Editor's Note (Ken Shepherd): The 9/11 conspiracy nuts behind "Loose Change" are supposed to be guests on the May 24 "The View." It's odd that Rosie wouldn't be on to share her thoughts about fire being unable to melt steel.
After Rosie O'Donnell's now infamous fight with Elisabeth Hasselbeck on the May 23 edition of "The View," Rosie hinted on her blog that she may not co-host the show tomorrow. The homepage of rosie.com starts with a rambling poem ending with, "tomorrow [Rosie's partner] Kelli turns 40. I will not be at work."
The question and answer page contains a few anti-Elisabeth commentors that Rosie either does not respond to or implicitly endorses. Rosie filters her questions and selects which ones she wants to put up. A few select ones are below. Note that the commenters and Rosie use text/instant message style formats.
Frank:I have learned to appreciate EH because of your friendly interaction with her. However, her refusal to support you over FOX’s characterization of you, changed my mind about her.
Rosie: [No response]
Amy: It seems some can’t see the real EH. And for her to not answer yes or no?! It’s clear who your friends are.
Rosie: [No response]
Leticia: EH is your frnd cause she is good pure & sweet, she “let” u clear the air insead of sticking up for her frnd who she should know did not mean that the troops are terriorst! Right? That maks sense!
Rosie: maybe she doest know thats even worse
Donna: Ro- my heart hurts for you right now. EH not much of a friend. Glad you have true friends & know the difference. Today she was mean spirited & that is saying something about her. Glad 4 U 2 B out
Rosie: i am glad 2 b out 2
Angela: What is wrong with EH. I was yelling at my TV today, she cant be serious. I agree with you 100%. answer the question - yes or no! Not that hard. Keep on rocking, peace - a true fan
Rosie: not hard at all
Sharon476: elizabeth’s POV is ALWAYS on the airways, 24 hr a day. yours isn’t. we need to see/hear you. please stay on broadcast tv/andor/cable. btw, EH’s claim to fame? is? what? right wing tool?
Rosie: [No response]
Amanda: Hi Rosie, I dont understand EH at all now. I know I wont be watching the View after you are gone. And for EH to bring up D.Trump on the show today, what was she thinking?. I dont enjoy her at all now
Rosie: i do not know
Marie: If you re-watched a prior show Eliz said in res. to ur question..”Do you are troops are terrorists” SHE planted that in the media. And won’t admit it. I hope you get a new show. I can’t watch View.
Rosie: [No response]
—Justin McCarthy is a news analyst at Media Research Center.
Comments Policy
pouting sow
May 23, 2007 - 17:57 ET by LionKingEHassleback is not my friend. She stood up to me. He questioned my facts.
I cannot face her ... I will not go to work.
[kind of like the Dumbocrats being afraid to debate on FOX]
Rosie won't be on the The Vie
May 23, 2007 - 18:01 ET by bigtimerRosie won't be on the The View tomorrow with the 9/11 conspiracy nutcases....
Now isn't that mighty convenient.
Btw...What childish gibberish on her site.
Also does that mean we get one day on here without something about Rosie?
Please....I'm beggin' ya here...
BT, U R Gr8!
May 23, 2007 - 18:24 ET by TeamcheeserBT, U R Gr8!
Team...Thanx!So R U.
May 23, 2007 - 18:30 ET by bigtimerTeam...
Thanx!
So R U.
See? Gibberish is fun!
May 23, 2007 - 18:35 ET by TeamcheeserSee? Gibberish is fun!
Ro-ZOU82 much!*****"Was
May 24, 2007 - 08:49 ET by Hero SquadRo-Z
OU82 much!
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
Oh, pul-eeeeeze!
May 23, 2007 - 18:04 ET by goldenthroat"Ro, my heart hurts for you! EH is not much of a friend. Glad you have true friends and know the difference." - Donna
Would someone please pass me the bromo and the airsick bag? Now the fat lesbo's followers are sounding as twisted and deranged as she is!
It's funny they make no mention of how Wosie has maligned, lied about, ranted and raved, shot off her big fat mouth, and spewed hatred toward the President, Christians, our troops, et al - and these brain-dead, twice-dead, plucked-up-by-the-roots, left-coast, bleeding-heart, 'do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do' liberals kiss her fat butt like someone died and made her queen!
Wouldn't be wonderful if she was off "The View" - for good - starting tomorrow?
Never dance on an empty stomach unless it's a liberal.
