Kudos to Couric: Highlights Pro-Terrorist Views of Fourth of Young Muslims in America

Photo of Brent Baker.

On Tuesday's CBS Evening News, anchor Katie Couric allocated a few seconds to alerting viewers to how a new poll discovered that a significant minority of Muslims in America hold “disturbing” views on the acceptability of suicide bombings and who carried out the 9/11 attacks. Neither the ABC or NBC evening newscasts mentioned the new non-network poll released Tuesday by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.

Though Pew headlined its report “Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream,” Couric picked up on the AP's spin (“Some US Muslims say suicide attacks OK” on Yahoo; CBSNews.com: “Poll: 26% Of Young U.S. Muslims OK Bombs”), as she reported: “One in four American Muslims under the age of 30 believe suicide bombings are acceptable in at least some cases if they're defending their religion. And only 40 percent of all American Muslims said they believe Arab men carried out the September 11th attacks.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Muslims in America, however, are no more radical than Democrats in general, a majority of whom, a recent poll skipped by CBS and the other networks found, believe President Bush knew in advance of the 9/11 attacks or are not sure if he did. A May 4 Rasmussen Reports survey of 800 likely voters exposed how “Democrats in America are evenly divided on the question of whether George W. Bush knew about the 9/11 terrorist attacks in advance. Thirty-five percent (35%) of Democrats believe he did know, 39% say he did not know, and 26% are not sure.” (Only 7 percent of the Muslims asked by Pew agreed “Bush/U.S. conspiracy responsible.” See page 51 of the PDF linked below.)

Another finding of concern in the Pew survey: 47 percent of Muslims in America think of themselves as “Muslims first” over being an American. Also noteworthy (see page 41 of the PDF): Muslims identify as Democrats over Republican by a whopping 63 to 11 percent and they voted for Kerry over Bush in 2004 by an overwhelming 71 to 14 percent.

The 100-page plus PDF of the full report on the poll of 1,050 Muslims in the United States. Check page 54 for the support for suicide bombings amongst those aged 18-29.

Couric's short item, on the May 22 CBS Evening News that she anchored from Philadelphia, in which she segued from news about al Qaeda using Iraq:

“And late word tonight, the White House has declassified some intelligence about a newly revealed terror plot against the United States allegedly ordered up by Osama bin Laden. According to the intelligence, bin Laden ordered a top lieutenant in 2005 to form a terror cell that would use Iraq as a staging ground to launch attacks around the world with the United States the top target.

“Meanwhile, a new poll released today shows most American Muslims are critical of al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists, but there are some disturbing findings as well. One in four [26%] American Muslims under the age of 30 believe suicide bombings are acceptable in at least some cases if they're defending their religion. And only 40 percent of all American Muslims said they believe Arab men carried out the September 11th attacks. According to the FBI, all of the hijackers were Arab, most from Saudi Arabia.”

Editor's Note (Ken Shepherd | 23:29 EDT):

Related NB items available here and here.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

#$%# ABC

I am usually the first one to defend the MSM, because I usually do not find them as bad as most on this site say. Well "breaking news" on ABC. I personally find this disgusting. ABC is giving sensitive Intel to our enemy. Judge for yourself.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/05/bush_authorizes.html

Bush Authorizes New Covert Action Against Iran

The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert "black" operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell the Blotter on ABCNews.com.

The sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the subject, say President Bush has signed a "nonlethal presidential finding" that puts into motion a CIA plan that reportedly includes a coordinated campaign of propaganda, disinformation and manipulation of Iran's currency and international financial transactions.

"I can't confirm or deny whether such a program exists or whether the president signed it, but it would be consistent with an overall American approach trying to find ways to put pressure on the regime," said Bruce Riedel, a recently retired CIA senior official who dealt with Iran and other countries in the region. 

A National Security Council spokesperson, Gordon Johndroe, said, "The White House does not comment on intelligence matters." A CIA spokesperson said, "As a matter of course, we do not comment on allegations of covert activity."

