CRITICAL UPDATE: At end of post, Rush responds to NBers' concerns regarding his appearance with two women in bikinis.
For those that missed Sunday's "1/2 Hour News Hour" on Fox News, as he promised a few weeks ago, President Limbaugh is on vacation (video available here courtesy of El Rushbo himself).
Addressing the nation from the Southwestern White House, President Limbaugh informed us that:
- America's problems were largely solved during his first six months in office
- Most of his cabinet has resigned out of sheer boredom
- The Limbaugh tax cuts are in place
- The war on terror has been won
- Michael Moore has been exiled to Cuba
- America's future has never looked brighter
- As long as he's in the White House, America is in good hands.
Critical Update: Folks, as some have commented that it was inappropriate of Rush to appear in this video flirting with two young women wearing bikinis, I e-mailed him to comment. Here's his response:
Sure...it's a COMEDY show, designed to get laughs. There was a little bit of a "Hey, libs, take this (Clinton)" aspect to it. But mostly it was just for the fun of it. And I always relish the opportunity to appear "out of character" and display other aspects of my "talent." At any rate, I am not married, either in real life or as President. Plus, my whole cabinet has quit out of boredom because I am doing such a great job.
Comments Policy
M. Moore would be happy eno
June 4, 2007 - 12:27 ET by lnthompM. Moore would be happy enough -- he should have money-is-no-object funding for more anti-American "documentaries".
Lee T.
U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington
The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain
. . and all the health care
June 4, 2007 - 16:09 ET by FastEd. . and all the health care he could use!
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Sigh!
June 5, 2007 - 11:09 ET by Ole_SargeI don't know which makes me sigh more, the young women with great figures, or the idea that "problems are solved" and a President COULD actually have a period of "down time" with out a crisis to interupt.
Okay, the the young women with pre-pregnancy bodies, and me going "why's it so hard for a 46 year old women to get that shape back" LOL!!!
Sarge
June 5, 2007 - 11:13 ET by Cool ArrowNot likely any of the current group of candidates still have their period.
OK, maybe Edwards
So it's true, Edwards is stil
June 5, 2007 - 13:31 ET by Clear thinkerSo it's true, Edwards is still going through puberty.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
All Hail the Chief!!!! But,
June 4, 2007 - 12:28 ET by kathleenirishAll Hail the Chief!!!! But, where's Ann??? Kicking Hilary's ass somewhere, I hope!
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
Zzzzz....
June 4, 2007 - 12:34 ET by balboaZzzzz....
I'm with you balboa, I've s
June 4, 2007 - 12:42 ET by MightyMouthI'm with you balboa, I've seen better swimsuit models in a "Queen Size" Lingerie catalog.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I've seen better comedy on Ba
June 4, 2007 - 12:43 ET by balboaI've seen better comedy on Bazooka Joe comics.
Can't beat the classics!!
June 4, 2007 - 12:44 ET by MightyMouthCan't beat the classics!!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Still reading Bazooka Joe, hm
June 4, 2007 - 12:48 ET by kathleenirishStill reading Bazooka Joe, hmm? Says it all.
Ice works well in helping get that gum out of your hair.
Lighten up, isn't that something you tell us all the time, Luke?
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
I'm not angry about it; I j
June 4, 2007 - 13:55 ET by balboaI'm not angry about it; I just think it's lame and not funny. :-)
Just like "SNL"... Lame and
June 4, 2007 - 15:35 ET by ZoneDaiatlasJust like "SNL"... Lame and not Funny...
SNL has hit hard times, but
June 4, 2007 - 15:43 ET by balboaSNL has hit hard times, but every once in a while they have a gem, like Justin Timberlake as a Cup o' Soup mascot.
who said anything about being
June 4, 2007 - 16:04 ET by kathleenirishwho said anything about being angry?
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
You said "lighten up.&qu
June 4, 2007 - 16:07 ET by balboaYou said "lighten up." I assumed you thought I was angry in some way.
Uh, why is this here ?
June 4, 2007 - 13:13 ET by SportPoliticsUh, why is this here ? Babbleone knows that right wing neocons hate sex and never get any.
This is propaganda.
Now if it was Clinton...well - .
