If television news were covered the same way the media covered Iraq, Katie Couric would surely be out of a job by now. I can imagine the New York Times lede:
The news just keeps getting worse for the administration. After spending millions of dollars and manpower to sell a leadership transition, the situation continues to deteriorate. External critics are stepping up their attacks and cracks within the administration's iron-clad discipline are beginning to show as dissenters leak secrets, express discontent and demand an exit strategy to an eager press.
That, of course is not a lede you'll ever see in any American newspaper but it is dead-on accurate as far as the facts go. The "CBS Evening News" continues to sink in the ratings despite the fact that former "Today" star Katie Couric was brought in to save the show from oblivion. Here's the actual New York Times:
The numbers are stark. Eight months into Katie Couric’s job as the first woman to anchor a network newscast on her own, her “CBS Evening News” has not only settled back into its long-held position of last among the evening news broadcasts, but also regularly falls short of the newscast that Ms. Couric replaced.
In the latest week’s ratings, “CBS Evening News” had its worst performance since the Nielsen company installed its “people meter” ratings system 20 years ago.
Ms. Couric professed to be unfazed. “Honestly, I think we’re going to see ebbs and flows,” she said in a telephone interview the day after receiving the ratings news. “I don’t think it’s a doom-and-gloom scenario.”
But it certainly is not a buoyant scenario either, as Sean McManus, the president of CBS News, acknowledged. “We are a distant third,” he said. “There is no way to sugarcoat that fact.”
CBS executives say their research had predicted that the newscast would continue to struggle in the ratings, even after the network’s enormous investment in Ms. Couric — an estimated $15 million in annual salary — as well as millions more to build a new set and promote her and her newscast.
Internal critics are legion and many of them have been speaking to the press. Yet, the same CBS who has been eager to pronounce the Iraq war a failure is taking a decidedly different tone when it comes to its own attempts to do something big:
Despite the low ratings and the reports of sniping from colleagues, the mood inside CBS News remains unshakably upbeat. In an interview in her office overlooking the set, Ms. Couric sought to convey the message, backed up by CBS management, that she was not going anywhere. Not now, not after the 2008 election, not anytime encompassed by her initial five-year contract.
Nor does she want to go anywhere, she insists. “I have no regrets,” she said.
The network’s executives, including Leslie Moonves, the CBS chairman, say they knew that they were acquiring probably the most avidly followed personality in television news, and so they did expect a media spotlight. But some of the other reactions caught them off guard. [...]
With those early expectations gone and signaling perhaps that CBS has no Plan B in the works, Mr. McManus said that the network is looking for long-term gains.
“Our ratings will improve because of the quality of our newscast and the quality of our anchor,” he said. “That’s the only plan that makes sense right now.”
As to when that might happen, Mr. McManus said, “Three years, four years, five years; that is the time frame that I think, realistically, you need to use to evaluate where the broadcast is and where CBS News is.”
Five years down the road. The hypocrisy is staggering.
CBS thinks that everyone should reserve judgment for up to five years for it to grow the ratings for a television show while expecting the creation of democracy in a region which is infamous for religious intolerance and despotism to have been completed within one year.
CBS which was calling for an "exit strategy" in 2003,* the first year of the war, and has been eager to compare Iraq to Vietnam. This is also the same CBS which referred to low poll numbers for President Bush as proof that the administration's attempts to convince the public on Iraq were like a "mission impossible" scenario, and asked explicitly "is there any way out of this nightmare?"
The fact is, CBS is right to say that it's been too short of a timeframe to pronounce the Couric regime a success or failure. Too bad the network's ideological blinders keep it from thinking similarly on Iraq.
* Steve Kroft on the May 23, 2004 edition of "60 Minutes" asked former general Anthony Zinni the following question: "There was a point during the Vietnam War where we had opportunities to say, 'No, no, we're not going to go any farther.' Has the time come to sit down and say, 'Look, this is not going well, and there is a potential for it to go much worse. Maybe the time has come to develop an exit strategy.'"
—Matthew Sheffield is the creator of NewsBusters and its Executive Editor.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Let's face it, the evening ne
May 14, 2007 - 12:32 ET by KC MulvilleLet's face it, the evening news has never been anything more than a headline service anyway. Now, with Drudge and every news website, we have the headlines ... but now the headlines have hyperlinks, so we can pursue the news that interests us. We don't have to wait through the stories we don't really care about. Once you follow news through the internet, you can't go back to evening news. Who wants to sit through endless ads and feel-good fluff stories to hear the news you could have gotten instantly with a click of the mouse?
