Here We Go Again: Inane Hype for 'Record High' Gas When Price Lower than in 1981

Photo of Brent Baker.

As another summer driving season approaches, media outlets cannot resist again hyping dire stories about the supposed “record high” price of a gallon of gas when, adjusted for inflation, the current $3.10 average for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline is still lower than in 1981. ABC was out front Monday night with the fallacious reporting. World News anchor Charles Gibson teased up top, “Record prices: Gasoline across the nation hits an all-time high, a record price, before the summer even begins.” With “Record High” on screen, Gibson relied on new numbers from the Energy Information Administration as he introduced the subsequent story by asserting that “a gallon of gas has never been more expensive than right now. The government announced this afternoon that the average price of regular gas is $3.10 a gallon.” Reporter John Berman also cited the “record high” price before marveling at how demand is rising: “Despite the agony, for the most part, we haven't changed our actions. Demand for gas is actually up one percent from this time last year...”

The headline over a Monday afternoon article on USA Today's Web site, which matched stories all over the Web from wire services and television news sites, declared: “Gasoline prices top post-Katrina record.” But USA Today reporter Barbara Hagenbaugh at least noted that “prices are still below the all-time high when adjusted for inflation, $3.223 in today's dollars set March 1981, according to the Energy Department.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Earlier in her story, Hagenbaugh reported the $3.10 average national pump price “tops the old record of $3.07 set in September 2005 after Hurricane Katrina disrupted refinery operations and oil production along the Gulf Coast, the EIA said.” It's silly, however, to see the current $3.10 as higher than the September of 2005 price of $3.07 since the inflation rate over the past 20 months has certainly exceeded three cents on three dollars.

Just over two years ago, the networks also erroneously trumpeted “record high” gas prices. The March 17, 2005 MRC CyberAlert, “Networks Falsely Claim Oil and Gas at 'Record High' Prices,” recounted:

The futures price for a barrel of oil and the cost of a gallon of gas at the retail pump have been soaring, but they are far from record highs, yet the networks make that false assertion. On Wednesday night, Peter Jennings teased: "On World News Tonight, the price of oil is at another record high." Betsy Stark soon issued an inaccurate prediction that "gas prices are now within a penny of their all-time record." On CNN, Erica Hill referred to how "crude oil prices hit a record high today closing" and the "AAA predicts U.S. gas prices could reach an all-time high tomorrow." CBS's Bob Schieffer insisted that "the price of oil hit a record $56 a barrel today." NBC's Brian Williams declared that "the price of oil set a new record high -- $56 a barrel." PBS's Jim Lehrer maintained that "the price of crude oil rose to an all-time high today." FNC's Shepard Smith warned: "The cost of oil hitting an all-time high. It looks like the cost of gas is not far from behind." In fact, adjusted for inflation, oil will have to hit $90 a barrel to set a record high and gasoline would reach a record not at $2.07 per gallon but at a $2.97.

The April 12, 2005 MRC CyberAlert, “ABC, CBS and NBC All Falsely Hype 'Record' High Gas Prices,” relayed:

Adjusted for inflation, gas at the retail pump will have to hit $2.97 to match a record high, but that didn't deter ABC, CBS and NBC on Monday from falsely describing much lower prices as a "record" high price. "Gasoline hit yet another record high," CBS Evening News anchor Bob Schieffer insisted as he cited a $2.28 price. ABC's Good Morning America painted "Record Breaking Gas Prices" on screen over a story in which David Muir claimed that "the price of a gallon of regular gas is now at an all-time high" and highlighted a woman who supposedly moved in order to avoid driving. Katie Couric declared on NBC's Today: "Gasoline prices have hit an all-time high today averaging $2.32 a gallon." Couric soon suggested that "political analysts say one of the main reasons" for President Bush's falling approval level "is the record high gas prices." Maybe it wouldn't be such a problem if the media weren't making such false statements about "record" high prices.

