Not that there had been much doubt as to where MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski stands politically . . . . As we have noted before, today wasn't the first time that the daughter of Jimmy Carter's erstwhile National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski has expressed liberal views on air. Still, it was jarring to hear the ostensibly objective newsreader, appearing as a guest on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" [an occasional show hosted by Joe Scarborough in Imus's former time slot] at 6:24 am EDT today, spout criticism of President Bush with a passion worthy of an "out" Dem partisan. The springboard was a discussion among Mika, Joe and NPR contributor John Ridley of the moment in last night's GOP presidential debate in which Rudy deftly dealt with a lightning strike just as he was explaining his pro-choice views. Ridley opined, to the agreement of the others, that Rudy handled the impromptu moment more smoothly than President Bush often does his scripted ones. Scarborough observed that "we do need elected leaders who can communicate effectively," noting that it was Tony Blair, not President Bush, who in a session with Congress had made the most effective case for the Iraq war.
That's when Mika pounced.MIKA BRZEZINSKI: We're looking for someone who is going to be able to communicate globally and sort of repair what some may believe is a huge problem in terms of our reputation and respect for ourselves around the world.The "some may believe" was only the barest of cover for what was clearly Mika's personal opinion. She immediately erased any doubt that she was aiming her dart at President Bush by ending her intervention by archly exclaiming "Vladimir!", an allusion to President Bush having recently referred to the Russian leader that way.Story Continues Below Ad ↓
Things got even more pointed. When Joe announced that he was going to "get on George Bush's side for a second," Mika responded, "alright, do it, please!" Meaning: yes, I've clearly put myself in the anti-Bush camp so go ahead and try to defend him. Joe pointed out that Germany and France, the two allies in Europe "that thumbed their nose at us," have in recent times elected pro-American leaders in Merkel and Sarkozy.
Snapped Mika, disdain in her voice: "What does that have to do with George Bush?"
Contact Mark at mark@gunhill.net
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.
Comments Policy
What's Next
June 6, 2007 - 06:35 ET by allanfWhat's next for Mess NBC? Perhaps Amy Carter as a hard boiled reporter? Maybe they will hire Ronald Reagan Jr. for a Republican point of veiw?
Ooops they already have?
"We're looking for..&quo
June 6, 2007 - 06:39 ET by Sergeant ROCK"We're looking for.." Yeah, the MSM has no agenda.
TRANSLATION: We need someone that will openly appease those that seek our destruction.
Stop the presses! Joe said To
June 6, 2007 - 06:42 ET by Mica the MagnificentStop the presses! Joe said Tony Blair made the most effective case on behalf of the Iraq war?
Well excuuuuse meeee!
I thought Bush lied and people died! I didn't know there was an effective case for the war in Iraq no matter who proclaimed it!
Mika's political views should not be confused with Mica's political views - Mica
Maybe Rudy handled it so-sm
June 6, 2007 - 06:51 ET by sarcasmoMaybe Rudy handled it so-smoothly just because he's used to God sending him these sorts of messages when he's wrong... ;)
JMR
Respect for ourselves? Soun
June 6, 2007 - 06:55 ET by rimskyRespect for ourselves? Sounds like a personal problem. And "What does that have to do with George Bush?" Maybe nothing, but it's just possible that it has a lot to do with the United States of America!
Forget the "damage to ou
June 6, 2007 - 07:12 ET by fosstenForget the "damage to our reputation around the world." We need to fix our reputation here at home. Bush has done plenty of damage to our freedoms and to his own party. As far as I'm concerned he's sold out the conservatives in this nation who supported him through some very dark moments, and I've washed my hands of him.
Well, they didn't call him an
June 6, 2007 - 07:16 ET by Sergeant ROCKWell, they didn't call him an 'empty suit' for nothing. He's under the control of his RINO puppeteers.
It's so easy, and fashionable
June 6, 2007 - 07:40 ET by rimskyIt's so easy, and fashionable, to bash Bush, isn't it. So you wash your hands of him. Good for you.
Listen, I know that Bush is going to struggle mightily to have any kind of legacy, and regarding certain issues, that's probably fair - spending, immigration to name a couple.. but his burden has largely been centered around the WOT and he's had to battle with the constant negative spin that has been thrown at EVERY decision, EVERY turn, EVERY moment in this global war. You wouldn't feel the way you do, if the MSM had consistently supported Bush.. wait forget Bush.. if the MSM had been simply Pro-America in their so-called reporting on Iraq and the GWOT, you wouldn't have uttered this crap about washing your hands of him, because, IMHO, we would already have been enjoying the victory.
