Updates at bottom of post.
The CBSNews.com blog "Public Eye" reported today that a retired general who has appeared in anti-Bush TV ads has been dismissed as a CBS News military analyst due to his political activism. Yet the CBS executive who defended the move seemed to almost blame CBS's at-home audience for the personnel decision.
Maj. Gen. John Batiste (US Army, Retired) may still be quoted on CBS's newscasts, he just won't get paid for it.
"We might still go to the general to ask about things, but not as a consultant to CBS News," CBS News Senior Vice President for Standards Linda Mason was quoted by editor Brian Montopoli.
Montopoli quoted Mason's rationale for asking Batiste to leave (emphasis mine):
"When we hire someone as a consultant, we want them to share their expertise with our viewers," she [Mason] said. "By putting himself front and center in an anti-Bush ad, the viewer might have the feeling everything he says is anti-Bush. And that doesn’t seem like an analytical approach to the issues we want to discuss."
[...]
She said that Batiste's appearance in the ad marked a violation of CBS News standards, in which “we ask that people not be involved in advocacy.”
CBS was right to dismiss Batiste. A network-paid military analyst simultaneously working as a partisan activist is, to say the least, not good journalistic practice. That being said, it's odd that Mason couched the firing as a concern for how "the viewer might have the feeling" that Batiste is a partisan, rather than defending the decision in terms of upholding journalistic integrity.
NewsBusters and the Media Research Center will be watching to see if CBS News features Batiste in future stories without including mention of his participation in an anti-Bush TV ad.
Update (15:28 EDT): Here's something for the "dog bites man" file. Time magazine writer, blogger, and biased journalist extraordinaire Joe Klein calls the decision by CBS News "outrageous." Remember, this is the same guy that said the "spinners" of the Bush administration should be forced to clean out the bed pans at Walter Reed.
Update (10:50 EDT, May 14): In an update to his post, Montopoli noted that Mason clarified the issue was not Batiste's mere advocacy of a policy position, but rather that Batiste took part in a commercial campaign by an activist group. "She also said that the decision would have been the same had Batiste appeared in a similar ad in support of the president," Montpoli wrote.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Appearing in the Ad isn't
May 11, 2007 - 14:04 ET by Dee BunkAppearing in the Ad isn't the problem it just makes the problem of bias hard to deny. If he didn't go on the ad, he would still have been just as biased and they would deny it.
I'd rather seem them leave him and realize that they need to also add a general who would vote for Bush. Now they are just going to go out and get another anti-Bush one who isn't in an ad.
True Dee Bunk, there are a nu
May 11, 2007 - 14:09 ET by terrigTrue Dee Bunk, there are a number of them out there.
That's so typical of the Li
May 11, 2007 - 14:09 ET by motherbeltThat's so typical of the Liberal MSM....don't admit there's a problem with your bias; just say that that the viewers might "have the feeling" that there's a bias....
Yeah, perception's a bitch. Especially when it's correct....
Dead on target, mother.
May 11, 2007 - 22:26 ET by Scout FinchDead on target, mother.
Here is a link to who is behi
May 11, 2007 - 14:22 ET by bigtimerHere is a link to who is behind this...also I think Soros has money behind this too.
To me no big deal what CBS did, they are still going to use him, just without pay, well he most likely is making more this way and still getting his voice out over the air-waves via CBS.
I detest these men doing this...
All a political agenda,
Doing this during a time of war is disgraceful.
http://www.votevets.org/
Michael O'Hanlon is a &qu
May 11, 2007 - 15:37 ET by ding7777Michael O'Hanlon is a "CBS News Consultant" just like Bastite was.
O'Hanlon wrote a WaPo op-ed , advocating his position in favor of the "surge"
O'Hanlon appeared as a panelist, advocating his position in favor of the "surge".
If O'Hanlon does outside advocating of Bush's "surge" , why didn't CBS fire him just like Bastite?