"Wouldn't be wonderful
May 23, 2007 - 18:12 ET by ckc1227"Wouldn't be wonderful if she was off "The View" - for good - starting tomorrow?"
Only problem with that is someone is going to give her a solo platform where she can spew her wingnut nonsense unchallenged. My guess would be PMSNBC.
a response
May 23, 2007 - 20:10 ET by goldenthroatIt was merely wishful thinking, ckc1227. A lot like "when hell freezes over". But I would bet a steak dinner that you're right with that guess as to where that fat lesbo will end up.
I wonder if Al Qaeda TV needs a left-coast, bleeding-heart, lesbo host? Nah - Wosie wouldn't be caught dead wearing a burka!
What does being a lesbian h
May 23, 2007 - 23:11 ET by The PresbyterWhat does being a lesbian have to do with anything?
What does anything have to do
May 23, 2007 - 23:17 ET by Clear thinkerWhat does anything have to do with a lesbian?
Help a wounded soldier here...
http://newsbusters.org/node/12877
Agreed. If she were straigh
May 24, 2007 - 06:57 ET by dahliatraversAgreed. If she were straight, she'd be just as much a brainless, braying idiot.
A response
May 24, 2007 - 16:00 ET by goldenthroatWith Wosie O'Dumber, being a lesbo is everything! She has used her sexual orientation as a political soapbox on "The View" and other places to espouse her sick, twisted and bizarre views and makes no apologies for it.
Why do you think Baba Wawa ask her to grow her hair longer as a condition to be on the show? So she wouldn't look like a dyke!
Never dance on an empty stomach unless it's a liberal.
The manner in which you use
May 24, 2007 - 19:56 ET by The PresbyterThe manner in which you used the term would suggest it had nothing to do with her using it as a political soapbox.
One thing I don't like to see are fellow conservatives being so judgemental. You wonder why we have an image problem... sheesh. You play right into the hands of the MSM.
Wosie wouldn't be caught dead
May 24, 2007 - 10:12 ET by slayerwatcherWosie wouldn't be caught dead wearing a burka!
Do they make them in that size...and in rainbow print?
On a side note, I love watching Liz. I wish she would get her own show. I could watch her all day long. She looked awesome yesterday. She handles herself with such poise and sophistication. A breath of fresh air after listening to those cackling shrews (Joy, Rosie and even Baba Wawa).
Huge Rainbow Burkas would l
May 24, 2007 - 12:44 ET by dabalHuge Rainbow Burkas would look wonderful on her while she's being publicly stoned for homosexuality, promiscuity, driving, you name it, Islam wants to kill her for it.
I really hope our leftists finally see Islam for what it is...the death of everything even remotely referred to as "liberal".
Hey, lefty windbags, you may not want to admit it, but the only thing standing between Islams' raised sword and you is...me, and others like me.
Funny how when the war drums were beating for Afghanistan, the "human rights abuses" suffered by women was the iron-clad cinch that sealed the deal. Since the same crap happens in Iraq under the Shia, I wonder why nobody stood up for Iraqi women? (Hint: Saddam was a Socialist, and the UN/International Socialism will NEVER allow an attack on a fellow socialist, no matter what!)
Rosie is taking her ball and
May 23, 2007 - 18:23 ET by TeamcheeserRosie is taking her ball and going home!
She really is in A League of Her Own!
9/11 conspiracy? Fire melts
May 23, 2007 - 19:05 ET by TruthMatters9/11 conspiracy? Fire melts steel? No??? Was the Government doing some covert demolition when the concrete and steel bridge collapsed in Oakland due to a supposed "gasoline tanker truck" accident?
Come on nutbags, get a brain and use it.
The entire history of black
May 23, 2007 - 19:09 ET by lnthompThe entire history of blacksmithing has all been a hoax, too! There were never any steel horseshoes, or steel rims on wagon wheels, etc.
Lee T.
U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington
The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain
Yes the fire melting steel th
May 23, 2007 - 19:21 ET by FOXFANYes the fire melting steel thing, what a moron she is. Maybe she can tell us about that place in Colorado where they mine I beams. I truely believe she needs rehab.
Steel melts at roughly 2,50
May 23, 2007 - 19:42 ET by ThoughtPoliceSteel melts at roughly 2,500*. Maybe you should look up the maximum temperature of kerosene (jet fuel)?
Maybe...
