The Formerly Mainstream Media is favorably transfixed on the proposed immigration "reforms" being whipped through Congress -- legislation that opponents characterize as "amnesty."
"Somehow," they have managed to virtually ignore immigration-related legislation that has actually become law in Oklahoma.
Perhaps it's because Oklahoma's reforms have nothing to do with "amnesty," and everything to do with enforcement.
Specifically, from a May 8 Associated Press story on the bill's passage:
Governor Henry today signed a sweeping immigration reform bill that was passed overwhelmingly by the Oklahoma Legislature, but described it as a stopgap measure until the federal government takes action on the issue.
Among other things, the bill contains employment, labor law and civil rights provisions to protect citizens and legal immigrants who lose their jobs at companies that employ illegal immigrants to perform the same or similar work.
Beginning in November, public agencies will be required to use a program that screens Social Security numbers to make sure they are real and that they match up with a job applicant's name.
A One News Now story provided more detail. It also makes it clear that the sponsor of the legislation believes that the states have more power to enforce immigration law than the "it's the Feds' problem" types would like us to believe (bold is mine):
House Bill 1804 was passed by overwhelming majorities in both the House and Senate of the Oklahoma Legislature. The measure's sponsor, State Representative Randy Terrill, says the bill has four main topical areas: it deals with identity theft; it terminates public assistance benefits to illegals; it empowers state and local police to enforce federal immigration laws; and it punishes employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens.
Oklahoma is no longer "O.K." for illegal aliens, Terrill observes. "When you put everything together in context," he contends, "the bottom line is illegal aliens will not come here if there are no jobs waiting for them, they will not stay here if there is no government subsidy, and they certainly won't stay here if they know that if they ever encounter our state and local law enforcement officers, they will be physically detained until they're deported. And that's exactly what House Bill 1804 does."
The Oklahoma legislator is pleased the bill he sponsored into law was signed by Governor Henry and believes it will go a long way to curb the illegal immigration problem in the state. "I would remind people that states are separate sovereigns in our federal system," Terrill points out. "Anyone who doesn't understand that needs to go back and take an American federal government class in college," he says.
It should be noted that Governor Brad Henry, a Democrat, at first waffled, but did sign. But he attempted to downplay the legislation's significance, especially the state-sovreignty issue brought up by Representative Terrill, saying that "States can take some actions on their own, but until the U.S. Congress enacts a comprehensive, national immigration policy, citizens will see little progress on this issue."
Press coverage of the news from Oklahoma has ranged from non-existent to barely concealing writers' opposition to what has taken place:
- The New York Times had no story (search is on "Oklahoma immigration" without quotes).
- A Houston Chronicle report by Kim Cobb fretted over "the ripples it may cast," including a worry that it might "provide a license to discriminate against anyone who appears Hispanic."
- A longer version of the AP story cited above said that immigration groups "are considering a challenge to the new law's constitutionality, saying that immigration policy is the domain of the federal government, not the state."
Representative Terrill's bold assertion of states' rights may explain why federal government-favoring Old Media and the Washington establishment are virtually ignoring what has just happened in Oklahoma (the AP story made relatively few appearances outside the Southwest). I would suggest that politicians ignore it at their peril.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Tom Blumer-- Oklahoma
May 19, 2007 - 11:07 ET by misterbillTom Blumer-- Oklahoma . My daughter lives in Tulsa--I read about HB1804(?) last week --it is fantastic. The vote in the OK house shows the sentiments. It was overwhelming. I am still waiting for someone to explain to me why some people are so pro immigration illegal or otherwise. I am for legal immigration. Strongly opposed to illegal and recently have developed the attitude, "send 'em back".
The "Compromise" agrement is utter trash. I will not vote for either of my Senators again. If I could I would vote them out today.
OK
May 19, 2007 - 11:15 ET by Tom BlumerMost can't drink the Beltway water for more than about 4 years without getting ruined.
You're telling me that Coburn is supporting the nonsense?
OK
May 19, 2007 - 11:16 ET by Tom BlumerI should add that if it weren't for the 17th Amendment, OK would be sending Senators selected by the state legislature, and none of this nonsense would be taking place.
Tom - I hope I did not mislead you--
May 19, 2007 - 11:39 ET by misterbillTom - I hope I did not mislead you. My daughter lives in OK. I live in Georgia. Yesterday Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson sold Georgia down the river. Our elected officials are so concerned about being "bipartisan" that they allowed themselved to be taken in by the Dems. I am going to send one of those Nigerian scam letters to both. I am sure they will send me their bank acoount data. IMHO Rep Terrill of OK has stepped up to the plate because our federal governmant has failed dismally. I am a strong States' Rights advocate. We have state legislators here that are of the same mind as OK. Bush has sold us to Mexico.
Where’s the coward that would not dare to fight for such a land? And the parent that wouldn't be honored by the sacrifice?
Sir Walter Scott & Noel Sheppard
nop
May 19, 2007 - 11:46 ET by Tom BlumerNo problem. You didn't tell me where you do live, but I misread your comment. Chambliss is a bitter disappointment, and squish Isakson should have been taken out by Herbert Cain when there was a chance to do it.
and color me stupid---
May 19, 2007 - 13:38 ET by misterbilland color me stupid---up until Thursday I was bragging about how almost all of Georgia's federal, elected politicians were so strong against illegal immigration.In fairness to isakson, the poor fool is biting on a scam. A bait and switch. My wife said it best-"who would be so foolish as to partner with Ted Kennedy?".
