Reporting how President Bush “called on 15 other nations to join the U.S. in taking new steps to reverse climate change” by reducing “greenhouse gas emissions,” the NBC Nightly News demonstrated how caving in to liberal demands will not generate positive press coverage as NBC focused on those who complained Bush's plan “doesn't go far enough.” From Chicago, anchor Brian Williams marveled Thursday night at how “President Bush today underwent something of a conversion. He called for new action on global warming, something he resisted doing for a long time.” Williams proceeded to devote an entire report to how “the reaction to the President's global warming speech today was cold in some quarters.” Anne Thompson, identified as NBC's “chief environmental correspondent,” relayed how “environmental leaders I talked to today certainly weren't impressed. One said it was worse than too little, too late, and several agreed that it was a PR strategy, designed to keep President Bush from looking like an obstructionist at next week's G-8 meeting.”
Of the three broadcast network evening newscasts, NBC was the most aggressive in taking on Bush from the left over global warming.
A partial transcript from the May 31 NBC Nightly News:
BRIAN WILLIAMS: Back in Washington, President Bush today underwent something of a conversion. He called for new action on global warming, something he resisted doing for a long time. In fact, the use of the term global warming has been frowned upon in some quarters of the Bush administration for years. Today the President called on 15 other nations to join the U.S. in taking new steps to reverse climate change. We get more on this story from our chief White House correspondent David Gregory.DAVID GREGORY: Brian, you can imagine that critics are already saying this doesn't go far enough, but this is what is significant -- you've already said it: For the first time, this President has committed the U.S. to lowering the emissions that scientists insist cause global warming. It was an attempt today to end the administration's isolation on climate change. It comes just days before the President will meet allies in Europe who have long criticized the U.S. for failing to join the Kyoto treaty, an international agreement mandating a cap on greenhouse gas emissions....
Gregory ran a soundbite from Bush before moving on to other G-8 matters without including the views of anyone who thinks Bush is going too far. Williams then set up a second report with just the liberal point of view:
BRIAN WILLIAMS: The reaction to the President's global warming speech today was cold in some quarters. We get more on that tonight from NBC News chief environmental correspondent Anne Thompson, who's with us tonight from British Columbia, where she is on assignment. Anne, good evening.ANNE THOMPSON: Good evening, Brian. Environmental leaders I talked to today certainly weren't impressed. One said it was worse than too little, too late, and several agreed that it was a PR strategy, designed to keep President Bush from looking like an obstructionist at next week's G-8 meeting. David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council said that the world is full of lots of international meetings and summits, the question is whether you're ready to lead at home. Environmentalists want the President to get behind legislation that would mandate cuts in greenhouse gas emissions that scientists believe contribute to global warming. The United States is the largest producer of greenhouse gas emissions in the world and environmentalists believe only after the U.S. makes cuts at home can it pressure countries like China and India to do the same. Brian?
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center















Comments Policy
Bush is a little busy right n
May 31, 2007 - 21:12 ET byBush is a little busy right now. But the Democrats aren't doing anything. ...Debra
LESSON LEARNED: Don't ever ca
May 31, 2007 - 21:22 ET by mostlymoderateLESSON LEARNED: Don't ever cave into the enemy. The same goes for Iraq and Iran; fight them until you win. Global Warming, the war in Iraq, etc. have nothing to do with what is right or wrong. Instead, Democrats just vehemently hate G. Bush. I am willing to bet if Bush came up with the ultimate plan for eliminating the troubles in Darfur, Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran, it would NOT be enough for the whinning liberal.
My feeling exactly. Unfort
June 2, 2007 - 18:18 ET by MilesDMy feeling exactly. Unfortunately the President learned this lesson many times with these people. Over and over.
He'll get mocked and hated anyway, should've known that.
Well if we get a pink leftist climate controller, maybe people will look back and think how easy it was just to blame him for their problems. And do nothing constructive except mock him regularly.
Unfortunately a lot of innocent people would suffer (a lot)
including me
Why the hell does Bush always
May 31, 2007 - 22:14 ET by RESTLESS 1Why the hell does Bush always do this. He isn't the only "Republican" to cave like this. The fact that He legitaimizes agw is what pisses me off the most. I am not really bothered by the bias in this piece so much as I am that Bush won't tell the climate change alarmists to f-off.