May 23, 2007 - 19:49 ET by Mr. BishopMaybe you should research what an accelerant is. When you're done with that, research what equipment was located on the floors in question, and what temperature they burn at, as well as how hot they can get when they are burning. When you're finished with that, research what temperature steel BENDS at. There is a world of difference, by the way (for your limited brain capacity), between melting, and bending. Once steel begins to bend, due to heat, it will allow for the collapsing of the steel girders in place. Once that happens, the sheer weight of the levels above the several floors of weakness, will cause the entirety of the building to begin to collapse under the pressure and weight.
You've already been told this before ToiletPaper... you just choose to ignore it because it proves your conspiracy theory false.
If homosexuality is genetic, then it must be a birth defect. If it is a birth defect, then stem cell research might provide a cure.
Exactly Mr. Bishop. Anyone
May 23, 2007 - 20:02 ET by FOXFANExactly Mr. Bishop. Anyone who the the slightest thing about controlled demolition know the building blows from the ground up, not top to bottom. There is probably only a handfull of men who could pull this off and I'm sure they all have business cards.
ThoughtPolice, the steel di
May 23, 2007 - 21:11 ET by MightyMouthThoughtPolice, the steel didn't have to melt, all it had to do was become weak enough to no longer support the load it was designed to carry. Look up the temp that will weaken steel enough to cause catastrophic failure under the additional load of a 757. Also the buildings support system included the exterior walls which were breached by the plane "not flown" by Muslim extremists.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
extreme heat
May 23, 2007 - 21:17 ET by LionKingExtreme heat can also create a vacuum (not unlike the interior of some trollic craniums). This vacuum effect can further cause the structural integrity of a building to collapse.
A lot of physics involved; more that just melting points and gravity.
And the second building hit
May 23, 2007 - 21:23 ET by MightyMouthAnd the second building hit was the first to fall. Why? It was hit lower with more weight on the breach. No amout of planning by "conspiritors" could have staged such a clear example of simple physics.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
(in the best robot voice you
May 24, 2007 - 08:24 ET by ThoughtPolice(in the best robot voice you can do) YES, STEEL BENDS AT "X" DEGREES WHICH IS ALL IT TAKES. PLEASE GIVE FURTHER INPUT BEFORE WE MALFUNCTION FROM A LOGIC ERROR. TOO LATE, CAN'T COMPUTE, TRUTH TO STRONG....TERMINATING....
Haha. Seriously though. You guys sound like your reading straight out of the PM handbook for those who can't think for themselves. Show me ANYONE that has done scientific research into how the towers collapsed AFTER the initial point of collapse (in other words, once the building started to fall, show me the evidence to prove it would have kept falling and would not have been stopped by the other 90% of the building). Oh wait, NO ONE HAS DONE THAT. Not even your beloved NIST. They stopped after point of initiation. Hmm, wonder why? Oh yea, probably because the building wouldn't have collapsed in 10 seconds if it were a normal collapse.
And to whoever said buildings are demolished from the bottom up, you would be right if you are talking about a conventional demolition (such as WTC 7 which was a classic bottom up demo). However, when you have two 100 storey buildings, it's quite a different scenario.
Well domo arigato, Mr. Roboto
May 24, 2007 - 08:58 ET by Hero SquadWell domo arigato, Mr. Roboto...
...for making conspiracy theorists look even more ridiculous.
Plane hits building. Causes massive explosion and fire. Weakens steel. Top of building collapses. Steel can't hold weight and pressure from falling structure. Collapses. Shock and vibration from collapse weakens other nearby buildings.
Meanwhile, no demolition crews spotted entering any buildings to cause a collapse, despite tremendous proliferation of cameras in that area that day.
It's really not that hard of a concept.
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
"Show me ANYONE that has done
May 24, 2007 - 09:25 ET by Recon"Show me ANYONE that has done scientific research into . . ."
You are kidding right?
http://www.popularme...
Crack?
May 24, 2007 - 11:26 ET by Mr. BishopAre you on crack? Really? I mean, you ask for one scientific research, but you are ignoring all the scientific evidence showing how the towers collapsed under their own weight on 9-11 in favor of an unproven, wild-eyed conspiracy theory? It took longer then 10 seconds for the buildings to collapse. It took almost an hour for the steel to get hot enough to bend.
