On the May 21 edition of "The View," co-host Rosie O’Donnell responded to the fall out from her moral equivalency rant on Thursday. Rosie claims some cable news outlets "twisted" her words, and then got personal with token non-liberal Elisabeth Hasselbeck, calling her critics the "crappy shows" that "Elisabeth watches."
"But I didn't say it. You know who said it? Those crappy cable shows said it. The ones Elisabeth watches. Those shows."
Hasselbeck harshly reacted to those comments and it prompted Rosie to personally attack her more.
HASSELBECK: I watch all cable news, number one. I watch all of the, because that's part of my job and as an American citizen I try to broaden as many concepts as possible by watching all those news programs, okay. I do, obviously, like, like certain shows. I'll throw them out if you want me to. Like "Hannity and Colmes," they're one of my favorites, because they hold debates [applause] They hold debates on that show and I think that is, that is like what we do here only, you know, we have four women. And I think it's special here. But to say that, you know, someone can't hold two thoughts at the same time just because I believe in terrorism when there are Democrats out there running for office who don’t want to believe in terrorism and they want to treat it like the boogeyman. How are they going to protect us from something--
O’DONNELL: I think that you’re treating it like the boogeyman. I think they've used it to polarize people. They’ve used it–
Earlier in the segment, Rosie answered to the charge that she called U.S. troops terrorists. Elisabeth followed up with a very pointed question.
O’DONNELL: Okay, I’ll say it a million times. I just think it's interesting that the network you support takes such joy in twisting my words and distorting them. I do not think our American troops are terrorists. I want our American troops home, able-bodied. [applause] I don't want them to invade countries that have done nothing to the- us. I don't want them to die at the hands of a Republican administration that doesn't care enough about them to give them health care when they return. I love our troops and will work for our troops and no matter what you say [bleeped out] I– and that's the truth. Change it around as you like.
[Applause]
HASSELBECK: But when you pose that question, what is the answer to the question? Who are the terrorists?
On the May 17 show, Rosie did not say explicitly "U.S. soldiers are terrorists," but she did heavily imply that the United States engages in terrorism. One can only conclude from those comments, that U.S. soldiers, following orders, are engaging in that terrorism as well. Here is the exchange from the May 17 edition of "The View."
HASSELBECK: Do you not believe in terrorism?
O’DONNELL: I believe, Elisabeth, that 6,000 dead Americans from 9/11 and from this war is a lot less than 655,000 dead Iraqis.
HASSELBECK: But do you believe in terrorism?
O’DONNELL: I believe every human life is equal.
HASSELBECK: Do you believe there is terrorism?
O’DONNELL: I believe in state sponsored terrorism. I believe there is government sponsored terrorism by every nation in the world, including ours.
Barbara Walters, perhaps in an effort to save her reputation, strongly reacted to Rosie, noting that terrorism (or "jihadism" as Walters called it) does indeed exist and is a threat.
WALTERS: But they’ve killed innocent civilians other places. What is happening in Iraq, I think everybody believes is horrific and we don't know how to get out of it. But that does not mean that there are not jihadists, terrorists, who are out to harm us and we must be aware of it.
BEHAR: That's right.
[Applause]
At one point, some audience members actually booed Rosie’s comments. Rosie, who admits to discriminating against men, dismissed the booing as coming from a man.
O’DONNELL: Of course it’s a man booing [laughing]
HASSELBECK: Oh. I’m a woman. I would boo too.
The entire transcript is below.
ROSIE O’DONNELL: The White House said he's becoming increasingly irrelevant.
ELISABETH HASSELBECK: Yes. Well, that was after his comment saying that this is the worst administration in U.S. history. Which he meant-
O’DONNELL: Which I totally agree with.
HASSELBECK: Well he actually took that back, interestingly enough-
[applause and boos]
O’DONNELL: Of course it’s a man booing [laughing]
HASSELBECK: Oh. I’m a woman. I would boo too.
[...]