This is why at this point, I am hoping that Fred Thompson will enter the Presidential race. There has been some noting that He has leaned liberal on certain ideas,(He said He wished he'd voted differently on McCain-Feingold by the way), but I believe He would tell the democrats what's up. We need somebody,ANYBODY, to stand up to these fools in a big hurry.
exactly restless...more frust
May 31, 2007 - 22:23 ET by Conservative Voiceexactly restless...more frustrated with President Bush than I am with the media.
Evening Restless...Same with
May 31, 2007 - 22:28 ET by bigtimerEvening Restless...
Same with him caving into not drilling here in our own country...I have been so disgusted, disappointed...whatever.
I know one thing..I will not vote for anyone who does not believe in being self-depent on our own oil here...we have tons...he should of made it an EO after Katrina with the war and all and made it a National Emergency...
Which it is IMO...we are getting oil from the dictators and terrorists countries.
I am sick to death of the leftist greenies winning...here and world-wide.
We must fight back..it will be at our peril if we don't.
Even Rush has said many times
May 31, 2007 - 22:41 ET by RESTLESS 1Even Rush has said many times that trying to get along with the dems is pointless. I know that He ran as a "uniter, not a divider" but come on. It is too late to think that He will ever come to his senses on this.
Environmentalists want the Pr
May 31, 2007 - 22:22 ET by CapitalismRulesEnvironmentalists want the President to get behind legislation that would mandate cuts in greenhouse gas emissions that scientists believe contribute to global warming.....
Translation: Socialist Hippies want Bush to force the country to wear hemp clothes and have only one child until all humanity can be wiped out and the Antelope can once again rule the planet.
Maybe Bush is as 'stupid as stupid does' - Forest Gump
May 31, 2007 - 22:23 ET by CTIt's been down hill ever since Harriet Myers and now it appears to be picking up speed.
Stephen King?Supreme Court,
May 31, 2007 - 22:25 ET by botgStephen King?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Nah, there was no apostrophe
May 31, 2007 - 22:27 ET by CapitalismRulesNah, there was no apostrophe in the title........
CT editted while we were co
May 31, 2007 - 22:39 ET by botgCT editted while we were commenting
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
......and made a very good po
May 31, 2007 - 22:40 ET by CapitalismRules......and made a very good point to boot.
Possibly but I hold out hope
May 31, 2007 - 22:44 ET by botgPossibly but I hold out hope for Alito
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Robert's and Alito
May 31, 2007 - 22:53 ET by CTI wish the best for both Robert's and Alito yet still curse the ghost of Earl Warren.
True all too true, can you im
May 31, 2007 - 22:59 ET by botgTrue all too true, can you imagine if Gore or Kerry had been nominating the SCOTUS? It's why even knowing Ws globalist tendancies I had to vote. I think now W is just trying to preserve the legacy which is why he's going with the flow on AGW. Of course now the MSM can come out against AGW if only to embarass Bush
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Confused and fumble fingered
May 31, 2007 - 22:46 ET by CTI'm glad that's what it was as I was confused there for a minute!
Carbon Credits Smoke'em if you got'em!
Your original post wasIt'Supr
May 31, 2007 - 22:49 ET by botgYour original post was
It'
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
yeah, I mean I'm for Alito to
May 31, 2007 - 22:51 ET by CapitalismRulesyeah, I mean I'm for Alito too, I was just giving props. Myers was, as the libs like to say....... "swiftboated", ever notice how left can come up with generic terms like that faster than anyone? It's like they can't win on ideas so hey I'll just come up with a catchy term that will dumb-down everything so everyone will like me..., sorry, I'm off topic......
RESTLESS, CV & bt,
May 31, 2007 - 22:54 ET by Dave RRESTLESS, CV & bt,
-And no, I have no idea why this comment popped in way the heck down here!
My problems with W began way back in his first term(though I suspected he was a lib before he was elected in 2000, which was part of why I voted for Harry), when he jumped into the sack with Ted on that hideous education bill. Then there was that prescription drug fiasco, along with many other things I don't feel like getting into right now, and then this hideous immigration cave-in, with W kissing up to Ted yet again.
If I were tasked with coming up with a plan to bankrupt this great country in the shortest possible time, I doubt I could improve much on what this man, and his party, have been doing for the last six years.