They no longer needed two &
May 11, 2007 - 15:41 ET by MightyMouthThey no longer needed two "bushbots"?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Did O'Hanlon start or contri
May 11, 2007 - 16:42 ET by BDDid O'Hanlon start or contribute to a PAC?
BD - Did CBS mention that as
May 11, 2007 - 17:02 ET by ding7777BD - Did CBS mention that as its rationale? No. CBS said its rationale was because Bastite adovocated an external anti-Bush position. Well, O'Hanlon advocated an external pro-Bush position. Where's your outrage at the "liberal bias"?
Batiste & CBS News
May 11, 2007 - 16:23 ET by m_zeplinOh. let me get this straight. If you are biased, have an agenda, push that agenda while being paid by CBS, that's OK.
On the other hand if you get paid by someone else to push the same agenda, that could possibly shine too much light on the CBS left, leaning, wacko agenda. Thereby causing the viewing audience to see the CBS agenda for what it is. Left leaning, wacko, Bush hating, damn the truth, just put it out there if it's negative about this Administration and Republicans in general.
We couldn't have that now, could we?
The realities of war sure can
May 11, 2007 - 19:24 ET by joe conservativeThe realities of war sure can change a man. Batiste was once a Repubican, until Prez AWOL distroyed our military with his blunders.
Proof?
May 11, 2007 - 19:31 ET by Mr. BishopEvidence of the military being destroyed by Bush?
Evidence that any military action considered a "blunder" by yourself, was from Bush?
Evidence that President Bush was even AWOL (Yeah... I know... I hit on this one again -- if he were actually AWOL, his discharge papers would say it)?
Basically... it's a bad idea for you to try and think you know anything about the "realities of war". You don't, and you've never led a convincing argument to the contrary.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
As a Vet, I vomited at the si
May 11, 2007 - 19:44 ET by joe conservativeAs a Vet, I vomited at the sight of Prez AWOL in a flight suit, he was grounded in the National Guard, on the aircraft carrier and declaring an end of the war in Iraq. The answers you seek are found when go to yahoo and type Bush AWOL.
But Bill Clintons 5 to 6 phot
May 11, 2007 - 19:50 ET byBut Bill Clintons 5 to 6 photo ops on Carriers were just fine with you weren't they? Also you made the assertions YOU defend them. Gad what an aristocrat you are: assigning homework!
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
How many soldiers died during
May 11, 2007 - 19:58 ET by joe conservativeHow many soldiers died during Clinton's tenure? Prez AWOL lied us into war. Conservatives claim to support our troops, but nary a one can tell be how many have die in Iraq.
Hey Joe, where you goin'....
May 11, 2007 - 20:01 ET by acumenSo you want to fight and win a war with no American military casualties. As a "vet", please explain to the class how that is possible.
AcuThis liar has to first ans
May 11, 2007 - 20:06 ET byAcu
This liar has to first answer his original crap as elaborated by Bishop. It's not time to hop-scotch
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Point taken botg
May 11, 2007 - 20:15 ET by acumenPoint taken botg - but you do realize we only have so much time on this earth... :)
Mr Bish seems to have this li
May 11, 2007 - 20:20 ET byMr Bish seems to have this liar covered. Not to mention Free's cites in the Forum. Yeah it's really easy to jump at this one. "Like fish in a Barrel, Bert"--Judge Judy. The liars very name is a lie!
Well dinner time see ya
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Ha, enjoy botg.
May 11, 2007 - 20:30 ET by acumenHa, enjoy botg.
Family time
May 11, 2007 - 20:33 ET by Mr. BishopIt's time for me to see some of my family now... not just my kids, my brothers, sister -- mother/father... you know, those people. Keep up the good fight against joe -- I remember him from a long time ago, specifically around the election time -- he made no sense then, and makes even less now. Just repeated rhetoric, no substance.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
Thanks for the company Mr. Bishop
May 11, 2007 - 20:50 ET by acumenThanks for taking the time to fight the good fight here Mr. Bishop - always my pleasure. Your family is very fortunate.