No talking about Clinton ! He's not in office. Is that all you can ever do ?
Uhh, forget that Madame list in DC...that was a lie too. Well, I mean we dimmocrats since were sexcrazed just thought - uhh.. well.. nevermind, we lied for so many years, but those years- heck Clinton is off limits... now shut up...
Bite your tongue MM, or you w
June 4, 2007 - 12:45 ET by bassndudeBite your tongue MM, or you will find yourself exiled to the Bahamas! I happen to like queen size. Well, maybe I just like ALL sizes..:-)
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Ha bass! I suspect that we
June 4, 2007 - 12:59 ET by MightyMouthHa bass! I suspect that we both have seen queen size catalogs appear in our mail? It sure is funny how they keep coming, even if you don't buy anything for a whole year. Or maybe yours come in your wifes' name?
:-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
LOL MM...I will never tell...
June 4, 2007 - 15:39 ET by bassndudeLOL MM...I will never tell...:-)
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Okay
June 5, 2007 - 11:11 ET by Ole_SargeSo my less than a perfect size 0 body IS okay??? Wait, is this my spouse posting??? : )
Sarge, funny you should men
June 5, 2007 - 11:17 ET by MightyMouthSarge, funny you should mention "sizes". Mrs. mighty mouth is insisting that clothes makers have recently been putting size 6 tags on size 8 skirts! Could it be that some marketing GENIUS has figured out that a size 8 girl would much rather be a size 6 girl?? hmmmm.... food for thought.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Wow! Even sex doesn’t hel
June 4, 2007 - 12:52 ET by Dave HighWow! Even sex doesn’t help the lack of humor in that clip. It was sooo bad, it gave me shivers. Brrrrrrr! It is easy to understand how the Oxycontin King has been married and divorced three times, though. Is it possible to objectify women any more than that? Yikes!
Regards, Dave High
I'm with you on this one, Dav
June 4, 2007 - 13:26 ET by Roger the ShrubberI'm with you on this one, Dave. About as funny as the recent season of SNL. No-Watch TV at its worst!
Rushbo
June 4, 2007 - 15:11 ET by goldenthroatDave and Roger,
Agreed! As much as I like Rush, he had better not give up his day job!
Happily, someone still know
June 5, 2007 - 11:17 ET by sarcasmoHappily, someone still knows how to reliably detect sex-humor -- money. Last time Larry did this we were rid of one hypocrite-congresscritter, let's see if it works again.
JMR
Which ones?
June 4, 2007 - 22:16 ET by acumenIs it possible to objectify women any more than that?
Which ones? Juanita Broaddrick, Eileen Wellstone, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Regina Hopper Blakely, Kathleen Willey, Sandra Allen James, Kathy Bradshaw, Cristy Zercher, Paula Jones, Carolyn Moffet, Gennifer Flowers, Dolly Kyle Browning, Sally Perdue, Betty Dalton, Denise Reeder or "that woman" Ms. Lewinsky?
A response...
June 5, 2007 - 10:40 ET by goldenthroatTouche', acumen - TOUCHE'.
There are other ways that the
June 4, 2007 - 12:55 ET byThere are other ways that the point could have gotten across without having to do what Rush did. His respect level just went down 100 points in my book.
Sorry, as a mother of two daughters, seeing an old man being dirty with two pretty young girls, is not what I want to see from a man who is supposed to be a conservative. That was tacky.
Debra...
Tacky indeed Debra. SNL di
June 4, 2007 - 13:15 ET by MightyMouthTacky indeed Debra. SNL did a much better job with Al Gore as President.
(strange the actual snl video is nowhere to be found!)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Lighten up, Debra.At least it
June 4, 2007 - 13:25 ET by Dave RLighten up, Debra.
At least it wasn't with two young guys!
I only hope that when I get to be Rush's age (and that ain't all that far off for me) that I will still be able to hang around pretty young ladies, too. :-)
All I can say is God bless the man and more power to him!
-Besides, it was only a skit.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
His respect level just went d
June 4, 2007 - 16:06 ET by bigtimerHis respect level just went down 100 points in my book.
Wow Debra....
I just bet Rush is sweating the small stuff...like your view of him.
