroll, then I could quit this $125/hr job.
Leon's job pays him all the H
June 14, 2007 - 17:26 ET by Mica the MagnificentLeon's job pays him all the Hillary posters he can roll around in.
Wow. That is pretty lame.
June 14, 2007 - 17:29 ET by LeonWow. That is pretty lame. Nice try though Mica.
It looks like I have a new superfan. You and RJ can compete for my affections.
Who will win? Only time will tell. Depends on which one of you can be more irrational.
Congratulations, Leon! Since
June 14, 2007 - 17:33 ET by Mica the MagnificentCongratulations, Leon! Since you are the "most irrational" on this site, you get to 'f*** yourself!
I'll close the door, Leon.
Enjoy!
Nah. Affection has nothing to do with it, Leon
June 14, 2007 - 17:38 ET by RJNah. Affection has nothing to do with it, Leon. We just keep you around because, pathetic as you are, you seem to be about the best the leftists can muster for NB duty..... ;^>
Oh man....RJ...you have me la
June 14, 2007 - 17:42 ET by bigtimerOh man....RJ...you have me laughing so hard with that descriptive perfect post that it is taking forever to get this posted to you.
Thanks....I needed that.
Alan Colmes???
June 14, 2007 - 17:44 ET by LionKingIs Leon now the Alan Colmes of NB?
[What does that make Monty?]
LK...Uberman sounds good to m
June 14, 2007 - 18:15 ET by bigtimerLK...
Uberman sounds good to me.
Lol...
true..uber
June 14, 2007 - 18:18 ET by LionKinguberman works. An insignificant number of people listen to him.
[Neither one can formulate a coherent thought.]
You'll find Leon's great gran
June 14, 2007 - 23:31 ET by Del DolemonteYou'll find Leon's great grandfather Barney posting over at Power Line.
HA! HA! HA! HA!
June 15, 2007 - 09:52 ET by Sergeant ROCKHA! HA! HA! HA!
Telling people how much $$$ y
June 14, 2007 - 17:28 ET by LeonTelling people how much $$$ you make without being asked is a sure sign of insecurity.
I wish !!!
June 14, 2007 - 17:30 ET by LionKingHyperbole...if you are not sure what that means, try wiki. It was all just a joke.
Hi Agnostic Front,I would say
June 14, 2007 - 17:40 ET by Darth DutchHi Agnostic Front,
I would say one difference has to do with what each group is trying to "police", as you say. The MRC and others like it are trying to protect children from obscene or offensive material on what would otherwise be a normal family-friendly time. From what I can tell they've never said that HBO and others that have obscene material on their airwaves shouldn't be allowed to do so; they just say it should be kept to late, late night where children cannot or should not see it. A great example is the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction; it was on during the day on network channel that was showing a sporting event. You have no expectation that a boob will come out of nowhere during the broadcast. If you purchase a sugary cereal you do have an expectation that it will be bad for you.
The CPSI (or however it's spelled) are for banning these mascots altogether. I can see a difference in that.
Yes, it is ultimately up to the parents to police what their children eat and watch on TV. But I think an argument can be made that what we allow on TV and in the media states what we as a society are willing to accept as what is normative in society. The same can't be said about breakfast cereal. Plus what is shown on the TV and the airwaves has a far greater reach than what a few cereals do.
And, I would say that both sugary sweets and all the "bad" stuff on TV are harmful, but it's comparing apples to oranges so it's hard to make an equal comparison.
That's my 2 cents!
Dutch
The Same People
June 14, 2007 - 17:37 ET by exLibI am sure these are the same people who want the schools to teach their kids how to properly have sex and are OK with promiscusou teens "as long as they use a condom or birth control".
Of course, if they have an "accident" they'll just wisk them off to Planned Parenthood for a quick abortion, without telling mom & dad of course.
OH MY WORD! How STUPID is thi
June 14, 2007 - 18:11 ET byOH MY WORD!
How STUPID is this?
Debra...
"...because you can't ev
June 14, 2007 - 18:22 ET by Trix Rabbit"...because you can't even take your child to the grocery store because they're clamoring for the products with characters on them."