Amen to that.
PS I thought Herman Cain was a great candidate.
You cannot believe how betrayed I feel right now. I have always been a states rights advocate. It may be time to join the militia.
Where’s the coward that would not dare to fight for such a land? And the parent that wouldn't be honored by the sacrifice?
Sir Walter Scott & Noel Sheppard
Tom Blumer, Henry signed the
May 19, 2007 - 11:19 ET by bassndudeTom Blumer, Henry signed the bill, but he waited untill the 11th hour to do so. He dident want to sign the bill at all. But he was faced with a political decision. He wants to run for another term as governer. Had he veto'ed the bill, it would have been over turned anyway. He knew this. Had he just let it set and become law, it would have been very apparent to us he dident want the bill, and it would have severely "hog tied" his run for re-election. Knowing that the feelings about illegals run very deep, here in Oklahoma, he signed it, not because he liked it, but because not signing it would have been a nail in his political coffin. And, being a dem, he really dosent want to go back to a real job.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Henry
May 19, 2007 - 11:29 ET by Tom BlumerDidn't know that. Thought Henry was term-limited after two terms.
Y'all can't elect a GOP governor? Yikes.
It was close, but henry won o
May 19, 2007 - 11:36 ET by bassndudeIt was close, but henry won out this time. We term limit our representives, havent gotten to the governer yet, but I suspect we will before long..
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Bass, he's a lawyer. What m
May 19, 2007 - 11:35 ET by MikeBBass, he's a lawyer. What makes you think he ever had a "real" job?
I called both Coburn's and Inhofe's offices yesterday (Friday) to urge them to vote NO on the Illegal Immigrant Amnesty bill coming up for a vote on Monday. Both offices told me they were getting a LOT of calls on the bill, nearly all were against it, and nearly all were angry about it. Coburn's office told me that the bill has not been presented to the Senators yet, but that the vote Monday is on whether even to consider the bill. So, all is not lost yet. Keep calling and writing your Senators, people, and we may yet force the S.O.B.s to do their jobs and represent us instead of representing the people of the Republic of Mexico.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Mike B. Yes, I called to. I d
May 19, 2007 - 11:39 ET by bassndudeMike B. Yes, I called to. I dont think that either will vote for it. Coburn is my Senator, I voted for him. He votes for this bill, I will not vote for him again. As a matter of fact, I told him I may run aginst him. Wouldent win, but might get his attention.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
I tried to call my two senato
May 20, 2007 - 11:25 ET by Cape ConservativeI tried to call my two senators several times Friday, but guess what! Both their lines were constantly "busy" - and...who are my two senators, why the ???honorable??? Kerry and Kennedy! Perhaps even their constituents are trying to get their thoughts recorded by the office staff...however, you know darn well that neither of them really gives a rat's behind what we think...THEY know what is best for us! Right!#$%$
THEY know what is best for us
May 20, 2007 - 11:36 ET by botgTHEY know what is best for us! Right
absolutely and its wind power (just not in Teddy's view)
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Yet again I get to brag about
May 19, 2007 - 12:42 ET by AtheistRepublicanYet again I get to brag about my state but,
"Oklahoma is no longer "O.K." for illegal aliens, Terrill observes"
Oh god... why the pun? No no no! Yes Oklahomas abbreviation is OK, and yes OK sounds like Okay, but seriously, do we have to make that joke everytime? Can't something just be alright?
But it's so tempting!
May 19, 2007 - 15:09 ET by dahliatraversBut it's so tempting!
"Can't something just be
May 19, 2007 - 15:12 ET by RJ"Can't something just be alright?"
I suppose it could, but AR just doesn't have the same punch as OK....
Meanwhile in Texas, State Dem
May 19, 2007 - 16:24 ET by alamojbMeanwhile in Texas, State Democrats block legislation requiring voter Photo IDs after hundreds of illegals are noted to be registered voters. Democrats and MSM- subversion from within.
Texas effort at border control may be 20 years to late.
"...The Democrats love chaos. The Republicans love order and discipline and waiting your turn." Chris Matthews on "Gregory Live" as reported by Scott Whitlock 16MAY2007 blog "Matthews Rips..."<
Gee, I wonder if I could conv
May 20, 2007 - 11:18 ET by Cape ConservativeGee, I wonder if I could convince the Massachusetts state legislature to follow suit??? Oooppppssss, I forgot...our new governor has said we must NOT allow our state troopers to check immigration status of offenders...I believe he said "they had better things to do" or something to that effect. This wonderful, law-abiding??? commonwealth of liberalism has gone astray...surely the founding fathers would be spinning in their graves if they could see how far this state has strayed from their principles.
One ot the best moves by Rudy
May 20, 2007 - 12:03 ET by botgOne ot the best moves by Rudy G for NYC was to crackdown on the little crimes, it had a great impact on the overall crime rate. Perhaps it's time to try this with the "little" crime entering the country illegally? (Especially when you note the % of illegals in fedral prisons)
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.