Appearing on last Sunday’s "Reliable Sources," "Good Morning America" co-host Robin Roberts provided a look into the secular world of America’s newsrooms. She told CNN host Howard Kurtz that although her faith is very important, she admitted to, in the past, being "very fearful" about discussing religion on GMA. Prompted to explain why, the ABC anchor elaborated:
Robin Roberts: "Because, because you don't do that. You don't let – You're not supposed to, we're not supposed to talk about faith. We're not supposed to let people-- I bought into that."
Mr. Kurtz also asked Roberts about a late March town hall meeting with Hillary Clinton that ABC televised. According to the GMA anchor, the reason there’s been no follow-up event with any of the Republican candidates is because Clinton has thus far been the only one to respond. She also explained why the ABC program allowed the New York Senator to pick the topic for discussion:
Howard Kurtz: : "Why leave that up to the candidates? Why not decide what you want to discuss?"
Robin Roberts: "Well, we have a play in it, but we want them to be able to have a say in what they want to do, because so many times now -- and you know this -- it's sound bites. It's all sound bites. And how can a viewer, who's a voter, make a decision, if always you're hearing in sound bites? So, we want to be able to give them the forum to be able to talk in full sentences -- not so much our questions, but questions from the viewers and what they want to discuss."
There's no doubt that Mrs. Clinton talked in full sentences. In a previous blog, I discussed how the 26 minutes of air time given over to Clinton amounted to a campaign infomercial. Roberts allowed the Senator to talk unchallenged and uninterrupted for 18 of those 26 minutes. It will certainly be interesting to see if a Republican contender is permitted to give what amounts to an extended speech at a future GMA town hall meeting. (That assumes, of course, that there are any additional ABC-sponsored events.)
And on the subject of letting the candidates to pick their own topics, apparently that extended to allowing Clinton to pack the audience with supporters. I noted at the time the oddity of how a member of Mrs. Clinton’s 1993 health care task force just happened to be in the audience:
Robin Roberts: [to Clinton, regarding health care]"What you said then in, in ‘93, many people felt it was just, in some ways, ahead of its, ahead of its time. Somebody that was there, and wants to ask you what is different now, between what happened then, and he is Dr. Steve Eckstat. He is, he works at the free clinic of Iowa. Doctor?"
A partial transcript of Mrs. Roberts’ interview, which aired on "Reliable Sources" at 10:38am on May 27, follows:
Howard Kurtz: "Some weeks ago, you conducted a town hall meeting in Iowa, in which Hillary Clinton talked about health care. Didn't do great in the ratings. Will you do more of those?"
Robin Roberts: "Absolutely. We've extended invitations to all the top candidates, and we're waiting for them to respond. She was the first one to do that. We let them also decide what it is they want to discuss. We were a bit surprised that Senator Clinton said, ‘I want to talk about health care.’ So–"
Kurtz: "Why leave that up to the candidates? Why not decide what you want to discuss?"
Roberts: "Well, we have a play in it, but we want them to be able to have a say in what they want to do, because so many times now -- and you know this -- it's sound bites. It's all sound bites. And how can a viewer, who's a voter, make a decision, if always you're hearing in sound bites? So, we want to be able to give them the forum to be able to talk in full sentences -- not so much our questions, but questions from the viewers and what they want to discuss."
10:44
Kurtz: "You write in your book that religion is very important to you, personally. What kind of job do you think the media do covering religion?"
Roberts: "I think we are better at doing that. I think that we're more open about talking about faith and religion. And I think, again, it's because people respond to that. I was very fearful the first time that I did something talking about my faith. And it was a simple piece about morning routines, things that we do in the morning."
Kurtz: "Why fearful?"Roberts: "Because, because you don't do that. You don't let – You're not supposed to, we're not supposed to talk about faith. We're not supposed to let people -- I bought into that."
Kurtz: "Yes."
Roberts: "And so, we did the piece. And the producer said, ‘No, this is very authentic. You're not trying to impress anybody here. This is your authentic self. Let's air this.’ And it was a prayer that I say every morning. That was about seven years ago. I'm telling you the truth. Barely a week has gone by that someone hasn't asked for that prayer."
Kurtz: "Still?"
Roberts: "Still. That, you know, that much time later. But I remember that distinctly. I was, like, oh, I don't know if I should do that. I don't think – That's just not what you're supposed to do, but have become more comfortable with doing it since."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Is Robin and John married??
June 2, 2007 - 17:38 ET by charlietexasIs Robin and John married???