I agree totally, rimsky. Bu
June 6, 2007 - 08:39 ET by SmartypantsI agree totally, rimsky. Bush has been eviscerated by the mainstream press and the disingenuous Democrats. His problem primarily is that he has allowed his enemies to define who he is. I still believe history, if it is fairly analyzed, is going to show Bush to be a much more effective president than what most realize today. He's far from perfect; then again, show me a former president who was perfect.
The attacks from the media an
June 6, 2007 - 09:18 ET by RJThe attacks from the media and the left are no excuse for President Bush's behavior regarding illegal immigration.
In exchange for his "legacy", George W. Bush is willing to destroy the Republican Party.
Proud Bush Backer
June 6, 2007 - 09:51 ET by PawpawNIsn't it great to have a president who doesn't care about his legacy! Geez, Peanut Carter still trying to make his the way he wants. Bush fighting for safety for you and me, that's leadership. He doesn't care what his approval rating is-even tho it is now higher that the Dem controlled House & Senate!!
We'll have to disagree about that, Pawpaw
June 6, 2007 - 10:35 ET by RJWe'll have to disagree about that, Pawpaw. I think this proposed illegal alien Amnesty bill has EVERYTHING to do with his desire to leave a "legacy." He's even willing to get in bed with Kennedy to achieve it.
----------------
In exchange for his "legacy", George W. Bush is willing to destroy the Republican Party.
This is about a voting block RJ
June 6, 2007 - 11:34 ET by exLibI think Bush, and the RNC for that matter, has basically conceded that sooner or later the American people will elect a Dem majority that will push through some form of amnesty and that Republicans will be left with another huge voting block going 90% Democrat.
And this is a voting block that is out growing any sector of our society. I have heard many pundits, like Dick Morris, claim that Hispanics will be over 50% of the population in the next 10-20 years or so.
I am not making a judgement here in the sense that I think it's pragmatic. I may not agree with it but I may be basically giving up on this issue because, in my view, this is the beginning of the end.
The problem I have with the whole thing is that Bush is going to get this through and then the MSM is going to give all the credit to the Dems for this even if it's Bush that made it happen. Or, if he doesn't get it through and the Dems get it through in 08, all that will be reported is how the Republicans were against it.
Sorry, exlib, I don't view this as an abstract
June 6, 2007 - 11:56 ET by RJSorry, exlib, I don't view this as an acceptable, abstract, or "pragmatic" political act. President Bush's prime responsibility is the protection of this country, and his behavior regarding the borders is a dereliction of his duties.
He should be pushing for support of existing illegal immigration laws and he should be making Border Enforcement his primary goal. Some of the real issues he has ignored are American sovereignty, national security, disease control, overburdened schools and hospitals, terrorist infiltration, and even the huge environmental insult of ton upon ton of garbage left behind by illegals.
----------------
In exchange for his "legacy", George W. Bush is willing to destroy the Republican Party.
absolutely not
June 6, 2007 - 16:40 ET by tumblerLet's get this straight. Those things you're accusing Bush of are FALSE.
He has not "ignored" your pet fetish, illegal immigration. He forwarded a workable reform bill early on, which rightist extremists hated. Now he's doing as well as anyone could exect. He HASN'T ignored sovereignty, national security, or terrorist infiltration. You're making up this BS. Above all; he is NOT "willing to destroy the Republican Party for any legacy". That's pure lies. If you're just going to lie, go over to the Democrats.
Tumbler, I'm going to respond this time
June 6, 2007 - 20:06 ET by RJTumbler, I'm going to respond this time because you've been only mildly abusive in this last post. Go back to your usual level and I'll continue to ignore you.
Illegal immigration is a serious problem that needs to be addressed, but this bill will do tremendous damage to America....and that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that the illegals are primarily Mexicans.
I (and others) have been describing why we think the bill will be harmful to America, but how about if you describe specifically what you LIKE about it and how it will HELP America?
Agreed, RJ. I am with you
June 6, 2007 - 20:46 ET by BlondeAgreed, RJ.
I am with you one hundred percent.
Although I no longer reply to anything TIAA says...I thank you for not leaving his assertions lie on the ground.
