Proving that he's not a fan of Republicans, "Hardball" host Chris Matthews slammed 2008 GOP contenders on Wednesday for running a "mordant," "negative campaign." Sounding like a Democratic activist, he appeared throughout the day on MSNBC and, at one point, bitterly complained about former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee’s jibe that Congress spends money "like John Edwards at a beauty shop."
Mr. Matthews condemned the line, which was delivered during a May 15 presidential debate, as "stupid," "embarrassing" and "pandering." (Is it surprising that a Republican would play to his Republican audience?)
Video (1:22): Real (2.25 MB) or Windows (2.54 MB), plus MP3 (1.22 MB).
The "Hardball" host showed up in the 2pm hour of "MSNBC Live" to trash Governor Huckabee for daring to make fun of John Edwards. Responding to a question by host Contessa Brewer about whether Huckabee prepared the line in advance, Matthews could barely contain his contempt:
Chris Matthews: "Of course. You think he thought that up on the spot? Yeah. It’s, it’s, it’s hokie panokie. (SP?) It's Mickey Mouse. So what. And what a stupid thing. What did it have to do– John Edwards paid the price for his haircut weeks ago, to bring that up in front of that audience was pandering. Let's face it."
In an early morning interview with Imus replacement David Gregory, Matthews attacked Republicans as "desperate" for looking to former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson. He dismissed the Tennessean as just too old:
Matthews: "Certainly if Fred Thompson is their idea of a hero, they are desperate. He is not Ronald Reagan. He seems to be uninterested in the campaign. I, I think his first campaign pledge for something would be, ‘Will somebody get my slippers?’ I mean, he looks like a guy about to retire, not about to enter a race for president."
Appearing on the newly minted "Gregory Live" show (MSNBC has been cycling through various possible replacements for the fired Don Imus), Matthews asserted that the only reason Republicans are supporting the war is because George Bush is part of the GOP:
Matthews: "They wouldn’t be with this war for a second if it was Bill Clinton’s war. They would say this is a crazy, ethnic war. What are we doing over there in the middle of all these nuts, nutty behavior? What, what are we doing there? But they are very loyal to their president and the leader of their party, George Bush."
The "Hardball" anchor also expounded on a question about GOP themes in ‘08. After citing Hillary and Bill Clinton as issues to run on, Matthews snarled that the Republicans are "going to try to really scare the country about the dangers of that and they’re going to use that as their rallying and unifying point."
Transcripts of his various May 16 appearances are below:
Gregory Live
7:37am
David Gregory: "But here’s what I don't understand, how John McCain can stand up at a debate and use the very same language that George W. Bush uses about sticking with the strategy in Iraq, and not pay a penalty for that? Even among Republicans?"
Chris Matthews: "Well, first of all, the Republican Party is a very disciplined party and even if you poll, you know this better than I, I mean, poll them today and they aren’t with the president, they are with the president. They wouldn’t be with this war for a second if it was Bill Clinton’s war. They would say this is a crazy, ethnic war. What are we doing over there in the middle of all these nuts, nutty behavior? What, what are we doing there? But they are very loyal to their president and the leader of their party, George Bush. So, I think there’s always that residual loyalty in the Republican Party that you never see in the Democratic Party. The Democrats love chaos. The Republicans like order and discipline and waiting your turn."
7:41
Gregory: "Are you clear about what the Republicans, what the top Republicans are saying to the country about what their rational for keeping hold of the presidency is? What the campaign is about?"
Matthews: "Well, I think it is about right now, the fear or the argument of what would happen if we left Iraq. That seems to be the chaos, the catastrophe to come. It is a very mordant, it’s a very negative campaign. And it won't work with the American people. The American people are hopeful people and they are not going to vote for someone who simply proposes themselves as the only alternative to disaster. That is not going to work. But I do think down the road, you and I know that the issue is going to be Hillary Clinton. If she is the nominee and it looks like she will be, if she becomes the nominee, say, next February, from February to November, the Republicans are going to try to build up a head of steam against A, her coming back, B, him coming back, C, the Democrats coming back. And they’re going to try to really scare the country about the dangers of that and they’re going to use that as their rallying and unifying point. I'm not sure it will work. I think it will get her numbers down, but, you know, this could be a three-way race in which case Hillary could win with 45 percent. The Clintons are very lucky, I really believe in luck. I believe they have demonstrated their ability to win with good fortune and last time around Bill Clinton had 43 percent and he was elected president because of Ross Perot. I can see a situation developing where the Clintons both of them come back to the White House, given everything we know, just because of events, because of the three-way race or four-way race or simply the Republicans cannot find a hero. Certainly if Fred Thompson is their idea of a hero, they are desperate. And he is not Ronald Reagan. He seems to be uninterested in the campaign. I, I think his first campaign pledge for something would be, ‘Will somebody get my slippers?’ I mean, he looks like a guy about to retire, not about to enter a race for president."
