As the Civil War in Gaza between Hamas and Fatah rages on (please see fabulous coverage on this by our friend at Gateway Pundit), Glenn Reynolds marvelously commented Thursday: “[S]ince it's Hamas killing people, nobody will really care -- unless, ironically, they can find a way to blame the Israelis.”
Well, as he pointed out in an update, the Boston Globe unbelievably published an editorial Thursday not only doing exactly that, but also longing for the peaceful days of Yasser Arafat’s rule in the region (emphasis added throughout):
The Hamas campaign to eradicate Fatah from Gaza is certainly not the sole cause of Gazans' misery. They long suffered from Israel's suffocating occupation, and then from Ariel Sharon's foolishly unilateral withdrawal in 2005, a move that allowed Hamas to bid for power with the misleading claim that its rockets and suicide bombings had driven Israeli soldiers and settlers out of Gaza. Gazans were victimized as well by the corruption and misrule of Yasser Arafat's Fatah cronies.
Amazing. Yet, the Globe editorial staff weren’t finished:
The bitterness of the civil war that has forced the United Nations relief agency to suspend all but emergency deliveries of food and medical supplies is clear in the epithets the two sides use for each other. Hamas calls the Fatah fighters "the Jew-American army" while Fatah, alluding to Iran's backing for Hamas, calls the Sunni Muslims of Hamas "the Shi'ites."
What looms ahead is a division between a Fatah-ruled West Bank and a Gaza that is already being called Hamastan. Arafat may be remembered today for his many failings, but the cardinal rule of all his exasperating deceits and maneuvers was to avoid precisely this sundering of the Palestinian national movement. Arafat understood that without Palestinian unity there could be no hope of an independent Palestinian state.
Yes, that Arafat sure was a brilliant and compassionate humanitarian always concerned about Palestinian unity and an independent Palestinian state. That’s why he rejected all of Ehud Barak’s peace offers at Camp David in July 2000 and instead decided to start the al-Aqsa Intifada.
Forgive me, folks, but the revisionist history being employed by the Globe is devastatingly disingenuous to the point of being sick-making.
Suddenly, I need a shower, and my keyboard disinfecting.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Speaks for itself.
June 14, 2007 - 12:48 ET by mattmSpeaks for itself.
blame game
June 14, 2007 - 12:54 ET by LionKingFor the liberals, it is always a blame game. The problem is between Hamas and Fatah...let's put the "blame" where it belongs.
Someone tell me where arafat is complimented?
June 14, 2007 - 13:20 ET by treshanNewbusters' Critique of this article indicating that Arafat is complemented is totally off base. The author of the Globe article is
NOT complementing Arafat. If you read it, he merely says that with intra-fighting within the Palestinian effort, the Palestinians will never achieve PALESTINIAN goals. Newsbusters, however, goes on to criticize how Arafat didn't accept the Peace Offer at Camp David. That's a totally different issue than that of the fact that Arafat wanted to keep the Palestinian effort UNITED.
Why does the newsbusters article go on to say that arafat was a compassionate humanitarian? the globe article didn't state that, yet newsbusters seems to imply that it did. come on newsbusters, you usually do better than this.
the globe article stated arafat was obsessed with palestinian unity, not accepting ehud's peace offer. those two things are not bound together by any stretch of the imagination.
"Arafat may be remembe
June 14, 2007 - 13:28 ET by LionKing"Arafat may be remembered today for his many failings, but the cardinal
rule of all his exasperating deceits and maneuvers was to avoid
precisely this sundering of the Palestinian national movement. Arafat understood that without Palestinian unity there could be no hope of an independent Palestinian state."
The end justify the means...at least according to the libs of the MSM, et al.
i can bold things, too. but you need to have a point.
June 14, 2007 - 13:38 ET by treshanbut the cardinal
rule of all his exasperating deceits and maneuvers was to avoid
precisely this sundering of the Palestinian national movement.Arafat understood that without Palestinian unity there could be no hope of an independent Palestinian state
."
here's the point: arafat, from the article was full of deceits and maneuevers (not a complement to note AGAIN), however, he understood that the quagmire palestine faces now is as much hamas v fatah as arab v israel, a problem arafat limited much more so under his control. now, if you have an actual opinion instead of a cliche, i would love to hear it, because that's what i'm here for.
why does newsbusters insist that the article was complementing arafat?
complement or compliment
June 14, 2007 - 13:45 ET by Cool Arrowcomplement or compliment.
Which word do you mean? The two have different meanings.
insist ???
June 14, 2007 - 13:46 ET by LionKingReally, you are on a stretch. You choose to focus on several words that indeed have a negative connotation. If you would rather choose to look at the whole context, you would be able to see that they are excusing his actions for the better good. They are complimenting him for being concerned about the better good, eventhough he was deceitful.
[btw, I am so proud of you that you know how to use bold and italics.]
MandS
June 14, 2007 - 13:37 ET by Noel SheppardMandS,
Forgive me, but you're being silly and disingenuous. Let's read the relevant section together, shall we, with different emphasis added to hopefully alleviate your confusion:
That is called praise.
