On Thursday’s "Good Morning America," the ABC program repeated anti-Wal-Mart talking points from the liberal group Wake-up Wal-Mart. Reporter Bianna Golodryga explained that the segment, which discussed recent company woes, was based on a confidential memo given to the network:
Bianna Golodryga: "...Wake-Up Wal-Mart, a union financed group highly critical of the retailer has provided ABC News with a confidential memo from a former ad agency with a dire warning."
The memo, which is six months old and amounts to nothing more than an embarrassing behind the scenes discussion of Wal-Mart’s strategy to market high-end goods, seemed to simply be a pretext for GMA to bash the company. Golodryga piled on, noting that "the leaked memo is just another blow to a company which has experienced its share of blunders this year, ranging from sexual discrimination lawsuits to a recent war of words with a fired ad executive." The segment also featured a representative from the left-wing Wake up Wal-Mart group slamming the company’s "poor values," while having nobody on to defend it:
Chris Kofinis (Dir of Communications, Wake Up Wal-Mart website): "Wal-Mart's biggest challenge right now is its reputation, and it's loss of focus and its, really, it's poor values."
Golodryga closed the report by allowing that many consumers do still have a positive image of Wal- Mart. She also stated, "Now, we must add that this was a 2006 memo. It's an old memo." Then what, exactly, is the relevancy? Or was the point of the story simply to spout liberal talking points?
For more on the relentless media assault on Wal-Mart, head over to the Business and Media Institute’s February 2006 report.
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:17am on May 31, follows:
Elizabeth Vargas: "Now to the world's largest retailer, Wal-Mart, facing a tough morning. The company's high-stacks annual shareholders meeting is getting under way in Arkansas. And at the top of the to-do list, resuscitating Wal-Mart sales which are in a slump. Now a confidential, internal memo leaked to ABC News is adding to Wal-Mart's woes. ABC's Bianna Golodryga is here to explain. Bianna?"
Bianna Golodryga: "Good morning Elizabeth. Well, Wal-Mart is bracing for a rough shareholders meeting. Its sales are down already and some are saying its new strategy of appealing to upscale shoppers may be backfiring. Well, now, Wake-Up Wal-Mart, a union financed group highly critical of the retailer has provided ABC News with a confidential memo from a former ad agency with a dire warning. Do low prices translate to low quality? It's a high-cost question for the retailing giant Wal-Mart. Just last month, the world's largest retailer reported a 3.5 percent plunge in store sales, its worst monthly decline on record. Now, according to the leaked memo from October of 2006, Wal-Mart's ad agency says it knows why sales are off, saying shoppers simply aren't buying a new strategy to offer high-end products along with the chain's traditional low-cost goods. 'When shoppers compare prices,’ says the memo, 'our low prices actually suggest low quality.' The company dismissed the report saying, ‘This particular piece of work is not very useful, not least because it's now completely out of date and in some areas just plain wrong.' The document adds that, while Wal-Mart is still America’s top discount chain, its new strategy has given new opportunities to its competitors."
Patricia Edwards (SR VP, Wentworth Hauser & Violich): "Target, Kohls, JC Penny, they are all eating their lunch at this point."
Golodryga: "The leaked memo is just another blow to a company which has experienced its share of blunders this year, ranging from sexual discrimination lawsuits to a recent war of words with a fired ad executive."
Chris Kofinis (Dir of Communications, Wake Up Wal-Mart website): "Wal-Mart's biggest challenge right now is its reputation, and it's loss of focus and its really, it's poor values."
Golodryga: "The memo does suggest that overall consumers still believe that shopping at Wal Mart does save them time and, more importantly, money. In fact, when asked to compare the retail behemoth to a person, favorable comparisons, such as a handyman or even Uncle Sam come to mind. And now the pressure is on Wal-Mart's CEO Lee Scott to keep shoppers happy. The measure they're giving, don't forget about your core customers who are much more interested in low prices than high priced goods. Now, we must add that this was a 2006 memo. It's an old memo. Wal-Mart is reverting to focusing to the basic three Ps of marketing: Product, placement and prices."
Elizabeth Vargas: "And those shareholders will be interested in all of that."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
What a joke. The Wal-Marts in
May 31, 2007 - 18:15 ET by QueenMumWhat a joke. The Wal-Marts in my part of Ohio are full of customers just about any time of the day, every day of the week. Power to the people.
We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. - Queen Victoria
Silent Bias?
May 31, 2007 - 18:49 ET by acumenExcuse me, I was distracted by a post on Huff-n-puff by Dave Johnson and James Boyce making the case the MRC can't find a single example the media are liberal.
Now what's this about an ABC segment featuring a representative from the left-wing Wake up Wal-Mart group slamming the company’s "poor values," while having nobody on to defend it?