Hi Blonde
June 6, 2007 - 20:55 ET by RJHi Blonde. My policy on Tumbler is that I'll only respond to him if he argues on an adult level without constantly hiding behind the insults. Otherwise, he's not worth the effort.
I posted an answer
June 6, 2007 - 22:12 ET by tumblerI posted a moderately lengthy answer (insult-free) about an hour back. Then I went to dinner; and returning here, nothing. It was botched, I guess. Or erased by somebody. It's tiresome to write that over again.
At the end I explained I have nothing to do with the "bill," it's not mine; I never pushed for amnesty. I first berated YOU for the savage attacks on W; which are NOT mildly abusive. You're being the company hate-monger & Bush doesn't deserve it. If the "bill" proves harmful to America, it would be a bad surprise to me. America is a BIG, WIDE, WEALTHY country. It'll take a lot more than this to harm America. So, keep calm.
Tumbler, your last response was far from insult-free.
June 6, 2007 - 22:50 ET by RJTumbler, I read your last response. It was far from insult-free, and therefore not worth a reply.
So...you refuse to say if the bill is good or bad. Further, you use the excuse that you didn't push for amnesty. But you don't actually know what's in the bill do you? You can't really tell if the bill is good for America or if it will harm our country, can you?
Well, Tumbler, none of us pushed for this rushed-through, secretly written bill, either. The difference is that many of us have taken the trouble to find out what is in it. But it seems all you have for argument are generalities...and that you would be "surprised" if it harms America. That's a naive political attitude.
By your reasoning, I suppose, Americans should just shut up and let it happen. Well, I don't accept that. I'm not willing to wake up and find, too late, that we've been sold out by our President and that fat slug, Kennedy. It's our responsibility as citizens to investigate and to let our opinions be known.
I ask again, Tumbler. What will this bill do that will be GOOD for America?
RJ... I don't give a rats as
June 6, 2007 - 23:00 ET by Clear thinkerRJ...
I don't give a rats ass what tumbler wants. From what I can gather from friends and family (and the rest of the country) all anyone wants is SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST. Once that has been accomplished, then come back and talk about a immigration deal, but not a day sooner. I'm convinced that a lot of politicians, in both parties, are going to get their heads handed to them on a platter if they continue to ignore the will of the people. I will gladly supply the platters!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Ct......and I will the prunin
June 7, 2007 - 02:30 ET by bigtimerCt...
...and I will the pruning shears for the so-called 'Z' VisaCards....
A 24 Hour so-called back-ground check and the illegals aliens are issued one immediately thereafter for immediate legal citizenship my arse...
You can not even buy any kind of a fire-arm here in this country with a check of your back-ground that fast in most states.
what's wrong with you ?
June 7, 2007 - 12:06 ET by tumblerIf you don't like insulting posts aimed at you, stop spoiling for a fight.
I KNOW very little about this bill. Chances are you don't know much more. But the word "amnesty" is likely giving you a wedgy, so that means the bill sucks. FINE; you have rights. Protest ! Don't come to me demanding I kick about it.
We have to share the blame for this fiasco. I already explained the fatal effects over many months every racist speech and derogatory post had on last year's mid-term election. Because of so much intemperate and thoughtless bashing of Mexicans and their country, our own hispanic & Mexican-Americans went over to the Democrats.
I'm sure a lot of them would have in any case. But we MUST have lost many potential Republican votes. Since a good number of our House & Senate seats were lost by slim margins, it's not inconceivable we'd have kept our majority had we kept down the hysteria. And I warned us all ! We're being perceived as RACISTS, My Friend ! Whether or not it's false, there it is !
Now you flare up over this BILL. Nothing is ever going to make you alarmists pipe down. Frankly, I don't give a hoot if that bill is quashed or if it passes. The fat's in the fire ! Nothing we can possibly do while we remain a minority in Congress.
We'd better get ready now to quit the White House. I'm appalled at the ignorance around HERE with some people actually THINKING we can beat the Dems with nobodies like Tancredo and Romney ! Only a fool would expect that. If Thompson wins the presidency it'll have to be because BOTH Hillary and Obampa shoot themselves in the foot. --Otherwise . . .
Thompson will win because he
June 7, 2007 - 12:12 ET by bigtimerThompson will win because he is a straight-shooter.
Period.
Thompson/Hunter 08'
OK, Miz Cleo
June 7, 2007 - 12:27 ET by tumblerThanks for the horoscope read,
Give me today's late daily double for Hollywood Park -- Hmmm?