Furthermore, it is indeed quite appropriate to bring up Arafat's decision to not accept Barak's offer in July 2000 and begin the Intifada instead for it is that very moment in history that has led us here. To ignore it is a mistake and the height of journalistic malfeasance.
In July 2000, the world was closer to peace in this region than at any time since 1948. Now we are here, and this article rather than placing any blame on Arafat chose instead to suggest that if he was still alive he would have prevented this Civil War.
Excuse me...he caused it by not unifying the Palestinians behind an extraordinary offer of peace almost seven years ago. And, if you can't see that, what can I say? ns
MandS
June 15, 2007 - 09:11 ET by Noel SheppardMandS,
Hmmm. No response from the seemingly disgusted MonkandSharona. Shall I take this as a sign of silent acquiescence, or another example of bad manners on the part of liberals?
After all, as I took the time to thoughtfully respond to criticism, isn't it good form to reciprocate? Or, is that asking too much?
I must say to other NBers here that I'm growing tired of this kind of behavior from so many of the left-leaning members who feel comfortable castigating writers and editors for the content of posts, but then skulk away when their criticisms are adroitly addressed. How sad. ns
You misread, Noel
June 15, 2007 - 09:21 ET by Cool ArrowWhen they Resort to namecalling and skulking obviously your point is nailed down.
Let them run. I just wish they could hide better.
Noel...thanks
June 15, 2007 - 09:26 ET by LionKingNoel...your initial response was far better than mine to MonkandSharona. This additional post was really superb...I think you captured the frustration and expressed just how pathetic these hit-N-run posters are.
No doubt their shtick grows wearisome for many of us.
Noel,The run-away is a lame
June 15, 2007 - 09:28 ET by LeonNoel,
The run-away is a lame style no doubt, but I will speak for myself. Occassionally, when I don't respond to your posts for a while it's simply b/c I had to be at a meeting or at work. But I do always appreciate your thoughtful responses and it's great that you actually take the time to write back to posts, even when it's criticism.
Trust me I would love to be on here all day, chatting away, but unfortunately I've got these annoying things called BILLS.
Leon
June 15, 2007 - 09:35 ET by Noel SheppardLeon,
Yes, but you must pay attention to the time-stamps. MandS responded to LionKing at 14:38. I responded to them at 14:37. They were still present when I replied. As such, they can't make the "I had to run to work" claim.
See my point? In fact, if I wanted to, I could identify specifically what time they logged out. However, I'm working on an article right now, and that seems more important. ns
When you get a beat-down, suc
June 15, 2007 - 09:46 ET by Hero SquadWhen you get a beat-down, such as the one you put upon MandS, suddenly getting back to work is a more attractive option.
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
HS
June 15, 2007 - 10:02 ET by Noel SheppardHS,
Well, then our left-leaning members should pay heed, for I've taken all I can stands, and I can't stands no more. :-) ns
....suddenly getting back to
June 15, 2007 - 10:03 ET by Dave R....suddenly getting back to work is a more attractive option.
Yeah, after all, there are french fries to be cooked. :-)
Appeasement in Gaza
June 14, 2007 - 12:56 ET by Cool ArrowOne would think the appeasement policy Israel has employed with the Palestinians would be a thing of the past, but it isn't.
I know Israel is bowing to global browbeating, but there's no way they'll win in that arena anyway.
Found It
June 14, 2007 - 12:57 ET by allanfThis line should forever be a classic of lopsided editorial writing. The condensed version is "Heads I win, tails you lose"
So if 2 or more Jews start be
June 14, 2007 - 13:16 ET by chris_gillSo if 2 or more Jews start beating the crap out of each other and blowing up each others houses, will Arafat or Hamas/Fatah be blamed? Doubt it
Iran has won again.I am sure
June 14, 2007 - 13:17 ET by bigtimerIran has won again.
I am sure they will attempt to completely take over again in Lebanon...as the terrorists have been...via Iran/Syria.
Despicable.
I also heard a report early this morning from Tom Aspell(sp) on msnbc...it was absolutely disgusting...it would take to long to post it, but he is so far left with the reporting it not only angered me, but I lost my appetite.
Terrorists are a word they refuse to use when speaking of Hamas...same as Al Qaeda...Hezbollah...ect....
...and of course this all of our fault..the big bad USA....
I despise the left with all my being...they are the enemy within...we need to destroy them...one way or the other.
You leftist trolls...I wasn't speaking of murder...although forced permanent deportation wouldn't be a bad idea for me.
Exactly....this is Iran pulli
June 14, 2007 - 16:33 ET by SoftRightExactly....this is Iran pulling the strings on the Hamas puppet... Quick, distract the world with something, Hamas or Lebanon, either will do......
I'm dying to see these CIA documents that the CIA was dumb enough to let sit in some Fatah headquarters...maybe Hamas has hired the same document "verifier" that CBS uses.....
Congress: Do your Duty! Enforce Article 4 Sect 4 of the Constitution!
By the way...this outcome of
June 14, 2007 - 13:37 ET by bigtimerBy the way...this outcome of Hamas completely taking over ought to make Jimmah Carter pleased as punch.
bt,Jimmuh will declare it a f
June 14, 2007 - 17:49 ET by drillanwrbt,
Jimmuh will declare it a fair election ...
