Pro-Reform Syrians Angry About Speaker Pelosi’s Visit Last Month

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

As America’s media largely gushed over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-California) visit to Syria last month, it would only be fair of them to gauge reaction of the citizens most-largely impacted – the Syrians themselves.

In a rather stunning article published May 15, The New York Observer has gone where few press outlets dare (h/t LGF, emphasis added throughout):

Many Syrian dissidents and pro-democracy activists have privately expressed dismay at Ms. Pelosi’s message of friendship to the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. They say that Ms. Pelosi’s visit, no matter how well-intentioned, has effectively pulled the rug out from under them, critically damaging their efforts to create momentum for reform from within.

Think you’ll be hearing Charlie, Katie, or Brian utter such words any time soon? Regardless, that was only the beginning of this marvelous exposé:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Pelosi’s visit made the regime feel that Americans were divided on how to deal with Syria,” said a Damascus-based women’s-rights activist who, like five other activists interviewed for this article, asked that his name be withheld because he feared punishment. “This sends a message to the regime that the pressure is off, that it can do what it likes.”

And, her visit had immediate negative consequences the media here certainly will not report:

It has certainly seemed that way in the weeks since Ms. Pelosi’s departure, during which time the government has imprisoned Kurdish opposition figures while maintaining travel and work bans on political activists.

In the eastern Syrian town of Raqqa, hundreds of people were arrested for protesting rigged parliamentary elections. And over the last month, the Syrian courts have embarked on a veritable spree of sentencing, handing down harsh prison sentences to some of Syria’s most prominent pro-democracy activists.

Last week, the physician and dissident Kamal Labwani was sentenced to 12 years in prison for having met with American officials during a 2005 trip to Washington. This past weekend, the activists Michel Kilo and Mahmoud Issa were sentenced to three years each for having signed the so-called Damascus Declaration, a document petitioning Syria’s government to normalize relations with neighboring Lebanon.

As a result, reform activity has come to a screeching halt:

The few Syrian activists who are not presently behind bars say they have all but ceased working.

“Most of us are just sitting and waiting,” said the women’s-rights activist. “It’s too dangerous to try any political activities right now. The regime is making a point, and there’s no telling when the current crackdown will end.”

[…]

Pelosi’s visit was well-meant, but it’s been bad for everyone, and especially devastating for some of our closest friends in Syria,” an American researcher on Syria said.

How marvelous. Unfortunately, a media enthralled by the female speaker won’t dare point to her obvious lack of apparel.

Color me unsurprised.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I was reading DeToquville las

I was reading DeToqueville last night and I came across a brilliant point: Despotism is easy to set up quickly, but liberty is difficult and takes longer to establish the further removed from it the liberated people were.

The people of the Middle East (except the Israelis) have little experience with freedom and democracy, so it's already an uphill struggle.  So, when people like Pelosi, Murtha, Jimmah, and the rest of the despot-enabling Left seem to side with the enemies of freedom and democracy, they make the process more difficult...and probably cost more lives...

Well said. Of course, don't e

Well said. Of course, don't expect to see this picture of Pelosi to be used in the same way the one of Saddam shaking hands with Rumsfeld. Ohhh... the irony.

Yes, we need some clarificati

Yes, we need some clarification from the msm on this point.  The US, especially Republican administrations, has been accused of coddling and encouraging dictators in the past, as we undoubtedly and wrongly have done. 

Isn't that what Pelosi did here?  So when is it acceptable to coddle dictators and when is it wrong?

"So when is it accepta

"So when is it acceptable to coddle dictators and when is it wrong?"

I wish my country would come up with a logical, principled, coherent, and Constitutional answer to this question, because all I've seen over close to 5 decades is political BS explanations and excuse-making. And since various people here AND the news media don't want to see it, I'll include a bonus-link regarding entangling alliances. My friend Bigtimer will love the part about the United Nations, because once-again, it contradicts her totally-unsupported "he's pro-UN" assertions about Dr. Paul, but so be it!
JMR

Just call it yet another of

Just call it yet another of the endless examples of liberal hypocrisy.

What's interesting to note is that liberals will swear up and down that Saddam had nothing to do with terrorism! However, Syria's state sponsored terrorism is an undisputed FACT. (See also; Israeli-Palestinian Conflict)

Imagine my surprise?