Better idea for ya Eugene...t
June 7, 2007 - 12:36 ET by bigtimerBetter idea for ya Eugene...tomas...tumbler...
Read about each amendment and learn what they entail instead of always blathering on about what is in the Illegal Immigration Bill so far...there are plenty of links I have put in so far as I know you are well aware of if you want to.
The Amendments that Reid are not letting come to the floor so far is outrageous,including amnesty.... we shall see what happens...but this is going nowhere fast so far.
tumbler,Read this. Pay partic
June 7, 2007 - 12:48 ET by Dave Rtumbler,
Read this. Pay particular attention to No. 8.
Where's The Fence, George?
Dave R...It won't do any good
June 7, 2007 - 12:53 ET by bigtimerDave R...
It won't do any good, I put that link in also about the 20 Loopholes...also put the votes on No. 8, he was here yesterday, and here in the wee hours of the morning too....he has surely read them, he pretends otherwise.
Just like Sanctuary Cities.
Hopeless don't ya think?
LOL....
bt,That particular loophole
June 7, 2007 - 13:44 ET by Dave Rbt,
That particular loophole is the one part of this mess that really has me beyond merely torqued with Mr. Bush (actually, the whole damn thing does, really) but that was one of the more egregious parts of this scamnesty farce.
What the hell was this man thinking?
Where's The Fence, George?
but your honor:
June 7, 2007 - 13:12 ET by tumblerDear Dave R:
I'm perfectly OK with reasoned amendments to close bad loopholes.
I wish us luck. A fence is money down the tubes, though. Yet listen to the yahoos, bellowing Where's The Fence ? Of course, the U.S. could always fall back on those wonderful ideas you once thought would work. --Most of them murder.
BTW; if a gang-member is denied a Z Visa and deported, how do we keep him from returning two-weeks after deportation ? The smartest thing, I think is to treat ALL of the applicants alike. Equal rights for all --including gang members.
You'll ask why -- ?
This is, after all, a free country. The state can't dictate what clubs or societies a citizen can join. That's a police state ! What if the state orders you to renounce membership in your political action group ? If they can do it to a member of La Vida Loca, they can do it to anybody. Next time it might be the NRA; and you'd have to renounce your Glock Mod. 21 --
Now; once that gang banger commits a felony, I say lock his @ss up and toss away the key. He has rights; but not a felony license.
BTW; if a gang-member is deni
June 7, 2007 - 13:21 ET by bigtimerBTW; if a gang-member is denied a Z Visa and deported, how do we keep him from returning two-weeks after deportation ?
Build a Huge Strong Fence.
More Border Enforcement.
bigtimer knows it all
June 7, 2007 - 13:33 ET by tumblerYeah; a fence. Is that the best you can do ? We have laws right now; enforce the laws.
A fence won't make much difference. Prison terms make a difference.
Also-- how would the boondoggle fence correct the present situation: 12 million illegal squatters ? Are you paying for little fences around every barrio in the country ? Every house ? Aw, shucks. it's only money.
"Stop spoiling for a fight?"
June 7, 2007 - 12:55 ET by RJ"Stop spoiling for a fight?" "Don't come to you?" Ha. Coming from you that's funny, Tumbler. I haven't been responding to you for some time, but you've been constantly trying to engage me.
At least you admit that you have no knowledge about the bill. For most, that would be sufficient to shut them up, but you obviously believe lack of knowledge on a subject is irrelevant.
Interesting that you call this a fiasco but then say you don't care if the bill passes. You have an odd concept of American citizenship.
This is a Kennedy bill. Why do you think Democrats and RINOS are so hot to get it passed? Do you really believe it will be good for Republicans or America? As for your urging Republicans to just appease the Democrats, a fella named Chamberlain tried that, and look what it got him.
--------------------
In exchange for his "legacy", George W. Bush is willing to destroy the Republican Party.
Rimsky, you don't know who yo
June 6, 2007 - 11:10 ET by fosstenRimsky, you don't know who you're talking to. I'm not one of those lib moonbats who believes everything he sees on TV. I'm a conservative, you know, one of the ones recently called a bigot and a fearmonger by Bush and his cabinet members.
The fact that Bush is willing to bash his own conservative base (and there are millions like me, by the way, who don't like this amnesty bill one bit) shows that he is completely out of touch with us and therefore no longer represents us.