Boston Globe flip-flops in 21 months
June 14, 2007 - 13:42 ET by Jack BauerHere's the thing ...
It's not that MSM Editorial writers can't make the most assinine bass-ackward's "analysis" of the most sophomoric standard. It's their 1st Amendment right.
No.. it's that they also think we (readers) are so dumb, we can't (or won't) go back TWO years to compare what they said then... Because it's just soooo hard to find this secretive stuff.
Then here's the blame game. Mmmm, clearly the rewriting of Arafascist's thuggocracy is well in swing on the Boston Globe
Very intriguing, makes you wo
June 14, 2007 - 17:23 ET by general companyVery intriguing, makes you wonder what they are trying to get accomplished with this?
MSM, THIS is CIVIL WAR, Iraq IS NOT in civil war
June 14, 2007 - 14:08 ET by Ten7sThere are no heros here, what you see is worst case, what might have happened in Iraq when we took out the dictator there. But that does raise an interesting point, sooooo.... All of you media types out there LISTEN UP ... THIS is what a CIVIL WAR looks like, two organized, armed factions within the citizenry with opposing political goals fighting long, winner-takes-all boody pitched battles. Iraq IS NOT in a civil war, so STOP saying it. Random car bombs, booby traps, isolated Arab blood feuds, foreign terrorists, etc.... do NOT make a civil war.
Exactly! However, this X 100
June 14, 2007 - 17:53 ET by drillanwrExactly! However, this X 100 is what Iraq would look like if we did the ReidMurthaKennedyPelosi~puke~Kucinich~puke~ cut and run of the troops.
Give WAR a chance.....the Pal
June 14, 2007 - 15:51 ET by JayTeeGive WAR a chance.....the Palestinian Peace has been killing people for years...and now, we have RESOLUTION to a "Fatah" problem, thanks to a "minor war".
Who says Wars don't work ? After...what 30 years or so......the peace still ain't working. And all those guys are fighting over "holy" land. We have better land in West Texas that nobody is living on. We should relocate all the Palistinians to West Texas, and they can kill Illegals crossing the border and violating their land rights. That would work, but for one thing...It's isn't the "HOLY" Land.
In fairness, Same with the Israels, we could relocate them to the Desert Southwest, they could thrive in peace.......but again, the sticking point....it wouldn't be the "Holy" land.
Give War a chance, the peace continues to Kill people.
What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ? David Foote GoE
I don't understand all that i
June 14, 2007 - 16:07 ET byI don't understand all that is going on. But I do know that God says whoever curses Israel will be cursed. The Boston Globe better duck.
Debra...
Monk and SharonaSo Israel's
June 14, 2007 - 17:08 ET by daveinbocaMonk and Sharona
So Israel's relinquishment of direct control in 1993 is overlooked
and the incredibly corrupt regime of Yasser Arafat that ensued is, in
the view of the Globe, because:
Note that it was Abu 'Ammar's "Fatah cronies" who were corrupt. But
Arafat was technically in charge from 1993 until his death in 2004, so
was it just his cronies who were guilty of "corruption and misrule?"
Unless, of course, Arafat resides in the Globe's pantheon of Leftist
Working Class Heroes such as Che and other freedom fighters like Pol
Pot and Kim Jung-Il.
And let's just overlook those "rockets and suicide bombings" that
Hamas inflicted on the neighborhood. Or the fact that Hamas is run out
of Damascus under the command of Khaled Meshaal who gets Iranian and
Syrian money to oversee his terror campaigns. Unsuitable perspective
for the Globe.
dave...excellent
June 14, 2007 - 17:12 ET by LionKingRemember...the MSM are Arafat apologists. For years he was considered one of the top terrorists, but upon his death, he was proclaimed either a Freedom Fighter or a Liberator.
I do not believe Arafat is de
June 14, 2007 - 19:06 ET by alamojbI do not believe Arafat is dead. Have you not noticed the suspicious resemblance of Arafat and Willie Nelson? Did anyone see them at the same place, at the same time? A little plastic surgery maybe? lol
"...The Democrats love chaos. The Republicans love order and discipline and waiting your turn." Chris Matthews on "Gregory Live" as reported by Scott Whitlock 16MAY2007 blog "Matthews Rips..."<
I thought he was Ringo
June 15, 2007 - 09:49 ET by Hero SquadHmm. I always thought he was Ringo Starr.
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
Cut & Run Palestinians
June 15, 2007 - 05:31 ET by Cool ArrowPalestinians live with the shame of having deserted their homes in favor of a vantage point from which to watch the slaughter of the Jews in Israel.
Having taken so cowardly a retreat, the older generation now strap ordinance to the bellies of their grandchildren and send them back. Why on earth would we try to understand such stupidity.
Well, here's one reason why. Our government fully expects we surrender our National identity to the "Beggar Barons" importing slavery.
Why not boy-loving homo as
June 15, 2007 - 07:42 ET by Sergeant ROCKWhy not boy-loving homo as alleged by that Russian author?