Personally, I think we have all been had. Big time.
What scares the hell out of me is that, six months hence, I am going to be here in NB, commenting on the possibility that perhaps Bill Clinton was, in some ways, more conservative than Mr. Bush. Hell, even he saw the kyoto BS for being the economic disaster that it is.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
I will always thank the good
May 31, 2007 - 23:02 ET by bigtimerI will always thank the good Lord for President Bush being elected after 9-11....always.
Please Dave do not even make me think of imagining what it would of been like with a finger in the wind to see which way the polls are blowing Clinton or Gore or Kerry for that matter as President handling this terrible mess President Bush was left with from day one.
He has stood tall and strong so far on defense of this country against those who do want our destruction.
I thank God and our strong brave military for that...and yes President Bush.
The war on terror is the only
May 31, 2007 - 23:10 ET by RESTLESS 1The war on terror is the only thing I can think of right now that I agree with him on. I am glad that Gore wasn't President, but that doesn't excuse him on these other things he has been more than happy to ram down our throats. I was afraid that in 2000 and 2004 that he was simply the lesser of two evils, and it seems I was right.
Rest...I wasn't excusing Pres
May 31, 2007 - 23:31 ET by bigtimerRest...
I wasn't excusing President Bush whatsoever...
I have been just as disappointed, disgusted, mad as everyone else and have said as such here as they happen.
I have also been very thankful and glad he has stood tall against the UN and the terrorists.
Just wanted you to know that.
It is also easy for all of us to say told you so after the fact...we all do it too in our lives at some time or other.
Bt.I didn't mean to come off
May 31, 2007 - 23:46 ET by RESTLESS 1Bt.
I didn't mean to come off as saying I told you so. I was simply stating that I was afraid at the time that he would not stand up for conservativism as we would have hoped. Given the options in these elections, I wouldn't change my votes if I could.
RESTLESS,Glad Al isn't the PO
May 31, 2007 - 23:32 ET by Dave RRESTLESS,
Glad Al isn't the POTUS, too. However, I'm not at all happy with the PC BS that has wormed ints way into our military. I have read more military history than probably 98% of the population, so I know something of which I speak, and it has never been like this. Hell, after the defeat of Germany, we had soldiers who were ordered to shoot known NAZIs on sight!
I am getting really, really tired of hearing about our brave soldiers being court-martialed right and left for doing what they are being paid to do, killing the enemy, and don't even get me started on the Border Patrol agent stuff.
Something smells here.
Right now, I'm giving GWB a C- as CIC.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
I hear you, the only hope for
June 1, 2007 - 00:07 ET by Conservative VoiceI hear you, the only hope for the republicans in Congress is if they do not sign this amnesty bill. There are more seats up for re-election in the Senate that are Republican then Democrat...something like 2-1, so be prepared to lose the Senate...especially if they continue to out liberal the liberals.
As far as President Bush is concerned...the only good he has done is lower taxes, judges and the war...and he was a far better cry over Gore or Kerry. But I will go third party if the republicans don't shape up.
In future years you will than
May 31, 2007 - 23:38 ET by NL207In future years you will thank God Bush appointed Roberts and Alito.
Won't make a difference if Hi
May 31, 2007 - 23:46 ET by botgWon't make a difference if Hillary gets to appoint two
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Hillary will never be preside
May 31, 2007 - 23:49 ET by NL207Hillary will never be president. She won't even capture the Dem nod. Wait and see.
Oh, how I hope you are correc
May 31, 2007 - 23:52 ET by BlondeOh, how I hope you are correct!
He wasn't so much liberal as
May 31, 2007 - 23:03 ET by RESTLESS 1He wasn't so much liberal as he was deferential. I believe the thing with Kennedy was because he wanted to prove to the nation that he could make everone in Washington get along like he thinks he did in Austin. The difference is that a lot of democrats in Texas are conservative compared to D.C. and the coasts.
RESTLESS,Well, if my friend U
May 31, 2007 - 23:13 ET by BlondeRESTLESS,
Well, if my friend Unsane were here, he'd point out that Austin is "Moscow on the Colorado", or somesuch.
But the point is that there are lib cities around....and when we let them (or any of the other liberal idiots) have their way....we (conservatives) lose.