The only person here, trying to function on illogical ideas, has been you. You can't disregard steel bending, thus allowing the entirety of the structure to collapse, from the top down. Yet somehow, you manage to simply ignore it because it doesn't sit in with your conspiracy crackpot theory. We've all shown you this information. We've helped you in every way possible to see that your idea is ludicrous, yet you still want to ignore it. You're living in a dreamworld ToiletPaper. You need to come back to reality.
However, in answer to your question about showing a scientific study... blah blah blah. At what point, do you plan on convincing someone to actually fly a 767 into a 100 story building, built exactly like the WTC, to prove you wrong? Good luck finding that. In the meantime, I'll stick with reality, and what happened... planes-crash-fire-bend/melt-collapse. Can't do any better then that, since that is the proven method of what happened.
__________________________________________________________
If homosexuality is genetic, then it must be a birth defect. If it is a birth defect, then stem cell research might provide a cure.
The jet fuel ignited the explosives--
May 24, 2007 - 11:36 ET by misterbillThe jet fuel ignited the explosives--Willy Clinton had put in there in his adminstration. No, no, wait, I mean Richard Nixon. No, no wait, I mean, I mean ummm, no, it's Jon Lovitz, yeah, yeah, that's who it was.
Are you on crack? Really? C
May 24, 2007 - 12:52 ET by Jack BauerCould be! I just think he's a evil prick. That simple.
TP..compute this, a man weigh
May 24, 2007 - 12:57 ET by bassndudeTP..compute this, a man weighing 150 lbs, falls 10 feet, he impacts with 1500 pounds per foot. Now, say a building floor is constructed to carry a dynamic load of, say, 100,000 pounds max safe load. Ok? Now suppose the floor above is built the same way. The floor its self weighs some 100,000 pounds and there is another 100,000 pounds on the load of the upper floor. One floor fails and falls on they one below. It falls 10 feet, to keep is simple. There you have 200,000 pounds falling on the floor that was designed to carry only 100,000 pounds. Question, what happens to the floor below the one that falls and why?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
TP, in reality, steel cuts at
May 24, 2007 - 12:46 ET by bassndudeTP, in reality, steel cuts at about 2500 degrees F. Thats about the temp of an acy oxy torch set up. It readly cuts all ferrous steels. Steel begins to weaken at about 300 degrees F. Most steels will fail under a moderate load around 600 degrees F. Oxygen aids combustion, and raises the temp of a fire. The wind tunnel effect would have provided enough oxygen to raise the temp considerably, maybe as much as 1000 degrees. At any rate, once the temp of the steel reached a temp of 800 degrees, welds would have begain to fail, connections and bolts and beams on span would have weakened to the point that they could not support themselves, let alone any weight. Steel dosent have to melt to fail, it just needs to get hot enough. And that is way below 2500 degrees. I have told you this before. Guess it dident sink in. Crome molly steel will retain most of its strength up to about 800 degrees. But it is only used in pipe and is much to brittle for structures.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Keep saying it, bassndude.
May 24, 2007 - 22:36 ET by dahliatraversKeep saying it, bassndude. The truth cannot be repeated often enough.
I'd have to second that as
May 25, 2007 - 17:16 ET by The PresbyterI'd have to second that as an engineering student. Things are built with a factor of safety... I SERIOUSLY doubt the towers (let alone many building period) were designed considering a blazing inferno and structrural damage together.
that place in Colorado where
May 24, 2007 - 07:02 ET by dahliatraversthat place in Colorado where they mine I beams
lol
Right...because a bridge is
May 23, 2007 - 19:39 ET by ThoughtPoliceRight...because a bridge is the same thing as 2 100 story buildings and 1 47 story building. Nice comparison...
tp
May 23, 2007 - 20:24 ET by SportPoliticsyou're an idiot
You're just tied to the rai
May 24, 2007 - 12:27 ET by slayerwatcherYou're just tied to the railroad tracks and that "stupid train" keeps running you over, heh? It amazes me how your hatred blinds you to the truth. It's the same thing with Ro the tubby lesbo.
Where She Gets It
May 23, 2007 - 19:32 ET by Michael DurantHere is where she gets her number of deaths information from:
http://www.npr.org/news/specials/tollofwar/tollofwarmain.html
NPR? Go figure, I'm sure th
May 23, 2007 - 19:36 ET by FOXFANNPR? Go figure, I'm sure their right. Yeah.