Mika says: "We're look
June 6, 2007 - 07:20 ET by Seabeach4348Mika says: "We're looking for someone who is going to be able to communicate globally the sort of repair what some believe is a huge problem in terms of our reputation and respect for ourselves around the world."
First of all, PMS-NBC, it appears as if the only people who have a problem with our world image and, moreover, "...respect for ourselves...." are the Marxists, commies, and liberals in this country, the very same people who continue to whine and complain about how bad America is for the health of the world community. (Mouthwash break; I hate that term "world community")
My respect for America is just fine, Ms Mika, thank you very much.
Second, Ms. Mika, I suppose you contend that once President Bush leaves office ( as in Ding-Dong the Witch is Dead), the dark cloud that has settled over the world since 2000 will suddenly lift, flowers will burst into bloom, Global Warming will correct itself so we won't need Algore any more, and we will finally be able to make nice with the Islamo-Barbarians who want to behead all of us and burn our country to the ground. They will just go home and leave us alone because everyone around the world will simply be in Love-Fest mode over America once again!
Third, Woodstock is long over, Ms. Mika, and we really don't need the likes of you telling us what's best for America.
"Woodstock is long over.
June 6, 2007 - 10:12 ET by Gat New York"Woodstock is long over." - - - heh man, when did it end???
Her father did a real bang-up job when he worked for Carter. I'm not sure her father or Carter can be seen as experts on sensible world affairs.
Mika Mocks: Next Prez Needs to Repair Damage Done by Bush
June 6, 2007 - 08:22 ET by oorampMIKA : We're looking for someone who is going to be able to communicate globally and sort of repair what some may believe is a huge problem in terms of our reputation and respect for ourselves around the world.
All you have to do is clean out Hollywood and the old dying media of the America bashing bastards that tear down everything great about this country and the sore will heal on its own.
Communicate globally, means kissing the world's ass, is the important thing to life's losers on the left. Every time I see or hear one, I keep expecting them to reach up and wipe that brown spot off their noses, but it never comes off. The press has attacked Bush beyond anything else in my lifetime, it is so obvious that the press is trying to put brown nosed liberals in office, how can anyone not stand-up to the old dying media and for our own president is beyond me.
'06 Democrats just surrendered, vote republican in '08.
I remember our great standing
June 6, 2007 - 16:55 ET by TruthMongerI remember our great standing in the world 10, 20 and 30 years ago. Absolutely everybody completely loved us before GWB...
Don't you people remember that?!
Remember how the Soviets loved us back then? And how China absolutely exalted us? Remember how the Arab world unequivically supported their "beloved America" back then?
Remember all those emerging democracy's around the world back then...?
I sure hope the MSM can find someone to bring back those absolutely wonderful glory days...before GWB destroyed our sterling world reputation...
Snapped Mika, disdain in her
June 6, 2007 - 08:27 ET by Challenger GrimSnapped Mika, disdain in her voice: "What does that have to do with George Bush?"
It's called logic ma'am. It's also a challenge to your basic assumption. If, Bush has so damaged our reputation, why then did these other countries elect pro-america leaders? It's not the expected result if your claim is true.
So what can we conclude...
Be sure to get your daily Fred Thompson Fact!
BDS trumps logic. I can't p
June 6, 2007 - 09:50 ET by JimboBDS trumps logic. I can't put it more simply than that.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
I wish one of my parents woul
June 6, 2007 - 16:01 ET by Chris NormanI wish one of my parents would have been a famous politician or policy advisor, so I could have got a job in the media...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
I clicked the channel early t
June 6, 2007 - 16:23 ET by bigtimerI would call the trio the Three Stooges, except they give The Three Stooges a bad name.
Mika gives even dumb blonde's a bad name...she is dumber than a box of rocks.
a box of rocks is pretty dumb
June 6, 2007 - 16:25 ET by Leona box of rocks is pretty dumb right?
I'm sorry for asking for clarification, I'm just not hip to these turn of the century sayings.
Leon, compared to you a box o
June 6, 2007 - 16:28 ET by MightyMouthLeon, compared to you a box of rocks are Rhodes Scholars. (another turn of the century saying)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Hmmm. Another lame joke from
June 6, 2007 - 16:30 ET by LeonHmmm. Another lame joke from the resident NB child. Not surprising. I figured you'd take a day off after getting put in your place by sarc this morning, but apparently you weren't as embarassed as you should have been by your utter lack of class and dignity.
