Meredith Vieira Advances Democratic Line on 'Big Oil' Conspiracy

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.
  • Bookmark and Share

Interviewing Shell Oil's president on this morning's Today show, NBC's Meredith Vieira cited Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer's "Big Oil" conspiracy theory, worried America's "addiction to oil" was "dangerous," and altogether added fuel to the fire that oil company execs, "were a bunch of thieves." Appearing in the 7am half-hour, Shell Oil president John Hofmeister, for the most part, explained the basic economics of the oil business to viewers but that didn't stop Vieira from throwing out conspiratorial charges from left-field.

After asking if Hofmeister thought the price of gas was "reasonable," Vieira launched into the conspiracy theories:

Vieira: "Let's talk about the refineries for a minute because there's been a lot of controversy about them. Maintenance problems at refineries around the country. There are some people, consumer activists, some analysts and even some politicians like Senator Schumer here in New York, who believe that the oil companies are basically holding back the production of gas, they're slow on repairs of their refineries, to keep the price of gas high. Senator Schumer has not gone so far as to say that the oil companies are in collusion but he did say, quote, 'that they wink at each other and do the same thing.' First I'd like your response to that."

Then after Hofmeister denied the charge of collusion, Vieira attempted to play the populist role noting, "among certain consumers," there is a belief "the oil companies are a bunch of thieves," that, "are ripping people off."

Vieira: "I'm picturing some people watching us right now at home and they're probably screaming at the television because they just went to the pump, they shelled out maybe $50 or more to fill up their car. They also know that companies like Shell are posting record profits. In the first quarter of this year, I think the profits for Shell were over $7 billion. Now it may not be fair, it may not be right but there is a perception out there in the country, among certain consumers, that the oil companies are a bunch of thieves. That you're ripping people off. Now I know you've been going around the country talking to people in 50 cities. What are they saying to you and what are you saying back to them?"

After Hofmeister made a plea for an expansion of greater oil exploration Vieira did wonder if that was a realistic expectation under "a Democratically-controlled Congress," but then concluded with the "addiction to oil" line:

Vieira: "And finally, very quickly, will we ever get over this addiction to oil, which I think, for this country, is a dangerous thing?"

The following is the full conversation between Vieira and Hofmeister as it occurred on the May 14th Today show:

Meredith Vieira: "John Hofmeister is the president of the Shell Oil company. Good morning to you, Mr. Hofmeister."

John Hofmeister, Shell Oil: "Good morning, Meredith."

Vieira: "Feel a little bit like deja vu, all over again. You were here in the studio, a year ago, around this time talking about the high price of gas. How it was dictated by supply and demand and basically oil companies had very little control over the global economy. Now here you are back again, yet again in May, prices even higher. As Matt said they're averaging about $3.07 a gallon. In some places even higher than that, 17 cents above what it was a year ago. And meanwhile people are really feeling the pain at the pump. There was a poll conducted by CNN and Opinion Research Corporation, 66 percent of those people who were polled said that they are suffering financial hardship as a result of these gas prices. I have to ask you, sir, as the president of Shell, do you believe that the price of gas is reasonable right now?"

Hofmeister: "Very painful prices, Meredith and-"

Vieira: "Is it reasonable?"

Hofmeister: "Is it reasonable? It's reasonable from a supply, demand situation. We're currently at inventories 16 percent below, I should say the lowest in 16 years. That's because of the coming out of the winter season in which we do a lot of turnarounds, a lot of maintenance on our refineries. With the low inventories and the continuing demand that's what is pushing the price up right now."

Vieira: "Let's talk about the refineries for a minute because there's been a lot of controversy about them. Maintenance problems at refineries around the country. There are some people, consumer activists, some analysts and even some politicians like Senator Schumer here in New York, who believe that the oil companies are basically holding back the production of gas, they're slow on repairs of their refineries, to keep the price of gas high. Senator Schumer has not gone so far as to say that the oil companies are in collusion but he did say, quote, 'that they wink at each other and do the same thing.' First I'd like your response to that."

Hofmeister: "Well we do not do the same thing. We do not collude with one another. It's great sport to attack the oil companies, particularly, when people are upset but the reality is the winter season is the best time to do preventative maintenance. We do that every year and that's not in collusion. That's because to try to do maintenance in the summer, outside work, wearing all kinds of safety gear in tropical conditions along the Gulf Coast, that's very difficult on people."