Yes, I remember it well Mr. Bishop. I almost feel sorry for Joe. Anybody that far out on the fringe, taking so much delight wallowing in hatred, I would normally pity. However; he chooses to spread his infectious hatred to other simple minded, gullable folks much like himself and that make him dangerous. Dangerous not only to America but to oppressed people in other countries presently fighting for their freedom and counting on us to help them achieve and maintain that freedom. But he is so consumed with his hatred for Bush, Joe can't undestand that reality. Sad.....
You haven't defended your fir
May 11, 2007 - 20:03 ET byYou haven't defended your first LIES and now you bring on more LIES. Go back "JOE" and prove your first points before you bring up new ones.
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
What?
May 11, 2007 - 20:09 ET by Mr. BishopYou must be joking -- Clinton was responsible for Somalia, Bosnia and Kosovo, as well as Haiti. US soldiers died in every single situation.
As for "... how many have die [sic] in Iraq..." I can give you a number as to how many have died. It may, or may not be, completely accurate. However, what does it matter? Still, far less have died in Iraq, during combat operations, and defensive security operations, then ever died in Vietnam or World War II.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
I believe there were a few...
May 12, 2007 - 17:00 ET by Cape ConservativeI believe there were a few...let's see now, does Somalia ring a bell??? How about the barracks in Lebanon????
No no no...
May 11, 2007 - 19:52 ET by Mr. BishopWrong... you show me, you don't tell me to google, or yahoo anything... that gives nothing more then ridiculous blogger nonsensical garbage.
And that's funny -- you wanted to vomit "as a Vet". Right... whatever you say. As a Vet, as a family of Vets, we have never been more proud of a president for standing up to backboneless Democrats, and who stands by any decision he makes, rather then changing his mind based upon a poll.
You see -- I know how the AWOL system works -- having had to forward a soldier, under my command, for being AWOL. I know that the AWOL status would appear on his discharge papers, since I had to SIGN the papers for the soldier under my command. So -- show me the magical discharge papers you have, that shows Bush AWOL.
No, I don't believe you to be a Vet, since if you were one -- you would know what happens when you are actually AWOL. I've seen General's sons booted out for being AWOL, who thought they would get special treatment -- so don't try and feed this crap to anyone. You show your evidence.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
Write on Mr. Bishop
May 11, 2007 - 19:58 ET by acumenWrite on Mr. Bishop. Joe conservative sounds a bit like Rosie, no? Google it!
I had to hear my president, a
May 11, 2007 - 20:02 ET by joe conservativeI had to hear my president, a man who never had the courage to serve in Vietnam, entice my enemy with words like, "Bring it on." No wonder the man is afraid to go to Iraq.
Evidence of the military bein
May 11, 2007 - 20:07 ET byEvidence of the military being destroyed by Bush?
Evidence that any military action considered a "blunder" by yourself, was from Bush?
Evidence that President Bush was even AWOL (Yeah... I know... I hit on this one again -- if he were actually AWOL, his discharge papers would say it)?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Did you not hear the pleas of
May 11, 2007 - 20:15 ET by joe conservativeDid you not hear the pleas of General Batiste and other generals about our Commander and Thief blunderings in Iraq. Watch some else than FOX fake news.
Joe
May 11, 2007 - 20:20 ET by misterbillIt seem like happiness is jus' a thing called Joe
He got a smile that make the lilac wanna grow
He got a way that make the angels heave a sigh
When they know little Joe's passing by
Sometime the cabin gloomy and the table bare
Soon he kiss me and it's Christmas everywhere
Trouble fly away and life is easy go
Does he love me good? That's all I has to know
Seem like happiness is jus' a thing called Joe
Oh my goodness, wrong Joe.
Scared?
May 11, 2007 - 20:21 ET by Mr. BishopYou scared about the questions asked of you joe? You should be, since they are baseless accusations, with no evidence. As for General Batiste -- why should I care about anything he says? He was hand-picked by Eric Shinseki to be the commander of the First Infantry -- that, alone, is enough to make Batiste a nobody in my book -- his association with Shinseki.
