Well that's the thing isn't it, answering that the blogger has a point - is a clear indication that you're a liberal smart aleck who hopes "hate the Christian Bush" is the next thing someone else will say. I'm telling you, it's ignorant smart aleck, that's their template. That's why they get a chuckle with their antics, while many of them even argue or say they believe it. I mean think about it. When they're home, they stretch out and think to themselves, "Boy is this easy, I can just be the class clown and smart aleck for work - a couple more years of it - and I get to slap around that sob Bush the whole time, and everyone agrees with me. This is easy. There are whole comedy shows and even countdown news hours to help me along doing it. " LOL- It is funny, really, it's the perfect thing for the post modern ex-dopehead idiot activist liberal gasbag fool. Woodstock was the good 'ol days, and now the rebels rule the roost. I get the impression of that long haired pouting smarmy Kerry in his duds pic on the capitol hill lawn, just getting ready to trounce off to the Kennedy compound Island and toke up some jays again with the band members of The Mama's and Papa's. It's scarey, in just as silly a sort of way. I kind of expect them to come to their senses when it's time to be serious, but on the other hand, maybe they already are. The libs talk about how goofy John Kerry's campaign was now- putting down his constant "reporting for duty" crap as a gigantic error, but the thing is the election was close enough and nearly all of them voted for him then, and I believe the midterm was even closer in the split vote, but try to get one of these clowns to acknowledge that. They are getting so sloppy with their overblown talking points, that it amounts to flat out lying, in a very large fashion, but it is clear they have utterly convinced themselves they are spewing the truth, and noone seems to call them on it. So, they don't even have a handle on 20/20 viewpoints, or the current situation, and constantly tell lies about it all. Out of control smart aleck clowns playing the role of serious documentarians. Sounds like Michael Moore - they pretty much have adopted that stance and attitude and position - it's so much fun to get away with it, and stand up there and pretend it's true.

 You see the occassional slapdown, like Pelosi's trip to Syria where she submitted in dhimmitude with her maple leafed scarf, blew her Israeli foreign policy talking points, and was scorned and ridiculed when she returned, but good 'ol lib moron fag talker the war is lost Harry Reid immediately boneheaded up and announced in solidarity, the idea that Iran was next. I guess that one crashed on them, it finally became clear that lib action was a dangerously stupid thing to attempt in the hands of the moronic lib babbling smart alecks the dems had chosen as their leaders.

I thought liberals were against "profiling". 

Good one. 

The point, of course, is that McVeigh (and Nichols) never cited any Christian teaching or doctrine to justify (in his sick mind) his acts. The fact that they were once Christians (McVeigh was not a practicing one and he later stated that he was an agnostic) was completely irrelevant to their actions. It played no role.

Their justification was entirely political and had no religious component. Islamic radicals cite a mixture of politics and religion to explain their actions.

It is interesting, as your point shows, that the same liberal/lefties who are reluctant to cite the religious aspect that plays a role in Islamic terrorism are gleeful in pointing out that McVeigh or Rudolph were Christians.

Apparently, they're not as concerned about people painting with a broad brush against Christians as they are again Muslims. Some religions are more equal than others.

You cannot measure what someone is by what they say, only by what they do. The scriptures state this emphatically. 1) All men are liars. 2) You will know them by their fruits.

Q: Are professed Christians following their religious teachings when they commit acts of violence against innocent people?

A: No. Therefore, by definition, they are NOT Christians.

Q: Are professed Muslims following their religious teachings when they commit acts of violence against innocent people?

A: Yes, if those people are non-muslims they are, by definition of the Koran, NOT innocent.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic.

No, they have been bombed by less than a dozen individual nuts. Making the actions those of wacked out loners NOT one indicative of the religion as a whole -- or even of a sizable portion. On the other hand THOUSANDS of Muslims have bombed people for their religious beliefs making THEIR actions much more representative of a dominate branch of that religion.

Again, you are like most extremist leftists who practices (im)moral equivalence.

Congrats for a lack of a moral compass.

Abortion clinic bombers (<sarc> btw, how many dozens of instances of that have there been? <end sarc>) do it because they are under the delusion that God wants them to do it. The Koran, on the other hand, actually tells Muslims to destroy those who are called infidels.

Political.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

I whole-heartedly agree with your sentiments.  The Left know that Tim McVeigh never said he did what he did in the name of Christ or Christianity.  He hated the government.  He had an asocial personality.  They use whatever reasons or justifications to spew their crap.  Why should the truth or reality hinder them?  They have an agenda and script to follow here! They need to malign Christians whenever possible, so, Tim McVeigh, bombing, Christ= all connected!  Christ and Christianity causes bombings!

    Lying and manipulating?: the media's first commandments; standard operating procedure.  Even if he did say it was for Christ, the rest of Christianity would totally condemn him for it, and speak out against such evil.  Any takers for the Islamic terrorists who kill innocents?  I hear crickets, not so-called "moderate" Islamists speaking out against violence in the name of Islam.  Very different responses and philosophies, very clearly demonstrated again and again.  

    Oh, and by the way,  was there ever a mass call from the Leftist Media for Janet Reno to resign after the holocaust at Waco?  Using the logic they employ to blame President Bush for every bad thing that ever happened, shouldn't Bill Clinton and Janet Reno be blamed then for Tim McVeigh's bombing of the Murrah Building?  Only following their line of thinking.

    Also, thank you from the bottom of my heart for your service to this country and all of us, Airforce.  Thank you for your voice here, as well.