And the August 12, 2005 CyberAlert, “Nets Falsely Cite 'Record High' Gas Prices, Target Oil Profits,” reported:

To reach a record high, the price of a gallon of gas would have to exceed $3 a gallon and oil would need to go over $90 a barrel, yet the media continue to erroneously hype lower price points, such as $2.37 for gas, as "record highs." On Thursday night, ABC anchor Bob Woodruff fallaciously cited "record high" gas and oil prices before Betsy Stark fretted that if "record" prices on home heating oil "comes on top of record gas prices, there will be lots of consumers with nothing left to spend after they've paid all those energy bills." Woodruff spun the story into an indictment of the energy industry: "Oil companies and oil-producing countries are making massive profits while American consumers are really feeling it." A second ABC piece featured two soundbites from far-left Naderite Joan Claybrook, whom ABC's David Muir innocuously described as a "consumer advocate." CBS's John Blackstone, who showcased $4 gas at a remote California station 65 miles from any other service station, proclaimed that "across the nation, gas prices went to record highs today." He also ridiculously asked: "Will it get to the point that only the privileged can afford gas?"

The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide a transcript of the May 14 World News story:

Anchor Charles Gibson: "A turnaround for Chrysler looks even more difficult tonight with the word that gas prices as of today are at a record level. A gallon of gas has never been more expensive than right now. The government announced this afternoon that the average price of regular gas is $3.10 a gallon. That's up five cents from a week ago. And ABC's John Berman is here with some word on the effects of all that. John?"

John Berman: "Charlie, anyone who drives knows just how bad these record prices are, paying $50 or more to fill up, but the concern is that the ripple effect will move beyond your gas tank and hit the rest of the economy. The math at the pump is brutal."

Unidentified man #1: "Takes $60 to fill up my tank."

Berman: "Despite the agony, for the most part, we haven't changed our actions. Demand for gas is actually up one percent from this time last year, 391 million gallons per day, even though gas is 16 cents per gallon more expensive."

Unidentified man #2: "I mean, I'm going to pay it and hate it."

Berman: "This frenzied demand is coming as supplies are unusually low. Because of maintenance or breakdowns at refineries, the national supply of gas has dropped 12 of the past 13 weeks. The ripple is reaching the skies. American, Delta and Continental have all hiked domestic, round-trip fares by $10 to offset higher fuel costs. It's hitting retailers, too. Wal-Mart reported a 3.5 percent drop in sales last month, the biggest drop since the company started keeping records. One of the main reasons, the company says, shopper jitters over gas prices."

Peter Kretzmer, Bank of America: "A typical family has certain driving needs, and they can't quickly change those driving needs. And if they have to spend more on gasoline, then they have to cut down somewhere else."

Berman: "Sixty-seven percent of Americans said gasoline prices are causing them financial hardship. And the people feeling it the most can afford it the least. Eighty percent of lower-income Americans say that gas prices are a hardship."

Unidentified woman: "It's going to make me really consider what kind of jobs I take and where I take them."

Berman: "One of the big ripple effects may be political. President Bush today directed federal agencies to find a way to cut gas consumption by 20 percent over the next 10 years. Most of the analysts I spoke with today think that prices are nearly as high as they're going to get, but that's assuming the refining and supply situations get worked out. In either case, Charlie, it will be a long, expensive summer."

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Actually a report on high gas

Actually a report on high gas prices combined with an exposee on why there have been no refrineries built would be welcome news.  They could throw in a report on ANWR describing how much oil is there and how much cleaner the US is at drilling than say China using low-grade coal

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.   

Nah, it's much easier to ju

Nah, it's much easier to just throw the "record high prices" story out there and let it fester until someone like Newsbusters refutes it. And even then, a lot of people won't see the refutation.

I personally would like to see each and every story about high gas prices in the US end with the line "and no new refineries have been built in the US since the year (whatever the year is).

gas

Since the gas started climbing, I have been taking my mountain bike to work, and I must say, it is a whole lot more fun than driving there, and I actually enjoy my ride to work again.  Keeps the weight down, too.  I figured if I wait until more refineries are built, or drilling in ANWR begins, I will too old to pedal anything.

Touche, Emma.

Touche, Emma.

gas

Hi, Blonde.  I really recommend the bike for people who can do it.  And I am almost 67 years old, so if I can do it, so can the young whippersnappers.