Do you disregard any general or admiral that has shown support for Bush's decisions in Iraq? My guess is yes because it doesn't net the result you want. There are far more troops, generals, sailors and admirals that support Bush and our mission in Iraq, then the traitors that don't.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
2700 plus Joe
May 11, 2007 - 20:27 ET by acumenHere are some of the folks Mr. Bishop is referring to Joe. Still waiting on links to back up your lame claims by the way.....
Thank you for the article.
May 11, 2007 - 21:47 ET by amberThank you for the article. I forwarded it to my husband. The 34th is near and dear. I served with them and my husband is with them now. They will have 16 consecutive months in Iraq by the time they get back. Since they are NG, that translates to 23 months on active duty away from home for many of them. They are the largest brigade there. I am excited for my husband to return. We have both learned a lot since the deployment started. Some stuff I will spontaeously forget, like how to mow the lawn.
Joe C...time to change your m
May 12, 2007 - 17:02 ET by Cape ConservativeJoe C...time to change your moniker...it disgusts me!
Why was a sorry excuse of a m
May 11, 2007 - 20:08 ET by joe conservativeWhy was a sorry excuse of a man able to leap frog over hundreds of other canidates to get his commission. Was the Texas National Guard looking for few good drunks with arrest records? Why was Prez AWOL grounded in the National Guard?
Evidence of the military bein
May 11, 2007 - 20:10 ET byEvidence of the military being destroyed by Bush?
Evidence that any military action considered a "blunder" by yourself, was from Bush?
Evidence that President Bush was even AWOL (Yeah... I know... I hit on this one again -- if he were actually AWOL, his discharge papers would say it)?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
As The Boston Globe reported
May 11, 2007 - 20:19 ET by joe conservativeAs The Boston Globe reported on September 2004:
I say again
May 11, 2007 - 20:24 ET by Mr. BishopI say again -- show me his discharge papers joe. Show me the discharge papers, that show Bush as being AWOL. Since I missed an entire year of National Guard duty, and made it up all in one summer period (as Bush's records have shown him to do), I know what makes him AWOL and what doesn't.
Now... show me the discharge papers that you have, that say AWOL on them.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
Liar,If you have no interest
May 11, 2007 - 20:12 ET byLiar,
If you have no interest in defending anything you say who will listen to any further lies?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Answer
May 11, 2007 - 20:12 ET by Mr. BishopNo no no... you answer the questions asked of your already. You do that, with evidence, and I will answer every single question you just asked. Amazingly, my father was able to "leap frog" over other candidates to get his commission. Lord knows, he was not wealthy, or a child of anyone important. He did so through his intelligence. I know, I know... someone like you makes your hate filled existance possible, by calling Bush an idiot -- but any evidence to prove the Bush was simply "given" his commission, instead of earning it -- would be greatly appreciated.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
Prez AWOL's daddy the congres
May 11, 2007 - 20:25 ET by joe conservativePrez AWOL's daddy the congressman from texas didn't mind sending young boys to Nam during the war, but pulled strings to keep Jr. out of harms way. You don't have problem with that? Silly me, conservative think they are above the law.
Evidence?
May 11, 2007 - 20:30 ET by Mr. BishopYou have evidence, of course (not the stuff that was proven as false, as well as shown to be outright lies), to prove your assertions here?
No, you don't. You have no evidence that George HW Bush pulled strings. There has been written evidence to show how Al Gore was kept way behind the lines in Vietnam, however. I would just, for once, like to see you actually provide evidence to your nonsensical claims.
Now, return to the questions already posed -- I want evidence of the claims you make, not more BS.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
So the never-do-well son of a
May 11, 2007 - 20:42 ET by joe conservativeSo the never-do-well son of a rich congressman from Texas is going to get a dishonorable discharge from the Texas National Guard for going AWOL. You have better luck convicting OJ in LA for murder.