The sources say the CIA developed the covert plan over the last year and received approval from White House officials and other officials in the intelligence community.

Officials say the covert plan is designed to pressure Iran to stop its nuclear enrichment program and end aid to insurgents in Iraq.

"There are some channels where the United States government may want to do things without its hand showing, and legally, therefore, the administration would, if it's doing that, need an intelligence finding and would need to tell the Congress," said ABC News consultant Richard Clarke, a former White House counterterrorism official.

Current and former intelligence officials say the approval of the covert action means the Bush administration, for the time being, has decided not to pursue a military option against Iran.

"Vice President Cheney helped to lead the side favoring a military strike," said former CIA official Riedel, "but I think they have come to the conclusion that a military strike has more downsides than upsides."

The covert action plan comes as U.S. officials have confirmed Iran had dramatically increased its ability to produce nuclear weapons material, at a pace that experts said would give them the ability to build a nuclear bomb in two years. 

Riedel says economic pressure on Iran may be the most effective tool available to the CIA, particularly in going after secret accounts used to fund the nuclear program.

"The kind of dealings that the Iranian Revolution Guards are going to do, in terms of purchasing nuclear and missile components, are likely to be extremely secret, and you're going to have to work very, very hard to find them, and that's exactly the kind of thing the CIA's nonproliferation center and others would be expert at trying to look into," Riedel said.   

Under the law, the CIA needs an official presidential finding to carry out such covert actions. The CIA is permitted to mount covert "collection" operations without a presidential finding.

"Presidential findings" are kept secret but reported to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and other key congressional leaders.

The "nonlethal" aspect of the presidential finding means CIA officers may not use deadly force in carrying out the secret operations against Iran.

Still, some fear that even a nonlethal covert CIA program carries great risks.

"I think everybody in the region knows that there is a proxy war already afoot with the United States supporting anti-Iranian elements in the region as well as opposition groups within Iran," said Vali Nasr, adjunct senior fellow for Mideast studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.

"And this covert action is now being escalated by the new U.S. directive, and that can very quickly lead to Iranian retaliation and a cycle of escalation can follow," Nasr said.

Other "lethal" findings have authorized CIA covert actions against al Qaeda, terrorism and nuclear proliferation.

Also briefed on the CIA proposal, according to intelligence sources, were National Security Advisor Steve Hadley and Deputy National Security Advisor Elliott Abrams. 

"The entire plan has been blessed by Abrams, in particular," said one intelligence source familiar with the plan. "And Hadley had to put his chop on it."

Abrams' last involvement with attempting to destabilize a foreign government led to criminal charges.

He pleaded guilty in October 1991 to two misdemeanor counts of withholding information from Congress about the Reagan administration's ill-fated efforts to destabilize the Nicaraguan Sandinista government in Central America, known as the Iran-Contra affair. Abrams was later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush in December 1992.

In June 2001, Abrams was named by then National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to head the National Security Council's office for democracy, human rights and international operations. On Feb. 2, 2005, National Security Advisor Hadley appointed Abrams deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor for global democracy strategy, one of the nation's most senior national security positions.

As earlier reported on the Blotter on ABCNews.com, the United States has supported and encouraged an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, that has conducted deadly raids inside Iran from bases on the rugged Iran-Pakistan-Afghanistan "tri-border region."

U.S. officials deny any "direct funding" of Jundullah groups but say the leader of Jundullah was in regular contact with U.S. officials.

American intelligence sources say Jundullah has received money and weapons through the Afghanistan and Pakistan military and Pakistan's intelligence service. Pakistan has officially denied any connection.

A report broadcast on Iranian TV last Sunday said Iranian authorities had captured 10 men crossing the border with $500,000 in cash along with "maps of sensitive areas" and "modern spy equipment."

A senior Pakistani official told ABCNews.com the 10 men were members of Jundullah.

The leader of the Jundullah group, according to the Pakistani official, has been recruiting and training "hundreds of men" for "unspecified missions" across the border in Iran.