The thing about Rosie is that
May 23, 2007 - 19:42 ET by 4arrowThe thing about Rosie is that she parrots what she hears. Seemingly no research on her part. Add to that the 'you should have my back' street slang attitude toward EH. Even though she has referred to herself as the 'moderator' of the show...Meet the Press this bilge isn't. I wonder what serious female newspeople think about this circus.
rosie
May 23, 2007 - 19:50 ET by tblotWhenever you give her the right facts she will not answer but just get louder. She is another mouth piece for george soros.
Rosie O'gasbag says there wer
May 23, 2007 - 21:19 ET by FOXFANRosie O'gasbag says there were 650,00 Iraqis killed from March 2003 till July 2006 (according to the non biased NPR). Run the numbers(I did the math) and it's a blatant lie.That may deaths a month would have gleefully picked up by the MSM and sung from the rooftops day in and day out. She is truely demented.
LGF covers the origins of t
May 23, 2007 - 23:17 ET by Heather RadishLGF covers the origins of the "650k dead myth."
Thanks Heather.Help a wounded
May 23, 2007 - 23:23 ET by Clear thinkerThanks Heather.
Help a wounded soldier here...
http://newsbusters.org/node/12877
Soooo... 650,000 Iraqis... an
May 24, 2007 - 07:08 ET by carolina conservativeSoooo... 650,000 Iraqis... and 3,700 Americans. That means we're winning doesn't it?
Lets see she builds up all
May 23, 2007 - 19:50 ET by mlongLets see she builds up all this 9/11 "truth" crap on The View for weeks and now that their going to do a full segment on it she bails.....whose the coward now Rosie?
Very true. It's typical of pe
May 23, 2007 - 19:53 ET by ArchConservativeVery true. It's typical of people like her who spout all this sophmoric crap that is spoonfed to them, but when it comes time to totally embrace their far-out ideologies, they scamper and find excuses. She knows that this would be the final piece of the puzzle that outs her (so to speak) as the sociopath that she is.
Mlong, ArchConservative, I am
May 23, 2007 - 22:13 ET by MikeBMlong, ArchConservative, I am afraid nothing about tomorrow's Truther episode will "out" Rosie about anything. If The View allowed the Popular Mechanics people on at the same time to answer the Truther's stupidities then, yes, Rosie would be shown to be completely without gray matter. As it is, the Truthers will be unchallenged by an opposing viewpoint or any facts, the in studio and at home audiences who already believe this crap will stupidly nod their heads like bobbleheads and swallow whatever is dished out to them.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
i hear that if Hillary gets e
May 23, 2007 - 22:26 ET by botgi hear that if Hillary gets elected the history books will read that Bush blew up WTTs to divert attention from his destroying the world via AGW (and the Rove weather machine)
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
As Ronald Reagan once said: &
May 23, 2007 - 19:51 ET by ArchConservativeAs Ronald Reagan once said: "It's morning in America, again!" Ding Dong the Witch is gone. Bring on more Elisabeth, I would TiVO her alllllll day. She did grow a semi-spine. Now it's time to go all the way and open up both barrels. We're behind you Elisabeth.
"Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."
- President George W Bush September 2001 speech to a joint session of Congress.
Interesting that suddenly, wh
May 23, 2007 - 19:52 ET by GregEInteresting that suddenly, when Rooooooooooosie is confronted head on she begins to feel she's not "head of household" and suddenly seems a bit stunned someone came back at her fat mouth full bore.
Maybe she needs that new pr
May 23, 2007 - 20:18 ET by FairlightMaybe she needs that new product:
Mor On -- apply directly to the forehead.
Mor On -- apply directly to the forehead.ro
May 23, 2007 - 20:33 ET by Emma GrumpThat was quite good, FL...
Excellent!
May 23, 2007 - 20:39 ET by GregEExcellent!
"I can't stand yor comme
May 24, 2007 - 08:15 ET by Sergeant ROCK"I can't stand yor commercials, but your product is amazing!" - Rosie
What the hell is wrong with p
May 23, 2007 - 20:17 ET by ZsuzsaWhat the hell is wrong with people? Are there that many out there who truly believe the crap Rosie OD spews? I am bewildered. Sometimes I think there is something wrong with me as I feel I am part of a minority, like I am the abnormal one.
Just a suggestion, perhaps we should all send e-mail to Elisabeth at The View in support just as Rosie's buds have done. Here's the link: http://abc.go.com/daytime/theview/
NOTE how Rosie's name is NOT on the e-mail contact list - that speaks volumes.