I enjoyed the show.
aw - did you miss the part th
June 4, 2007 - 16:16 ET by FastEdaw - did you miss the part that it's just tv? even if it's bad comedy, (haven't seen the show) can't a sombody just have fun, or are we really as stodgey as the demolibs whould have everyone think? At least with this you don't want to throw something at the set, or barf, as you would with the msm (Lsm) news(?).
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Rush needs to apologize for w
June 4, 2007 - 19:51 ET byRush needs to apologize for what he did. Descent people who see that will not take him seriously until he at least admits to it being poor judgment on his part.
Think about it like this: What if that was Bill Maher doing that skit? Sorry, we have to stay consistent, no matter what side does the nasty deed.
And I am not a prude. I am fine with two piece bathing suits, even. I don't like the dirty behavior and I don't like the implication that he is going to do dirty things with two women.
I just showed it to my husband, along with my post. My husband asked, "What was the point that Rush was making?" Was Rush saying that Bush does stuff like that? Seriously, what was Rush saying by that disgraceful display?
Debra...
My husband asked, "What
June 4, 2007 - 20:11 ET by bigtimerMy husband asked, "What was the point that Rush was making?" Was Rush saying that Bush does stuff like that?
What the heck are you even talking about here Debra?
Bush...how do you even get there.....
HUH?
Try reading the other posts...it is self-explanatory.
LMAO!
You two need to get out more often...or something.
Deb,Get a grip....get a life.
June 4, 2007 - 20:13 ET by BlondeDeb,
Get a grip....get a life.
And kindly learn to spell....Rush needs to get a "descent" life. You are such a little hypocrite here....
Rush's skit was done for effect...HELLO BILL CLINTON.
You are either an idiot, or you are too stupid for words (your choice Debra ....why don't you try another one of your little insipid little emoticons at this juncture? :-o)
You are most certainly one of the most prudish broads I've ever seen...Dave R's link to the "Church Lady" shined a huge spot on you, Deb. Except you probably wear uglier "day" suits, in real life, and then I've no idea what you''d possibly wear for "bathing"! LOL.
Keep it up with your "I'm fine with two piece bathing suits"....what a lying little bit of blather. Lady, go find a one piece bathing suit, preferably one with a skirt (the way you come off here, dear Deb...you'd do better in a Burkha). Wear it. But keep your toenails off of my better looking suit. And keep your holier than now comments to yourself.
You are a prudish prune.
See you on the beach, Deb.
I'll be the really tall blonde in the great black bathing suit....the one cut up to there and down to the other there.
While you're in the tent. Sheesh!
debra's no prude
June 4, 2007 - 20:21 ET by tumblerNot Debra; she insists the Blessed Virgin Mary was quick to make more babies in the aftermath of bearing the Son of God.
There was nothing wrong, she said; sex is beautiful ! Making one immediately recall those two gross bloggers who went to work for John Edwards. "Hot and sticky," yum, yum !" That's OK by Debra, I suppose.
Tumb,You are gross.If I see y
June 4, 2007 - 20:28 ET by BlondeTumb,
You are gross.
If I see you on the beach, you'd better RUN!
Tumbler is still stalking y
June 4, 2007 - 20:30 ET by Free StinkerTumbler is still stalking you, as we can all see.
No kidding, Free.But if I eve
June 4, 2007 - 20:34 ET by BlondeNo kidding, Free.
But if I ever catch him...he better look out.
We BLONDE types take this silly stuff kind of personally!
Plus, I've been workig out a bit. My roundabout kick has a bit of "punch" (so the instructor says) to it! LOL!
Old school morons such as B
June 4, 2007 - 20:37 ET by Free StinkerOld school morons such as Bumbler have never caught on to the fact that Modern Women can defend themselves. Well, he may catch on, the hard way. ;-)
Free,You have no idea....I'd
June 4, 2007 - 20:46 ET by BlondeFree,
You have no idea....I'd love to land a roundhouse right legged stab at this ASSHOLE.
That is kind of a sad thing for me to say...except for the fact that I never allow anyone to defend me, other than me!
I'd love to personally kick Tumbler's ass, and BTW, physically.
The conceptual goes without saying....but, oh, how I would love to see this "diplomat" beat on a girl....I'd kick his ass, personally. Any day of the week.