O’DONNELL: Did you watch what they said about me? Did you watch them this weekend? They said Rosie O'Donnell thinks our troops are terrorists. What do you think about that?
JOY BEHAR: They said something like that on MSNBC.
O’DONNELL: Did you watch it?
ELISABETH HASSELBECK: I didn’t watch it this weekend. No, I wasn’t here this weekend. I was in Boston with my brother.
O’DONNELL: But you were here when we talked about it.
HASSELBECK: Yes
O’DONNELL: So do you think that, that's what I was saying in that conversation?
HASSELBECK: They're referring to --
O’DONNELL: No here’s what they said. They said Rosie O'Donnell thinks our troops are terrorists.
HASSELBECK: That's because you asked the question who are the terrorists if 650,000 Iraqis are dead, after we came in there and invaded a sovereign nation. I’m just trying to--
O’DONNELL: That was the conversation.
HASSELBECK: Maybe that they drew the link there.
O’DONNELL: They drew the link, or they misrepresented what I said in order to twist it to make it seem what they want.
[Applause]
HASSELBECK: What is the, what is the– No, so, so I would clarify it for them now because you have the opportunity. What– because I did read that a lot of people were thinking you said that. Answer your own question, then.
O’DONNELL: Okay, I’ll say it a million times. I just think it's interesting that the network you support takes such joy in twisting my words and distorting them. I do not think our American troops are terrorists. I want our American troops home, able-bodied. [applause] I don't want them to invade countries that have done nothing to the- us. I don't want them to die at the hands of a Republican administration that doesn't care enough about them to give them health care when they return. I love our troops and will work for our troops and no matter what you say [bleeped out] I– and that's the truth. Change it around as you like.
[Applause]
HASSELBECK: But when you pose that question, what is the answer to the question? Who are the terrorists?
BARBARA WALTERS: Can I just say something? Because I listened the other day. And I think that sometimes you're confusing the word "terrorists," because you said "who are terrorists" implying they could be us. What you really mean, I think, is jihadists. We are talking about a particular group of people.
O’DONNELL: I'm talking about a word, "terrorism," that the administration has used to terrify this country. They're terrorizing Americans by using the word "terror" and taking away or civil liberties.
HASSELBECK: All countries, all nations use the word "terrorist" to describe those which would use the name of Allah will blow someone else up, will blow children up. Those are jihadist, those are extremists--
WALTERS: Those are jihadists.
HASSELBECK: –Islamists who are trying to use their religion to justify killing hundreds of thousands. But when you ask--
[moderate applause]
O’DONNELL: All I’m saying is, do you not think we've killed hundreds of thousands?
HASSELBECK: In the name of what?
O’DONNELL: Invading Iraq.
HASSELBECK: So are you then calling us terrorists?
O’DONNELL: No, I just said it, Elisabeth. Are you not able to hold two concepts at once?
HASSELBECK: I can hold more than two, actually. I can hold more than two if you'd like me to. I would like you to hold the idea that there are people out there named terrorists --
O’DONNELL: There are pregnant women in Iraq just like you and I will speak for them and you.
HASSELBECK: They're not terrorists. They’re not terrorists. They’re nice women.
O’DONNELL: So we shouldn't be over there killing them.
WALTERS: That's different story than saying that Americans are terrorists.
O’DONNELL: But I didn't say it. You know who said it? Those crappy cable shows said it. The ones Elisabeth watches. Those shows
[boos]
HASSELBECK: I watch all cable news, number one. I watch all of the, because that's part of my job and as an American citizen I try to broaden as many concepts as possible by watching all those news programs, okay. I do, obviously, like, like certain shows. I'll throw them out if you want me to. Like "Hannity and Colmes," they're one of my favorites, because they hold debates [applause] They hold debates on that show and I think that is, that is like what we do here only, you know, we have four women. And I think it's special here. But to say that, you know, someone can't hold two thoughts at the same time just because I believe in terrorism when there are Democrats out there running for office who don’t want to believe in terrorism and they want to treat it like the boogeyman. How are they going to protect us from something--
O’DONNELL: I think that you’re treating it like the boogeyman. I think they've used it to polarize people. They’ve used it--
WALTERS: There are people, there are jihadists whose life work and will die for it, is primarily to attack the west.
