"Gay bishop snubbed by Anglican conference" reads the headline for the May 22 Reuters article by Luke Baker. But take a look at the lede and second graf and you'll see there are two bishops to be excluded from the gathering of Anglican prelates:
LONDON (Reuters) - The Archbishop of Canterbury, spiritual head of 77 million Anglicans worldwide, has not invited two wayward bishops to a major conference next year, a move likely to stir controversy in the deeply divided communion.
Archbishop Rowan Williams has sent invitations to more than 800 Anglican bishops asking them to attend the Lambeth Conference in July and August 2008, but has not invited two American bishops, Gene Robinson and Martyn Minns.
The first "wayward" bishop, Gene Robinson, of course is the openly gay Episcopal bishop of New Hampshire. He's also fairly theologically liberal, although that point is not mentioned by Reuters. But who's Martyn Minns? Why, only a priest who is perhaps polar opposite theologically of Robinson. You'll notice his conservatism is played up (Emphasis mine):
Minns, a deeply conservative Episcopalian, was installed last year as the head of a new Nigerian-based church branch in the United States designed as a refuge for orthodox believers. The Anglican Communion does not recognize his position.
"This crisis in the Anglican Communion is not about a few individual bishops but about a worldwide Communion that is torn at its deepest level," Minns said.
So wait, a gay, liberal priest and a conservative priest are barred from the same conference? How does that wash? Rather than being an "anti-gay" "snub" by the Archbishop of Canterbury, it's a slap on the wrist to both men, not so much for being "wrong" in theology, but because they rocked the ecclesial boat (again, emphasis mine) in separate ways:
Williams said in his statement: "I have to reserve the right to withhold or withdraw invitations from bishops whose appointment, actions or manner of life have caused exceptionally serious division or scandal within the Communion."
"I do not say this lightly, but I believe that we need to know as we meet that each participant recognizes and honors the task set before us and that there is an adequate level of mutual trust between us about this."
"Exceptionally serious division or scandal," to Williams' mind, have occurred both with Robinson taking office despite grave reservations by conservative Anglicans and with Minns coming to hold his office thanks in part to some of the very same conservative Anglicans.
Reuters reporting religion news to the great unwashed is like the blind leading the blind. Both fall into the ditch.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
That report was bizarre on so
May 22, 2007 - 18:17 ET by tracheostomyThat report was bizarre on so many levels. "Rocking the boat" indeed!
I hear that cautionary suggestion all the time from the "theology divides" crowd, like it's always a bad thing. Sometimes you have to draw the line. Sometimes the erosion reaches your very doorstep. Thanks again for spotlighting it Noel.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Thanks, trake, but I'm Ken,
May 22, 2007 - 20:47 ET by Ken ShepherdThanks, trake, but I'm Ken, not Noel.
OK. Here's my take...
May 22, 2007 - 19:33 ET by c5thenThe Anglican church has decided that almost anything is OK except for two things:
1) Being openly gay and a Bishop [either by themselves is fine- but then who made him a Bishop?]
2) Actually adhering the the Bible and standing up for it's teachings.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
c5...Does this mean you can b
May 22, 2007 - 19:44 ET by Clear thinkerc5...
Does this mean you can be a Bishop if you stay in the closet and only sleep with male hookers to keep things hush-hush?
Help a wounded soldier here...
http://newsbusters.org/node/12877
rock the boat indeed
May 22, 2007 - 22:07 ET by txteacherThe Episcopal church's boat has been rocking for decades. But the issues that divide it now deal principally with the authority of Scripture, the divinity of Christ, and whether or not, as the Bible says, Jesus is the only way to salvation. The deeper divides have resulted in the disagreement over the sexuality issues. The election of the very liberal Katherine Jefferts Schori as presiding bishop was a signal to the orthodox that the Episcopal church is now the church of anything goes. The faithful are headed for the lifeboats. The ship has lost its anchor and is now drifting along being tossed to and fro by the waves of secular progressive culture.
Can you say Shelby Sprong boy
May 22, 2007 - 22:15 ET byCan you say Shelby Sprong boys and girls?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Yeah, if I had more time I
May 23, 2007 - 00:58 ET by Ken ShepherdYeah, if I had more time I could have probably dug up how Schori and Robinson are quite liberal/heterodox on the physical resurrection of Christ and other key doctrines of the faith.