OK TUMB, I know you're going to freak over my challenge.
So come on down to Florida. I'll be happy to kick your illegal immigrant ass out into the Carribean. And we can invite all of the NB's here to watch.
Are you up for it, Tumb?
Blonde,So come on down to Flo
June 4, 2007 - 21:51 ET by Dave RBlonde,
So come on down to Florida. I'll be happy to kick your illegal immigrant ass out into the Carribean. And we can invite all of the NB's here to watch.
ROFLMAO-Remind me never to get on your bad side. :-O
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
her grossness lets on
June 4, 2007 - 23:42 ET by tumblerHer Grossness the Baroness of Corpulence is ticked off. Wants to get physical;
personally kick Tumbler's ass, and BTW, physically.
I'll buy you the beer, Baroness. Come & get me. HA ! Bring your baggage; 16 trunks full of corsets and boots, 10 more full of anti-aging creams & lotions, and a sack of noodles. And don't forget the cook. (Grunt.)
Blonde, if I didn't know bett
June 5, 2007 - 12:16 ET by Conservative VoiceBlonde, if I didn't know better, I would picture you as a red head ;)
tumbler, What does this have
June 4, 2007 - 20:34 ET bytumbler,
What does this have to do with Mary having other children after Jesus? Sex inside of a marriage is not a sin.
As for the Edwards blog situation, I spoke against that dirty talk too. And actually the blog that is owned by the more nasty of the two women went after me for my stand against homosexuality back before Edwards ever hired them.
I am consistent.
Dirty is dirty, no matter what side does it. And one does NOT have to be a prude in order to NOT like dirty!
Debra...
little debra marshmallow pie
June 4, 2007 - 20:38 ET by tumbler"What does this have to do with Mary having other children after Jesus? Sex inside of a marriage is not a sin."
Only a total loss like you as a Bible scholar would have to ask. "Sex inside of marriage," you're talking about the mother of God ? Imagine ! You could go work for John Edwards with your brains.
Tumbler, You do realize that
June 4, 2007 - 21:04 ET byTumbler,
You do realize that the RCC does not own Mary. Mary is the mother of the body of Jesus Christ. She is not the mother of God. God 'came' here as a man. God has always been. Jesus is God and all that was created was created by Jesus --hence Mary was created by Jesus Christ.
For you to believe that someone saying that Mary had sex to have her other children, is equal to the Edwards bloggers, is not wise. Why? Because God is who puts in His Holy Word that which shows that Jesus had brothers. And God is who chose a woman who was engaged to be married. And God is who said that a woman is to give herself to her husband.
I like you, tumbler, and we can disagree without you going with personal insults. Perhaps if you would realize that Mary is seen as blessed by all true Christians; and stop thinking that the RCC owns her, you may see that to people of my faith-beliefs believe that Mary not having sex with her husband would have been a sin.
Debra...
debra lets on:
June 4, 2007 - 22:45 ET by tumblerShe is the Christian. Nobody but her. She failed to see that Jesus Christ is infinitely holy, and therefore, His holy mother does not go on to do stints as other peoples' mother, after God says she is "Blessed among women." Not for HER sake; for the honor and glory of His Divine Son.
These aren't things I invented. Logic tells a true believer; Christ's holy mother is not a pick-up right after God gives her His only-begotten Son. She has no further physical motherhood on earth; unless you think Jesus is not so important. (Some folks think He isn't.)
Tumbler,Sex in marriage is no
June 4, 2007 - 22:56 ET byTumbler,
Sex in marriage is not dirty, but rather blessed by God. And Mary would have been sinning, had she not had sex with her husband after Jesus was born. Scripture is clear that Joseph knew her not, "till" after Jesus was born. Scripture is also clear that Jesus had brothers. If God had wanted Mary to remain a virgin, He would not have had her marry.
Your belief goes against the word of God, because YOU think sex in a marriage is dirty. Well, God says otherwise.
Sex is like food. If you steal it, it is wrong. If you only have that which is yours, then you can ask God to bless it.
Stop putting your inability to get your mind out of the gutter about sex inside of a marriage, above the word of God.
