Reminiscent of Bryant Gumbel's 1989 charge on the Today show that you're either “a racist or a liberal,” on Sunday's This Week, ABC's George Stephanopoulos presumed only Republicans are racists who will not vote for Democratic candidate Barack Obama, who had an African father. During the roundtable, Sam Donaldson proposed that the country is ready for an African-American President, but noted how “he said he thinks he'll lose some votes because of that, and so the question is what does the word 'some' mean? In critical elections, not just in the South, it may mean something.” Moderator Stephanopoulos then jumped in: “I guess I think that anyone who's not going to vote for Barack Obama because he is black isn't going to vote for a Democrat anyway.” Donaldson, however, soon explained that he was referring to Democratic primary voters: “But I'm talking about the race for the nomination.”
Video clip (15 seconds) Real (500 KB) or Windows Media (600 KB), plus MP3 audio (100 KB)
Back on the September 5, 1989 Today show on NBC, previewing his prime-time special, “The Racial Attitudes and Consciousness Exam (RACE),” Bryant Gumbel asserted: “This test is not going to tell you whether you’re a racist or a liberal.”
The May 13 This Week opened with a pre-taped interview of Obama conducted by Stephanopoulos. The relevant portion of the roundtable panel, with Cokie Roberts and George Will in addition to Donaldson and Stephanopoulos, in which Donaldson referred back to the interview:
Sam Donaldson: “You raised something, let's just put on the table: He's an African-American. Is the country ready? Well, I think it is. And he said he thinks it is. He said he thinks he'll lose some votes because of that, and so the question is what does the word 'some' mean? In critical elections, not just in the South, it may mean something.”Cokie Roberts: “Well sure. And it could be huge. But I think the fact that we're having this conversation is just wonderful. I mean, the idea that we are at this point in 2007, if you had told us that 40 years ago when we were having all the civil rights debates that we would be talking very seriously about a black man being President of the United States in 2008, we would not have believed it.”
George Stephanopoulos: “Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm naive, but Sam I guess I think that anyone who's not going to vote for Barack Obama because he is black isn't going to vote [Roberts says at this instant “Democratic”] for a Democrat anyway. And I wonder if there are as many people who will vote for him-”
George Will: “More.”
Stephanopoulos: “That's the question.”
Will: “The place where Barack Obama really helps is in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, right outside Philadelphia.”
Stephanopoulos: “Exactly.”
Will: “Moderate, mainstream swing district where it makes people feel good.”
Donaldson: “You already made him the nominee.”
Stephanopoulos: “Not yet Sam.”
Donaldson: “But I'm talking about the race for the nomination. Now, many states have crossovers I understand, but the states in which you have to be a Democrat in order to vote in the Democratic primary, that's where- [talked over.]”
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
For the bazillionth time: O
May 14, 2007 - 08:45 ET by MightyMouthFor the bazillionth time: Obama is NOT black! He is half black and half white! Sheesh!!!!!!!!!! And I might add, that calling him black is racist, as if the white half doesn't count. Yes?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Maybe they should allow 'frac
May 14, 2007 - 10:31 ET byMaybe they should allow 'fraction' votes, along with whole votes? The Republicans can vote for his white half and Democrats can vote for his black half; the Muslims can cast whole votes.
:o)
Just kidding, just kidding...
kind-of-sort-of
hmm.. but seriously... It is obvious, what is going on here. They are just trying to come up with an excuse for why Republicans will not vote for Obama, other than the fact that he is an anti-Christ, if not THE anti-Christ. ---Which is a huge possibility, ya know.
Debra...
Debra, your split vote idea
May 14, 2007 - 11:06 ET by MightyMouthDebra, your split vote idea got me thinking (oh no!). Since both Dems and Repubs have such a hard time choosing just one candidate; why don't we got to a" presidential committee" for the executive branch instead of just one person?
Here me out: The DNC and RNC pick their top 5 candidates to run for the "committee". The voters vote for the "team" they like best (we could even eliminate the office of VP under my plan). Then all decisions and vetos would require a simple majority from the committee! They could take turns giving state of the unions, visiting disaster areas, visiting heads of state etc. Plenty of co-presidents to go around. This way we get the Top five from each party making decisions and even the Libertarians could participate! Waddyathink?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Interesting, but I think that
May 14, 2007 - 11:21 ET by JimboInteresting, but I think that the politics that would be played within the committee would be crippling.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Probably right, like the su
May 14, 2007 - 11:27 ET by MightyMouthProbably right, like the supreme court! And like the supreme court there would always be the tie breaker. But with the number of decisions that would be made, the tie breaker could always be someone new! :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
So the O-man is a hybrid.
