NYT in Denial: 'Unclear What Role, If Any, Religion Played' in Fort Dix Six Terror Plot

Photo of Clay Waters.

New York Times reporter Alan Feuer, seen on Times Watch last May giving respectable coverage to a convention of "Bush-caused-9-11" conspiracy nuts, went to enormous (and erroneous) pains on Monday to soft-pedal the Muslim beliefs of the Fort Dix terrorist plotters in "Two Mosques Are Shaken by Ties to a Terror Plot."

"It is unclear what role, if any, religion played in the attack Mr. Shnewer and the five other men are charged with planning. (The sixth suspect, Agron Abdullahu, had no apparent connection with Al-Aqsa or the South Jersey Islamic Center.) The authorities have described the suspects as Islamic extremists, but the lengthy criminal complaint summarizing the F.B.I.'s 15-month undercover investigation of the group does not mention where -- or how often -- they prayed. Certainly there is no evidence that they picked up radical ideas at either mosque."

In contrast to the Times' uninformative, politically correct take, the New York Post filed a complete story, with details on the suspects' radical Islamic beliefs.

"When the teen and another employee went into a back room and began the conversion of the tape, they saw a group of bearded men wearing 'fundamentalist attire' and shooting 'big, f-ing guns,' the teen later told co-workers.

"Throughout the 90-minute-long tape, above the booming gunfire at a Pennsylvania target range, the jihadists could be heard screaming 'God is great!'"

[…]

"That call to authorities set in motion a 16-month undercover investigation in which six of the men caught on tape chillingly discussing killing soldiers 'in the name of Allah.'"

In a related story, the Times entered a familiar plea for sympathy on Saturday's front page, a predictable story by Richard Jones on the plight of a father of one of the "Fort Dix Six" terror suspects -- "Fort Dix Case Empties Pizzeria Where a Father's Pain Is Double."

The paper shows while it does not put terror threats against the U.S. at the top of its priority list, it at least remains sleepless in its dedication to stomping out the hint of a possibility of a shadow of a backlash against Muslims in America.

"After the third death threat of the day, Muslim Tatar decided on Thursday to telephone a sign maker. He had an assistant dictate precisely how he wanted the big new banners to read: 'Under New Management.'

"Not that Mr. Tatar was certain he would be able to sell his beloved and suddenly beleaguered pizzeria here, Super Mario's. Not that he was even sure he wanted to. But he had to do something about the empty tables, the car honks, the nasty taunts.

"'Now, I am target,' Mr. Tatar said, standing in the deserted restaurant on Thursday afternoon. 'How do I know some kid won’t come and. ...' Instead of finishing the sentence, he raised the thumb of his right hand and jabbed his forefinger, riddling the air with invisible bullets.

[...]

"Federal prosecutors said there were no indications that the elder Mr. Tatar had any idea about the plot, and the father said he and his son had grown largely estranged in recent years as Serdar’s religious zealotry increased."

Jones didn't add the quote Tatar gave the Newark Star-Ledger about the terror charges against his son, which may have made Tatar appear less sympathetic: "It's persecution, religious persecution. Nothing more.''

For more New York Times bias, visit Times Watch.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Putting aside the fact that t

Putting aside the fact that the suspects are Muslim. Why else would anybody considering arming themselves and attack a military installation if not in sympathy with the insurgents in Iraq fighting the U.S. Military. There could be a personal reason but that does stretch logic. The simplest explanation is usually the correct one. 

"A mind is a terrible thing." - A comic I forgot the name of.

Perhaps the soldiers----

Perhaps the soldiers----didn't like his pizzas??? Certainly that's enough to justify murder.

They probably didn't tip them

They probably didn't tip them enough for the pizza delivery.

"A mind is a terrible thing." - A comic I forgot the name of.

Only to the NYT is the islamic factor unclear.

To everyone else it is perfectly clear.

My headline: "It's unclear what role, if any, journalism plays at the NY Times."

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic.

Ever get the feeling that Lib

Ever get the feeling that Liberals are stupid enough to drown in a simple rain shower (like Turkeys looking up at the sky with their mouths open)?

Hey come on Ten7's

Hey come on Ten7's, the liberals are just making sure that this nation remains innocent before proven guilty, so that Bush the faux Christian Zio devildog HitlerNazi can't lock us all up in deatrh and torture camps and declare marshall law and expand his never ending oil war on the world.

 Sheesh, give innocence a break, you know all the Bush neocons have already sent us all to hell for not being one of them, including all muslims.