Austin is most definitely lib
May 31, 2007 - 23:19 ET by RESTLESS 1Austin is most definitely liberal, but most of Texas certainly isn't. Reps and members of the house outside of Austin and Dallas remember this on both sides of the aisle.
Blonde,Well, if my friend Uns
May 31, 2007 - 23:36 ET by Dave RBlonde,
Well, if my friend Unsane were here...
(Psst. Me, too, 'cause he knows far more about this stuff than I do!)
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
Hi Blonde I'm go
June 1, 2007 - 00:05 ET by shawn228Hi Blonde
I'm going to bring up a topic you have strong feelings about. June 5th is almost here and from what I have been reading from the msm, it does not look like the judge will let Scooter Libby go free during the appeal process. If this is the case will President Bush do the right thing and have the stones to parden Scooter Libby or will he be too afraid of angering the left?
Москва
June 1, 2007 - 06:45 ET by UnsaneIndeed, Остин = Москва На Колорадо Река. Reading The Economist, Austin's mayor was whining about how his city is the capital of "the most polluted state in the most polluted nation on earth" or somesuch (don't have the article in front of me). Amazing how affluence feeds intense feelings of guilt, isn't it?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Can't agree with you Dave, W
May 31, 2007 - 23:04 ET by botgCan't agree with you Dave, W did not cave on immigration, he just couldn't pursue his views on it with a republican Congress
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
botg,A while back, GWB invite
May 31, 2007 - 23:46 ET by Dave Rbotg,
A while back, GWB invited several well-known radio talk show hosts to the WH for a little pow-wow. Most of what was discussed has never really been made public, but one of the hosts present related this to his audience, one I happen to be a loyal member of.
The President asked them all what they felt was the most important issue among their listeners. All of them named illegal immigration as the one issue foremost on their callers minds. According to Neal Boortz, who was present at the time, Mr Bush seemed very surprised at that answer.
Sadly, what Mr. Bush had to say yesterday about those who oppose this bill sealed the deal for me
As for border security, Mr Bush has had six years to lock that puppy down. The southern border could be closed down probably within 48 hours if the government really wanted to do it. Trust me, we have the technology. What we lack is the will.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
Exactly why I dis-agreed with
May 31, 2007 - 23:53 ET by botgExactly why I dis-agreed with you on the point, this bill is Ws view on the subject. Sure he could have closed the borders. Why send un-armed National Guard to the border?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
What scares the hell out of m
June 1, 2007 - 09:37 ET by dscottWhat scares the hell out of me is that, six months hence, I am going to be here in NB, commenting on the possibility that perhaps Bill Clinton was, in some ways, more conservative than Mr. Bush. Hell, even he saw the kyoto BS for being the economic disaster that it is.
My first reaction was to say heresy, then I toned it down to wash out your mouth with soap, now I'm thinking very perversely you might have a point... This is getting very disappointing, unrestrained immigration, AGW, what next? Universal Health Care??? I shutter to think of it.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
Once again Mr. Bush proves he
May 31, 2007 - 23:36 ET by NL207Once again Mr. Bush proves he is no conservative.
where went the comments?
May 31, 2007 - 23:58 ET by botgMatthew, stop playing around!
June 1, 2007 - 00:00 ET by Dave R*
Yeah, G'night, John Boy!This
June 1, 2007 - 00:07 ET by Dave RYeah, G'night, John Boy!
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
0% approval rate? It’s com
June 1, 2007 - 05:48 ET by USA4freedom0% approval rate? It’s coming. The left will hate you no matter. Bush could hand over the White House keys to Pelosi and they would still hate him.
Now for us, we are starting to hate him as well, “we the people” who put his name on our lawns, donate to the rNC (typo was intentional) work at campaign HQ’s, worked the dam phone banks. “We the people” are now, racist because we don’t want 12M-20M+ people invading our country. Being a burden on our children and grandchildren. Not to forget they are lawbreakers!
I am surprised donations are “only” down 40%! http://hotair.com/ar...
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
USA4,.....we don’t want 12M
June 1, 2007 - 07:48 ET by Dave RUSA4,
.....we don’t want 12M-20M+ people invading our country....
It gets worse when you consider that each of those illegals will be allowed to bring in five more illegals. Personally, I think the government is deliberately low-balling the real number. I believe it is somewhere around 25 mil. Multiply that by five and we are looking at in influx of 125 mil. within ten years.