Gee Leon - I figured you woul
June 6, 2007 - 16:39 ET by JimboGee Leon - I figured you would cool your jets after getting b****slapped by Noel on the other thread... You know... where you tried to defend the NY Times on a point even they said was true...
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
It was amusing to watch Leon flop around,
June 6, 2007 - 16:42 ET by RJIt was amusing to watch Leon flop around, trying to shake the hook
How so? I am 100% correct.
June 6, 2007 - 16:46 ET by LeonHow so? I am 100% correct. I'm yet to see his reply to my assertion that the story belonged in the Metro section in NYC.
I said the story was on the front page and it was. I never said it was the entire story. Furthermore, I extended my argument to defend their placement of the story in the NY/Metro section where it belongs.
Soooo...... You are 100% c
June 6, 2007 - 16:49 ET by JimboSoooo......
You are 100% correct and the editors at the NY Times are wrong....
Riiiiiight.
So that puts you further left than the NY Times....
Riiiiiight....
We're going to need you to go ahead and come in on Saturday......riiiight.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Amazing... A terror plot t
June 6, 2007 - 16:52 ET by Clear thinkerAmazing...
A terror plot that could have killed many people from many nations, blow up an airport (one of the busiest in the world) filled with people from all over the country, AND IT'S NOT A NATIONAL STORY?
Leon, step away from your crack pipe, NOW!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
It's not a national story for
June 6, 2007 - 16:53 ET by LeonIt's not a national story for people in NYC...it's a metropolitan story for them. Get it?
Good lord you are stupid. An
June 6, 2007 - 16:57 ET by Clear thinkerGood lord you are stupid.
And I mean that with all due respect.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
How so? Aren't city papers g
June 6, 2007 - 16:58 ET by LeonHow so? Aren't city papers geared to people in those cities specifically? So shouldn't happenings specific to those areas be in the Metro sections? Seems reasonable to me.
Yeah, that's why the NYT is s
June 6, 2007 - 17:02 ET by Clear thinkerYeah, that's why the NYT is sold at every major newstand across the country (unfortunately).
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Explain to me then how, as a
June 6, 2007 - 23:11 ET by UnsaneExplain to me then how, as a San Antonio resident (at the time) saddled with his own crappy newspaper, I kept getting phone calls from salespeople offering me a subscription to the New York Times? Or do you revel in intellectual dishonesty?
TWELVE DOWN, FOUR TO GO...(until the SPURS' FOURTH RING!!!)
What an ass. So 9/11 shoul
June 6, 2007 - 17:11 ET by JimboWhat an ass.
So 9/11 should have been in the Metro Section??
Most of the time you are amusing. Right now you are burning my ass.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Do you mean the thread that
June 6, 2007 - 16:44 ET by MightyMouthDo you mean the thread that you stuck your nose into? If that's the one you are talking about, then I think you should re-read it. While I opened it very pissed off at sarcs lack of respect for those who died on D-Day. I did end it by apologizing to Noel for dragging it out. Something I noticed none of you did. And by the way Leon, you really aren't the epitome of class and dignity you think you are. But you are dumber than a box of rocks.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Yeah MM that's the one. The
June 6, 2007 - 16:57 ET by LeonYeah MM that's the one. The post where you once again indulged in simple-minded, crass language to make no point at all.
I am classy on this site. I've never once attacked anyone personally and I've never ever used profanity or 'blue' language (which is all you ever do). So, say what you will , but the proof is in the pudding.
Leon – with all seriousness
June 6, 2007 - 17:13 ET by JimboLeon – with all seriousness, today you have proven that you are either stupid or being intentionally provoking. Unfortunately my money is on the former.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
How about she's dumber than
June 6, 2007 - 16:29 ET by RJHow about "she's dumber than a poster who uses as his logon the name of a writer spelled backwards?"
I didn't even notice that unt
June 6, 2007 - 16:31 ET by LeonI didn't even notice that until it was mentioned by you a while ago. I used this name b/c it is the title of one of my favorite movies.
sure
June 6, 2007 - 16:32 ET by RJsure
You've never seen Leon? Star
June 6, 2007 - 16:34 ET by LeonYou've never seen Leon? Starring Natalie Portman and Jean Reno? Directed by the famous Luc Besson?
Man, you're missing out. You should see that immediately. Tremendous flick.
"What it lacks in depth..."
June 6, 2007 - 16:37 ET by RJSure I have. Just don't believe you.