Vieira: "So the oil companies are not, in any way, holding back the production of gas?"

Hofmeister: "It would be un-economic to do so. These margins being what they are, we're trying to produce everything we can produce but they're-"

Vieira: "I know, oh I'm sorry."

Hofmeister: "-but they're have been a couple of fires in a couple of refineries which have aggravated the situation. So it's not just the maintenance that's been happening but a couple of fires in a state like Texas or California can really affect the supply and demand equation in a short term basis."

Vieira: "I'm picturing some people watching us right now at home and they're probably screaming at the television because they just went to the pump, they shelled out maybe $50 or more to fill up their car. They also know that companies like Shell are posting record profits. In the first quarter of this year, I think the profits for Shell were over $7 billion. Now it may not be fair, it may not be right but there is a perception out there in the country, among certain consumers, that the oil companies are a bunch of thieves. That you're ripping people off. Now I know you've been going around the country talking to people in 50 cities. What are they saying to you and what are you saying back to them?"

Hofmeister: "Well as we go around, we've been to 33 cities since I was here a year ago and we've talked to thousands and thousands of people from coast-to-coast. What they're really saying is, 'we are unhappy, we are angry. We are frustrated and we are in fear that we're running out of oil and gas. Is that true? We're running out of oil and gas? Well the reality is we're not. There's plenty of oil and gas out there, if we had public policy to support production of more oil and gas we'd have a lot more supply coming into the system. Actually part of the supply, demand crunch that we're experiencing right now is public policy that allows us to only access oil and gas in 15 percent of the outer-continental shelf, 15 percent. 85 percent we're banned from exploring for oil and gas. Meanwhile we bring in expensive imports from around the world. We would much rather see a situation where we could explore across the outer-continental shelf. Where we could have public policy enabling the building of new refining capacity. Shell is looking with its partner, Motiva, at a major refinery expansion in Port Arthur, Texas. And we-"

Vieira: "Do you see that kind of exploration, though, happening with a Democratically-controlled Congress?"

Hofmeister: "Well here's the reality. We have a 100-year infrastructure of oil and gas. We have to continue to feed that infrastructure to sustain our economic growth model, to sustain our lifestyle. If we don't bring in more oil and gas into the system we're gonna have to pay more and more and more. I'd hate to see prices double or triple what they are today because we failed to explore for more gas and oil."

Vieira: "Meanwhile public policy seems to be going more towards bio-fuels and away from oil which is something you don't seem to support, even though they are renewable and they're cleaner."

Hofmeister: "Oh Shell's been in bio-fuels for 30 years. We support bio-fuels. We would welcome moving towards a 10 percent supply of bio-fuel in this country but we do prefer second generation ethanol. Corn ethanol competes with food. It's a fine fuel but it competes with food. We would rather use cellulistic ethanol, which we're working on, that's where we're investing our money, to add a 10 percent supply to the fuel chain."

Vieira: "And finally, very quickly, will we ever get over this addiction to oil, which I think, for this country, is a dangerous thing?"

Hofmeister: "We will. I'm convinced we will. And we hear this in the cities we go to. People are impressed with technology. They love technology. Technology is gonna take us from oil and gas over decades, not overnight, but over decades to renewable and alternative forms of energy and we'll be there."

Vieira: "John Hofmeister, thank you very much for joining us."

Hofmeister: "Thank you."

Editor's Note (Ken Shepherd |13:51 EDT): Related posts on the media's bias relating to gas and oil prices may be found here.

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Muwuhahahahahahahaha!- The Va

Muwuhahahahahahahaha!

- The Vast Big Oil Conspiracy

I love the way Veria says &qu

I love the way Veria says "and even some politicians like Senator Schumer".   As if to say that pols like Schumer don't spend half (or more) every day looking for and/or creating Prime Time no news issues like these.  The main reason the general public tends to think badly of big oil is because of the way the msm spins stories like these. 

Hofmeister:  Vieira, are you

Hofmeister:  Vieira, are you smarter than a 5th grader?

Vieira:  Well, of course, I am genius, but  could you explain supply and demand one more time for our viewers?  We like to treat them like they are complete imbeciles.  We hope that you will too.  It's a tradition here at wacko TV!

Meanwhile, the real major producers of oil and gas, OPEC, gets a free ride.  They aren't branded as thieves.  And, certainly, they couldn't be colluding with each other.  Now what does monopoly mean again?   