Thanks ZsuZsa
May 23, 2007 - 20:36 ET by SportPoliticsThanks for that link, I sent some encouragement.
We're not the minority yet, but it might someday be so.
Polls say 35% of democrats + another 25% in the possible range. 7% of republicans.
I'd say it's one third full out fruit looper in the general pop. Half the demcorats.
We have a dumbed down moron society, and it's from MTV and "snippet" crap, and quackos like rosie, and mass immigration, and the fact that the minute you really start discussing something, these MORONS claim they are "bored". It takes about 15 seconds for them to get there, to bored.
Try bringing up math or science, and they almost turn pale instantly.
If it isn't crazy, smarmy, slutty, stupid, cursing, cutting down, gankin, or some other crap, they are bored.
Ugh! I hate these type of &qu
May 23, 2007 - 20:50 ET by HypocriteHaterUgh! I hate these type of "women" who start these battles by opening up their big mouths, and then expect all their friends to help fight their battles for them. And if these friends don't, the pyscho bitch (Rosie, of course) gets real pissed off and whines about how no one sticks up for them. She did the same thing with Baba Wawa regarding the Donald Trump fight that SHE STARTED.
Now she's acting like a baby and won't come in to work. Good! A day without Rosie is like a day without pestilance.
Who's the coward now, Rosie
May 23, 2007 - 20:52 ET by AJWho's the coward now, Rosie? Get in a big fight and accuse a co-host of being a "coward", then you don't plan on showing up the next day. Wow, talk about lack of confidence. (Wait, Rosie'll use "depression" as an excuse to not show up.)
I like how the fat lesbian co
May 23, 2007 - 20:58 ET by Evinrude55I like how the fat lesbian comes out with the number of dead Iraqi's yet never says that that number was mostly created by insurgents and other Iraqi's blowing people up. I'd like to know what percentage of that number was actually killed by U.S. troops.
Rosie finally speaks the
May 23, 2007 - 21:18 ET by JerryRosie finally speaks the truth on her blog:
"Rosie: i do not know"
That about sums it up.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
I think these questions are
May 23, 2007 - 22:01 ET by JerryI think these questions are a better fit for Rosie's answers:
Frank: Hi Ro, my conservative frinds think u r stupid. Please prove them wrong by taking this IQ test... What's 2 + 2 ?
Rosie: [No response]
Frank: 1 + 1 ?
Rosie: [No response]
Frank: What number do you dial for 911 ?
Rosie: [No response]
Leticia: EH thinks that fire can melt steel! Right? That maks sense!
Rosie: maybe she doest know thats even worse
Donna: Ro- my heart hurts for you right now. Mental Insitutions are terrible. Glad 4 U 2 B out
Rosie: i am glad 2 b out 2
Angela: If your intelligence were an erection, what condition would it be in?
Rosie: not hard at all
Amanda: If someone showed you a picture of your butt and a picture of a hole in the ground, would you be able to distinguish between the two?
Rosie: i do not know
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
"Thank you! Kevin Euba
May 23, 2007 - 22:28 ET by bretzysdude"Thank you! Kevin Eubanks, ladies and gentlemen!"
she won't be on tomorrow beca
May 23, 2007 - 22:30 ET by pmohbuckshe won't be on tomorrow because she's probably aware that the mighty-mite (hasslebeck) may bodyslam her carcass on national TV ... again
either that or she may be honoring her partner's likely birthday request ... not to hear rosie's screechy-squealing voice for the entire day.
Rosie and Liz
May 23, 2007 - 23:25 ET by BurroCrane 3098Does anyone else get the feeling that it was all scripted. It is a show for ratings. How many of you are going to watch tomorrow as Liz takes on the Conspiracy folk? That rumble you just felt might have been the View moving to the right...
This is the perfect example o
May 24, 2007 - 05:44 ET by USA4freedomThis is the perfect example of how the left does not like to debate. Joy keeps grabbing Hasselback’s hand trying to shut her up. Notice no one grabs “loveable Rosie’s hand”.
Well things did not go my way and I’m not coming in… you and all your Republicans/ American’s talking points.. You have some nerve questioning me! I’m going home to my play doll, and you are not coming! My real friends never question me.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagn- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Joy keeps grabbing Hasselback
May 24, 2007 - 07:53 ET by dahliatraversJoy keeps grabbing Hasselback's hand trying to shut her up.