MSNBC Live
2:05pm
Contessa Brewer: "And let's talk about Mike Huckabee, because last night he sort of had the humorous line of the night. I know a lot of people are talking about it."
Chris Matthews: "That was set piece though. He brought that in with him."
Brewer: "Okay, well, let’s play it."
Matthews: "How can you respect– These guys write this stuff down ahead of time with their staff people. They bring it aboard and they waste our time with this set pieces. I'm far more impressed by the candidates who can respond intelligently and spontaneously to the actual debate than the people who bring in– Well, go ahead. Let’s show it. To me, it's like bringing in notebooks with information on it if they bring these set pieces in with them. It's embarrassing to everybody when they do these jokes."
Brewer: "All right. We’ll play it and then–"
[Brief montage of Huckabee statements.]
Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee: "After I served for eight years as president I'd be happy to change the Constitution for Governor Schwarzenegger. We've had a Congress that spent money like john Edwards at a beauty shop. And it's high time that we have a different kind of tax structure."
Brewer: "So what you're saying is, they go into this, they prepare and they're going to figure out a way to use this line somewhere in the debate?"
Matthews: "Of course. You think he thought that up on the spot? Yeah. It’s, it’s, it’s hokie panokie. (SP?) It's Mickey Mouse. So what. And what a stupid thing. What did it have to do– John Edwards paid the price for his haircut weeks ago, to bring that up in front of that audience was pandering. Let's face it."
Brewer: "Do you think Mike Huckabee brings anything to the table except for bad jokes?"
Matthews: "Well, that's for the voters to decide."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I guess poor little Chrissy o
May 16, 2007 - 17:02 ET by Clear thinkerI guess poor little Chrissy only likes humor when it comes from liberals.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Bingo. Oh but he's not biase
May 16, 2007 - 17:32 ET by GregEBingo. Oh but he's not biased though. Just ask him.
Many years ago Chrissy used t
May 16, 2007 - 18:11 ET by mulerider24Many years ago Chrissy used to mitigate his liberal bias a little better (not well, just better). Apparently those efforts have been completely flushed down the toilet. He's past the point of bias; he is a bonafied political strategist for the left. He is so tapped into the dems' talking points that he went out of his way to ridicule Fred Thompson, who wasn't even on stage for the debate. That is taken straight from the political playbook entitled, "Define your opponent before he has time to define himself." Does he get a tax write-off for all this pro-bono work he is doing for the libs?
Matthews doesn't even attem
May 16, 2007 - 18:20 ET by motherbeltMatthews doesn't even attempt to hide his bias any more. And as for pandering, he has cornered that market. I posted this link in another thread, but it's worth another look. The Hillary character is OK, if a bit overdone. But the SNL guy has got Matthews COLD!
Chris the Panderer
Why should he hide his bias?
May 16, 2007 - 21:27 ET by KC MulvilleWhy should he hide his bias? Olbermann doesn't, and MSNBC promoted Olbermann above Matthews. You know the message that sends, and Matthews got the point. Trying to be fair on MSNBC is a waste of time. It doesn't pay.
And at what point does a Dem
May 16, 2007 - 20:28 ET by dahliatraversAnd at what point does a Dem candidate have to declare a Matthews' show as an in-kind contribution on a campaign finance report?
Probably the same day that Ha
May 17, 2007 - 10:14 ET by Chidi NwachukhuProbably the same day that Hannity's show is considered a Republican contribution. Ok, now start attacking me with "superior logic"...
No attacks; Hannity is a Con
May 17, 2007 - 13:20 ET by mulerider24No attacks; Hannity is a Conservative but he gets no write-off due to the "Alan Colmes Quota" disqualification. But do you think the libs would allow him to moderate a Democrat debate?