Meh, well at least I'm in goo
June 6, 2007 - 16:43 ET by LeonMeh, well at least I'm in good company. You don't believe anyone. Ever. About anything. So...
Just those who use bumper sticker
June 6, 2007 - 16:47 ET by RJJust those who use bumper sticker "thought." Most of the time, that means lefties.
You've never seen Leon? Star
June 6, 2007 - 16:34 ET by Leondouble. Strange things are afoot on the computer of a one, leon.
Leon the Troll
June 6, 2007 - 16:35 ET by LionKingLeon the Troll...I am not familiar with that movie. ;-)
Just kidding, I assume you mean Leon: The Professional?
Yes of course, but it was cal
June 6, 2007 - 16:36 ET by LeonYes of course, but it was called only Leon in the UK and it was called only The Professional in the USA.
Great movie right? Possibly one of the best action films I've ever seen. Second only to THE ROCK of course :)
"What it lacks in depth..."
June 6, 2007 - 16:39 ET by RJWell, the first review coming up on a search would certainly fit you....
it begins "What it lacks in depth..."
zing! good one! I'm not us
June 6, 2007 - 16:42 ET by Leonzing! good one! I'm not used to that level of creativity from you. It's good to see you trying to get outside the box. I like it! I like it!
Nah. I thrash you regularly, Leon
June 6, 2007 - 16:45 ET by RJNah. I thrash you regularly, Leon.
Man I wish I was there to see
June 6, 2007 - 16:48 ET by LeonMan I wish I was there to see it. You thrash nobody. You're the master of never using citations for anything you say, but always demanding them from others. It's hilarious to watch you in action.
Show me
June 6, 2007 - 16:50 ET by RJClassic leftist trick: accuse the oppostion of what you've been doing yourself. Nice try, Leon, but no cigar. ;^>
oops, gotta go
June 6, 2007 - 16:51 ET by RJoops, gotta go...have to answer later ;^>
have you seen 300?
June 6, 2007 - 16:44 ET by LionKingHave you seen 300? My kids love it. Except for the infanticide, it really demonstrates what strong resolve, leadership and courage can accomplish. It also demonstrates the folly of allowing politicians to dictate war policy. Finally, it shows Persia for the evil empire that it is ... okay, maybe a bit too strong there.
Lots of action though.
I haven't seen it but I heard
June 6, 2007 - 16:52 ET by LeonI haven't seen it but I heard it's got some great action and some superb cinematography. I'm not big on going to the movies. Can't seem to bring myself to spend $10 to see a movie I can rent in 2 months for 2 bucks or download for free.
But I will see it as soon as I can get it on Netflix. haha I like the Persia jab! :)
Download for free? You mean
June 6, 2007 - 17:19 ET by JimboDownload for free? You mean illegally?
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Leon... Clarification. Yo
June 6, 2007 - 16:29 ET by bigtimerClarification.
You know what a rock is right?
Go crawl under one.
Stay there.
Two 'wizbangers' in a row! G
June 6, 2007 - 16:32 ET by LeonTwo 'wizbangers' in a row! Good golly Miss Molly you had me laughing so hard I just about split the back of my Norfolk Jacket.
Leon/Hater... You are not
June 6, 2007 - 16:35 ET by bigtimerYou are not one bit humorous.
Or intelligent.
Oh now you've done it again!
June 6, 2007 - 16:39 ET by LeonOh now you've done it again! I stepped on the wide trouser leg of my Oxford Bags and fell right over.
You and your old timey humor are a trip!
Working hard to get your vaca
June 6, 2007 - 16:43 ET by bigtimerWhat vacation time?
June 6, 2007 - 16:52 ET by LeonWhat vacation time?
Leon the Trollster works hard
June 6, 2007 - 17:01 ET by bigtimerSoros is getting robbed. Jimb
June 6, 2007 - 17:20 ET by JimboSoros is getting robbed.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Hi Jimbo... LOL... Soro
June 6, 2007 - 17:23 ET by bigtimerLOL...
Soros won't mind...after all look how he made his money.
Little Leon the Trollster is the perfect employee.
I sense a lull in the dark si
June 6, 2007 - 17:26 ET by JimboI sense a lull in the dark side of the force. Once Leon finishes all the food on his plate and is excused from the table, I’m sure things will pick up again!
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Let's hope he has to sit ther
June 6, 2007 - 17:33 ET by bigtimer