USA4freedom, Behar wasn't trying to shut Hasselback up. She was trying to end the embarassing scene by appealing to the only rational participant.
Who would want to grab Rosie'
May 24, 2007 - 08:00 ET by Sergeant ROCKWho would want to grab Rosie's hand?? Ewwwww!
Behar didn't try to grab Rosi
May 24, 2007 - 15:02 ET by MikeBBehar didn't try to grab Rosie's hand for two reasons: one, she didn't know where that hand had been (I know, off to rehab with me), and two, if she had grabbed Rosie's hand, she'd have probably brought back a stump.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Don't get me wrong, I hate Ro
May 24, 2007 - 08:54 ET by LeonDon't get me wrong, I hate Rosie, but I could literally hear the wind whistling through Hasselback's cavernous skull as she tried to piece together something slightly resembling an actual argument.
To be fair, Rosie's complete
May 24, 2007 - 09:01 ET by Hero SquadTo be fair, Rosie's complete and utter absurdity in her arguments are enough to baffle even the brightest and articulate of thinkers.
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
as distorted and twisted as h
May 24, 2007 - 09:03 ET by Leonas distorted and twisted as her rationale is, at least her arguments DO follow some sort of logic, bizarre/wrong as it may be. Hasselback on the other hand is braindead.
It takes one to know one
May 24, 2007 - 09:08 ET by RJ"distorted and twisted rationale"...."follows some sort of logic"
Ha. If you believe that, it explains a lot about your OWN distorted and twisted rationale, Leon
Leon, please, enlighten us to
May 24, 2007 - 09:12 ET by jpatchLeon, please, enlighten us to what magical logic Rosie uses to blame the U.S. for 9/11, to call our soldiers terrorists, to assert that fire can't melt steel, and to assert that terrorists are mothers and fathers, and are just misunderstood. I'm guessing that it's probably the same logic that you use when you post here. Go find Rosie and play with here, we don't want you here. You're a traitor if you're defending Rosie's "logic" and her claims.
... and do you think that the
May 24, 2007 - 09:05 ET by Sergeant ROCK... and do you think that they would have a real conservative on a show like that? Say an Ann Coulter perhaps? Of course not. I have to say though, that Elisabeth is easy on the eyes, unlike the hobgoblin Rosie.
Leon,The wind that you heard
May 24, 2007 - 09:08 ET by jpatchLeon,
The wind that you heard was going through your cavernous, yet unbelievably thick skull.
You and Balboa exemplify liberalism perfectly...no matter what the topic is, you have to add something that is contradictory to the truth, or just plain stupid. I think that your last comment is a little bit of both. Good start to the day for a liberal!!
Liberalism is a mental illnes
May 24, 2007 - 09:10 ET by Sergeant ROCKLiberalism is a mental illness.
Whoa buddy. Didn't realize
May 24, 2007 - 10:06 ET by LeonWhoa buddy. Didn't realize you were so sensitive about Hasselback. Do you have her poster hanging above your bed or something?
Rosie and Hasselback are by far the two most annoying talking heads on television. Neither of them have any clue what they are talking about and they're shouting cuts into my brain.
The world would be a better place without both of them
No, Leon, here on NB's, we're
May 24, 2007 - 10:39 ET by jpatchNo, Leon, here on NB's, we're sensitive to ignorance, idiocy, dishonesty and half-truths. But since you are who you are, I'm sure you've already got a PhD in all of those disciplines.
I'll reiterate: You are a traitor and an enemy of the United States if you defend Rosie's "logic", beliefs or comments. You're just like her...you even do the same, "I support our troops" thing that she does, when you preface your comment with, "don't get me wrong, I hate Rosie, but she does have a point about [insert unfounded, ignorant treasonous claim here]"
We're Americans here, so take your Bill Maher wanna-be as* elsewhere...
Nowhere did I defend her beli
May 24, 2007 - 10:51 ET by LeonNowhere did I defend her beliefs. What are you talking about?
I said she was insane, twisted, distorted and her logic followed this bizarre path.
In your haste to attack me you simply forgot to read my post. It's ok i forgive you
No, leon, unfortunately for m
May 24, 2007 - 11:10 ET by jpatchNo, leon, unfortunately for me, I read all of your horrible posts, and they go a little something like this...