Let's try to imagine Saudi di

Let's try to imagine Saudi dissidents & pro-democracy activists saying or doing anything. Nope, I couldn't imagine 'em anywhere besides a filthy Saudi jail, either. What wonderful "friends" the Saudis are -- no wonder people respect and love America's ideals of liberty so-much over there!!
JMR

How much time have you spent

How much time have you spent in Saudi Arabia?  Of the Arab states, their government has been one of the most open to ideas of reform.  In fact, Crown Prince Abdallah heads up a large segment of the ruling family itself that is pushing for social and government reform.  So what you have is a pro-reform and anti-reform segmentation in the government itself, so what makes you think that people calling for reform in Saudi Arabia are being locked up?  In fact, the reformist violence in Saudi Arabia has been focused on people in the government who want reform and is conducted by agents external to the government who don't want reform. 

Who are you getting your information from: MoveOn.org or Michael Moore?

None, but are the media sto

None, but are the media stories I hear of a corrupt dictatorship wrong? I'm talking about stories like this and this. Does Micheal own the VOA?? Did MoveOn buy the Washtimes from the Moonies??? Wow, apparently I'm really behind on the news...And now, since I answered yours, let me ask you a question. Have you ever made money in/from Saudi Arabia?
JMR

In answer to your question, I

In answer to your question, I worked with the Royal Saudi Naval Forces (RSNF) for about a year while I was employed by the U.S. Navy.  The RSNF bought command & control systems from the USN, and my job was to train the RSNF on how to operate their systems.  I was never hired or contracted by the Saudia, I just got an opportunity to spend some time in their country and meet a lot of their folks.

One thing you need to be cautious of is that everything you read in the media is written with an agenda in mind (as I'm sure you know).  All of these articles tend to paint the arrested folks as benevolent folks who are just wanting to call for change in their government, but you may notice that the details of who was sponsoring these people, ties to hostile groups, or other occurances that led to the arrest are usually left out.  Also, you don't see breakouts of people associated with groups like Hamas, or sponsored by Syria, who are trying to stop pro-democracy reform that allow you to differentiate them from those arrested for protesting for pro-democracy efforts.

So, is Saudi Arabia "evil"?  I would ask what would happen in the US if you had a group not just protesting the US government, but actively engaged in trying to overthrow it?  Wouldn't they be arrested just as fast?  Most of the folks who get themselves arrested aren't your run-of-the-mill Sheehans, but folks who are linked to terror, insurgent, or nationalist groups who are in business to overthrow the government, not just protesting.  There's a pretty big difference there.   

I picked the VOA & Wash

I picked the VOA & Washtimes (from among a panoply of choices given by a VERY rudimentary websearch) for exactly that reason -- so that media agendas would not be in question. I don't think any of the dissidents mentioned in either of the stories were trying to "overthrow" the Saudi dictatorship (let's be real here, it's not a "government" or "kingdom" as long as an entire sex isn't even permitted to drive cars in this day and age). Anyway, do you deny or can you explain the Saudi dictatorship's decades of financing Wahabbi hate against the USA under the guise of spreading "the Religion of Peace"??
JMR

First of all, you seem to hav

First of all, you seem to have a real issue with women driving cars, and are using that as a basis for your hatred for the Saudis.  I get that.  But that's the way the majority wants to live over there.  What right do we have to tell them that women should be allowed to drive?  Is it the same power that would allow them to come here and tell us that women are not allowed to drive?  They look at us as nuts for letting women drive just as much as we look at them as nuts for not letting them drive.  In my opinion, we have no more business telling them what's right and wrong than they (or anyone else) have telling us.

Also, where do you think the Washington Times is getting their info from???  You have an Arab reporter talking to Arab sources... any chance that he's as unbiased as say Chris Mathews talking to a DNC rep?  Also, in the WT article it states ""There have been sporadic demonstrations in the kingdom over the last few decades, but none where the participants were jailed for six months," he said.  So... in the past these demonstrations were tolerated, but this group got arrested... makes me wonder what they did that was different and that isn't being reported (as it usually isn't).