Emma,If you could just tell m

Emma,

If you could just tell me how to get to work on a bicycle in South Florida without perspiring....I'd go for it.  Things like a.c. are a tad important here in the deep south.  LOL.

Good for you Emma! 

I thought ladies don't perspire

I thought ladies don't perspire....they "glow"     ;^>

Well, RJ, we try not to.Somet

Well, RJ, we try not to.

Sometimes we just postively glow from the effort, though.

Catch you tomorrow, I'm out.

Exactly, Blonde.

Exactly, Blonde.

And I'm out, too.   'night all.

South Florida in summer wit

South Florida in summer with no air conditioning . . . I think my sweat glands just involuntartily twitched. I'm in Boston right now with no AC, sweating my butt off. Pathetic, I know.

"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18

Hey Jason, Long time no see.

Hey Jason, Long time no see.

You New Englanders are a tad, um sissyish when it comes to the heat....of course, you could say the same about us Floridians when it comes to the cold....60 degrees and I need a fur coat!

How goes it, guy?  Glad to see you back here.

Pathetic indeed, Jason.  Com

Pathetic indeed, Jason.  Come on down to TX this August.  It will feel just like you stuck your head in an oven.  :-)

But I wouldn't have it any other way.  I had my fill of cold in Germany, CO, and above all, AK. 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

gas

Well, Blonde, I have visited Florida on several occasions on vacations, and was temporarily stationed in northern Florida, and I must agree - it is bloody humid there!  You may not be a candidate for my regimen, but here in PA, it works for me.

I too take my bike to work ev

I too take my bike to work everyday...its refreshing, and I do with with a flat tire!  Ok, I work from home, so the bike stays in the garage...but I just wanted you all to know that if I can take my bike to work anyone can!

Simple economics: If demand

Simple economics: If demand is still increasing, prices could go higher without hurting us. In addition, the futures market is driving the price as it is. Wonder what the price would be if the Dems hadn't been preaching defeat all this time?  That sort of talk makes the futures market very nervous, and so prices for crude go up, in anticipation of a US defeat in Iraq.  If you think gas is expensive now, just wait until all the ME oil is controlled by the terrorists. We literally can't afford to cut and run from Iraq. We must assist a stable ME country to be born.

How about drilling for more oil ?

How about drilling for more oil ?

Oh, that's right, that's someone else's job.

How is it, I ask myself, that drilling has been outlawed by congress ?

Really. Come on, that's insane on the face of it.

 Problem is the people of this nation are so screwed up in the head, they can't figure that out.

PS- If prices get so high it drives useage out of the market, it will hurt us, and even with rising demand, which almost a certainty, it will hurt as well, only not as much as forcing people out of the market.

Housing materials are prohibitively high in 3rd world nations, driving useage out of the market. That of course, under the theory that supply and demand is great when demand is reduced because noone can afford it is a very strange notion for anyone in a western economy to hold, as well as the idea that - demand is somehow not there when people can't buy what they used to, and have had to reduce their lifestyle because it costs too much. Not like anyone (everyone) in America is going to suddenly find themselves in a position that their demand for oil and oil products has dropped. It always goes up, and continues to, and so does population, and will continue to. There is no reduction of demand, hasn't happened. Therefore, claiming it won't hurt us if prices go up is pretty STUPID. It always hurts us when gasoline prices go up.

 We think we're so hot, that indeed this basic neccessity for our way of life can just be priced up out of reach, and there are no consequences? LOL That demand should be reduced ? In whose fantasy world ?

 Sounds like Al Gores $2.50 a gallon sin tax to reduce useage plan. DUHHH - if people buy less, then magically demand has gone down. DUHHHH - if people keep buying and buy more at higher prices- the price hasn't hurt us. DUHHH.

 In what scenario - a ZERO growth economy ? In a CONTRACTING economy ?

 A lot of people seem comfortable making sure most or all of the blame is laid at the feet of unbuilt refineries, but if the oil supply was millions of barrels more a day, the price per barrel would drop significantly, yet we sit here while our congress has effectively banned drilling, and the entire party of idiot democrats supports that, without question.