What Rush did on that show, was dirty. Sex between a husband and wife is not dirty.
Debra...
don't be a fool
June 4, 2007 - 23:55 ET by tumblerDebra, you're talking like a fool, not a minister of God.
I never intimated sex wasn't holy. I say the Mother of God is too HOLY to indulge with a mortal and a sinner after having given birth to GOD. (You deny Jesus is God, apparently.)
Who says sex is dirty ? YOU, not I. -- My wife & I are healthy, we love sex. But God never asked her to become the mother of the Word Incarnate. I wouldn't have been worthy to occupy her bed subsequent to the holiness of her divine child. This is over your head. You took for literal a mention of Jesus' "brethren" and assumed it's on account of Mary went on to have additional children. FALSE. Jesus had NO siblings; although we see His brothers and sisters spoken of in Scripture.
Because you are unable to interpret Scripture, the first thing you think is: OK, Mary had more children. That's an AMATEUR Bible scholar caught in Satan's snare. BRETHREN in the langage of the Bible has more meanings than just siblings. --It means RELATIVES. End of your trip. You shot for the moon & ended up in Cornpone, Tennessee. An ordinary old revival meeting. NO AUTHORITY to preach.
tumbler,Come out of that chur
June 5, 2007 - 00:41 ET bytumbler,
Oh, how sad that you believe man over God.
Good night, Tumbler... May you sleep well and wake up blessed....
Debra...
if you only believed, debra
June 5, 2007 - 02:42 ET by tumblerWe would have no argument at all, Debra;
If you'd ever believed Jesus Christ is All-holy. --And if you believed He is God.
Oh, tumbler,Make not mistake,
June 5, 2007 - 12:12 ET byOh, tumbler,
Make not mistake, I believe that Jesus Christ is Lord God Almighty, The ONLY Holy One, The Risen and ONLY Savior!
And make not mistake, I hope that some day you can say the same.
Debra...
Right on, Tumbler
June 5, 2007 - 12:18 ET by Cool ArrowNone of that coredemptrix nonsense for me either.
For those who do not believe
June 5, 2007 - 12:51 ET byFor those who do not believe that the leaders of the Catholic church teach that Mary is a Co-Redeemer, read this. (This teaching is NOT of God.) ...Debra-------------------------
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Cite This Source
Co-Redemptrix:
In the Roman Catholic faith "the Fifth Marian Dogma" refers to a proposed dogmatic recognition of the Blessed Virgin Mary as Co-Redemptrix.
Mary has already been designated by the Church with four holy attributes (as Mother of God at the Council of Ephesus in 431, as ever Virgin in 649, as immaculately conceived by Pope Pius IX in 1854, and as being assumed into heaven body and soul by Pope Pius XII in 1950); this would be the fifth.
The proposed dogma would hold that "Mary is Co-Redemptrix (Co-operator in the Redemption) by her unique co-operation with God as the Woman, New Eve, Mother of the living. Assumed into heaven, Mary continues this saving office as Advocate and Mediatrix of all grace by her constant intercession to obtain for all men the gifts of salvation. Mary's role is subordinate to and always dependent upon the essential and chief role of her Son."
Some Catholics in the late twentieth century urged Pope John Paul II to infallibly declare Mary Co-Redemptrix, and he actually referred to her as such in a speech in 1985. In the early 1990s Professor Mark Miravalle of the Franciscan University of Steubenville in the United States launched a popular petition to urge Pope John Paul to make such a move. More than six million signatures were gathered from 148 countries, including those of Mother Teresa of Calcutta, Cardinal John O'Connor of New York, 41 other cardinals and 550 bishops. However, such a proposal was also heavily criticised by many Catholics who suggested that only Christ could be a Redeemer and that such an act would drive a wedge in relationships with other apostolic tradition Christian faiths, notably the Eastern Orthodox Church and Anglicanism, neither of whom would accept such a designation. Though both Pope Pius XI in 1935 and Pope John Paul II himself in 1985 did use the word co-redemptrix to refer to Mary, no formal infallible dogma supporting such a designation has been issued, notwithstanding the petition.