What a great blog here...than
May 16, 2007 - 17:10 ET by bigtimerWhat a great blog here...thanks SW.
Matthews is very worried, he has to be.
I posted earlier when I heard his rant about Huckabee's comment regarding Edwards that was funny.
Matthews also was clueless, classless along with msnbc and politico and their so-called pathetic debate.
He is going to help with our win in '08...so I look at it as a win for us.
Rant on you drooling, whining, leftist mental midget.
Partisan hack pretending to be a journalist
May 16, 2007 - 17:11 ET by kch50428What a gasbag. Were some democrat to make a similar pronouncement, he'd giggle like a schoolgirl, especialy if the comment were directed at a conservative.
Chris Matthews: "...The
May 16, 2007 - 17:24 ET by alamojbChris Matthews:
"...The Democrats love chaos. The Republicans love order and discipline and waiting your turn."
Good Stuff. That about says it all! I am pretty new here and did not have a quote in Italics at the bottom of my post like many of you have. I think I just found one! Thanks Scott Whitlock!
Test, TestSeems to have a lim
May 16, 2007 - 17:46 ET by alamojbTest, Test
Seems to have a limit on number of words in "signature"
"...The Democrats love chaos. The Republicans love order and discipline and waiting your turn." Chris Matthews on "Gregory Live" as reported by Scott Whitlock 16MAY2007 blog "Matthews Rips..."<
Maybe you could limit it to
May 16, 2007 - 19:40 ET by motherbeltMaybe you could limit it to the quote and the Chris Matthews accreditation.
stupid, embarrasing and pande
May 16, 2007 - 17:26 ET by Gat New Yorkstupid, embarrasing and pandering . . . . HA!!!! . . . Matthews ENTIRE so called debate was filled with questions that were stupid, embarrassing, and pandering (to the left).
self-righteous fraud
May 16, 2007 - 17:27 ET by CatherwoodAll this villification coming from a man who seriously asked Republican presidential candidates about how they would feel about the return of Slick Willie to the White House. Mathews is such a phony hypocrite. Of course, he makes his money saying phony, inane things.
Is Matthews really serious??!
May 16, 2007 - 17:29 ET by winston smithIs Matthews really serious??!! After that childish travesty of a debate sponsered by MSNBC 2 weeks ago and he really has the gall to criticize a great smack-down zinger by Huckabee? Matthews should clam up and start taking some notes if he and his network expect to be around for a couple of years.
So making a joke about Edwa
May 16, 2007 - 17:51 ET by wiwfSo making a joke about Edwards haircut is totally out of line, but asking when Romney and his wife first had sex is totally fine...
Matthews, no one cares about you. Ever. STFU.
He actually asked if they h
May 16, 2007 - 18:24 ET by motherbeltHe actually asked if they had had sex before they were married!
Who knows, maybe next time he interviews Hillary, he'll ask her if she had sex with Bill after Monica! LOL
mb,Funny....to carry it a ste
May 16, 2007 - 18:57 ET by Blondemb,
Funny....to carry it a step further....Maybe he'll ask Hillary if she had sex w/Bill after Chelsea was conceived.
Chris Matthews has become a parody of himself. What a buffoon.
Chris Matthews has become a
May 16, 2007 - 19:42 ET by motherbeltChris Matthews has become a parody of himself.-
Blonde, very well put!
So making a joke about Ed
May 17, 2007 - 07:43 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsSo making a joke about Edwards haircut is totally out of line, but
asking when Romney and his wife first had sex is totally fine...
Matthews, no one cares about you. Ever. STFU.
Somebody should ask Matthews when he first had sex with his hand.
D
A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.
Winston,I think Chrissy has e
May 16, 2007 - 18:16 ET by BlondeWinston,
I think Chrissy has enrolled in a new class...Hypocricy 101. And these latest comments of his are homework assignments. "Become more ignorant and outrageous...see how much you can get away with".
He's seriously become a bad imitation of himself. Which is funny, actually.
Sad, but funny.
Actually, I think Chrissy is
May 16, 2007 - 18:21 ET by winston smithActually, I think Chrissy is the professor of that class and all MSNBC talk-show hosts are required to enroll!
It's true...you can't even
May 16, 2007 - 19:45 ET by motherbeltIt's true...you can't even do a parody of him any more. It all looks too authentic Matthews, as the Hillary video shows. You don't even think of the guy as exaggerating him; it just looks like a good imitation.