Just a question
Ah yes, media whores come t
June 2, 2007 - 18:21 ET by RackieAh yes, media whores come to confession. What a sorry sight in deed.
sound bites
June 2, 2007 - 18:27 ET by m1xramRobin Roberts: "Well, we have a play in it, but we want them to be able to have a say in what they want to do, because so many times now -- and you know this -- it's sound bites. It's all sound bites. And how can a viewer, who's a voter, make a decision, if always you're hearing in sound bites? So, we want to be able to give them the forum to be able to talk in full sentences -- not so much our questions, but questions from the viewers and what they want to discuss."
I don't know about you but this staggers me. Roberts believes that the Democratic Candidates are incapable of "talking in full sentences" when the topic is unrehearsed. What will they do when they have a country to run? Wait.. the terrorists are trying to kill us, let's conduct a poll. Oh yeah, that's what they're doing now.
Maybe Roberts would be more comfortable with them as short order cooks, doing simple tasks with instructions, I know I would.
m1xram
You should have heard Bill Cl
June 2, 2007 - 22:14 ET byYou should have heard Bill Clinton's "Speech" at my oldest daughter's college.
He spoke on how only 10% of our person is different from others, that 90% of our make-up is the same as everyone else. Seriously.... He must have finally ran out of things to talk about.
He went on to say how people (and he included himself) concentrate all too often on that little 10% that we are different.
hmm...
Clearly our morals, credibility and ability to tell the truth, must lie within that 10%.
Debra...
Oh, and they gave him an honorary degree. Yes, they must have felt bad for the one he pretty much lost, when he was disbarred. However, he refused to wear the cap. Some women wondered if he was wearing a wig piece.
:o)
Three short comments: 1.
June 2, 2007 - 22:38 ET by m4ster chiefThree short comments:
1. I am a former newspaper reporter/staff writer. It was a matter of professional pride with me to control the interview; I asked fair questions, and let the answers fall where they may...that is what a good journalist does.
2. One doesn't have to flaunt their religious preferences and beliefs when interacting with others. But to take pains to avoid the subject, steer the conversation away from the subject, or to be ashamed of the subject...could be interpreted by God as being ashamed of Him...and the Bible speaks of that. Paraphrased...if you are ashamed of Me in front of men, I will be ashamed of you when you stand before the Father. And we WILL stand before God! Remember..."Every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess, that Jesus Christ is Lord."
3. As for "the prayer" she has said every day for the last seven years...the Scriptures specifically address that when they say to "...avoid vain repetitions." I'm not trying to judge her and/or her prayer life...just commenting on her statements.
Just my opinion.
Poor Robin.
June 3, 2007 - 08:38 ET by c5thenShe's been scared into being afraid to discuss, show or admit to her religious beliefs. "You don't do that..." No, Robin, that is EXACTLY what you are supposed to do. How else are people going to hear about the Good News. Unlike Judaism, Christianity is not supposed to be a private club, it's open to all who will believe and follow.
And....giving one candidate an extended time to discuss their views uninterrupted without extending the courtesy to any others is a campaign contribution in my opinion. Unless all the others are offered the same thing (from both parties), then ABC and GMA should get fined by the FEC.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
I actually like Robin quite a
June 3, 2007 - 10:44 ET by Rastus03I actually like Robin quite a lot and feel she is one of the few in the MSM who do not automatically think that believers are morons. She interviewed Pat Robertson a few months ago and treated him more than fair, IMO. Very kind and considerate.
It does have to be difficult to know where to draw the line on this kind of situation, and I challenge those of you who would be critical of her uncertainty to commence hitting the street corners of your local town/city, stand on a box and declare loudly the message of Christ to those passing by. If you do not, then by your own words you are ashamed of your faith.
She should not be expected to declare her faith on her job any more than the rest of us, and I see in her the spirit of Christ, which is more than I can say for some who want to get in people's faces with their religiosity.
She is still a young Christian
June 3, 2007 - 10:58 ET by c5thenRight, because Yahushua (Jesus) was such a private and "keep-to-himself" type of person. He never challenged the authorities on issues that related to his faith.
Robin is still young in her faith because, according to her own statements, she allowed herself to be intimidated into keeping her faith hidden. She will eventually reach a point in her growing faith, hopefully, where she realizes that just being who you are and following scripture is more important by an infinite amount than conforming to what other people would have you do.
The fact that she was afraid to reveal it is testiment to the bigotry and prejudice that exists in the MSM news rooms and editorial offices.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
So which street corner will y
June 3, 2007 - 11:03 ET by Rastus03So which street corner will you be declaring your love for Christ on this week?
I want to join you.