O’DONNELL: Right. And so when Ron Paul says why is that? Do we have any role in that Barbara? Why is that? He's asking the question.
WALTERS: We can go back to the mistakes we made in the beginning of the war, and we have to learn from that, and we have to learn from them. But that does not mean that there is a whole body of jihadists not, not necessarily Muslim, you can not say that, of jihadists whose, whose life and death is wiping out the west.
O’DONNELL: But they're not innocent civilians in Iraq. There are innocent civilians in Iraq.
WALTERS: But they’ve killed innocent civilians other places. What is happening in Iraq, I think everybody believes is horrific and we don't know how to get out of it. But that does not mean that there are not jihadists, terrorists, who are out to harm us and we must be aware of it.
BEHAR: That's right.
[Applause]





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Rosie, keep your love of the
May 21, 2007 - 15:14 ET by terrigRosie, keep your love of the troops out of your stupid conversation. Except for probably a very small percentage, they don't want your kind of "love". I mean in your book they're terrorists. My husband has quite a few confirmed kills on this last deployment. Is he a terrorist too? Again, my offer still stands to send you and Mommy Kelly to AQ HQ in Pakistan (?) to meet with these wonderful, all around good guys (in your sorry book).
Love of the troops
May 21, 2007 - 15:18 ET by Cool ArrowWhen they say it "isn't about not supporting the troops"
It's about not supporting the troops
Isaiah 32:5-8
The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. For the vile person will speak villainy, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD
Barbara Walters
May 21, 2007 - 15:16 ET by Cool ArrowBarbara surprised me in that she didn't know Rosie was lying about the "hundreds of thousands" we've killed in Iraq. For the rest of Barbara's input, I was encouraged that she didn't completely put her head in Mama Rosie's lap.
Isaiah 32:5-8
The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. For the vile person will speak villainy, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD
O'Donnell: I love our troop
May 21, 2007 - 15:17 ET by slayerwatcherO'Donnell: I love our troops and will work for our troops and no matter what you say [bleeped out] I - that's the truth. Change it around as you like.
Does anyone know what got "bleeped out" on the show? I really do not like this person.
Pul-eeze!
May 21, 2007 - 15:17 ET by goldenthroat"Did you watch what they said about ME?" - Wosie O'Dumber
Therein lies this fat lesbo's problem - it's all about her and no one else. Thank God Elisabeth finally fired back at The Mouth this time! Wosie's philosophy is "my mind is made up - don't confuse me with the facts."
I think we are all counting the days until this overweight, obnoxious and obscene slob is off "The View". I am really beginning to wonder if Baba Wawa will put up with it much longer. Maybe she'll fire her before the end of June.
Wait a minute - I just checked and that fall under the "when hell freezes over" category.
Never dance on an empty stomach unless it's a liberal.
David Letterman said it best
May 21, 2007 - 15:20 ET by SouthJersey1953David Letterman said it best:
"Shrek 3" opened today [5/18]. All your favorite characters are back. There’s the ogre, there’s the princess, there’s the jackass . . . Oh wait a minute. That’s the cast of "The View.”
No RINOs in '08 - Vote for a true conservative!
Who, sir? I don't see any. Ro
May 21, 2007 - 16:46 ET by kathleenirishWho, sir? I don't see any. Romney is a light-weight, if that's who you mean. \
" 'Fred's Slacks' is a winner!!"
libs
May 21, 2007 - 15:24 ET by iveseenitallBoo, Rosie!
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
libs
May 21, 2007 - 15:24 ET by iveseenitallI love the way the loudmouth libs back off when confronted with their own words. Jimmy Carter and Rosie are two prime examples. " I didn't say that ". Wow! Could it be that when confronted with their own vileness, they suddenly lose the courage of their "convictions". Or could it be they have no "convictions" at all, only diarrhea of the mouth and constipation of the brain.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
isia...No convictions at all.