Refineries? Anyone?

How about building some more refineries? Not one has been built since 1976! That is just stupid. You can have all the crude oil you want but if you can't make it into gas....prices will be high. They call this theory Supply and Demand. Meridith....PLEASE TAKE AN ECONOMICS COURSE!

Our Currency is inflating aga

Our Currency is inflating against other world currencies. This causes import prices to rise. Lack of refineries. Summer driving. Chinese and Indian demand. Turmoil in Nigeria, Venezuela and of course the middle east have an effect on prices. Pretty soon, however, the left with their henchmen trial lawyers will accuse the oil companies of selling an addicting product. Thousands of class action suits later the lawyers will "settle" (read confiscate) billions of dollars from the oil companies and then buy baseball teams like the Baltimore Orioles.

"A mind is a terrible thing." - A comic I forgot the name of.

While I don't subscribe to th

While I don't subscribe to the "Big Oil Conspiracy" (or most conspiracies for that matter), and I wouldn't call big oil theives, I do have some problems with the price of gas at the pump.

Just because supply and demand "justify" increased charge for oil, that doesn't mean it has to increase.

If demand is so much above supply, why aren't gas stations running out of product?

With a product that directly or indirectly affects every single aspect of American life, why can't the oil companies take an infintestimal reduction in profits and give Joe Q. Public a break at the pump?

I don't really care what other countries pay for their gas.

If the price of a barrel is decided in the Market, why do pump prices change several times per week, sometimes several times per day? I can understand that if a given barrel costs more, then the final product when delivered to the gas station should perhaps reflect the increased cost. But this variance in the cost per barrel doesn't justify altering the price of gas already bought and sitting in the gas station tanks.

Finally, how much profit does any one industry need to make? Quarterly profits in the tens of billions doesn't make me very sympathetic to damaged refineries and shareholder concerns. The shareholders are already recognizing incredible profits, and plenty is left for modernizing existing refineries and building additional capability.

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Why can't the Federal or Stat

Why can't the Federal or State Government give us a break in excise taxes on Gasoline for that matter a large part of the price of gasoline is taxes. The amount of profit is great in monetary terms but reasonable considering the size of the oil entities. The people's republic of Maryland, where I live, implemented a 5 cent surcharge on gasoline to offset some deficits and for road building. It was touted as temporary to make it easier to swallow needless to say 15 years later it is still in place. 

"A mind is a terrible thing." - A comic I forgot the name of.

The answer to your question,

The answer to your question, ahusser, is quite elementary:  Federal and state governments are loath to suspend or terminate taxes on petroleum products (particularly gasoline) because it is a steady, reliable cash-cow for them.  While politicians like Schumer insist that America is addicted to oil, it is quite fair to say that the Congress is addicted to taxes on oil. 

Galvanic, since we are addict

Galvanic, since we are addicted to oil the following scenario I am sure is about to ensue: Pretty soon, however, the left with their henchmen trial lawyers will accuse the oil companies of selling an addicting product. Thousands of class action suits later the lawyers will "settle" (read confiscate) billions of dollars from the oil companies and then buy baseball teams like the Baltimore Orioles.

"A mind is a terrible thing." - A comic I forgot the name of.

LOL.  You could be right, ah

LOL.  You could be right, ahusser.  Additionally, since virtually all addictions (e.g. alcoholism, drugs) seem to be classified as diseases,  we might get MEDICARE to pay for the stress we incure from the cost of filling up our tanks.

But I'd have to be addicted to the point of unconsciousness to buy the Baltimore Orioles.   :-)

GalvanicThat trial lawyer ext

Galvanic

That trial lawyer extrodinaire (sp?), Peter Angelos, as an asbestos and tobacco litigator made multi-millions on tobacco litigation alone did buy the Baltimore Oreos. It was all down hill from there for the Oreos. 

"Just because supply a

"Just because supply and demand "justify" increased charge for oil, that doesn't mean it has to increase."

And just because you feel you are entitled to cheap gas doesn't mean the oil companies have to comply.

"With a product that directly or indirectly affects every single aspect of American life, why can't the oil companies take an infintestimal reduction in profits and give Joe Q. Public a break at the pump?"

Since our government earns twice what the oil companies do on gas and oil sales for doing nothing to earn it, shouldn't they be the ones to take an "infintestimal" reduction in profits? I mean, afterall, chuckie shmuckie is sooo concerned for your well-being, it really is the humane thing to do.