Roberts and so many others in
June 3, 2007 - 13:10 ET by iveseenitallRoberts and so many others in the MSM are living proof of the results of affirmative action. Good or bad? Make up your own mind.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Quite an assumption to make c
June 3, 2007 - 22:46 ET by Rastus03Quite an assumption to make considering none of us knows the minds and hearts of all the people who have hired Robin over the years.
I happen to believe she is very good at what she does and would like to think she has earned the right with hard work and determination.
If you have some specific information you would like to lay on the rest of us let 'er rip.
I agree with you, I do not
June 3, 2007 - 22:50 ET by amberI agree with you, I do not think affirmative action had anything to do with her getting hired and getting to where she is, but this is one problem with affirmative action, it is racist and any black person who gets a job will never know if they got it because they were the best or just because of their skin. If I were a black woman, I would be insulted by affirmative action, I would be insulted that, because of it, my credentials and intelligence would always be called into question.
I agree with you, Amber. That
June 4, 2007 - 08:28 ET by Rastus03I agree with you, Amber. That "program" has done more to call into question the qualifications of good people than any other good thing it may have accomplished.
And while I am reticent to assume, like others, that she is absolutely a product of AA, I am equally reluctant to say with any degree of certainty that she is not.
We just simply do not know.
Ever notice that Blacks/Africans get the ok for faith but...
June 3, 2007 - 13:29 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasI have noticed that by in large blacks/Africans are given the green light to not only discuss faith but preach it and demand it integrated into culture while whites with the same Lord but possibly not always the same theological conclusions are treated with suspicion and contempt when their faith is spoken of with such exuberance and necessity.
Truth be told I will tell you why that is. There is a perception that faith is generally for the intellectually inferior or emotionally unstable and blacks/Africans are perceived this way so it is expected (hey I am not saying I agree or disagree with the general perception I believe exists, just reporting it as such). And while there are exceptions to this rule they are far and few in between.
Take T.D. Jakes for example. Now in reality he is a horrid Bible teacher whose doctrines barely include the gospel and quickly depart into socialism, pop-psychologoy, pop-theology and dramatics. He is received and entertained by the MsM (and has been on CNN) as a man of faith. He is given the freedom, without criticism, to preach and impose his faith. But after Jakes gets down from the pulpit mind you the folks as CNN and the rest of the MsM aren't REALLY interested in his prescription, they are simply appeasing the loud black man.
The same with Robin. She is black and so faith is expected from her and she is being appeased. No one is really interested in the integration of faith and career by her. They are humoring her and relieving themselves of the possibility of some form of claim by a potentially loud black person of stifling black faith. All this fear she talks of is real I am sure because of course they are her feelings. But Robin need not worry. She is a woman and black and of course the most susceptible to "voodoo" because in the end the MsM views it as just that, voodoo and usually that is how many blacks/Africans practice their Christianity anyway.
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
I have noticed that by in lar
June 3, 2007 - 13:43 ET by balboaI have noticed that by in large blacks/Africans are given the green light to not only discuss faith but preach it and demand it integrated into culture while whites with the same Lord but possibly not always the same theological conclusions are treated with suspicion and contempt when their faith is spoken of with such exuberance and necessity.
You can thank Falwell, Robertson, Tammy Faye, Jim Bakker, TV evangelists, etc., for that.
You can add Jackson, Sharpton
June 3, 2007 - 13:49 ET by sarcasmoYou can add Jackson, Sharpton, and a few others to that list.
JMR
Well balbozo...
June 3, 2007 - 14:04 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasWell balbozo...at least you are consistent with one thing...missing the point. Next please!
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
My answer beats the hell out
June 3, 2007 - 14:39 ET by balboaMy answer beats the hell out of yours.
Yes we know balbozo...
June 3, 2007 - 15:02 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasWe all know balbozo with libs like you it is always about an answering competition in your mind and not the facts. Next please!
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
No one said anything about a
June 3, 2007 - 15:06 ET by balboaNo one said anything about a competition. Simply mine makes more sense than your theory about religious people being perceived as "less intelligent."
balbozo, balbozo, ever the ignorant lib.
June 3, 2007 - 16:25 ET by Guy Arthur Thomasbalbozo, balbozo, ever the ignorant lib. You are the one that approached it as a competition. Allow me to quote your own words:
"balboa Says:
June 3, 2007 - 14:39
My answer beats the hell out of yours."
That, my simpleton friend, is your making it a competition. One cannot "beat" another (even in the imaginations of your wanting mind) without the context of competition. Gawd you libs love stupidity. Next please!
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
Wow...you're super smart, are
June 3, 2007 - 19:37 ET by balboaWow...you're super smart, aren't you.