May 21, 2007 - 15:34 ET by bigtimerisia...
No convictions at all.
Just pure blathering leftist hatred.
O’DONNELL: All I’m saying
May 21, 2007 - 15:43 ET by general companyO’DONNELL: All I’m saying is, do you not think we've killed hundreds of thousands?
NO, but if you do, please explain. On second thought, who beeping cares what you think. Why do we have to be assaulted by this hag constantly?
Does Rosie not watch The View
May 21, 2007 - 16:03 ET by whatajoyDoes Rosie not watch The View to see herself and how stupid she sounds. Why can't ABC let Rosie go now? Why wait until June? She's so stupid. She is so narrow-minded and refuses to hear the other side or consider other possiblities. It's like she doesn't know the definition of a "terrorist" or "military". The more she talks, the more she sounds stupid, idiotic and delusional.
----------------------------------------
Oh, um, it's Thursday, but Dwight thinks it's Friday. So...keep that going.
~ From "The Office"
O’DONNELL: There are pregna
May 21, 2007 - 16:11 ET by Higgins WRO’DONNELL: There are pregnant women in Iraq just like you and I will speak for them and you. ----- Wha?? I'm surprised Elizabeth didn't call her on this one.
Rosie wants to speak for pregnant Iraqi women, and Elizabeth Hasselbeck? Based on what experience?
What an absurd (and therefore liberal) idea....."You, over there! Shut up, and just let me do your talking (and thinking) for you. Believe me, you'll thank me later."
Her attack on Elizabeth reads like someone who is very much aware of their own pending mortality (cancellation) and she's in a panic to make sure that she's not going to have to live off of speaking fees (at liberal colleges) the rest of her life (she will).
So what if they're pregnant,
May 21, 2007 - 16:51 ET by kathleenirishSo what if they're pregnant, Rosie? Those aren't babies in there, after all, right? They're not even alive, never mind an organism that has any rights...isn't that the party line with the pro-choice crowd? Spare us your phony compassion and concern. You are a big- mouthed idiot, first and foremost. Propagandist.
" 'Fred's Slacks' is a winner!!"
"Crappy cable shows"
May 21, 2007 - 17:04 ET by mattm"Crappy cable shows" ???
Give Rosie the Pot Calling the Kettle Black award for the day...
But, but, but, mattm, The Vie
May 21, 2007 - 22:37 ET by MikeBBut, but, but, mattm, The View is not a crappy cable show. It's a crappy broadcast show. Tsk.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Rosie O'Donuts
May 21, 2007 - 18:38 ET by theknight70Why are people even commenting on what she has to say? Ignore her. This will piss her off more than anything we can say about her. She wants us to notice what she says and make comments about it. It's all about publicity. It's all about her. Just let her hang herself with her own anger by ignoring her. It would be a lovely sight if we did just this and watch her destroy herself while spewing her own vile venom.
knight,I agree. I am sick to
May 21, 2007 - 18:47 ET by bigtimerknight,
I agree. I am sick to death of her venom.
Less attention to her would be the best medicine.
I agree with your sentiments about her hanging herself too....upside down...forever.
Rosie is true to who she is..
May 21, 2007 - 20:23 ET byRosie is true to who she is.... a liar.
Yes, she was calling our men and women over there terrorists.
Elisabeth messes up a lot. She is not a true concervative and is far from a true Christian, but she did right today.
Debra...
She is not a true concervativ
May 21, 2007 - 20:31 ET by bigtimerShe is not a true concervative and is far from a true Christian,
Oh now you are judging whether Elizabeth is a true Christian Debra...
Aren't you special.
Church Lady
May 22, 2007 - 01:33 ET by RJ"aren't you special"
Our Church Lady brings her own special twist to "current events"....after watching too many of those SNL skits, she apparently believes she has been empowered with the Voice of God and the responsibility to keep a running tally of sinners....