How can you respect– Thes
May 16, 2007 - 18:36 ET by CrimsonfistedPot. Meet Kettle.
What an idiot. He has just defined why we don't like him.
WhatAMaroon
chrissy
May 16, 2007 - 18:56 ET by iveseenitallOh, come on Chrissy. Lighten up. It's just a joke. You're shirt has too much starch----- How do you like it, liberals? The tables have turned and the lefties are in a dither! Watching them squirm is great. The lousy hypocrites; how long did they think we would take it from them? Didn't they know that two could play their game?( BTW, I watched in 2000 and 2004 as their stinking candidates made fun of Goeorge Bush unmercifully and nothing was said. Matthews is , perhaps, the worst of them all with this crap. Unbelievable).
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
I'm sorry, but I have to obje
May 16, 2007 - 18:54 ET by FactFiendI'm sorry, but I have to object to this one.
I'm no Chris Matthews fan, but to say that this "[p]rov[es] that he really doesn’t like Republicans" is flat out absurd.
A month ago he said McCain "deserves to be president."
http://mediamatters.org/items/200704160007
Last year he said Giuliani "looks like president to me."
http://mediamatters.org/items/200605030011
And before you all throw a fit over me citing Media Matters as a source, remember it was for transcripts.
Matthews
May 16, 2007 - 19:51 ET by doug1950When Chrissy Matthews says "stupid, embarrassing and pandering" he could be reading his own résumé. I had to quit watching any of his program years ago because my butt was chewing holes in perfectly good furniture.
You deserve to have a fit thr
May 16, 2007 - 20:32 ET by Roger the ShrubberYou deserve to have a fit thrown at you for using the Soros-funded Media Matters as a source. If you were soooo concerned about being legit and not look like a moonbat, you would (and could) easily find the transcripts elsewhere, from a more reputable site, no? As it stands now, all you do is hope that Media Matters gets a handful of hits from the people dumb enough to click on your links. Try again.
To be honest
May 16, 2007 - 20:38 ET by Mr. BishopTo be completely honest with you Roger... the mere fact that he looked those transcripts up on that website, spent the time looking for them, on that website -- tells me that he spends a ridiculous amount of time ON that website. That should really tell you all you need to know about him being concerned about looking legit. He doesn't care -- all he cares about, is getting information (false or otherwise) out in the public to read.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
FactlessFiend
May 16, 2007 - 20:41 ET by RJNo, Factless Fiend, it's you who is absurd. So the phony Matthews panders a couple of times a year and tosses a bone of a compliment to Republicans. Wow. I'm soooo impressed.
Meanwhile, 99% of the time he fawns over the Democrats and tries his best to beat up on the Republicans.
I think every story on this
May 16, 2007 - 20:48 ET by BigBI think every story on this site featuring Matthews should be accompanied by the slobbering video...
And this, is quite possibly the best Chris 'God, Just Look at Him' Matthews SMAK DOWN that's ever been...
http://www.mediaresearch.org/rm/dishonor/2005/zellmiller05/segment1.ram
Now, this might sting just a little bit.....
Chris Wallace
May 16, 2007 - 21:56 ET by shawn228The best interviewer is Chris Wallace. Clinton took it way too personal with Wallace. Chris Wallace is equally tough with both Republicans and Dems. I watched him interview Lindsey Graham once a few months ago and he was squirming.
Mother always told me, &quo
May 17, 2007 - 08:51 ET by charlietexasMother always told me, "if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen"!!! Chris is a fool.
Sew it Shut
May 17, 2007 - 09:01 ET by JimboMatthews obviously doesn’t know what stupid and embarrassing means. If he did, he would permanently sew his mouth shut.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
No, Chris, YOU'RE the "p
May 17, 2007 - 10:44 ET by drillanwrNo, Chris, YOU'RE the "poopy-head"!!!! No, you are! "Poopy-head"! ~ ~ Chris is a "poopy-head"! ~ ~
Good gawd! This guy is beyond lame. Hey, MSNBC! I'll do what Matthews does (I'll be pretending to be a leftist, of course), and I'll do it for 1/2 what you're paying him!
But can they count on you to
May 17, 2007 - 15:26 ET by dahliatraversBut can they count on you to drool?