 Look, we sure need more refineries by everyone's estimation, but the whole world does, and the whole world needs more and more oil per day, and will for many, many years into the future - bar some massive nuclear war or gigantic plague or some huge disaster.

Yah think if refinery capacity remained the same, and the price per barrel went back down to 10 or 20 bucks a barrel, we wouldn't see  buck or buck and a quarter gas again ? LOLOL WE WOULD.

That's why the price per barrel has been for the most part dictating our price per gallon at the pump - for decades now. 

 When will our congress be slapped silly and told to bone up and do what it takes, by getting the hell out of the way ?

 I guess that day will be the day of crisis, massive crisis, sustained crisis, and then all the babbling idiots will shriek and moan the great new free energy world of tesla and sustained fusion and a tablet in water fuel sources and (secretly eating hydrocarbon)  fuel cells has been blocked by the evil Bush and his oil cronies, as they further demand windfall profit taxes and restrictions on drilling...

 The nation is basically INSANE, and prepared to cut it's own throat, as it obviously is getting in some great slicing closer and closer to the jugular already. 

Insane or not, there is metho

Insane or not, there is method to their madness.  They don't have the guts to address the issue of alternative energy production in the country because they know the answer is nuclear power to create electricity.  They know it is political suicide to levy the Federal gas tax to bring the price of gas to $4/gallon or higher to that of Europe at $6/gallon. The electric car is on the brink of public acceptance with the Tesla electric car using the lithium ion battery giving 250 + miles per charge.  But the price tag on the Tesla is $100k, only the rich and upper middle class have that kind of money.  So the basic plan is to continually blame the oil companies for the high price of gas while behind the scenes block any attempt of meaningful oil drilling or increase in refining capacity.  The liberals are doing their usual back door manipulation strategy to force their agenda without the public knowing it because they know the public won't accept their policy perscriptions.  The libs will get their $4/gallon gas at the expense of the poor and middle class, their only regret is that they didn't get the extra dollar in tax revenue for their vote buying scams, the rich don't care since an extra buck is just chump change to them.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

Exactly, botg. If we were to

Exactly, botg. If we were to build new refineries, drill in ANWAR and off the Gulf, not only would it add to our stockpile, reduce the cost at the pump and elsewhere, but it would bring more money to the general revenue because of job growth (which is at an all-time high anyways). But it is much easier to attack than to have positive things that work.

How about an expose of how using corn for fuel will destroy the economy because of increased prices on almost everything in your local grocery. Or how it really isn't that much of a savings or that it doesn't do that much more for fuel efficiency? Maybe I'll wait for the presidential debates to hear that....ohhh wait....that's right, no (C)onservatives are running this time...dammit!

"Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."

- President George W Bush September 2001 speech to a joint session of Congress.

AC and don't mention the gree

AC and don't mention the green-house gasses using corn for fuel

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.   

Ya mean for reducing oil useage

Ya mean for reducing oil useage, the corn ethanol crap is less fuel efficient than gasoline. Your mpg WILL GO DOWN as you fuel up with it, ten or twenty percent. Cripes, we've got idiots running this nation now.

Gas Prices

All I know is my salary has not doubled since 2000 but it cost twice as much to fill my tank. One of my cars is a Honda Accord and it cost $20 to fill in 2000, now it cost $50 to fill it up Ouch! I work 20 miles away and it is all freeway so biking is out of the question.

Maybe, just maybe if the tree

Maybe, just maybe if the tree huggers would loosen their grip long enough for us to drill in ANWR and build new refineries, we vould get the supply side of the equation up and prices would drop...

No RINOs in '08 - Vote for a true conservative!

South Jersey

SouthJersey, maybe if shawn negotiated a 30 dollar salary increase sometime within the past 6 years of work the whole problem would go away. I guess he gets those $4.95 cent raises, 6 years in a row.