Debra - Technically I would d
May 21, 2007 - 21:15 ET by Gat New YorkDebra - Technically I would disagree about Rosie being a liar. To be a liar would mean that you know the truth and I think you would agree that Rosie O'Donuts is way too ignorant to know the truth.
Gat New York,You have a good
May 22, 2007 - 01:13 ET byGat New York,
You have a good point there. Perhaps she chooses ignorance so that she does not have to deal with the truth?
Debra...
Rosie... try to figure this
May 22, 2007 - 10:15 ET by Challenger GrimRosie... try to figure this out:
Terrorists: kill innocents ON PURPOSE (see: 9/11 and more)
U.S. : When we kill innocents it is UNINTENTIONAL.
Terrorists: celebrate and party when innocents die
U.S. : Weep and express regret over innocent death.
Terrorists: use children as human shields
U.S. : build schools and deliver food to children
Anyone else want to keep going with this train of thought?
Be sure to get your daily Fred Thompson Fact!
Rosie 'understands' the terro
May 22, 2007 - 10:37 ET by Sergeant ROCKRosie 'understands' the terrorists. That's what's most important here: understanding.
Hasselbeck is now growing som
May 22, 2007 - 10:27 ET by Senior ChiefHasselbeck is now growing some cojones, I mean backbone, to stand toe to toe with fat leftoid lesbo. But for some reason, Behar uttered only two words, "That's right" and agreeing to Walters opinion. Behar- as always is stoned again and sleeping- could be next to be booted out, if she doesn't agree with BaWa. She wants her job badly, or she'll be on welfare by taxpayers' money.
Keep it up Elizabeth, expose these phony, lefty Americans.
Anyone else notice that the
May 22, 2007 - 10:35 ET by Challenger GrimAnyone else notice that the hottest one on there is the conservative/non-liberal?
Be sure to get your daily Fred Thompson Fact!
The U.S. is fighting a war wi
May 22, 2007 - 11:51 ET by jpatchThe U.S. is fighting a war with the ACLU, Amnesty International, the Red Cross, the U.N., the MSM, and the entire world looking over our shoulder, cowering behind us. Meanwhile, the radical Muslim terrorists kill indiscriminately, without care or regard for human life of any sort, and without remorse or hesitation. The acts that these "people" are carrying out in the name of Allah can only be described as evil, and as the work of the devil...which makes sense to me, because Satan is the god of Hell, and we've been warned that Satan wishes to extend his dominion into God's kingdom here on Earth.
The MSM is so wayward, ignorant and afraid of religion that they'd rather try to downplay the seriousness of radical Islam than confront it with faith. What is wrong with labeling these attacks as the work of the Devil? Has anything else ever been so obvious?
Works of the devil? To do th
May 22, 2007 - 11:57 ET by Sergeant ROCKWorks of the devil? To do that would acknoledge the existence of God. We can't have that now, can we?
Seriously, you know? I mean
May 22, 2007 - 12:50 ET by jpatchSeriously, you know? I mean, President Bush openly talks about his faith and how it has helped him on a personal and spiritual level...but the media portrays him as being blindly religious, EXACTLY WHAT OUR ENEMY IS. How are we supposed to accomplish anything as a nation when we are constantly and vehemently attacked every single day by our own people? People like Maher and O'Donnell claim that the filth that they spew is democracy is action, but in reality, much of what they say should be considered treason, especially in a time of war.
They also project that we are
May 22, 2007 - 12:58 ET by Sergeant ROCKThey also project that we are teetering on becoming a religious state! We are just one Republican away from that happening. However, they cannot bring themselves to believe that such a place already exists: IRAN.
Also, if liberals can re-define what the Second Amendment means in today's world, surely we can also re-define what the term treason means in today's world as well.