May 14, 2007 - 13:54 ET by RackieSo the O-man is a hybrid.
Either that, or he's... &qu
May 14, 2007 - 13:58 ET by MightyMouthEither that, or he's... "white!" :-P (just as valid as saying he's "black")
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
They're already setting up the strawman
May 14, 2007 - 08:49 ET by c5thenThey already appear to be setting up the strawman if Obama wins the nomination. Here's the strawman: If you don't vote for Obama, it's because you are racist.
In fact, some of the supposed "detatched media" already cannot distinguish between the race for a parties nomination, and the race for the general election. They are constantly comparing one democrat to another republican when all of that is superfluous and pre-mature.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic.
You know people - this is o
May 14, 2007 - 09:12 ET by Dee BunkYou know people - this is outrageous and I wish someone would organize a petition or something to get Stephapomus to retract his statement. If Republicans keep keeping their mouths shut about this kind of stuff, they are going to continue to lose. They need to quit letting the Dems define politically correct.
So if the ticket was Colin
May 14, 2007 - 09:20 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsSo if the ticket was Colin Powell / Condi Rice who would the 'racists' be that weren't voting for them?
I guess everyone would vote for them.
Except the Democra(cis)ts
D
A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.
Stephanopoulus didn't think h
May 14, 2007 - 09:27 ET by GalvanicStephanopoulus didn't think his statement through. There are many Democrats who would not vote for Obama because he is black, and they reside in the black Democratic elite. That's because Obama is a threat to their power structure and the heavy-handed influence they have wielded over the DP leadership for decades. They've already raised some issues about whether Obama is "black enough," presumably meaning has he suffered as a racial minority.
Obama didn't come up through the ranks of the race industry, like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton did. Nor is he the son of one who has, as is Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. He's fairly new on the scene, has considerable appeal across racial lines, and therefore he has no IOUs to the Jackson-Sharpton crowd. If Obama wins, the leading Dems won't come kowtowing to Jackson and Sharpton anymore, and so their balloons will completely deflate.
In the end, Jackson and Sharpton might support Obama, but if they do, it will only be after (a) he kowtows to them for their support and publicly acknowledges their importance, and (b) they can't get a better deal from Hillary Clinton.
So, I suppose this means that
May 14, 2007 - 09:29 ET by KaysguySo, I suppose this means that Robert Byrd and all of his supporters will not be voting for a Democratic candidate next year?
I think that back in the late
May 14, 2007 - 11:07 ET by BruzillaI think that back in the late 1980s, HBO had a series that dealt with a fake presidential candidate, and was made to seem like he was a real candidate. They staged fake debates with the real candidates, and one of the shows had a debate where Jesse Jackson was saying that America might not be ready for a Black president. The fake candidate came back with the great line of "I think the country is ready for a black president, they just aren't ready for you."
Democrats use race to accelerate ruin of US
May 14, 2007 - 11:08 ET by j17ghsStephanopoulos worked in the White House with some of the biggest racists of our time: the Clintons and Gores. Like the Democrats themselves, they use blacks to establish quotas which are then used mainly to promote Marxism, hate and ignorance, not to advance minorities (though a few will benefit, which Democrats probably see as an unfortunate side effect).
And it seems Democrats always favor the so-called "black" man who is really more white than black. Obama Hussein Barack's white mother raised him. And Barack is an example of how Democrats will use race to get a subversive agitator elected who will accelerate the ruin of America and tyranny of Marxist-Muslim rule.
I see this as an underhanded
May 14, 2007 - 11:25 ET by JimboI see this as an underhanded way of campaigning for Obama. By putting that in people’s heads, he is hoping that the subconscious twinge of guilt will lead them to pull the lever. It’s transparent and shameless.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
but Sam I guess I think tha
May 14, 2007 - 22:07 ET bybut Sam I guess I think that anyone who's not going to vote for Barack Obama because he is black will probaly vote for Robert Byrd
http://www.shopmetrospy.com/cgi-bin/cNc/showPage.plx?db=shopmetro&pid=46
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.