Oh, right, low price equals
May 31, 2007 - 19:29 ET by motherbeltOh, right, low price equals poor quality, which equals "poor values" because Wal Mart shoppers have to settle for less. Well here's a news flash....everyone can't afford top-of-the-line!! So if Wal Mart provides serviceable items at reasonable prices, more power to them!
Wal-Mart makes the middle cla
May 31, 2007 - 19:34 ET by josephsamuelsonWal-Mart makes the middle class lifestyle available to all Americans ... leave it to the Left to seek to harm and destroy what makes prosperity a reality to people.
WalMart = successful, free en
May 31, 2007 - 19:50 ET by VT Con ManWalMart = successful, free enterprise in action.
WalMart = the enemy of the left.
WalMart = the enemy of the MSM.
hmmm.
any large, successful company in our country is automatically a target for the left. WalMart, Big Oil, Auto Companies, Nuclear Power Companies, you name it, if it is big it is the enemy of these socialist, commie outifts(there are of course, occasional exceptions, for a while, if the corp kisses up to the loonies). if shillary ever gets in office (GOD FORBID), they (Corps)will pay dearly, and she is going to TAKE THOSE PROFITS AND>>> sorry, post traumatic stress disorder jolt.
Wind on the Mountain
May 31, 2007 - 19:52 ET by deerjerkydaveThis is just wind on the mountain. The people have voted with their feet and dollars: they love to shop at Walmart.
Golodryga said, "the leaked memo is just another blow to a company..."
PLEASE. If Walmart isn't turning a profit because of these pseudo-scandals then you could call it a blow. Otherwise this is just your anti-Walmart opinion which is worth about as much as a baked potato.
The only thing that I have ag
May 31, 2007 - 21:45 ET by Trix RabbitThe only thing that I have against Wal-Mart is that where they once sold mostly American made goods, they now sell substandard or shoddy Chinese manufactured items.
Having said that, I own 75 shares of Wal-Mart stock. I will purchase more just to spite the pea-brains who cannot or will not understand the free market.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
wal-mart
May 31, 2007 - 22:53 ET by Emma GrumpI flip-flop between Wal-Mart, K-Mart, and the dollar stores when I need stuff. I have found that even the middle group of department stores offer the same imported items that the discounters do, and they cost a lot more. I'd rather buy American, of course, but that is tough today.
I want to thank these looters
June 1, 2007 - 06:49 ET by UnsaneI want to thank these looters (h/t to Ayn Rand) for giving me yet another reason to go shop at Wal-Mart.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Walmart
June 1, 2007 - 09:21 ET by bsmarjMy family loves Walmart, and the more the msm bad mouths them the more often we go.
Speaking of "baked potatoes", they had Russetts on sale, 2 bags for $3.00 last week!
I heard somewhere that Wal-Ma
June 1, 2007 - 10:06 ET by kathleenirishI heard somewhere that Wal-Mart offers their employees a whole lot more than Starbucks, but since Starbucks is part of the beautiful-people's world: you'll never see anything against one of their own.
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
You Are Right
June 1, 2007 - 14:27 ET by deerjerkydavekathleen, you are right. I think it was the disingenuous John Edwards who has been criticizing Walmart's pay wages but had no problem signing books at a Barnes and Noble which has a starting wage that is 50 cents less than Walmart! (source)
Oh yeah, and remember how he had one of his staffers go down to Walmart and cut in line to buy a Playstation 3 just a month or two later? (source)
And he owned stock in Walmart at least up until 2004. (source)
Can anyone say: do as I say, not as I do?
I live in a college town and
June 1, 2007 - 18:52 ET by mostlymoderateI live in a college town and the Wal Mart and Barnes & Noble hire a lot of college kids and even a few high school kids to do the work. When are people going to understand that these jobs are "entry level" jobs. They are not intended for immigrants, they are not intended for slackers that refuse to gain the skills to work elsewhere and they should not be considered an adult-full-time family income! I made less that $8.50 an hour through college and law school. I was happy to get it!!
I love Wal Mart. They won't
June 1, 2007 - 18:20 ET by mostlymoderateI love Wal Mart. They won't sell anything that isn't quality. They also cut out the local businesses that used to "rape" the customer on high mark-ups. I think I will go shopping there right now. :0)
How does the Walmart memo qualify as news?
June 1, 2007 - 21:03 ET by nkviking75Here's the top definition of "news" in American Heritage Dictionary:
"1 a. Information about recent events or happenings, especially as reported by newspapers, periodicals, radio, or television." (Italics mine)
So how exactly is a memo from last year, one which has been circulated for months, news? Let me make it easy. It ain't.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised if a circus breaks out.