No culture can absorb that many outsiders in that sort a period of time and remain intact.
George W. Bush has lost his bleepin' mind.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
I agree. I don’t understa
June 1, 2007 - 08:09 ET by USA4freedomI agree.
I don’t understand, I took so many licks for this man when I ran my bar. It was liberal land. And now I feel like I got screwed and no kiss…
Who the hell is going to support him now? The left hates him, we can’t trust him. The MSM is trying to destroy him. I understand there is a part of him being a Christian that wants to help down trodden, but in a few years that down trodden will be OUR KIDS AND GRAND KIDS!!!
Mexico has no problems with enforcing their southern border. But gripes at us for the
same!!
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Bush is gone. He's done. Ju
June 1, 2007 - 06:08 ET by Jack BauerBush is gone. He's done. Sorry, it's painful to admit, but the truth has to be faced. I believe he's a decent man, a Christian man...
but politically it's over when you get editors on the conservative National Review starting to say they too are suffering from BDS.
And just when you think he can't do something dumber than spend the past week insulting the conservatives who worked to get him elected twice, he does just that. (Earth to Bush -- those Swift Boat vets who you dissed turned the election for you.)
Don't underestimate the role the soon to be British ex-Prime Minister, the Socialist Tony Blair has had in this announcement. The scary thing, don't count on this being Bush just playing politics. He means this crap. Apparently his looming legacy no longer includes ANY conservative support. And he could care less.
This is a disaster if implemented.
By the way, the President attacked critics of the amnesty bill by claiming they hadn't read it. Seriously, anyone think President Bush has actually read all 700 pages?
Even better/sadder...
June 1, 2007 - 06:47 ET by UnsaneHas ANY ELECTED OFFICIAL in Washington, DC read all 700 pages of that load of garbage?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
No, but they have all read th
June 1, 2007 - 07:17 ET by NL207No, but they have all read the 4 page Policymaker Summary Reoprt, which is itself a distortion of the 700 page report, which is in turn a distortion of the actual situation.
If so, it might be a first.
June 1, 2007 - 07:23 ET by sarcasmoIf so, it might be a first. Also, I don't get why it's in any way "anti-immigrant" to want to have secure borders, either, especially if you don't mind plenty of (legal) immigrants of any sort coming (to work, that is, and not for the various holy big government programs which are the root of what attracts the wrong people anyway!). It almost seems like Bush wants to hurt his own party, although I find it hard to imagine that's true, with his support for all this unpopular stuff.
JMR
I agree Jack, The last note
June 1, 2007 - 06:58 ET by USA4freedomI agree Jack,
The last note from the RNC I got asking for money I taped a brick to it and dropped it in the mail. I don’t know if they got the note but it made me feel better. My Mom who is a major major contributor has refused to give a cent. She contributed so much that she was invited to many of the Presidtental affairs. That was then, this is now…
I’m soooooooooo piss off I cant see straight.
This could be the death of the Republican Party, as we know it.
It has the look of the perfect storm. You piss off every one that is you base, by calling us dumb or racist, and the Mexicans that come in will not vote for you. You loose them, our donations and us. Wow every leftist dream!
I had a Bush sign in my front yard in very very liberal area of North Jersey.
All the heat I caught supporting him…. Ugh…
I feel like a passenger on the Titanic who is pointing out the ice burg and having the captain yell at me for pointing it out.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
DON'T GIVE IN!
June 1, 2007 - 08:07 ET by PawpawNYou know, we are all beginning to sound like the LEFT. & the MSM is sure we get all the news of what we should think about this, think about that, etc. Well, by doing all the things you say we should do, we are just CAVING IN to the left and letting them take the controls over everything. We start making the changes from within-we go to the local party heads, we get the right people nominated, we work the grassroots, we get out and do it like in the early 90's before '94 election, etc. We don't just sit back and whine about it!
Nope Paw, you're all not star
June 1, 2007 - 08:11 ET by LeonNope Paw, you're all not starting to sound like the left, you're simply showing your true colors.
The Right is a feeble group of fair-weather fans, ready to scapgoat and alienate members at the drop of a hat. It's not surprising because that's exactly what their leaders do. That's the Bush Admin specialty - you're my man until there's a problem, then you're taking the fall alone.