Maybe because some parents who never should have been allowed to breed can't say "no" to their kids????
There will be hell to pay if these namby-pamby neo-fascists even so much as to attempt to retire the Trix Rabbit.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
There will be hell to pay if
June 14, 2007 - 18:38 ET by bigtimerThere will be hell to pay if these namby-pamby neo-fascists even so much as to attempt to retire the Trix Rabbit.
I'm with ya on that sentiment.... Trix Rabbit is here to stay!
BT,Thanks.Liberal: a power wo
June 14, 2007 - 18:59 ET by Trix RabbitBT,
Thanks.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
Kellogs should counter-sue th
June 14, 2007 - 18:24 ET by AvatarKellogs should counter-sue the parents for BUYING the product to begin with. Last I checked, the 5 and 6 years olds who are targeted for this can neither work to make money nor get to the grocery store on their own. What happened to parental responsibility?
The Avatar
Hannah Storm, Albert Belle's
June 14, 2007 - 18:38 ET by drillanwrHannah Storm, Albert Belle's on the phone for you ...
I have laughed my butt off reading all these comments. Can't say as I can top any of them, as yunz have covered every thing I was going to say. Except, Storm, keep your boney fingers off my CoCo Krispies or I might have to snap, crackle, pop your stupid liberal @$$!!!
Tell your kids "NO!" and feel free to list ALL the "I know better than you and everyone else" reasons as to why while dragging them through the store, just like the rest of us "unwashed" parents do ... Or just leave your kids in daycare while you shop.
I suppose all the cartoon characters can be replaced on the boxes by liberal heroes (sort of like jocks on the Wheaties boxes) ... You know: Che Guevara, Castro, Hugo Chavez, Jabba the Rosie, Sean Penn ...
“[B]ecause you can’t even
June 14, 2007 - 18:42 ET by general company“[B]ecause you can’t even take your child to the grocery store because they’re clamoring for the products with characters on them.
Maybe you shouldn't have kids if you cant control them any better then this. That being said I am thinking of filing suit against Center for Science in the Public Interest because of their failure to protect me from these cereals sooner. Who said we need tort reform?I IMPLORE all to go to the
June 14, 2007 - 21:43 ET by BobAnthonyI IMPLORE all to go to the Center for Consumer Freedom's website and take some action against these commie lib fascists who run the corporate media trying to make this country into a socialist Utopia!
www.consumerfreedom....
Auwe! Gimme a break. Toucan S
June 14, 2007 - 23:23 ET by Del DolemonteAuwe! Gimme a break. Toucan Sam has been shilling cereal since I lived in Hawaii as a kid. For the life of me, I cannot remember one kid who ever got corrupted by watching cereal commercials. Goebbels would be proud of these nuts.
I wouldn't worry about what Hannah says, as I gave up on CBS a long time ago. And what's with her changing her name to get a job? Wasn't her own original name good enough?
I think it's time we voice ou
June 15, 2007 - 03:42 ET by liberal_bug_zapperI think it's time we voice our dislike of these companies bowing to this Nazi group.
Conservatives, it's time you flood these companies with faxes and letters. I've already faxed them (of course, they'll see my fax # is from outside the US and maybe not care).
Come on... you got the illegal immigration amnesty act destroyed, it's time to teach these LibaNazis a lesson.... show them they can't destroy our culture.... and... I LOVE Fruit Loops!!!! We need to stop these people before we are living in a Stalinist version of Nazi Germany :(:(:(-shudder-):):):
____________________________________________________
"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine
Actually, I'm thinking about
June 15, 2007 - 09:50 ET by drillanwrActually, I'm thinking about suing the cereal company. For years they have completely ignored my demands to put out a version of Lucky Charms that is only a box full of the marshmallow charms ...
Anyone want to make it a "class action" suit?
This blows. It's cereal, not
June 15, 2007 - 10:13 ET by Hero SquadThis blows. It's cereal, not cigarettes, for crying out loud!
At least they can't kill this beloved cereal character.
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello