Appearing on Tuesday’s edition of "Your World With Neil Cavuto," former "CBS Evening News" anchor Dan Rather talked to guest host David Asman and defended his "tarting it up" comment about successor, Katie Couric. He dismissed the "insulting" assertions by CBS President Les Moonves that his comments were sexist.
Additionally, Rather, who left CBS after famously trying to smear President Bush’s National Guard record, lamented how the network used to be "the champions of hard news." Now, he added, "They know about entertainment, but they don’t know about news." He also hoped for the continuance of "quality news with integrity."
Video (5:23): Real (3.92 MB) or Windows (3.28 MB), plus MP3 audio (1.54 MB)
Finally, Rather snuck in this little slam at the Bush administration. Minimizing the Couric controversy, he mentioned all the more important topics that should be discussed:
Dan Rather: "We’re talking about something infinitesimally small here. We’ve got the war. We’ve got a presidential election underway. We have the dismantling of the civil rights division of the Justice Department. These are important things."
A partial transcript of the segment, which aired at 4:30pm on June 12, follows:
David Asman: "Well, CBS news chief, CBS chief actually, Les Moonves blasting comments by Dan Rather about his successor, Katie Couric, today. Rather described the network’s changes to the 'Evening News' as, quote, ‘dumbing it down and tarting it up’ in a bid to attract a younger audience. Today, Moonves calls those segments, comments sexist. So what does Dan Rather say? Let’s ask him. ‘Dumbing it down, tarting it up,’ referring to Katie Couric. It’s tough talk."
Dan Rather: "Well, it’s tough talk about the news. Look, this isn’t about Katie Couric. It’s nothing to do about her gender. Anybody who reads what I wrote and what I said knows that that is true."
Asman: "But I think Les Moonves was dealing with that tarted, tarted up comment. Do you regret having said that?"
Rather: "No. I was asked my opinion. I didn’t bring it up. I was asked my opinion and I said what, what I genuinely feel, but it does not have to do with gender. What he is trying to do is change the subject. And I find it insulting and I find it disappointing, that’s a better word, disappointing, that Les Moonves, who knows a lot about entertainment would try to mask the real point with that line of attack."
4:32
Rather: "At one time, places like CBS, they were the champions of hard news. These days, they don’t know what hard news is, the top corporate leadership. They know about entertainment, but they don’t know about news."
Asman: "When did that change?"
Rather: "Well, I’m not quite sure that you can set an exact date with it. But certainly in the late 1990s and going into the early 2000s, that changed. Now, with CBS and the other networks being under such great pressure, it’s some excuse, but they don’t see news as a public service anymore, which has, in our great American system, opened up venues for others to take that mantle of news and integrity, hard news, understanding what it’s about and serving it. Where I work now, HDNet being one, it’s not the only place and the program we put on plays to a smaller audience. But as things evolve. I think that we will continue to have quality news with integrity, but the networks have given up that mantle."
4:34
Rather: "We’re talking about something infinitesimally small here. We’ve got the war. We’ve got a presidential election underway. We have the dismantling of the civil rights division of the Justice Department. These are important things."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.





Asman: "When did that change?" 













Editor at Large
Comments Policy
News with integrity? Dan, are
June 12, 2007 - 18:04 ET by Chris NormanNews with integrity? Dan, aren't you "pining" for something you helped destroy? Not that the long existing, bias-tainted, news ever had "integrity"...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Bingo Chris!I personally do n
June 12, 2007 - 18:17 ET by bigtimerBingo Chris!
I personally do not know which is worse...Couric or Rather....
Which one is the lesser of two evils...both the same mind-set, both with an obvious leftist agenda....hmmmmmm....
I say they tie!
Couric is just trying to live
June 12, 2007 - 18:21 ET by Chris NormanCouric is just trying to live down to the liberal bias, the trail that Rather helped blaze. Now he turns on her. Perfect, just perfect...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Rather: No, no, when I say 't
June 12, 2007 - 18:10 ET by Mica the MagnificentRather: No, no, when I say 'tart it up' I don't mean a cutie pie tart like Katie. No, it had nothing to do with gender. When I say 'tart' it doesn't meant 'to tart' or 'they tart'' in the sense that I said it.
Asman: When did CBS go from hard news to entertainment?
Rather: That's hard to say - hard to say if I include tongue twisters like 'he sells sea shells,' so I won't - so it'll be easy to say.
Asman: You said CBS doesn't know about hard news?
Rather: Let me make this as clear as I can. There is the hard news, the soft shell news, and the tarted up news, which has nothing to do with gender but has everything to do with that dumbed-down pixie-tart who took my job that f**ken B**ch!
He said that with a straight
June 12, 2007 - 18:15 ET by nnptcgradHe said that with a straight face? :o
Mother nature is a bitch - Ninth Corollary of Murphy's Law
Rather? NOT!...
June 12, 2007 - 18:24 ET by goldenthroatYou have got to be kidding! Dan Rather - complaining about the lack of integrity in network news? He still believes that he was right about GWB's National Guard papers! And he talks about integrity?
Dan Rather - a legend in his own mind.
Never dance on an empty stomach unless it's a liberal.
and brett humidity does a bet
June 12, 2007 - 18:47 ET byand brett humidity does a better job on fox with his monotone and obvious fascist probushista slant?
Marlon Brando used to mumble words better than this moron who is top anchor of the American Pravda.
A free press is one of the first things to go in a totalitarian government. Montana Lyons
Hey everyone! When you read t
June 12, 2007 - 18:54 ET by TruthMongerHey everyone! When you read this backwards it plays satanic messages...
TM...LOL!Me thinks mt lyin' i
June 12, 2007 - 18:59 ET by bigtimerTM...LOL!
Me thinks mt lyin' is a goner....the more he posts the more he proves it.
La-La Land for sure.
This morning i could make out
June 12, 2007 - 19:03 ET by TruthMongerThis morning i could make out some of his words but now he is really slurring his speech - and he absolutely reeks of bong smoke...
His parents will be pretty annoyed when they get home...
and brett humidity does a bet
June 12, 2007 - 20:15 ET by mikejand brett humidity does a better job on fox with his monotone and obvious fascist probushista slant?So your admitting that Dan Rather had a bias? Thanks Montana!Fox News is biased Montana. They are biased in reporting the news as it happens, not as they want it to happen like the rest of the american hating unborn baby murdering leftists on the other networks.
Montana lyin' sh*thead,Prov
June 12, 2007 - 20:23 ET by Dave RMontana lyin' sh*thead,
Prove to us that you didn't attend a government school.
Define the term fascist.
After all, for an obvious supporter of the "Fairness Doctrine" such as yourself, that should be a breeze.
If you cannot define this term correctly, I will never read another post placed on this blog by you again, as you would clearly be devoid of the intelligence necessary to participate in the discussions here at NB.
All you will really be is just another lying liberal hypocrite with the credibility of say, a Jesse Jackson.
My guess is that you cannot define the term correctly, and therefore are nothing more than a typical, uninformed and uneducated liberal idiot.
Build the damn fence, George!
Rather: We have the dismantli
June 12, 2007 - 19:02 ET by general companyRather: We have the dismantling of the civil rights division of the Justice Department. These are important things."
Wish Asman would had asked him to elaborate on this. Rather hates Bush even more,I believe he thinks Bush cost him that job Couric has. He is getting more and more twisted every day.
I never thought the day would
June 12, 2007 - 19:06 ET by thefightinggopI never thought the day would come when I actually agreed with something Dan Rather said:
"They know about entertainment, but they don’t know about news."
He was referring to CBS, but it also goes for the rest of the MSM.
thefightinggop.org
"integrity" - dan's
June 12, 2007 - 19:50 ET by FastEd"integrity" - dan's definition seems to mean, lie to yourself, convince your co-workers the lie equals the truth, tell the lie, believing that the boobs on the other side of the tube will swallow the lie, then when they don't, 'cause they know a lie when they see one, and it's everyone's fault, but the lier. dan, don't you miss the frequency?
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Rather
June 12, 2007 - 20:17 ET by iveseenitallRather and his ilk did it to themselves by their bias and their outright lies. Nonetheless, I find myself agreeing with him about news being no more than "entertainment" today. I guess if you can't trust "journalists" to tell the truth, you might as well be entertained. What's next, naked new anchors?
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Dan's got as much integrity as Rosie has brains.
June 12, 2007 - 20:36 ET by mikej"I think that we will continue to have quality news with integrity, but the networks have given up that mantle."
You mean this kind of "integrity" Dan?
"An editor's note: When your reporter was in China recently, a very high ranking Chinese government official was repeatedly asked questions about religious persecution. He told me, and I quote directly, 'These stories are untrue. We do, as you do, have some trouble with cults and we, like you, deal with them accordingly, but that's all.' End quote."
*-- CBS News anchor Dan Rather after a story on persecution of Christians in China, July 22 /Evening News/
Well hey. If a Chinese government said it, then it must be true!
*"If we could be one-hundredth as great as you and Hillary Rodham Clinton have been in the White House, we'd take it right now and walk away winners...Thank you very much and tell Mrs. Clinton we respect her and we're pulling for her."
*-- Dan Rather at a May 27, 1993
Now that's integrity right there! Dan's got integrity out the ying-yang baby!
Dan Blather-unfit to pick the lint from Edward R. Murrow's...
June 12, 2007 - 20:56 ET by Dave R...."quality news with integrity."
Dan, we haven't had that in this country since the days of Edward R. Murrow, a man who was so far above you in the integrity department that you would be unfit to pick the lint from his belly button.
Build the damn fence, George!
Hmm, I'm surprised they had
June 12, 2007 - 22:51 ET by ckc1227Hmm, I'm surprised they had Rather on at Fox considering what he said about the network a few months ago.
A known forgery-using propaga
June 13, 2007 - 11:09 ET by mattmA known forgery-using propagandist posing as a journalist demanding integrity from the news is like Democrats complaining about corruption....
Like I said in another thread
June 13, 2007 - 13:07 ET by deedledeeLike I said in another thread did you see Rather say that the wall didn't fall until "5 or 6 years" after Reagan's speech implying that one had nothing to do with the other. Don't trust a newsman who can't do his math...Reagan's speech: June 1987; Opening of gates and fall of wall: November 1989