(Also, did you notice that some believe that they can petition a pope to change the things of God? God's Word is the same yesterday, today, and forever --it does not change because some man gives into a pressure.) ----Debra
What's this got to do with
June 5, 2007 - 13:57 ET by MightyMouthWhat's this got to do with Rush and chicks in bikinis?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Absolutely nothing MM.As usua
June 5, 2007 - 14:01 ET by bigtimerAbsolutely nothing MM.
As usual.
hey - just tuned in a short while ago--
June 5, 2007 - 14:11 ET by misterbillhey - just tuned in a short while ago--I can see that once again the Tumbler/Debra "we hate everyone who is not of our faith" debate has started again. I spend about 1/4 the time I used to because of them. I am going to jump off to a site that discussed the current happenings in the news. If those two prejudiced biogoted fools are still gioing at it when I next come back, wlell I will make them both happy by spending less and less time here. Get a life you two obdurate, know-it-all fools!
The editors of this site are TOO nice, more than they should be.
the spoiled mister boil:
June 5, 2007 - 17:44 ET by tumbler"hey - just tuned in a short while ago--I can see that once again the Tumbler/Debra "we hate everyone who is not of our faith" debate has started again. I spend about 1/4 the time I used to because of them. I am going to jump off to a site that discussed the current happenings in the news. If those two prejudiced biogoted fools are still gioing at it when I next come back, wlell I will make them both happy by spending less and less time here."
WHY do you insist on lying ? I have no hatred for any soul at ALL; I pray for every sinner's conversion, even YOURS.
It's to be expected that not everyone is of my faith. What's extraordinary is YOU, who are ostensibly Catholic have descended into habitual lying and petty hatreds, against another believer. You make your hatred well-known; there's no qualifying message behind any of your verbal silliness. When you make malicious accusations, at least cover your @ss. Your own hatred is showing. If you don't like religious discussions, pick the day you're LEAVING; I sure won't stop you. It'll be refreshing never again to see your bombast.
You got the wrong person Eug
June 5, 2007 - 17:57 ET by bigtimerYou got the wrong person Eugene....
It'll be refreshing never again to see your bombast.
This means you.
MM, blogging is the internet
June 5, 2007 - 18:17 ET by vrwc13MM, blogging is the internet game of "telephone". Remember that?
BTW, they were talking about sex just above, kind of ties in with Rush and two gals in bikinis.
Yeah, logic, reason, facts play less of a role now in the way we make decisions in America. – Al Gore
debra I hate to tell you:
June 5, 2007 - 17:33 ET by tumblerTo give any view of the Catholic faith by finding it first in Wikipedia is not a valid try. You LOSE. Go to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Don't try to lob off falsehoods you dig up in the trash.
There is enough in Catholic doctrine already to blow you out of the water. ONE Redeemer came to save humankind. Jesus Christ. That is an article of belief. We haven't EVER been taught otherwise. We know that Christ's holy mother co-operated fully with the Will of the Father; she consented freely to become the mother of Our Redeemer. In that sense it can be said she is in act word and deed a contributor to the divine redemption of all men. Her faith in God made it come to pass, according to God's Will.
But since she herself is NOT divine, only human in body and soul, she could've died TEN times, on ten crosses and never have redeemed anybody. Her SON is divine; hence, He is Our Redeemer. THAT'S the official doctrine of the Catholic Church, infallible as always. Nice try, you failed.
tumbler,I have shown you from
June 5, 2007 - 18:12 ET bytumbler,
I have shown you from your Catholic church doctrine a number of times already. I have shown you enough to open a blind man's eyes. Until you want the truth, you will not receive the truth.
Have a blessed night, tumbler,
Debra...
Logic tells a true belie
June 4, 2007 - 23:05 ET by Free StinkerLogic tells a true believer;
I guess you're discounting what the Bible has to say, eh Tumbler?
Debra,Tumbler is a moron.
June 4, 2007 - 20:41 ET by Free StinkerDebra,
Tumbler is a moron. Don't try to make any sense out of what he says.
Tumbler and Debra need to go
June 4, 2007 - 20:47 ET by bigtimerTumbler and Debra need to go to their on thread created by Dave R...just for the pair.
This was a fun thread...earlier.
Yep, Bravo!
June 4, 2007 - 20:58 ET by BlondeYep, Bravo!
