Al Gore Protested by ‘Environmental Militants’ in Argentina, Media Mum

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

When President Bush receives protests as he travels abroad, it’s front-page headline news. Yet, when former Vice President Al Gore is so protested, the media couldn’t care less.

Although the Associated Press did report Gore’s visit to Buenos Aires, Argentina, to speak at a biofuels conference Friday, virtually no American media outlet picked up the story:

As Gore spoke, outside the hotel demonstrators on bicycles and wearing surgical masks chanted slogans against multinational agribusinesses, saying the biofuel boom will cause deforestation and turn arable land into deserts.

Sadly, there wasn't a lot of details in this piece about the actual protests. Thankfully, I received the following La Nacion article by e-mail yesterday with a translation that offered a lot more insights into the matter:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

(DyN) – Environmental militants, from the left and from the Quebracho group protested this afternoon in the neighborhood of Hotel Alvear, where the former US vice president Al Gore is the stellar guest at the 1st American Biofuels Congress. 

The demonstration against Al Gore’s presence was in the corner of Ave. Callao and Callao, where the police had installed barricades preventing the access to the hotel, one block away. 

The protest started with a group of environmentalists, some of them disguised as victims of pollution, remembering that during Bill Clinton’s administration –from whom Al Gore was his vice president- the USA refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol, proposed by the UN for reducing carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming. 

They also took a big sign reading: “Stop spraying”, referring to spraying flights against coca leaves crops in Colombia. 

After the advance of the environmentalists that praised Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez because they consider that corn and soybean are needed for food and not fuel for the big countries, Quebracho arrived with huge flags and banners.

It is indeed a highly-kept secret that as corn prices have skyrocketed across the globe due to the use of ethanol, the world’s poor are being negatively impacted. As reported in paragraphs ten and eleven of the aforementioned AP article:

But a quarter of Argentina's 38 million people remain in poverty five years after an economic crisis, and the middle classes are also squeezed by two years of double-digit inflation. Harvesting the forests and switching ranchland from beef to soybeans for biodiesel will drive up consumer prices even more, they fear.

"Biofuels will bring big business here that will make the rich richer and only bring more hunger and misery to the poor," said Ramon Garcia, a farmer at the protests. "They want to buy up Argentine farmland to damage it and produce biofuels that they'll take back to the United States."

Unfortunately, a Google News search identified that so far, only Forbes.com has published this AP article. This despite the AP making its first edition of the piece available at 3:29 PM EST Friday.

Furthermore, from what I can tell by also doing a LexisNexis search, no other American media outlet has covered this matter. 

Yet, foreign press representatives aren't so shy. As reported Friday by Ireland On-line (emphasis added):

Argentina’s government is hopping on the biofuels bandwagon by offering tax incentives for new initiatives and saying five % of the nation’s fuel supply must be biodiesel- or ethanol-based in three years.

But many Argentines are worried that diverting farmland for biofuels – made from corn, sugarcane, palm oil and other agricultural products – will drive up food prices even higher.

Sadly, this is a negative ancillary impact of the new rush to biofuels folks like soon-to-be-Dr. Al Gore and his sycophants in the media not only ignore, but want to hide from the American people as they advance their manmade global warming alarmism.

Maybe this is why the Buenos Aires protests will largely be ignored by America’s press.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How does the Freto-lay compan

How does the Freto-lay company feel about all of this?

No, but seriously, I just hate it when the nuts fight between themselves.

I am sure that the main stream media just did not want us all to suffer the pain of side-aches from laughing so hard upon hearing of poor Al's latest rejection.

It began with Florida and has worked its way to Argentina! The poor man is going to pop, ya know.

:o)

Unreported Trouble in Goretopia?

Unreported trouble in Goretopia?  Bio-fuel? More like that one-square policy not "sitting" well with the Goracle's subjects.  Thank mother earth, Dr Al was able to make an unclean getaway in Goreforce Uno. 

"Media Mum" "M

"Media Mum" "Media Mum" "Media Mum"

This is what angers me the most!  This is the biggest area of media bias.

I was recently asked to give the opposing viewpoint to a proposal in my town and the news report only mentioned one of my statements which wasn't even related to the opposition points I had been invited to make.

Anyone of you trolls who what to scoff at media bias can stick it up your Algore!

Didn't these people get the

Didn't these people get the memo?  That was Al Gore they were protesting.  AL GORE! 

On ABC's website today, they

On ABC's website today, they were covering opposition in California to increasing the number of windfarms. 

For every form of energy there is a tradeoff.  Even Solar panels need a bank of batteries to keep the lights on when the sun goes down.  You know- Lead/ Acid or Lithium.  Or maybe fuel cells to store the energy -which require that ever expensive rare metal called Platinum.

Enviros long ago turned against the three most practical and reliable large scale energy sources: Nuclear, Hydroelectric and Fossil fuel.  So what do they expect?

PS "Big Oil" Texas has now passed California as the leading wind energy state.

http://www.seco.cpa....

alamoif used correctly you ca

alamo

if used correctly you can have solar without batteries there are plans for solar farms in the desert by El Centro.  These would generate during the day when business spikes the demand for electricity.  The main problem that was brought to my attention is the hazardous material used to make the panels

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.   

botgYou are correct, solar pa

botg

You are correct, solar panels can be used as a peak demand energy source.  I have no problem with that when it is practical.  Unfortunately, when the media talks about solar, they seem to leave out the trade offs, while willingly pointing out tradeoffs of convential energy sources. If you note in my original comment, I was speaking of keeping the lights on when the sun goes down. 

I am planning on building a house, and am considering instalation of a solar water heater, which is mostly a passive system, although you could install an electric solar panel to power a circulation pump.  I saw many roofs in Greece with solar water heaters on them- although I do worry about lightning strikes during storms.

The lightning strike is a val

The lightning strike is a valid concern.

And how often does the MSM point out the mercury in compact flourescent lamps?

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.   

I do not know how much lightn

I do not know how much lightning they have in Greece, but we have a lot here where I live.  I figure if you were in the shower, you would complete the electrical link between the roof mounted passive solar water heater  and the sewage system.  Not good. I do not know if a lighting rod could compete with that. Electricity follows the path of least resistance. I realize the sharpness of the lightning rod plays a role, but still...

Active electrical solar panels on roofs are fine, but I have to question the impact of covering large areas of open land with panels - even if it is desert. I guess the lizards can still crawl around underneath them if it is not completely paved over.

  I saw pictures of one farm where they were using solar to heat water- it seemed to me to be covered in concrete- so what is the enviromental difference between that and a Walmart parking lot? 

Al Gore or . . .

Is Al Gore looking more and more like Alec Baldwin?  Has anyone ever seen those  two together?