Furthermore, do you realize that some states REQUIRE station owners to charge a fixed amount above the wholesale price of gas, meaning they couldn't cut the price if they wanted to? In one state that was in the news recently, the amount was 9%. That means if the wholesale price was $3.00 a gallon, stations have to charge $3.27 MINIMUM! Then slap another 40 cents or more in taxes, and BAM, you're at $3.67 a gallon.

"If demand is so much above supply, why aren't gas stations running out of product?"

Because, while demand is running above supply, it's not that much above supply. Running above supply doesn't have to mean so far above supply that we are running out at the pump. It doesn't have to be either or, there are several levels in between. Temperatures around here have been cooler than normal the past few days, but that doesn' t mean we are in an ice age. Still, for the record, there are stations across the country that have run out of gas. I have seen it personally in my town. It does happen, more than you think. So there, happy now?

"If the price of a barrel is decided in the Market, why do pump prices change several times per week, sometimes several times per day?"

If you don't know the answer to this, how can you render judgement on an industry that, apparently, you know less about than you think? It never ceases to amaze me how people who probably can barely pump a gallon of gas into their vehicle somehow feel they know all there is to know about the oil business, lol.

"Finally, how much profit does any one industry need to make? Quarterly profits in the tens of billions doesn't make me very sympathetic to damaged refineries and shareholder concerns."

Oil companies(all companies) don't "make" profits, they EARN them. As such, they are free to earn as much as they want as far as I'm concerned. It's not my place to tell someone else how much they can earn, nor is it yours. Worry less about how much someone else is earning, and focus more on how much you are earning, and what you can do to improve that, and you'll be better off.

"I do have some problems with the price of gas at the pump."

I do too: I don't like them, lol. But what I like even less is government coming in and telling a private company how much money they can earn, and envious consumers who feel they are entitled to the fruits of someone else's labor. And you better think about this: A government that can put a cap on oil company earnings can put a cap on YOUR earnings.

What you really should do, since you've got this oil thing all figured out, is start your own oil company. I mean, really, it can't be all that complicated. Then you can sell/give away all the cheap oil/gas that you want. Then you'd really show those mean ol' oil companies a thing or two.

I just knew someone was going

I just knew someone was going to go anal and get all bent out of shape over this post. Of course, ckc, you had to take the most negative slant on everything I said and even insinuate quite a bit of sarcasm to do so. Here's MY slant on what I said:

And just because you feel you are entitled to cheap gas doesn't mean the oil companies have to comply.

I never said, nor did I imply, that oil companies had to comply. I offered the opinion that they don't have to do something, like raise prices, simply because they can. Their hands aren't tied, and price increases aren't automatic. Raising prices, especially on speculation, is a conscious decision.

Since our government earns twice what the oil companies do on gas and oil sales for doing nothing to earn it, shouldn't they be the ones to take an "infintestimal" reduction in profits? I mean, afterall, chuckie shmuckie is sooo concerned for your well-being, it really is the humane thing to do.

I won't play national or international economics with you. Neither of us knows a fraction of what would be required to make it a legitimate debate. We both know the government will not cut taxes except as a last resort. That's not how government works. They expect the companies to take a hit or the consumer to foot the increase. Until commerce in the US is drastically, negatively affected, the taxes won't change. As for those taxes, and just to set the record straight, the government doesn't "make twice what the oil companies do". The federal government tax per gallon is a standard 18.4 cents. The state taxes vary from 8 cents per gallon to 32.1 cents. Using $3.00 per gallon as a base, the oil companies, on average, make 30 cents per. Using the worst case (Wisconsin), the government (state and federal combined) takes 50 cents per gallon and the oil companies make 30 cents per. Best case (Alaska) changes the math to 26 cents for the government, while the oil company profit stays the same. So government takes from 14% to 40% per gallon ("at-the-pump" costs). While I agree that taxes are a major part of the problem, it is primarily the state taxes that are to blame as only 13 states have less taxes than the federal 18 cents per gallon, while 37 take as much or more than the feds, 30 of whom take at least 10% more than the feds.

Furthermore, do you realize that some states REQUIRE station owners to charge a fixed amount above the wholesale price of gas, meaning they couldn't cut the price if they wanted to?

Most states force a mandatory charge over cost. This is nothing new. I ran a gas station over 20 years ago, and this policy existed then. It is also all profit. So additional price increases are increased profits, which they can control.