We've seen it time and time again, so it doesn't surprise me that the supporters of such leaders also have a weak backbone.
The Republicans are starting to sound like Philly fans.
Don't you ever tire of the
June 1, 2007 - 08:18 ET by Jack BauerDon't you ever tire of the trite meaningless shite that spews from your every orrifice? Guess not.
Man you are just such an un-nuanced chap who sees everything in sloganizing black and white.
It's all rather pathetic doncha thunk, bizzaro reverse noel?
Diagree with what I've said a
June 1, 2007 - 08:24 ET by LeonDiagree with what I've said all you want. Try to hide the fact that your post was pointless with snarky attacks.
This site is the perfect embodiment of what I said above. People on here bashing Bush this past week, were ready to defend his every action to the death 2 weeks ago.
Bush is the Republican's T.O.
Leon, This only shows we hav
June 1, 2007 - 08:30 ET by USA4freedomLeon,
This only shows we have enough character and that we love this country more then politics.
I would bet every one on here calls themselves:
#1- Patriots
#2- conservatives
#3- Republicans or Libertarians
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Paw I have tried. I have ema
June 1, 2007 - 08:22 ET by USA4freedomPaw
I have tried. I have emailed, the White House, all my members of the Senate, House, the RNC (even the DNC) My NC, Rep. party.
It is as though they saying: the more you fuss and complain the more we will do what we want.
The RNC would send me surveys, I would write on them in red ink: build a fence
I’m not sure what to do. I’m frustrated, We are the people who worked and spend money and time and effort to get him in and now its screw you. I’m really mad.
As for you Leon bite me.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
This could be the death of th
June 1, 2007 - 09:45 ET by dscottThis could be the death of the Republican Party, as we know it.
It has the look of the perfect storm. You piss off every one that is you base, by calling us dumb or racist, and the Mexicans that come in will not vote for you. You loose them, our donations and us. Wow every leftist dream!
The Phoenix shall rise from the ashes, in the meantime encourage the remaining conservative Repub senators and reps to block every piece of legislation or amend them to death to limit the damage to the country. We will take up this issue during the primaries and see if we can derail the nominations of Guiliani, McCain and Romney.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
Man I sure hope so. Thes
June 1, 2007 - 10:29 ET by USA4freedomMan I sure hope so.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Bush and his advisors have royally screwed up.
June 1, 2007 - 07:58 ET by c5thenThey are getting NO praise from the left for flopping in their views (as they should not) and they are allienating their base because of these decisions made for obvious political reasons, not logical or principled ones.
First there was the flop on illegal imigration by allowing amnesty to make it into the bill, now they are flipping on global warming even though more and more data are showing it's all a hyped up crock.
The donations to the RNC are apparently plummeting even though the President is not getting that message. here
Fred Thompson should enter the race as an independant.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
Bush and his crew have only e
June 1, 2007 - 08:06 ET by LeonBush and his crew have only ever cared about themselves and their personal agendas (mainly, big business cash money). Those of us that are rational and not blinded by W infatuation have been saying this for nearly 8 years.
They Bush admin. never cared about Republicans and what they wanted. They just wanted your votes so they said whatever you wanted to hear and you lapped it up. If you disagree, simply look at their track record.
If I was a rabid Bush apologists like most of the Newsbusters have been since I've been reading this site, then I would feel extremely used and abused.
Leonovitch,Believe me, that w
June 1, 2007 - 08:11 ET by Dave RLeonovitch,
Believe me, that will be nothing compared to the used & abused feeling most will have after 8 years of comrade Hillary's regime.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
I don't even know what that m
June 1, 2007 - 08:13 ET by LeonI don't even know what that means.
Did she win the primary while I wasn't paying attention or something?
You will ten years from now.T
June 1, 2007 - 08:18 ET by Dave RYou will ten years from now.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
Right, so she won the primary
June 1, 2007 - 08:27 ET by LeonRight, so she won the primary?
Leonovitch,Her Royal Clintone
June 1, 2007 - 09:53 ET by Dave RLeonovitch,
Her Royal Clintoness did not spend her entire life plotting, lying, scheming, cheating, destroying the lives of others, running over anyone who crossed her and suffering through a sham marriage, only to cave in at the very momment she has her ultimate "triumph" within sight and see it snatched away by an upstart nobody named Barak Hussein Obama. No way that happens. The people occupying the Clinton War Room may be dumb, but they are far from stupid.