Yes exactly. We're basicall
May 22, 2007 - 13:17 ET by jpatchYes exactly. We're basically a theocracy already...just wait until we get 6 Catholic justices in the Supreme Court!! Then our master plan will be ready to implement...
That's the point Sergeant - we have literally dozens of examples of state sponsored hate, of persecution, of totalitarianism, of theocratic regimes seeking domination and power; examples of leaders like Kim Jong Ill who are starving their countrymen and women while they're setting off nukes, people like Hugo Chavez who call our President the Devil...there is no end to the amount of evil in this world, but no matter what, no evil seems to be as grave as the evil that exists in Washington.
And thanks for bringing up a good point: treason does need to be re-defined for this generation. It's as if there are no limits to what can be said, printed or aired these days...no scruples, no integrity, no morals...just how can I get ratings, how can I get a laugh, how can I sell magazines?? No thought for the content or its impact.
I want O'Donnell and Maher in the gallows on the White House lawn...
And who is monitoring the ki
May 22, 2007 - 12:45 ET by Senior ChiefAnd who is monitoring the killers of the 665,000 Iraqis this fat lesbo was referring to? Are ACLU, UN, Red Cross, Green Peace, US Congress, BaWa, Pelosi, Reid pursuing these "jihadist" to be put to jail for violating human rights? Just asking...
That's the even sicker part o
May 22, 2007 - 13:00 ET by jpatchThat's the even sicker part of this - not only is Rosie in denial that terrorism exists, she claims that our nation, our President and our soldiers are the biggest terrorists in the world, and that it is our army that is detonating all of these explosives in Iraq, killing thousands of civilians in the process.
HELLOOOO!?!?!?!? It is the jihadists that are killing innocents in Iraq Rosie!! Take yourself out of your upside-down lesbian love harness for two seconds, let the blood circulate back down to your gut where it belongs, and try to understand that it is not the U.S. army that is murdering these civilians.
No consequences in the media for being a jihadist, for screaming "Death to America!!", for announcing your pure hatred for our President, for burning the American flag...kinda makes you wonder what side some "Americans" are on...
It's the moral equivalency ar
May 22, 2007 - 13:09 ET by Sergeant ROCKIt's the moral equivalency argument. It is used quite extensibly by liberals when debating the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. There, like in Iraq, innocents are intentionally killed in vastly larger numbers than those killed unintentionally by the military. Additionally, in both cases only the TERRORISTS have a standing order to kill innocents, not the military forces.
When's the last time you've heard Rosie condemn the beheading of an innocent?
Rosie is apparently complet
May 22, 2007 - 13:04 ET by lnthompRosie is apparently completely oblivious to the documented treatment of women in general by even "moderate" followers of Islam, and even more blind to the treatment of homosexuals buy followers of Islam.
Lee T.
U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington
The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain
Which is why she should be of
May 22, 2007 - 13:26 ET by jpatchWhich is why she should be off of the air immediately. If you're getting paid to be on TV to talk about current events, and you have no clue what you're talking about; if you have no ability to put things in a historical context, if you are so completely one-sided in your thought process that you either ignore or interrupt someone whenever they disagree or have an opposing point of view, then you are unfit to do your job, and you should be fired.
Good point about the treatment of woman and homosexuals in Islam...but guess what? No jihadists currently hold office in the U.S., so they can't be on the list of people we hate. You have to follow the MSM rules, and stick to hating someone that gets paid to make the U.S. and the world a better place.
The more schizo Rosie gets,
May 22, 2007 - 22:45 ET by txteacherThe more schizo Rosie gets, the higher the ratings for this 3rd rate production. Follow the money. Wait...that gives schizos a bad rap :P
I wish the classy Hasselbec
May 23, 2007 - 02:10 ET by daveinbocaI wish the classy Hasselbeck would nail the mouth-without-a-brain on the bogus figures for number of Iraqis killed since the war began. Those emanate from the fraudulent Lancet publication---a bunch of Bolshie sawbones with no cred outside their little ultra-left cabal [except to morbidly-obese lesbian agitprop shouters].