Still, for the record, there are stations across the country that have run out of gas. I have seen it personally in my town. It does happen, more than you think. So there, happy now?

I won't disagree that there are probably stations experiencing shortages. But for this supply-demand being touted as the national level issue as it has been, then this shortage of product should be felt nationally, instead of at isolated locations. Are you happy now?

If you don't know the answer to this, how can you render judgement on an industry that, apparently, you know less about than you think? It never ceases to amaze me how people who probably can barely pump a gallon of gas into their vehicle somehow feel they know all there is to know about the oil business, lol.

So your answer is what? You're pretty quick to point out my supposed ignorance of the process, but that's all you did. Let's hear your expertise. To answer my own rhetorical question, these price fluctuations at the pump are based on speculation. Not cost. Hence, another way they could cut the consumer a break is by basing their prices on their actual cost, instead of what they anticipate their cost will be in the future. When they get a delivery, then they could, and should, raise their prices accordingly. And BTW, I can not only easily pump a gallon of gas, I can easily rebuild the engine it powers. LOL

Oil companies(all companies) don't "make" profits, they EARN them. As such, they are free to earn as much as they want as far as I'm concerned. It's not my place to tell someone else how much they can earn, nor is it yours. Worry less about how much someone else is earning, and focus more on how much you are earning, and what you can do to improve that, and you'll be better off.

One makes profit by earning it. Semantics. Find a better rebuttal. And while I again agree that companies are free to make as much profit as they want, what I was saying is that, due to the criticality of their product and it's impact all across our economy, they, who incidentally also live here, could voluntarily choose to reduce their profit margin to benefit the nation's economy as a whole. Again, I never said one word telling them how much they can earn. I simply question how much is enough? Sure, they're free to make as much as they want, but at the expense of our economy? Huge profits at the expense of driving up the prices of virtually every other product sold? No, government already had their hand deep enough in this particular cookie jar. But, for the good of the nation, it's not too much of a stretch that the oil conglomerates could take a little less and still make vast profits. As for what I earn, I do just fine. I don't particularly like paying the price at the pump that I do, but I don't feel any huge crunch. But what about the hundreds of thousands of Americans who feel the pain every time they tank up? Who have to pay through the nose in order to survive? And what about small businesses like delivery companies and such who need fuel to operate, but don't have their own huge profit margin to dip into to compensate for the increased cost of running their business? What about lower income families who have to pay more for every single necessity due to increased fuel costs, but have no income increase to defray it? All so oil executives can pocket $400 million per year instead of $395 million salary. Or the stockholders who will see a profit regardless?

But what I like even less is government coming in and telling a private company how much money they can earn, and envious consumers who feel they are entitled to the fruits of someone else's labor. And you better think about this: A government that can put a cap on oil company earnings can put a cap on YOUR earnings.

What you really should do, since you've got this oil thing all figured out, is start your own oil company. I mean, really, it can't be all that complicated. Then you can sell/give away all the cheap oil/gas that you want. Then you'd really show those mean ol' oil companies a thing or two.

I think I've addressed this exaggeration of yours sufficiently. I don't know where you read into my post that I think government should price cap oil, nor did I insinuate consumers are "entitled to the fruits of someone else's labor". All I said is simply that the oil companies are making vast profits at the expense of our economy as a whole. They could, and should, VOLUNTARILY, reduce these profits by a small margin. They would be hurt at all and everyone else would feel the relief. It's called putting your nation before yourself. After all, operating in the US as they do, and reaping the profits they do, is only accomplished by the freedom America provides to them. Or should we compare the US system to Venezuela or the M.E. nations that have totally government-run oil companies? Giving a little back isn't that unreasonable. Or better yet, taking a little less is perhaps more appropriate.

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Demand is not currently above

Demand is not currently above supply that is why there is not a shortage of supply.  Prices rise in order to change demand to accomodate market pressures.  Fewer people are willing to pay the higher price and begin to conserve, therefore suppy remains in check.

Paradigm shifts in the supply or demand can occur and cause shortages. I.E. Hurricanes, natural disasters, oil embargos or any other unforseen loss of supply or unexpected rises in demand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand

Prices rise and fall due to the limited margin built within the price of a gallon of gas at the pump. If the owner of a convenience store makes the national average of $.10 a gallon. The cost of buying the next refill of the holding tanks has to be met at the pump. If oil jumps up based on speculative buying, disasters, middle east tensions or whatever, then the cost of refining goes up and then the end product of the wholesale gas rises as well. If the store owner is to afford the refilling of the tanks at the new market price the price at the pump must reflect that change.