You are not provoking a fig
June 5, 2007 - 01:22 ET by Ken ShepherdYou are not provoking a fight on the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary in this thread, tumbler, c'mon.
And you most certainly are not going to compare people who don't believe that doctrine with gross blasphemers like Marcotte.
Watch yourself.
dear ken shephard:
June 5, 2007 - 03:09 ET by tumblerI know this isn't the place; we'd never come to any agreement.
That's mainly the point of my challenge. Debra objected to a secular offense on the part of Rush Limbaugh; but on her own part is flagrantly annoying to faithful Catholics in some other threads. If this thread is open to her petty musings, let's play fair. --We'll challenge her scriptural nonsense. Do you think Mary the mother of Jesus is less important than Rush, or some pretend minister in this gathering ? Yes, I see blasphemers as they present themselves; I don't look for them.
come on tumbler, let it rest.
June 5, 2007 - 03:34 ET by Conservative Voicecome on tumbler, let it rest...there is no need to prod Debra on this..why provoke it? Stay on topic.
I'm Sorry But Blonde Was Just Too Funny...
June 4, 2007 - 20:23 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasSmith...I am sorry but Blonde was just too blasted funny there. A tent! Hahahahahahahaha!
Yes, the sanctimony with Smith is unbearable sometimes but that is what you get with Charismanical/Pentecostal/Fundamentalist/King James onlyism cult types. Yes she is quite sincere, but out of touch with the realities of the human condition.
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
Guy Arthur Thomas,I am quite
June 4, 2007 - 20:45 ET byGuy Arthur Thomas,
I am quite in touch with the 'human condition,' probably more than most here are. I also know that people can be anything they want to be online. Normally the ones who boast the most are the ones who tote a rear the size of Montana.
See? I can do funny. Yep, funny is doable for me.
:o)
Sorry, not.Not funny.O:(
June 4, 2007 - 20:59 ET by BlondeSorry, not.
Not funny.
O:(
Montana...boast....whoaaaa th
June 4, 2007 - 21:00 ET by bigtimerMontana...boast....whoaaaa there Debra..hope you weren't referring to me.
I haven't boasted about my attributes...or lack thereof.
I will say this....from your pictures you have liked to display of yourself I am about your size frame wise...and about 5'7.
I ws talking about lightening up some....Rush didn't mean to offend most people,went out of his way to say as such, you are way to sensitive in my opinion.
A book I recommend...How To
June 4, 2007 - 21:07 ET by Conservative VoiceA book I recommend...How To Win Friends and Influence People
In Debra's defense,
June 4, 2007 - 20:51 ET by Conservative VoiceIn Debra's defense,
I know she isn't a prude...I can't remember what she wrote...but a year ago she has written an article about what girls wear and what not...and in that article she was with you Blonde.
tumbler, what in the heck are you smoking? Sheesh leave it be, no need to turn this into a religion fight.
And while I think we should promote more modesty...I thought it was funny. Maybe its because I'm a mind numb robot for Rush. Rush was being Rush, by no means was he being close to Howard Stern.
I don't get it Debra. You'v
June 4, 2007 - 21:07 ET by tracheostomyI don't get it Debra. You've featured multiple pics of some Playboy Playmate triplets featured on your website wearing nothing more than "censored" bars to make your bizarre association with Dr. Phil and porn.
When I asked you to take 'em down because I personally found them too racy for a "Christian website", you just laughed and thought I was joking.
Explain that. Is this about showing skin in general, or about how it's delivered?
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
"Bizarre association wit
June 4, 2007 - 22:27 ET by"Bizarre association with Dr. Phil and porn?" PJ?
PJ, how about you read what was on the page instead of just looking at the pictures? The one triplet is Dr. Phil's daughter-in-law. And Dr. Phil was the best man at the wedding.
And I was very clear on this thread, that I am fine with two piece bathing suits. It was what was being said, done, and implied, that was tacky of Rush.
Debra...
Tactful answer Debra, but non
June 5, 2007 - 01:38 ET by tracheostomyTactful answer Debra, but nonetheless evasive in a clear-cut case of "tit for tat". . .