Bill Richardson is probably the only one who may give her any trouble at all down the stretch. Al won't run because the beta man doesn't have the stones. Hillary may be riding a little lower in the polls than we have expected, but that doesn't mean she has lost control of a large chunk of her party.
Unless something totally unforseen takes place between now and the next election, I fully expect that Hillary Clinton will be the presidential offering of the Democrat Party for '08. Furthermore, thanks to 50 years of government-school indoctrination and to the serious damage GWB has done to his party as well as the conservative cause, I believe that Hillary Clinton will be the next POTUS.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
The woman is just plain mean
June 1, 2007 - 09:57 ET by NL207The woman is just plain mean spirited. It comes throuigh in everything she does. I am firmly conmvinced the American people will not vote for meaness.
NL207,Her disposition is of n
June 1, 2007 - 10:27 ET by Dave RNL207,
Her disposition is of no concern to her core supporters. The people she is appealing to are those among us who depend on government for their very existence, the wards of the nanny-state, if you will, whose numbers have grown apallingly large over the last forty years.
Most of these people pay little or no federal income taxes, and could not care less how much the rest of us have to pay. As long as they feel they are being taken care of, they would vote for Pee-Wee Herman.
Hillary is pushing all the right buttons in that area.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
Ok, so she hasn't won the pri
June 1, 2007 - 10:00 ET by LeonOk, so she hasn't won the primary. That's what I thought.
Phew! I thought I was way out of the loop.
Wow DaveAll I have hear
June 1, 2007 - 10:06 ET by shawn228Wow Dave
All I have heard on this site is how Hilary does not have a chance to win when she shows her true colors. You are the first anti liberal member of this site that I heard openly say Hillary will be the next POTUS. Do you think she can beat Thompson if he enters the race? Also you said "the next 8 years" I am assumming you think she will be re-elected?
shawn,That is entirely up to
June 1, 2007 - 10:21 ET by Dave Rshawn,
That is entirely up to Fred, as he will get little, if any help from the cheese-burgers who are currently in control of his party.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
DaveR
June 1, 2007 - 10:30 ET by shawn228Thx Dave, Now how about the 2nd half of my question, you think she is going to win, but why are you assuming she will be re-elected?
shawn,If Hillary gets in with
June 1, 2007 - 13:54 ET by Dave Rshawn,
If Hillary gets in with a democrat controlled congress for even two years, the game is up. If the "Fairness Doctrine" hasn't made it into law by then, it will make it under her. (Actually, I'm not entirely sure that Mr. Bush wouldn't sign that hideous piece of speech-chilling garbage into law, given that he signed McCain-Feingold, which was a heinous assault on free-speech that was, curiously, upheld by a so-called "conservative" SCOTUS.)
Besides, looking at the responses of many elected republicans, including Mr. Bush, to the treatment they have received from radio hosts all over the country for their support of the immigration "reform" bill, I would guess many of them would not object to the government stepping in to "stifle the dissent," even if that dissent is coming from their own supporters.
Now, this will not really affect, at first, anyway, those of us who get the bulk of our info from the internet-that will come a little later. When you add the average people out there (those who I refer to as the dumbmASSes) who went through our hideous government schools and haven't a clue what the Constitution is really all about, and who get most of their news from Entertainment Tonight and Inside Edition, then you have a recipe for disaster.
I am now firmly convinced that slightly more than half of the population of this country is scared to death of real freedom and is too ignorant and lazy to survive in a truly free society. The decades of government control of our schools is finally paying off for the dems.
All you have to do is look at the hullabaloo over the recent attempt to permit people to invest just 2% of their Social Security money privately. I saw many interviews with people who would say that they didn't want to have to bother themselves with deciding where to put the money. They wanted the government to do it for them. How sad.
Anyway, I'm straying from the point.
The trick for Hillary will be to moderate herself, as well as the congressional leadership, in order to appear moderate enough to maintain her her party's hold on congress for four years. I believe she can for two reasons in addition to the stupid factor mentioned above:
1)The republican leadership is hopelessly out of touch, as are many members of that party. This can be fixed, but not in four years.
2)The dem congress will be busy ensuring that they never, ever, lose their majority again. Their goal will be to bring about a defeat-proof democrat congress.