As for your concerns with them financing Wahabbi hate against the US, let's put that in context.  Any party, government, kingdom, etc., that's in power usually wants to stay in power, and they'll make deals with people who will help them stay on top.  Do you really think that Reagan supported Iran's views when Iran-Contra went down?  No, the Iranians were a means to an end.  The House of Saud is in a tough spot.  If they move too much towards being too democracy/U.S., they fall under attack by agents of Iran and Syria.  If they move too much towards the view of Iran and Syria, they fall under attack from the U.S.  So what can they do?  They hedge their bets just like we do.  They provide a bit of support to those who are against us, and they provide support to us against them.  It's not an ideal situation by a long shot for us, but it's provided more for us than our enemies over the years, so we endure it.

I agree with your point that

I agree with your point that for decades they turned a blind eye to the indoctrination of young people into radical Islam in order to stay in power. They were not the only ones. So did every other Arab country. And we and Europe never pressured them to contain that propagation. It is impossible for the Saudis to turn that around on a dime after decades. But it must be the responsibility of  Muslims to eradicate this form of Islam.

Bruzilla, with respect, you

Bruzilla, with respect, you may want to reconsider your statement.  Below is the State Department's description of the human rights situation in Saudi Arabia.

http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61698.htm

Don't damage your reputation by defending this bad government.  Undoubtedly there are outside forces working on the country.  As there are on many countries.  Their pressure is nothing compared to the influence of petrodollars whispering against reform.

It is not my intent to defend

It is not my intent to defend the Saudi government, although I do agree with a lot of their practices.  The issue was that Sarcasmo was trying to correlate what the Syrians are doing with what is happening in Saudi Arabia, and that just isn't the case.  The Syrians are running a straight-up dictatorship and systematically squelching any dissent.  With the Al Sauds, there is a tremendous level of debate within the government over reform, and the pro-reform members of government have been successful to the point where you have more and more external dissent from Iran, Syria, etc., attacking the Saudi government.  That's very, VERY, different from what's happening in Syria.

Also, I would disagree with the notion that "petrodollars" are whispering against reform.  I think the real situation is quite the opposite.  Most Saudi businessmen that I got to meet, mainly the ones with business partners outside of the Kingdom, were very pro-reform.  They thought that the religious laws and restrictions against women were fueling anti-Saudi sentiment, which is bad for their business.  The folks I talked to who were vehemently anti-reform were those with the closest ties to Islam.  They feel that their laws are sacrosanct (even thought very few actually are followed) and they are against any government reform that will lesson their power or influence.

Look, I think they're both

Look, I think they're both horrid dictatorships, but at least in Syria women can drive a freakin' car. Saudis are just plain backwards and inbred, and they're not our friends when you consider the decades of subsidy for Islamofascist Wahabbi hate, which has led to what we see today. I stand by all my words.
JMR

No problem here.  Rosie O'Do

No problem here.  Rosie O'Donnell stands by all her words too... that doesn't make them anymore correct. :)  In working for the Navy, I travelled all over the World and experienced a wide range of cultures.  I saw lots of things happening in foreign countries that would never, ever, be tolerated in the U.S., but that's how they want to do things in their countries and I'm fine with that.  As long as they're not threatening us, or doing things like genocide, more power to them.  Does it make them "backwards and inbred"?  Maybe to you, but they look at us coddling killers and rapists in our criminal justice system, allowing abortion on demand, and not providing a free college education to everyone, and think the same things of us.  So who's right?

Here's something you won't read about in the MSM: in the Riyadh yellow pages, the yellow pages for the capital city of the country, there is only one and a half pages of listings for lawyers.  1.5 pages for the capital of the country!  I used to live in Peedunk, MD and we had almost 20 pages of lawyer listings!  So who's more backwards?  The country where you can't barely take a leak without some legal issue coming out of it, or one where a civilization sets it's civil rules and laws, enforces them, and folks know what'll happen if you break them? 

Speaking for myself, I don't feel that we should be telling any other country how they should live anymore than I want some other country telling us how to live.  If what they're doing isn't a threat to us, then we should respect their culture.  And if they don't respect our culture, why should I let that bother me?

It's bad enough that President Bush has had the State Department

It's bad enough that President Bush has had the State Department working behind his back with it's own agenda.   Pelosi, who apparently believes she has been elected President, has deliberately destroyed reform progress in that important region.

Now we see clearly why Pelosi's ego-based trip was unconstitutional and why she should not be conducting foreign policy.   She should be threatened with prosecution and an example should be made of her.

"Okay, I trust you. W

"Okay, I trust you. When I get on the plane back to Washington, you're not going to throw him in jail again, and make me look bad to the people from the Washington Post - who told me not to come here in the first place"