The Digg community is notorious for instantly burying stories by conservatives or about conservative-themed issues. Digg seems to be doing something that might help a little; they are banning users who bury stories (as well as those who Digg) without taking the time to read them. (hat tip Hot Air)
An Australian tech blogger named Dan posted a letter on his blog TheWrongAdvices.com from Digg notifying him that his account had been banned for Digging or burying too quickly. Strangely, Dan’s blog account has been suspended and his site is inaccessible, and so, the Righty blogger Weasel Zippers now seems to be the only source to read the email.
Here is the email as posted on Weasel Zippers:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓"Your account was banned for the rate of Digging activity you’ve engaged in. We’ve determined that the time in which your Diggs happen, it isn’t possible to actually read the stories. Please read each and every story before you Digg or bury a story. Once you agree that you will Digg/bury more responsibly and read the stories, we will unban your account".
Digg is a social networking site that allows users to vote up (Digg) a news article or vote it down (bury it). Dan seems to be guilty of “blind digging/burying,” which means that he was voting faster than the time it takes for an average person to read an article. This is possibly an attempt to stop “the bury brigade,” a range of people from individual users to organized users who aggressively bury stories, often for ideological or financial reasons.
As W Zip wrote, it does appear that Digg is using an algorithm to measure the amount of time between a Digger clicking over to a page and either Digging or burying it. If the algorithm determines that the Digger hasn’t spent enough time on the page, then the user could be banned.
Conservative tech blogger Eric Odum documented and explained how this Digging and especially burying behavior is often directed to kill any stories that are from conservative sites or favorable to conservative issues. The anti-terrorism blog Little Green Footballs has experienced this problem before. Odum recommended Digg get rid of the “bury” feature altogether.
Now that Digg is worrying about copyright violations and potential lawsuits resulting from illegal postings of a “crack” for the encryption code for HD-DVD, maybe they are paying attention to unhappy users whose stories are constantly buried by others who simply disagree with the content.
Contact Lynn at tvisgoodforyou2 AT yahoo DOT com


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I think the algorithm is a
May 24, 2007 - 08:25 ET by sarcasmoI think the algorithm is a good idea, but maybe a better one would be an option besides "bury" that just lets people -- left and right -- say "I disagree" or "I agree" rather than "hide this story." Also, TheWrongAdvices can be hit from here, but it yields the following:
Account Suspended
The account owner has been informed regarding this - in case of questions kindly open a support ticket via the control panel.
Best regards,
Your Servage.net
team
but that could be due to lots of things besides this issue.
JMR
Well this is refreshing news
May 24, 2007 - 10:14 ET by bigtimerWell this is refreshing news as I see it, I went to Digg as suggested here by another poster and it is addictive if you let it be like anything, but it got to be extremely frustrating with the articles that were buried.
May go back and try again later this week and see how it is now...thanks for this information Lynn.
Do users have to indicate whe
May 24, 2007 - 10:21 ET by whatajoyDo users have to indicate whether they are conservative or liberal when signing up? Because I doubt Digg measures the time to read the article for liberal users vs. conservative users. Interesting story about a site I've never heard of or will ever visit (now that I know what they are about!).
-------------------------------
CSI Miami
A show so cheesy and lame, it's fun to watch!
http://www.youtube.c...
dunder... No you do not have
May 24, 2007 - 10:41 ET by bigtimerdunder...
No you do not have to indicate what party you are affiliated with.
Anyway I didn't months ago.
I'm not sure why a "left
May 24, 2007 - 13:01 ET by ding7777I'm not sure why a "lefty site" would want to do this since many "conservative sites" are used to rally the liberals and also used to poke fun at the goofiness of righties
.The lefty-sites are just afr
May 24, 2007 - 15:10 ET by whatajoy.The lefty-sites are just afraid of us conservatives. (as well they should be!!)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Take it easy! We're not making a western here.
~ Uncle Junior
Leftist sites
May 27, 2007 - 05:05 ET by AgnosticThey are not afraid of you. They barely acknowledge your existance outside of making fun of your opinions. And thanks to a mostly liberal media they don't have to work very hard to ignore you if they do happen to feel threatened.
Digg
May 27, 2007 - 04:54 ET by securitySomething dramatic must have happened - far, far fewer stories than ever in recent history have been making it to the homepage, and the vote threshold is higher.