Canadian Front Page: ‘Experts Say Many of the Claims in Al Gore’s Film Are Wrong’

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

Here’s something that is almost a metaphysical certitude: no major American newspaper, in the midst of all the current global warming hysteria, would dare do a front-page feature article questioning the merits of Al Gore’s schlockumentary “An Inconvenient Truth.”

Yet, there it was Saturday, covering almost two-thirds of the front page of Canada’s National Post, right smack in the middle, with a big picture of the Global Warmingist-in-Chief, surrounded by the shocking headline:

Even Climate Change Experts Say Many of the Claims in Al Gore’s Film Are Wrong. 

So How Did it Become Required Classroom Viewing?

Think you’ll see that some day on the front page of the New York Times, Washington Post, or USA Today?

While you ponder, the article was just as skeptical (emphasis added throughout):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

First it was his world history class. Then he saw it in his economics class. And his world issues class. And his environment class. In total, 18-year-old McKenzie, a Northern Ontario high schooler, says he has had the film An Inconvenient Truth shown to him by four different teachers this year.

"I really don't understand why they keep showing it," says McKenzie (his parents asked that his last name not be used). "I've spoken to the principal about it, and he said that teachers are instructed to present it as a debate. But every time we've seen it, well, one teacher said this is basically a two-sided debate, but this movie really gives you the best idea of what's going on."

Amazing. The article continued:

Even scientists who back Mr. Gore's message admit they're uncomfortable with liberties the politician takes with "science" in the film. But, McKenzie says most of his classmates are credulous.

His teachers are not much more discerning. "They don't know there's another side to the argument," he says. McKenzie's mother was outraged to find out that Mr. Gore's film was being presented as fact in her son's classroom. "This is just being poured into kids' brains instead of letting them know there's a debate going on," she says. "An educational system falls down when they start taking one side."

But Mr. Gore's filmed climate-change lecture is showing up in classrooms across Canada, frequently unaccompanied by critical analysis or a discussion of competing theories. "One of the teachers at my kid's school showed it and he even said ahead of time, 'There is some propaganda in this,' " says Tim Patterson, a Carleton University earth sciences professor. "I said to him, 'You even knew this was a propaganda film, and you still showed it in your classroom?' " The weirdest part: It was the gym teacher.

If you have children in junior or high school, there is a good chance they have been shown An Inconvenient Truth in school - or they will be soon.

Shocking. Regardless of the admitted – and not admitted – flaws in this film, educators in Canada are showing it to students without any balance from the other side of the debate.

How disgraceful.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If a socialist nation like Ca

If a socialist nation like Canada can turn out a newspaper article like this, there is hope for our country. In the mean time, thank goodness for home schooling and private schools.

"Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."

- President George W Bush September 2001 speech to a joint session of Congress.

Education

American education is a socialist/communist propaganda machine and a 527 for the Democrat(ic)s. The same for the MSM.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

It's about freakin' time

Finally, a lone voice cries out against the mob with the torches of "Global Warming".  Beware of science that avoids debate. 

I've heard from others saying

I've heard from others saying they can't understand why their kids are having to watch this propaganda.  For one of my friends, this was the last straw after her freshman son saw it in History, Science and English class.  She has enrolled him into a private school where her first question was how many of your teachers are showing this film.  They told her nobody as they've instructed their teachers that it wasn't appropriate.

Suppose I took my Bible int

Suppose I took my Bible into classrooms of public schools or universities.

And I started reading it aloud to every class I had

And then I did that in other peoples classes too.

If anybody asked me what I was doing, I would say, "I'M DOING THIS BECAUSE YOU NEED TO HEAR IT AND BECAUSE I WANT TO"

How long would it be before I was

- put in a straightjacket and locked up for good

- shot

MD - gendernutral jacket and

MD - gendernutral jacket and sent to "re-educaiton camp" - being shot is not an option, by the "no guns allowed" crowd. Now, if you were wearing gloves, and reading a translation of the koran . . .

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Isn't the inverse of "An

Isn't the inverse of "An inconvenient truth" "A convenient lie".