 All these allegations sure look like they fit just the order the neocons need, now they've got 45 former charges on these poor pizza delivery boys.How convenient. Get ThoughtPolice in here,it'stime for a real discussion you Warren commission lackey !

I suppose it would still be

I suppose it would still be unclear if religion were the motive if the entire NYT's editorial board were getting decapitated while their murderers were heard chanting the glories of Allah, while in the act of decapitating. The NYT is just never going to get the fact that these terrorist, want to kill us and disrupt our way of life. And it matters not who is POTUS.

Not all Muslims are terrorist, however it seems, all terrorist are Muslims, who want to kill all Americans, and Israelis despite politcal beliefs. The only difference I see is that Republicans/conservatives, and Israilis would defend themselves.

This battle has gone on before GWB, and will continue after GWB, despite who is in charge, and despite what the MSM, & NYT thinks.

Don't forget jmad627

Don't forget jmad627, the smart and nuanced liberals can say they really meant it isn't true Islam, just like GWB isn't a real Christian.

Hello, don't we have any capablility beyond black and white ? I bet you love black and white thought because it's just like your cop cruisers, black and white,and how they enforce their crackdowns, you racist. You want to slap me don't you ? All you neocns have violent felony tendencies. Can't any of you give peace a chance ? I've been here for a few minutes and already I've been threatened and nearly assaulted, and I suppose you're a Christian ...

"Fort Dix Case Empties

"Fort Dix Case Empties Pizzeria Where a Father's Pain Is Double."

What about all the fathers who worked at Fort Dix that those fine, upstanding youths of indeterminate religious faith were planning to kill? What about all the fathers who worked at the Pentagon and in the WTC?

It reminds me of a headline Rush used to joke about...

WORLD TO END TOMMOROW!
Women and Minorities Hardest Hit

~~~
"Al Gore never shuts up; it's just occasionally we have to hood him like a falcon so we can get some sleep..."
Denis Miller (on Al Gore)

"It's persecution, relig

"It's persecution, religious persecution. Nothing more.''

Oh puhleeeeeze!

How stupid do these people think we are?

BT - actually they think thei

BT - actually they think their audience is pretty intelligent - they just don't how how stupid they (The Times) are.

Yeah.  Someone should inform

Yeah.  Someone should inform Mr. Tatar that the NYT is 'Unclear What Role, If Any, Religion Played' in Fort Dix Six Plot.  Therefore, it couldn't be 'religious persecution'.

Someone should tell Mr Tatar

Someone should tell Mr Tatar that his plan on false signage isn't something he should be blabbing to the newspaper, as some might consider him a LIAR now.

 Further, I'll be disappointed if they don't deport his stupid carcass, as it is clear he "shunned his son" after the religious wacko jihad ideations became ever clearer. So, that piece of crap failed to report, time to DEPORT - later loser !

"It is unclear what role

"It is unclear what role, if any, religion played in the attack Mr. Shnewer and the five other men are charged with planning.  The authorities have described the suspects as Islamic extremists

Even when it is right in their face

It is unclear what role, if any, reporting reality plays at the New York Times

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.   

bogt

Look, the NYT pretty much thinks the Fort Dix arsenal should be attacked, and dismantled, and that would really help put an end to this illegal war and occupation in Iraq.

The real problem is, the NYT reporters more or less agree with the idea of the captured six, and feel their own agenda would be furthered if the plot hadn't been discovered, and it was actually carried out.

 So, the NYT says - quite logically for them, that it isn't clear what role religion had in this captured terror cell,  because of course they themselves are not muslims, they're NYT reporters, and we all know they have thought and likely said much the very same thing - in their weak and imaginary moments, as the Fort Dix six have. Heck - we saw Bin Laden talk like a democrat talks nowadays before the 2004 election.

 Yeah, that's why they can be so far out there, because from their own perspective, and indeed their own minds, being a muslim fanatic is not required to want to do this.

 Uh-huh, so that's what we have, and the lib msm NYT'er knows they are correct, they have personally confirmable evidence. That certainty slips through to the printed page.

That's what Fort Dix deserves, they are one of the main training and force launch points for this illegal war or terror and occupation. The racist slaughter of Arabs must be stopped.

Fort Dix and Liars

NYT isn't in denial, they're just lying. It's part of the Jihadi propaganda network.

Read the NYT if you want to find out what didn't happen. For even more bizzare reporting try the LAT. Citing ether paper as a source puts you on shaky ground most of the time.

m1xram