The EPA has not issued a permit for the building of a refinery in over 30 years.

Oil companies would glady re-invest profits to build more if the EPA would let them.

Liberal Hypocrites

I always love it when a liberal politician drags an oil CEO into committee to be grilled as to why gas prices are so high. It's their own stupid non-progressive policies which hamper the supply of oil! Supply and demand is 1st grade economics and many liberal politicains don't even get it. Look, we are decades and decades away from any viable alternative to oil power. There is still so much oil still available in this world. Even shale oil (yes I spelled that right, look it up on Wikipedia) is found abundently in our own US of A. We could have cheap oil and be free of foreign dependence if constrictive liberal policies weren't stopping the free market.

Since conspiracy theories see

Since conspiracy theories seem to abound lately, allow me to advance one I heard many years ago (long before our serious confrontations with the Middle East and the oil company's vast profiteering.

It seems that someone told me that they had heard from someone who knew this guy who worked for a guy who overheard a conversation from an aide to a politician who was friends with another politician on some energy commission that the US government was buying up vast US oil fields and fencing them off and capping the wells all over the country. They were doing this in anticipation of the ME oil running out. Then we would be the ones with all the oil, and we would corner the world market and become the new Arabs...

Hey, it sounds as reasonable as any of the leftist conspiracy theories going around!!!

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

NO WAY!!!!!

NO WAY!!!!!

lol

lol

Meredith's viewing audience

Meredith's viewing audience is roughly the same IQ level of Oprah's, below 100. So she is preaching to the dummies allowed to vote even though they are not very smart. Anyone familiar with the industry knows it is a crap shoot, with crazy whack-jobs like Chavez and Ahmadodojihad thrashing about and great prospective areas like ANWR blocked from development because of political, not environmental, reasons.

Ditzes like Vieira only contribute to diminishing the quality of dialogue for a sensible energy policy.

Every year it seems like talk

Every year it seems like talking to oil execs about gas prices is a lot like talking to 10-year olds why their homework isn't getting done.  These guys have more excuses than you can count.  Winter is the usual time for refinery maintenance?  Winter has always been a time of peak production to meet heating demands.  When are people going to realize that profit is funds remaining AFTER all costs have been paid.  The fact that these companies are seeing record profits means that their costs aren't rising, just the prices they know they can charge.

As I've said before, there's nothing that consumers buy on a regular basis that's priced like gasoline, yet we tolerate it.  If we were told we had to pay the same amount for locally-gown apples as we pay for ones brought in from across the country, we would say "no way".  Yet we have no problem paying the same amount for a gallon of gasoline that's made from oil found in Alaska and shipped to the US for a low cost that we pay for a gallon made from oil that's been pumped in a danger zone and shipped from halfway across the planet!

And why do we tolerate it?  Because we have no choice as there's no external competition.  The companies that make gas from domestic oil will not charge less than those using expensive imported oil, and there's no alternative for gas except for less-than-effective public transportation and walking.  It's obvious the oil companies aren't going to change, so again I think gasoline production and distribution should be treated the same way we treat water and electricity.

Demlibs crack me up. They ref

Demlibs crack me up. They refuse to let us exploit known reserves right here in this country, yet they are the first to whine when the prices go up.

This is simple supply and demand, nothing more. If the libs in the MSM want to see the price go down (and let's be honest, they really don't) then they should be encouraging an increase in the supply, and perhaps doing away with all the different blends that are required now, which only serves to gum up the works even more.

Viera, along with the rest of the liberal MSM, are doing nothing more than taking advantage of the sorry state of real economics education in this country, which is nigh onto non-existent.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-Neal Boortz.

Exactly Dave...I have posted

Exactly Dave...

I have posted as such too forever it seems.

Self-dependency...I want a President who is going to FORCEFULLY run on this...which would be very easy to do with the prices.

Drill Often!...Drill Everywhere! 

Gosh, Mr. Hofmeister sure did

Gosh, Mr. Hofmeister sure did a great job, didn't he?  He was very articulate and reasonable even though that mean ol' reporter wasn't very nice to him.

(Just earning my Big Oil paycheck and cherry pez this week.)