AP Article on Edwards and ‘War on Terror’ Ignores Candidate’s Past

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

The Associated Press ran a story Wednesday entitled “Edwards Calls ‘War on Terror’ an Ideological Doctrine” (h/t LGF).

Unfortunately, the author chose not to look into former Sen. John Edwards’ (D-North Carolina) past to see whether the presidential candidate had either referred to or supported this “ideological doctrine” himself.

Had the AP done some homework, it would have found that not only did the former senator tell Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly in October 2001, “I think that we will be united with the President throughout this war on terrorism," (Allah has video here), but also that he and Sen. John Kerry (D-Massachusetts) both referred to this war in their respective acceptance speeches at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.

To set this up, Wednesday’s AP piece began (emphasis added):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards on Wednesday repudiated the notion that there is a "global war on terror," calling it an ideological doctrine advanced by the Bush administration that has strained American military resources and emboldened terrorists.

In a defense policy speech he planned to deliver at the Council on Foreign Relations, Edwards called the war on terror a "bumper sticker" slogan President George W. Bush has used to justify everything from abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad to the invasion of Iraq.

Hmmm. So, if this phrase is just a bumper sticker slogan, why was it in John Kerry’s acceptance speech for presidential nomination at the 2004 DNC:

We will double our Special Forces to conduct terrorist operations, anti-terrorist operations, and we will provide our troops with the newest weapons and technology to save their lives and win the battle. And we will end the backdoor draft of the National Guard and reservists.

[…]

As president, I will fight a smarter, more effective war on terror

The AP must have forgotten this, or certainly it would have reported the apparent hypocrisy. And how about what Edwards said the night before when he accepted the Democrats’ nomination for vice president:

None of us will ever forget where we were on September the 11th. We all share the same terrible images, the towers falling in New York, the Pentagon in flames, a smoldering field in Pennsylvania. We share a profound sadness for the nearly 3,000 lives that were lost.

And as a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I know that we have to do more to fight the war on terrorism and keep the American people safe. We can do that.

[…]

We will always use our military might to keep the American people safe.

And we, John and I, we will have one clear unmistakable message for Al Qaida and these terrorists: You cannot run. You cannot hide. We will destroy you.

Sounds like Edwards was behind this “ideological doctrine” when he was a Senator and a vice presidential candidate, doesn’t it? Yet, now that he’s a presidential candidate, are the press just going to let him make statements today which contradict those he made in the past?

Of course, that last question was rhetorical, although you probably guessed that.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It is amazing that these dumb

It is amazing that these dumb rocks can actually float to the top of the Democrat party's river. Truly muddy waters...

Say it ain't so..... Not Anot

Say it ain't so.....

Not Another leftist Flip-Flopper!

Heart be still!

Typical media....just typical, as long as it is someone with a 'D' behind their name they ignore the facts, pretend it didn't happen and no one else will know if they don't report it...if the same situation were reversed we all know what the msm would be doing of all venues to a republican.

Well what do you expect, he i

Well what do you expect, he is in another election. Last time he was for it and that didn't work, so this time?
I swear these guys are killing me with how stupid they think we are, unfortunately we gave them all the encouragement they needed by electing these morons originally.

What do you mean? The fact is

What do you mean? The fact is that this is what he's saying. We're just reporting the news. History only counts when we can use it against R's.

  Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.

Yep, ABC radio today referrs

Yep, ABC radio today referrs to it as ". . .what President Bush calls, the War on Terror."People at the intersection then saw me screaming at my radio.

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

What else do we seriously exp

What else do we seriously expect of someone who sees capitalism, profit, and Americans making even a penny above per capita income a greater threat to civilization than people who want to KILL us?

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Let's be real here. John Edw

Let's be real here. John Edwards is a documented liar. Let's just have his words juxtaposed to one another on the cover of every magazine and newspaper in the country, like they would be if they were G.W.'s words. Problem for the MSM, is that W has been firm in his principles since he's been in office, and one of the things that the MSM criticizes so often, W's strong Christian faith, is actually the main reason why he's been such a steadfast and brave leader - of a world that demonizes him.

John Edwards' run at the White House should be over now. Not that it really ever began.

John Edwards has completely s

John Edwards has completely sold himself out to the anti-war leftists. And the unions (re: Walmart). He is steeped in hypocrisy, and he believes (as do many of the leftists) that whatever he says today completely obliterates anything he may have said yesterday. He also firmly believes in "Do as I say, not what I do" (his mansion and $55K poverty speeches), as do many other leftests (Al Gore and his energy credits).

How do these people think they are going to get away with it? It's obvious -- they think they can constantly rely upon the MSM to support their lies. What's with people like the AP reporters? Have they all recently received lobotomies?

Noel

Isn't there a chance that John Edwards' opinion on the water has evolved over the years?

Of course boa...he's a leftis

Of course boa...he's a leftist...what more can you expect?

So a conservative's opinions

So a conservative's opinions and thoughts don't ever evolve? Interesting...