"don't get me wrong, I hate Rosie, but I could hear the wind blowing through hasselbeck's cavernous skull as she tried to form some semblance of an argument..." so right off of the bat, you jump into this conversation trying to tear-down the only woman on the show that stands up for most of our American ideals and beliefs, and you also used the Rosie tactic, that is, "I support our troops...but they are terrorists"..."trust me, I hate Rosie, but she has a point..."
then, you go on to do the same thing over again, "even as distorted/twisted Rosie might be, she does follow some form of bizarre logic...but hasselbeck is completely braindead" so again, you pretend to insult Rosie, but you defend her apparent adherence to some form of "logic", while again trying to undermine elizabeth, the only person who's trying to use REAL LOGIC AND REAL FACTS TO DISPUTE A LYING IGNORANT BLOWHARD
then you go on to just say that the world would be a better place without the both of them...um, excuse me sir, but why is elizabeth someone that we want to do away with? she's not a bullying mindless zombie of Soros and the DNC, she is actually trying to defend her beliefs with facts, something that is foreign to most liberals. you try to put elizabeth on the same level as that lying treasonous swine.
I know you think you're clever and insightful, but you're just as bad as Rosie. you adhere to the same brand of twisted, bizarre "logic" that she does.
jpatch, you used a lot of wor
May 24, 2007 - 11:57 ET by Leonjpatch, you used a lot of words to say nothing. It's quite an impressive skill actually. You should consider being a campaign speech writer.
I never defended Rosie. Again, you are missing the point. Rosie's arguments are insane. But they do follow a logical path, albeit insane. Rosie has an irrational hatred of W, which leads her to blame everything on him, and to think America is evil. This is way out there wacky, but it does follow a logical path. Hate bush = distrust of all things America = insane conspiracy theories. There is thought involved, despite the fact it's disturbing thought. Furthermore, these thoughts were actually created in Rosie's big fat head.
On the other hand, Hasselback reminds me more of a parrot, simply repeating talking points/key words without any real explanation. She is every girl in High School that I knew whose father's basically told them what they should believe, but not why. So when they got into a debate, it was more like regurgitation than actual thought. Hasselback might as well have a draw string hanging out her back, which when pulled elicits any of a number of canned kool aid style remarks without any substance.
Neither of these two clowns have ever used a fact in their life. To say so is completely wrong. They're both morons, just b/c Elizabeth supports your beliefs doesn't make her any less worthless.
Logic is the application of
May 24, 2007 - 12:32 ET by Jack BauerLogic is the application of reason conducted to strict principles of validity.
Insanity is a state of mind which prevents normal perception, and or any action caused by madness.
Insane logic is an oxymoron. The insane cannot be logical as the two states are polar opposites.
This is a common mistake people make -- rather like claiming they are putting in '150% effort'.
While this sounds plausible (as does insane logic), it is, in fact, meaningless, because 100% is everything. So how can one give more than everything? The same as the insane cannot be logical. They're frackin' insane.
Thank you, I'll take your ope
May 24, 2007 - 12:39 ET by jpatchThank you, I'll take your opening words as a compliment..
But I think that your assessment of Elizabeth being a talking points puppet is wrong; regurgitating talking points is EXACTLY HOW ROSIE BEHAVES!! I mean, she basically gets her "news" directly from Media Matters. I saw it the other day..."did you know Bill O'Reilly insults someone every 6.8 seconds?" Too bad that George Soros had paid Indiana U $5 million to do that study, which included the words "liberal", "conservative', "centrist", and about 15 other words that are NOT insults...Rosie is the puppet, not Elizabeth.
You're right, though, that Rosie has an irrational hatred of W, although her hatred doesn't end there...it extends to Cheney, to Rumsfeld, to Rove, to our Troops, to our country, and so on, and so on...but back the bigger picture...
I'm sure you've heard of BDS. It wouldn't be a problem at all if Rosie O'Donnell was the sole sufferer of this epidemic, but it has been institutionalized within the democratic party now. We have people that want to be in the White House afraid to debate on Fox (only the most professional news outfit in our country), calling the war an "ideological doctrine", and a "bumpersticker slogan."
Rosie is just the most unscrupulous, ignorant and obvious victim of BDS, but her symptoms tell us that this illness is widespread; and such a blind hatred without facts or logic is exactly how facism takes it roots, and it is the tool that radical Muslims use to justify their actions and to create further generations of blind, malevolent killers. Please, help us defend this country and it's ideals, it's not too late.
It was in your haste to sound
May 24, 2007 - 11:16 E