I find it rather "tacky" that you:
(a.) Feel the need to post fourteen barely-sanitized nude photos (42 counting each individual triplet) on a so-called "Christian website", to further your moralist agenda while pointing fingers at Rush's exploitive Benny-Hill methods.
(b.) Accuse Dr. Phil of hypocrisy when he has no control over the woman his grown-up adult son chose to marry.
(c.) Spin such a creative web of implied accusation spanning everything from incest to pedophilia when no one's even been arrested.
(d.) Imply that every single member of your family will become perfect adults by comparison.
Don't forget that holy scripture also called Lot righteous. Mind your own log woman, and roll the stumbling block off your so-called "Christian site".
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
PJ?(a) You counted the pictur
June 5, 2007 - 16:08 ET byPJ?
(a) You counted the pictures? Goodness, PJ, you need a hobby.
(b) Dr. Phil was the best man; this along with statements made by Phil showed that Phil was all for the wedding taking place and saw nothing wrong with what his daughter-in-law does with her two sisters.
(c) There was nothing 'implied' on that page, it is all quite clear. I didn't exactly hold back on what I posted. I posted facts and actually added very little of my own thoughts on the issue.
(d) I did not even mention my children on that page. But, if you would like, I will be more than happy to tell you how my kids have turned out. Would you like?
And if you have a problem with the page, you don't have to keep looking at it.
Debra...
See Deb. See Deb blow me of
June 5, 2007 - 17:14 ET by tracheostomySee Deb. See Deb blow me off.
(b) Dr. Phil was the best man; this along with statements made by Phil showed that Phil was all for the wedding taking place and saw nothing wrong with what his daughter-in-law does with her two sisters.
IT'S NOT HIS PLACE TO!!! His son is a grown adult and is responsible for his own decisions!
Furthermore, if Dr. Phil did express any disappointment, do you think that it would be made public? No! You're upset because you think he should have publicly condemned his own son. This is a private family matter.
(c) There was nothing 'implied' on that page, it is all quite clear. I didn't exactly hold back on what I posted. I posted facts and actually added very little of my own thoughts on the issue.
It is implied, because there is ZERO evidence to the accusations you have made. You put up Dr. Phil's links on incest and child abuse, and then go on to imply that he approves of the same! All of this comes with as stated before, no evidence of such hypocritical approval on the part of Dr. Phil.
(d) I did not even mention my children on that page. But, if you would like, I will be more than happy to tell you how my kids have turned out. Would you like?
It is clearly a webpage making a judgemental comparison about your approval of another parent based on a hyperinflated legalistic standard.
Do you have children over the age of 18? If so, I wonder what they're hiding from the likes of you.
And if you have a problem with the page, you don't have to keep looking at it.
Oh, but you would have no idea what my problem is with your page, would you? Keep playing dumb there, Deb.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
PJ, If Dr. Phil was against t
June 5, 2007 - 18:35 ET byPJ,
If Dr. Phil was against the wedding, even just in private, he would not have been best man for that wedding and he would not speak well of it. hmm... unless he is more of a hypocrite than his public actions show him to be. And yes, the evidence is all there, which is why the page has had thousands of hits on it.
I have two young adult daughters who will be 21 and 18 this fall. I home schooled both of my daughters. My youngest just graduated and will begin college this fall. My oldest just completed her 3rd year as a 4.0 biochemistry major at college --she has won numerous awards and scholarships, her most recent being receiving the most prestigious under-graduate scholarship award in America that was founded by Congress. Both of my daughters are well behaved young ladies of the Lord.
All glory goes to God, that my daughters have turned out well. Could either or both of them ever go bad? No. Why? Because God says that if we train up children the way they should go, when they are older they shall not depart. But, could they 'do' wrong? Of course. We all do wrong. But, I would not be a mother who said 'doing wrong' is 'okay' when my kid is doing it. When a parent loves a child, the parent stands up to the child, when needed and corrects that child.
All Christians mess up. But when we see a person claiming to be Christian, but practicing sin, that person is not a true Christian. There is a difference between sinning and practicing sin. Paul sinned, but did not want to sin. One person sins and repents (which includes change), another sins and does not want to stop sinning.
As for your "problem" with the page: I suggest you have your mother put child filters on your computer that block everything but Big Bird.
Debra...