The National Petrochemical an

The National Petrochemical and Refiners Association conceded at a May 23, 2006 Senate hearing on price gouging that gasoline supplies were temporarily tight. But the oil industry lobby went on to note that: This situation will ultimately be addressed through announced additions to U.S. refinery capacity, estimated at 1.4 to 2.0 million barrels per day. This is an 8-11percent increase in U.S. capacity, which should be in place by 2010 at the latest…. over the past 10 years, domestic refining has increased by an average of 177,000 barrels per day of production each year or the equivalent of building one new, larger than average refinery each year. This fact should assuage some concerns about the fact that no new grassroots refinery has been built in the U.S. in over 30 years. Indeed, at a Senate hearing last year, BP’s chief executive officer explained that “[refinery] margins over the last 10 to 15 years have not been high enough on average to justify building a new refinery.” And in a recent closed-door briefing with congressional aides, an Exxon Mobil official said that company foresees no need to build new refineries at least through the year 2030.

If we need no additional capacity, Chidi

Have I got the following wrong?

If we need no additional capacity, why are we told that adjusting for various state formulations slow production and why are we told that the seasonal change of gasoline grades also slows production....both supposedly causing "temporary" reductions in output and higher prices?

I think the point is that  f

I think the point is that  for now, there is not enough financial incentive for the oil companies to invest in new refineries, since they are working on increasing capacity at current facilities anyway.

Increasing capacity

Aren't they "working on increasing capacity at current facilities" because the enviros have made the regulations so onerous that it's cheaper and quicker to go that route than build new?

So shawn228 - you fool

So shawn228 - you fool, are you making 30 more dollars per tank fill up period than you were in 2000 ? I guess when you fail to double a buck and a quarter an hour, it's tough out there.

I kinda felt sorry for you, when I realized you tried to tell me your 20 dollar salary used to fill up the tank in 2000, and now it doesn't. Gosh if you had doubled your salary, that 40 bucks still wouldn't fill the tank, since now it costs 50 bucks. Get a sucker, pretty soon Sesame Street for the short bus comes on and the cookie monster is to be featured.

All you know is your salary hasn't doubled since six years ago, but filling up the gas tank costs 30 bucks more than it did then.

Shawn, are you making 30 dollars more than you did in 2000 ?

 Wait don't answer that, because it's too damned embarrassing- according to your WHINE.

I'm sorry could someone pleas

I'm sorry could someone please remind me why you are all defending these ridiculously high gas prices while the oil companies rake in record profits gouging us at the pump?

Why are you defending them again?  I'm not sure I follow. 

I'm not sure I follow.-No shiite, Leon.


I'm not sure I follow.

No shiite, Leon.

Back to school with you (preferrably one not run by the government). While there, you need to
study basic and intermediate economics. If you pay even semi-close attention,
you may actually learn the difference between profits and profit margins. Like
most members of the great un-washed out there (I’m talking the dumbmasses), this
concept is utterly foreign to you.

The ignorance of even basic economic concepts on the part of said masses (including you) is one reason the
simple minded among us continue to be exploited by the liberal media. They do this
because they know people like you will fall for it.

This is a supply and demand issue, nothing more. And as a liberal, unless you are willing to support increasing said supply, as well as doing away with the 40 or so blends that have to be specially made this time of year, then please refrain from further complaints about the price of gas at the pump.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

Exactly, Dave, but don't expect Leon to get it

"supply and demand"

Exactly, Dave, but don't expect Leon to get it.    The left does everything they can to restrict access to oil and gas deposits.....they make it all but impossible to build refineries....then they pretend to be shocked and angry when lower supply causes prices to go up......as they whine and cry and blame "big bad oil."

The left is incredibly stupid and hypocritical....meaning Leon has found the right home.

This is going to be painfully

This is going to be painfully difficult.

In a free market system, the PRICE of any given good or service is determined by its SUPPLY relative to the DEMAND for it.  Notice very carefully that there is no mention of the PRODUCTION COST of this good or service.  The sole factor in pricing the good or service is its scarcity relative to its utility.

This is how optimum distribution of scares commodities is achieved.  Only those willing to pay for the good or service badly enough to meet or beat the next best price offered will be able to purchase any of it.  i.e. Frivolous users will be deterred.   Investors will be incented to enter the market with new/more product.