... bin Laden ordered a top l

... bin Laden ordered a top lieutenant in 2005 to form a terror cell that would use Iraq as a staging ground to launch attacks around the world with the United States the top target.

OK, so we're actually IN Iraq, occupying that country, etc., and yet OBL is still trying to get a terror cell to use the country as a staging ground?

No

We're not occupying Iraq. I really wish you guys would stop trying to use that word. We are aiding in the defense and we maintain a force, but we are not occupying. Occupying entails us dictating to the Iraqis, what they will do, when they will do it, and how they will do it. Occupied France, for example, was the Nazis telling the French government and people what to do.

Other then that, what are you trying to ask with your question? Try elaborating, instead of leaving open-ended questions such as that.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Dude... lighten up..

OK, "not occupying." My poin

OK, "not occupying."

My point is...are we having any effect whatsoever over there if Bin Laden is trying to get terrorist cells going while we're still "not occupying" the country? I thought that was the point of us going there, that he couldn't do that.

Dunno'

I know that the battlefield has shifted to Iraq. Bin Laden laying claim to wanting to start a cell in Iraq to launch attacks, is hardly definitive evidence that it is occurring. Bin Laden could say that he is trying to get terrorist cells in the United States to train. Bin Laden could say that he is trying to make everyone in the world Muslims, or else murder them. Bin Laden could say he's trying to find the Easter Bunny to exterminate him, and bloody a Christian Holiday. Bin Laden can say a lot of things.

What difference does it make?


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Dude... lighten up..

Hey Bal, didn't we kill Abu M

Hey Bal, didn't we kill Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a top Al Qaeda opterative in Iraq not too long ago??? And wasn't he proven to have been in Iraq recovering from wounds suffered while fighting us in Afganistan?

It seems to me that they've been in Iraq long before 2005, and waaaaaaaaay before we invaded in 2003. You can't hide it or deny it. We have the evidence including the dead body to prove it.... so what's your point?  We're fighting Al Qaeda in Iraq... it's better than fighting them here on our streets.

In spite of what all you libs think, we're going to have to kill or subdue around 180 million Wahhabists before this whole war is over. You'd better have the mettle to handle it or get out of the way of those who do. I refuse to pay the jizya (non-muslim tax) or become a Dhimmi. And I'll kill those who try and force me to. As General George Patton said, "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." Change country to ideology and you get what I mean. I'm willing to live side by side with muslims as long as they don't want sharia law... but if they do... I'm more than willing to take up arms against them.

____________________________________________________

"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine

Didn't you hear? Wahabbis a

Didn't you hear? Wahabbis are actually wonderful people we've unfairly maligned! See the very first thread here. (Snicker!).
JMR

Wahabbis

I thought Wahabbis were cute little marsupials known to carry suicide bombs in their pouches.

Iraq as a staging ground

Bal-

Bin Laden doesn't think of "Iraq" like you or I might. The entire area is one land, the birthplace and cradle of Islam,  that's it.  It has no borders or countries.".. since Allah made it flat, created its desert, and encircled it with seas."

Pew gives the lie to the PB

Pew gives the lie to the PBS agitprop in its recent slanted and biased presentation on Muslims---the tax-funded leftist BBC wannabe stateside which said repeatedly that there were "7 million" Muslims, a number which CAIR forced on the hapless PC unwatched network.

<blockquote>Based on data from this survey, along with available Census Bureau data
on immigrants' nativity and nationality, the Pew Research Center
estimates the total population of Muslims in the United States at 2.35
million.</blockquote>

If Couric starts reporting re

If Couric starts reporting real "news", she might get a boost on her sagging ratings. There's no gender in newscasting as leftoids are suggesting. So, just report that dam* news lady...

KatieKooKie

She ain't getting my viewing vote.  She never apologized for advocating the castration of a certain group of men.

Isaiah 32:5-8 The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. For the vile person will speak villainy, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice hypocrisy, and to utter error aga