The evening news on TV is an inflexible format, and that doesn't attract new viewers. People only watch it out of habit. And anytime you change a habit, you risk breaking the habit. I think that's what's happening here. It has little to do with women or with Katie Couric herself. It has everything to do with the fading of the evening news format. It's a habit we're all breaking.
Of course, I can't help but laugh at the idea that the evening news is working on a five-year plan ... never mind the echoes of Soviet promises ... the evening news on network TV might not be here five years from now. Good riddance.
Matthew Sheffield - Comparing
May 14, 2007 - 12:41 ET by ding7777Matthew Sheffield - Comparing apples and rocks.
I think Matthew is making an
May 14, 2007 - 12:50 ET by Dave RI think Matthew is making an excellent point here, ding, about what is clearly (to most of us, anyway) a blatant double standard on the part of CBS.
Were it not for the rocks rattling around in your head, perhaps you would be able to see it, too.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
And that, friends, is what
May 14, 2007 - 12:57 ET by Matthew SheffieldAnd that, friends, is what we call a drive-by posting.
No arguments, just a short talking point to shore up the faithful. In and out in less than 30 seconds.
Nice.
It's not a woman thing or a K
May 14, 2007 - 13:31 ET by SamwiseIt's not a woman thing or a Katie Couric thing - it's a MSM thing. Agree with KC.
Moonbat Moonves should go b
May 14, 2007 - 13:57 ET by daveinbocaMoonbat Moonves should go back to bartending and of course the NYT would never mention that Rick Kaplan is to the left of Pol Pot. THAT'S how they're going to win new viewers, by following adenoidal drip Brian Williams to ultra-left land?
Note on the multimedia chart with the NYT article that both NBC and CBS are going down in viewers while ABC with sensible Charlie Gibson is going UP!
The nimrods at the two leftardo network news outlets will continue to drift leftward and KC will hemorrhage viewers until she is s***canned. In TV talk, Moonves and McManus were saying the same thing that LOSER George McGovern said about his vice-presidential candidate Eagleton. "I support him 1000%."
Next day, Eagleton was gone.
Fair is fair Katie.....If ben
May 14, 2007 - 13:59 ET by vietvet67Fair is fair Katie.....If benchmarks are good enough for President Bush and Iraq then they're also good enough for you.
No improvements in your show ratings in 3 months then kiss the $15million goodbye.....How's that?
I think CBS is having a "
May 14, 2007 - 16:30 ET by BruzillaI think CBS is having a "live by the sword, die by the sword" moment. They refused to acknowledge the fact that a lot of Couric's lack of popularity was based on her political leanings, and instead branded critics with the "sexist pig" label. Now they're stuck because there's no way they can cut away the Couric albatross around their necks without exposing themselves to the same criticism.
An observation
May 14, 2007 - 21:48 ET by goldenthroatJohn Murtha - the original grumpy old man!
Never dance on an empty stomach unless it's a liberal.
Don't you DARE insult the gru
May 14, 2007 - 21:53 ET byDon't you DARE insult the grumpy old men!
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Couric is a morning hostess
May 14, 2007 - 23:21 ET by JDWCouric is a morning hostess. Add on all of the negative details you care to, the evening role simply does not fit, nor is it going to.
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
Exit Strategy
June 6, 2007 - 15:48 ET by dconradOf course, this ignores that under the Powell doctrine there should have been an exit strategy before going in to any conflict. So calling for the development of an exit strategy is not at all the same as throwing in the towel.
powell doctrine ?
June 6, 2007 - 16:02 ET by tumblerGet real. Powell was NOT a Cmmander in Chief. Anyways; don't these mugs like to call us imperialists ? If we are, let's ask:
Did the Romans have exit strategies ? Did we have one at the Battle of the Bulge ?
Cortez skuttled his own ships, because they provided exits for his demoralizers. Now the surrender party is looking for an exit. They'd look for an escape hatch in a chicken coop.
Dcon.. we have an exit strate
June 6, 2007 - 16:12 ET by bassndudeDcon.. we have an exit strategy. Always have had. It may not be what you think it should be, but then again, you have no practical military planning experience. You libs all think that running away is the solution to all military engagements when things get tuff. Thats not an exit strategy, that is cowardly. The exit strategy here is the same one we had in WW II, WW I. Anything less is surrender. You can sugar coat it anyway you want, but thats it in a nut shell.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!