This mechanism works very well in pricing commodities that are in over supply as well.  The price plummets until the market clears [Say's Law].  Further production of the undesired item is deterrred.   Investors see no profit in producing more.  Scarce resources are not directed into wasteful production.

Whcih brings us to the point at which all socialists fail.  They regulate them production of commodities that are is great demand, diminsihing their supply and driving up the price.  This is exactly what government regulation of the oil industry is actually doing.  Socialists also do one more catastrophically stupid thing:  they sieze some part of the scarce commodity either directly or indirectly and distribute it to those in "need" based on political criteria and not actual willingness to pay.  These nitwits give such policies labels like "fairness", "rationing", and "social justice".   The results are persistent shortages and higher prices for everyone.

The great failure of socialism is its inability to correctly calculate the value of any good or service.  Consequently, socialism is unable to actually produce anything anyone really wants in quantities to satisfy demand. 

These nitwits give such polic

These nitwits give such policies labels like "fairness", "rationing", and "social justice".  

Except the libs aren't nitwits, Al Gore owns a large portion of Occidential Petroleum, he has a vested interest in the price of gas going up even if by taxation but especially by shortages created by the tom foolery of the Dems.  Fairness, rationing and social justice are just rationalizations to snow the public while they make the big bucks.  Remember, libs create a problem to solve it in order to sell the public on their leadership.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

SportPolitics

Its not just one tank of gas SportPolitics, it alll adds up. That 30 more dollars a tank equals out to another 120 dollars a months and $1440 per year. I also love to fly and some airline tickets "international flights" have almost doubled over the past 5 yrs because of high gas prices.

I did not blame anybody for the high price of oil in my post Sport Politics, I just find that it is effecting peoples quality of life. Lots of people have to commute a lot further than I have to. Like is said one of my cars is a an Accord. What about a person that commutes 50 mile per day each way and drives a Chevy Suburban? That tank cost 100 dollars to fill up and it last about 2 days. Also I will not get into a flame war with your, you will not quit until you get in the last word, o at least you are keeping your responses under 10000 words:)

You certainly use a lot of ga

You certainly use a lot of gas.  That $30 represents about a little more than 10 gallons a week by your example.  We get gas down here for $2.83/gal.  But I tell you what, Al Gore still uses more on one private jet trip than what you consume in an entire year.  Now consider all the other 15 million people of his class (5% of the pop. who owns 70% of the wealth) flying around in their private jets.  Jet fuel is pretty close to diesel fuel.  As far as he is concerned given his level of consumption, what you spend is chump change. Most of us could scarcely imagine using the amounts of fuel Al Gore and the rest of the rich use.   

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

Pretty straightforward to me what Repubs should say

http://www.damaveric...

The Republicans are asleep at the wheel. The response is obvious.

If you do not adjust for "inflation"...

Then, every new increase in the per gallon price in CA (where the highest prices are because of state taxes) is a "new record high".

Get used to it. We are not building any new refineries, we are not adding substantial capacity at existing refineries and we are increasing our demand by 3%-4% every year.

Ethanol is no cheaper, and if you remove the government subsidies for producing it, would be about $5 per gallon at the pumps. Hydrogen is uneconmical and unsustainable due to the higher energy needed to "produce" the hydrogen then you get from using it.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic.

I hate to burst bubbles here,

I hate to burst bubbles here, but supply and demand issues aren't what's happening here.  There's been no major disruptions or holdbacks to our importation of oil that's caused any significant decrease in product availability over the past decade or so.  There have been some minor and temporary impacts on refining capacity, but nothing that has resulted in the need for long-term, sustained, increases in prices.

When Katrina damaged our refining and delivery systems, we saw gasoline go from an average in the low $2.20s to over $3.00.  The stated reason: a decrease in supply stemming from the damage to facilities.  Once Congress started responding to cries from the voters and started snooping around, gas dropped back to pre-Katrina levels.  The stated reason:  supply was returning to normal.  But here's the thing: at the time gas prices were dropping, only about 40% of the Katrina damage had been repaired, and what was repaired was the "easy" stuff like lights, peripheral systems, fences, security, etc.  The remaining 60% of work that hadn't been done was the fixing the damage that required replacement of major structures and systems, i.e., the things that actually impact refining capacity.  At the time supply was supposedly going up, and price was coming down, there had been little or no work completed on fixing the things that caused the supposed shortages.