Sure they do ... but most l

Sure they do ... but most leftists want to hide the fact that they ever expressed anything that differs from the "in" idea of the moment -- most conservatives will explain to you why they changed their mind (and it isn't because of the most recent ABC/CNN/CBS/MSNBC/NYT/WashPost poll)

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington

The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain

Bal, he is a slip/fall lawyer

Bal, he is a slip/fall lawyer with a wet finger in the air.  He's just like Clinton(s), Lurch and all the rest.  The breck girl is poll driven and will never make a decision without checking a poll.  It's OK for thoughts to evolve but do it because deep down you know it's right, not some groups opinion.  That's why I respect President Bush.

Exactly. President Bush is fi

Exactly. President Bush is firm in his principles, and the MSM hates him for it...then they blame his faith. Just another radical Christian... Balboa, I'm losing hope for you. He went from referring to the war as a perpetual, ongoing struggle to "destroy" all enemy combatants, to actually saying that the war is fiction - created, of course, by the cleverest imbecile to ever be President. He's not having an intelectual or spiritual transformation here; he's lying.

I'm aware that politicians of

I'm aware that politicians often change their opinions for many reasons other than altruistic ones. I'm just not sure that this is ALWAYS the case.

The breck girl is an ambulanc

The breck girl is an ambulance chaser so lying comes easy and he's doing it now.  At the 2004 dem convention Kerry(who was in Vietnam you know) rode in on a boat.  I thought it would have been fitting if Edwards arrived behind an ambulace he was chasing. 

ff...too funny

lol

Of course he is. I think Dann

Of course he is. I think Danny DeVito's character in The Client was based on Edwards' life.

Yeah, the President made it t

Yeah, the President made it the policy of the US to have regime change in Iraq, and therefore he should be impeached. Get a liberal to agree to this, and then tell them it was Clinton in 1998. Buhbubububububuh.....

Radical Christianity is just as dangerous as radical Islam. Let the beheadings begin!

  Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.

Balboa

B,

Sure. If that's the case, then the AP should have brought up his previous position, and addressed the change rather than ignoring it.

Unfortunately, you continually forget that this is a media analysis website. Although I have problems with Edwards' change of heart, and its disingenuity, the issue at hand is how the AP covered it.

Don't you think a good journalist should have examined what Edwards' position was on the "war on terror" before he decided it was just a bumper-sticker slogan? Isn't that indeed newsworthy? Isn't that indeed what an impartial press should do? 

Or, as usual, am I just expecting too much from a literally unfettered industry with more rights and more freedoms than any in our nation?    ns

Noel

Good point. Appreciate the feedback.

Balboa

B,

My pleasure.   ns

the AP should have brought

the AP should have brought up his previous position, and addressed the change rather than ignoring it.--NS

Certainly they should have, but they don't, not with liberals and Democrats. They are even allowed to preface their changes with "I have always said...." and no one questions. Reminds me of a Clinton press secretary Mike McCurry, actually saying to the press at one point, when Clinton's excuses for something or other were continuously "evolving": that explanation is no longer operative.

I think Edwards (or his handl

I think Edwards (or his handlers) believe that the Left --- coached by MoveOn.org, etc. --- is very activated for the '08 Elections, so the Breck Girl has to come out strong on the Left  -- anti-war; no war on terrorism; national heatlh care --- to stake a position clear to the left of Hillary and most of the others, in order to win the significant primaries early. 

It may run against conventional wisdom, but he's in third place in the polls, the primaries are stacked up early in the season, and he has to make it clear that he's the "Not Hillary" choice for the Left, so he has to take some risks.

A deal he can't pass up.

I'm willing to make a deal with John Edwards.

If he wins the Dem nomination I will vote for him, but there is a condition... if he gives away every dime of his fortune to the poor before the general election, I will vote for him!

Having never voted Dem this is a serious deal for me. Now let's see how much he cares for the poor.

Help a wounded soldier here...

http://newsbusters.org/node/12877

CT, he is more than willing t

CT, he is more than willing to give away every dime of your fortune to the poor.  Does that count?

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Hi I'm John Edwards, and if I

Hi I'm John Edwards, and if I'm elected President you can rest assured that I can fight terrorists and my hair will not come out place.  America needs a President with hair that can withstand any and all attacks, even a nuclear war and come out looking great.

In fact, if I'm the President, during the next Hurricane, I will stand out in the gale force winds to show you the power of my hair!

I promise to put limits on the "Big Shampoo" industry and make sure any windfall profits they make go straight to my mansion in North Carolina.

A vote for John Edwards is a vote is a vote to give everyone with Phyllis Diller looking hair a chance!

As I posted yesterday, these

As I posted yesterday, these people are politicians first, with self interests and looking for votes. They will decieve their constituents as these politician lies time and time again. Besides, the democracks and the leftoids can spit lies for convenience sake and to their (dis)"advantage".

When are we going to see the

When are we going to see the story on NewsBusters about the Breck Girl's sunken treasure booty being talked about on FOX News this morning?? *snicker*