Where is resident troll Leon? His probable response will be that it is only a Canadian rag probably on the payroll of Big Oil.

inverse converse

converse, rather than inverse

The similarities between this

The similarities between this indoctrination and the one regarding evolution are so apparent.  Even though the evidence shows evolution didn't happen, we are still bombarded with the lie it did without any debate as to any other explanation.  All forms of media, movies, books, magazines,  are constantly echoing the preaching of evolution as the reason we exist with no consideration of alternate thought.  The same is happening with AGW.  And when you even try to bring up debate, you are vociferously attacked as an idiot or an 'unbeliever' in the lie that is being pushed.  We have to defeat liberalism.  It is harming this country and world in ways we can't even see yet.  If you aren't given the whole story, how can you make an informed conclusion as to the right way to proceed?

I'd like to hope that at le

I'd like to hope that at least a handful of teachers who show this movie are doing so to spark discussions about how to construct an argument, logical fallacy, media interpretation, the impact of authority and authenticity in discourse, etc, etc. As someone who still has a spark of faith in public education, I'm going to imagine that some teachers are doing this rather than treating it like a feature-length public service announcement. I would take my kids right out of any school that showed it and then didn't allow discussion; and then I would go apeshit at the next PTA meeting.

I do vehemently disagree with the previous poster though: ". . . the evidence shows evolution didn't happen" doesn't hold much water.

"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18

Hey Jason,If you're advocatin

Hey Jason,

If you're advocating using Al Gore's movie as a basis of debate, wouldn't it be even more constructive (and less biased on the part of teachers who show this film) to show a non-warmer documentary in tandem, and then let the debate (and the teaching of debate) begin?

BTW, check out Noel's post (I think it was Friday....cartoon of Al Gore) on the 15 year old who put up a non-warming website.   Unbelievable work from this young lady, her site is awesome.

I'm not really advocating t

I'm not really advocating that even, I'm just hoping that among the hundreds of teachers who are apparently showing Gore's film, at least a few are treating it as a learning/discussion opportunity, and not as the Final Word. I'd prefer they not eat up 90 minutes of class time with the film in the first place. But yeah, a better alternative might be like an excerpt from Inconvenient Truth and an excerpt from something else. Definitely.

Unfortunately, I have a feeling that a small number of teachers are using it as a teaching tool (as opposed to an indoctrination tool) in the first place is probably pretty low.

Of course, I haven't even seen it, so I don't really know what you would use it for in a classroom.

"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18

Jason,Of course, being more l

Jason,

Of course, being more liberal than I, you'd hope that teachers are using this as an opportuntiy to teach critical thinking.  You're far more generous than I in thinking this, and I'll grant you, you may have a point.

Having said that, showing this film without any opposing information (and some students report seeing it in several classes) is either intellectual laziness, or pushing an agenda.

I'd not send a child to public school, ever.  Hillary can keep her village.

Having said that, showing t

Having said that, showing this film without any opposing information
(and some students report seeing it in several classes) is either
intellectual laziness, or pushing an agenda.

I agree, 100%.

Funny story, when I was a freshman in high school (public, but a pretty affluent one), my dad wanted to pull me out and put me in private school after a pep rally riot. I had nothing to do with it, it just made him decide that public schools were for shit. I resisted because there was this girl I liked at my school. We dated for a month, and then I spent the next 3.8 years in public school. I gotta say, I really regret that decision. Public school was hellish. Funny the things we men will do for a pretty face.

"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18

Wow, Jason, we agree.Funny, i

Wow, Jason, we agree.

Funny, isn't it...about teenagers?

I myself attended a non-traditional school in the 7th & 8th grades, run by a university, where team teaching and modulized curricula (students could progress as quickly as they wanted to) were the norm.  It was great.  But it was also twenty five miles away, via nasty bus ride (no a/c) and having a working mom cut down on any extra-curricular activities.  Hence, I left a great academic environment for more or less social reasons, as well.  Bad decision.

However, that two years gave me a fabulous basis for the rest of my education, through high school and including college.

Blonde/jason

After working in a school district for 8 1/2 years I will tell you I want the teacher to stick to the three R's. I do not want them indoctrinating my children or grandchildren--even if they agree with me. What is happening out there??

I am for prayer in school, yet I was quite upset to see a first grade public school teacher advocating those kids to join a specific sect. Also teaching them the Bible. I want the kids to know the Bible but I don't want them learning from a public schoolteacher who is supposed to be teaching them tha alphabet, readin, simple math, etc. That teacher was giving ammo to my most hated enemy--the ACLU.