Also, why does anyone in their right mind think that with all their money, and all their influence, that oil companies couldn't get permission to build new refineries if they really wanted to?  These companies have managed to use their influence to get any other change to the laws they want, so what makes you believe that for some strange reason they are barred from getting changes made to zoning laws?  The truth is that the oil companies use the resistence from the left and environmental laws to meet their own ends, which is to maximize profits.  The last thing oil companies want to see is increased refining capacity, so they use the "they won't let us" excuse and you guys buy it.

yes kool aid drinker, and all

yes kool aid drinker, and all the lobby money big tobacco forked out did them well hasn't it.

We should drill more oil, after all its organic!

I agree that we should drill

I agree that we should drill for more oil and open more refineries.  But what is the incentive for the oil companies to do that?  I find it laughable that one of the strongest lobbys in the U.S. is saying "sniff, sniff... so and so won't let us do it."  These guys have a 100% success rate at influencing politicians to make rules, or waive rules, that benefit them (like tax regulation), but for some reason they see no hope in trying to change laws that don't benefit them.  When oil company reps talk about needing more refineries, and having no way to build them, that's a lot of BS.  They have no interest in seeing a surplus of gasoline as that would lower their profits.

I would like to hear all the folks who are drinking the kool aid from the oil companies if we decided to let electric and water companies do what the oil companies are doing.  These also have little or no external competition, so they should also be able to charge whatever the consumer will bear for water and power.  You can either pay $2 a gallon for tap water, or go dirty and flush your toilet once a day.  You can pay $1,000 a month to light a 1000 sqft house or you can sit in the dark.  If we don't let water and power companies run rampant with profits, why do we allow oil companies to?

Are you kidding me?  Did you

Are you kidding me?  Did you not get my point about big tobacco?  Do you realize big tobacco makes more profit off their product than the oil companies, and gave more to politicians of both parties?  Yet it wasn't enough when the government decided to do a class action suit against them (nevermind the fact that its a legal product and government gets a profit from cigarette sells, but I digress).

And basic econ 101, you make more money if you can expand your process so that you can maintain market share.  No since we haven't built a new refinery in 30 years the middle east has gained market share.  Instead of drilling for more oil we pay farmers to grow corn which costs more energy and costs oil companies more to refine and add.  The only real people benefiting from the high gas prices are the government (they make more profit and don't have to deal with the hassle or risk of running the business, what a scam!) and the corn farmers.  You do realize how much it costs to even open a refinery?  Billions.  How much does it cost for the government to raise taxes, collect taxes, make red tape? Nothing, because its not their money.  How much does it cost the farmer to grow more corn, less than a million.  So tell me, even though government has gathered twice the profit, farmers as well, who is guilty of price gauging?

At least the oil companies ar

At least the oil companies are in the business to invest so that we can have even more freedom (yes freedom, without oil or energy our freedoms are severely limited), can't say the same about government.

Assuming gas will keep goin

Assuming gas will keep going up a quarter or so, which these days seems a relatively-safe assumption, it might not be such a good idea to make such a big deal of this, as it's going to give them an excuse to bray again when the price goes up a bit. (I know, I'm possibly-wrongly assuming it'll go up, but lots of new car owners in India & China want gas!)
JMR

Mass-Media ignores worldwide gas prices: U.S. lucky

The leftists of the mass-media and elsewhere are not only nutters but ignorant. They conjure up whatever befits their leftist Big-Lie. Gas prices; do these nutters not know that gas prices are high the world over? That supply and demand, for one, does come into play at the pumps. America is not the only industrialised nation sucking back energy; gas etc. to maintain their economy.

Anyone, who swallows the conspiracy theories and the big bad Bush and company propagated these leftist nutters, deserves to remain ignorant.