They will first institute the afore-mentioned "Fairness Doctrine," which will make accomplishing this task even easier. Then they will set about making their government-dependent core happier and even more dependent than they are now, while expanding entitlement programs to a much larger percentage of the population.
Remember, he who robs Peter to pay Paul can always count on the support of Pual come election day, even if Paul is standing atop the deck of a sinking ship.
They will have no shortage of help from their dogwashers in the media, which will pull out all the stops to aid the dems in this endeavour. Even if the republicans do manage to get their act back together, which I doubt given their actions since the recent mid-terms, it will be too late.
When she gets in for a second time, then we will see the real Hillary. It won't be pretty.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz
Your lack of a grasp of the E
June 1, 2007 - 08:20 ET by UnsaneYour lack of a grasp of the English language is breathtaking, but then, I guess if you did bother to read, it might give you pause from making smartass remarks in a bid to place us all in a nice, neat monolith.
I don't see too many Bush apologists on this site; I actually see people who are quite critical of him quite a bit. I don't approve of all of his policies. Many of us don't...if you bother to take the time to read.
The only thing YOU care about, like most Leftists, is living parasitically off of America's producers, punishing them and stealing from them the entire time (as evidenced by your whining about big business). Those, like me, have been saying that for...considerably longer than eight years.
I can't imagine that there is an economic or political freedom you aren't willing to give to a Big Nanny in Washington, as you ache for a day when the government has 100% complete, direct, total control of your life.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Unsane, you're clearly writin
June 1, 2007 - 08:26 ET by LeonUnsane, you're clearly writing about another site and if you're actually talking about the Newsbusters website then you're lying to my face.
As one example, I remember people on this site admantly fighting to defend Bush's failed Social Security reform. At many different times since its inception.
I don't know if I was defendi
June 1, 2007 - 08:36 ET by mikejI don't know if I was defending Bush's Social Security program but I was very much annoyed and upset that he didn't do a better job trying to get reform pushed thru and letting the Dem's lie their way thru to destroying the bill.
I was for Social Security reform when Clinton brought it up in the late 90's and I was for it again when Bush brought it up a few years ago. Unfortunately there are people like you Leon, that have to look at what party someone is affiliated with before you decide if you agree with them or not, regardless of whether it is good for the country or not.
You have the choice to murder your unborn child because it's your body, but your money, well that's a whole another story. Just let momma Hillary Rob'em Clinton and Daddy Teddy Kennedy take care of it for you Leon, that way you don't have to think and make informed decisions to be a Democratic bling lapdog.
I will repeat this again.. L
June 1, 2007 - 08:39 ET by USA4freedomI will repeat this again..
Leon,
This only shows we have enough character and that we love this country more then politics.
I would bet every one on here calls themselves:
#1- Patriots
#2- conservatives
#3- Republicans or Libertarians
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
I guess "independent and
June 1, 2007 - 08:54 ET by mikejI guess "independent and free thinking" Leon went back to Koz and DU for them to tell him what to say instead of coming up w/idea's of his own.
Leon is a Democrats dream voter. Don't think, just obey what we say and know that politicians know what is better for you than you yourself.
yep. These are the boys
June 1, 2007 - 09:10 ET by USA4freedomyep.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
It doesn't show this at all.
June 1, 2007 - 09:47 ET by LeonIt doesn't show this at all. It merely shows your high level of stubborness and how you have to be beaten over the head with a hammer to finally admit you were wrong / your leaders are wrong.
The last thing it shows is your desire to establish accountability in a timely fashion.
Leon - you are very late to the party
June 1, 2007 - 10:42 ET by misterbillLeon - you are very late to the party--this issue was studied , debated and put to bed a long time ago. My wife and I put some money into a 401k about 20 years ago. Using an average of 6% return today, we would be collecting a much larger income today had we been able to invest our SS money in a 401k instead of SS. We compared on a spreadsheet, starting with the origin date of the 401k and our SS statement showing what we (and our employers) had contributed over the same time period. Democrtas in both the Senate and House, with the aid of AARP, convinced the seniors that if Bush's plan went into effect, their monthly checks would disappear. A false statement. It was fought strictly on the basis that they did not want Bush to succeed.
PS Bush caved--
June 1, 2007 - 10:44 ET by