MB, here's where I think pr

MB, here's where I think problems crop up: most curricula and pedagogical theories these days, not just the "progressive" kind, advocate doing more than the three R's. History and English morph into critical thinking. I took sociology, which a lot of people here probably think is junk science, when I was in 10th grade. Now, I think all of this is just fine, except that it takes a very talented teacher to show young, impressionable students how to think critically without also disseminating a specific way of thinking. And there's your indoctrination. So, in other words, I don't think that a lot of what people see as a liberal educational system is deliberate, but a symptom of trying to broach difficult new educational imperatives. For students who come in as strong independent thinkers, it's great. For the other 95% of them, it can be a problem, as their matching Abercrombie ensembles and taste in music betrays their inability to think for themselves.

"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18

Jason, most of the teachers I met

Jason, most of the teachers I met were really nice people. Most of them were dedicated to doing a good job. The basic problem is, when you are a teacher, disseminating knowledge is perceived (in my guess as an observer) perceived as advocating a position. For example, in my opinion, no teacher should discuss an alternate life style other than to tell her students that discrimination of any kind will not be allowed in his/her classroom. I submit to you, to even broach the subject will be seen as advocacy. Is this what we want our teachers to be putting in front of our students? I say, nay! You did say, "it takes a very talented teacher to...". I am not trying to split hairs here, who determines when a teacher is "very talented" enough to enter certain arenas of thought more associated with life styles rather than the hard rubber of ABC?

Sociology is indeed a mine field at the high school level. Sociology is a social science that has many sub-disciplines. The best protection for our youth in school is to have the proper sub-disciplines taught. Now, who determines the sub-disciplines. Again IMHO that should not be an instructor or school only decision.The PTA and parents should have say in the matter.

Well apparently no one is d

Well apparently no one is determining it. That's the whole problem. There's a level of subtlety in it, don't you think?

I like your remark about sub-disciplines. I think that topics such as these should be taught as much as disciplines - ie, how to prepare papers and citations and research - as about the actual content.

I'm not sure exactly what you mean by alternate lifestyle, but I have to disagree. I have no problem with discussing the way that sexuality, for instance, is consumed and represented in a culture. If I were to come across as saying it's OK to be gay (I would never be so hokey as to say that flat-out), and some parents got upset, as far as I'm concerned those parents can just deal with it or take their kids out of the school. However, it's a giant leap from that to actively encouraging kids to be gay. Those are two massively different positions that are consistently conflated by people who find homosexuality threatening. Fortunately for me, I am not a high school teacher, and if I was, I wouldn't be teaching in a community that finds tolerance of homosexuality to be offensive.

"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18

I have tolerance--I object to certain ways of teaching--

Your feelings???

http://forum.newspaperindex.com/viewtopic.php?t=2444&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid=d5f18d7e7c3fda1bc9ce17cacab16196

 My main objection is tio the following part of the judge's decision. He is wrong unless the school district has a voucher system.

Federal Judge Mark Wolf ruled on Friday that public schools are "entitled to teach anything that is reasonably related to the goals of preparing students to become engaged and productive citizens in our democracy." "Diversity is a hallmark of our nation. It is increasingly evident that our diversity includes differences in sexual orientation," he said.

I was over your way this week

I was over your way this weekend. Do you have a link for that site?

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

 gee i didn't know this was

 

gee i didn't know this was the perfered viewing in Canada, TOO:

http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/060609/14578__clockwork_l.jpg

 1300 IRANIAN PLUTONIUM  GAS CENTRIFUGES OPERATING 24-7 , OPPS IT'S NOW 8,000!!

This is obviously used to indoctrinate

The "teachers" are showing this because it reinforces their pre-concieved ideas and they are trying to indoctrinate children. There is absolutely no justification for a gym teacher showing this film. There is no eason to show this film for any reason to middle-school or junior high aged children. This is pure indoctrination, plain and simple.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic

No justification for a gym te

No justification for a gym teacher to show it?!?!  If it weren't for gym teachers and their quest to squeeze as many time-killing films into a semester as they could, we would have never gotten some shut-eye at school.

What a wonderful front page.

What a wonderful front page.  And printed in a country, as a Canadian commenter points out above, that leans further left than the United States.