Yawn, burp....
May 11, 2007 - 20:53 ET by acumenYawn, burp....
Soooooo
May 11, 2007 - 23:40 ET by Mr. BishopThat's a no then? You don't have any evidence, just an accusation, unfounded, and proven as false then? No problem... as I have said -- I've seen general's sons get the boot for being AWOL. A congressman's son is nothing special. No AWOL on the discharge papers, means it didn't happen.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
"No evidence that George
May 11, 2007 - 20:50 ET by joe conservative"No evidence that George HW Bush pulled strings" but the big picture clearly shows stings were pulled to get Junior his commission and away from combat duty in Nam.
Joe!Got any links? Any proo
May 11, 2007 - 22:46 ET by Scout FinchJoe!
Got any links? Any proof? Documentation? I'm patient. I'll just sit here and wait for you to provide concrete evidence for your assertions. Otherwise any viewers can correctly assume that you are a sensationalistic liar who enjoys making false, provacative claims with no ability to back up what he says.
No it doesn't
May 11, 2007 - 23:42 ET by Mr. BishopNo... the "big picture" does not clearly show anything other then what happened. Bush got into the National Guard, and there is no evidence to say otherwise.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
I repeat...change your login
May 12, 2007 - 17:04 ET by Cape ConservativeI repeat...change your login - you demean the word "conservative"
Back under your rock, you fre
May 11, 2007 - 19:52 ET by mytwocentsBack under your rock, you freaking troll!
Beating the dead horse joe
May 12, 2007 - 07:24 ET by Sua Sponte 75I watched the speech, yep, he said "and end to major combat operations", nothing about and "end to the Iraq war" as you types so often say. That BDS really kicking in eh?
"You're either part of the solution or part of the problem"
So much blah blah. And so t
May 12, 2007 - 07:36 ET by Jack BauerSo much blah blah. And so tedious. And I'm not even a huge fan of the non-conservative tendencies of the President.
Whatever your obsessive issues with the President leaving the TANG, the fact is he spent five years training, patroling and flying a fighter jet plane humorously known as the Widowmaker, because of its tendency to crash and kill pilots.
By all published accounts he excelled in those flying duties, which at the time (like the vast majority of those eligible for the draft), did not see him deployed in Vietnam.
But I do look forward to questioning the military background of Hillary Clinton and rest of the Democratic dwarves in the coming months. We may even resort to questioning a real draft dodger as well. What did Hillary know, and when did she know it?
A minor correction
May 12, 2007 - 08:16 ET by mandrakeJack, if I may make minor factual correction. The 'Widowmaker' was the F104 Starfighter. Which to the best of my knowledge was never used for training missions. I know that President Bush flew the T-38.
mandrake -- thanks for the
May 12, 2007 - 09:29 ET by Jack Bauermandrake -- thanks for the correction.
I was writing from what I thought was memory.. hang on while I do some research into something that happened 35 years ago in the life of a 2 term President who leaves office in 18 months...
Yes, I can't believe this is still an issue either!
UPDATE .. The President flew an F-102. The German Luftwaffe nicknamed the F-104 The Widowmaker. But a cursory search would indicate that a number of aircraft unofficially earned this nickname too, inclusing the F-101 Voodoo.
Apparently the F-102 had a fifty percent combat loss/crash rate throughout its lifetime. That sounds scary high to me.
UPDATE 2...
Just found this most excellent description of all fighter jets from the 1960s...
May 12, 2007 - 09:56 ET by mandrake
mandrake... no, some misund
May 12, 2007 - 10:01 ET by Jack Bauermandrake... no, some misunderstanding here
Though my dad was in the RAF, but only ground crew!
That was a quote I found... http://capitalistlio...
Jack
May 12, 2007 - 10:17 ET by mandrakeI know, sorry about that. That's why I tried to edit out my reply. My reading skills are not so hot before lunch :)
I have no problem with retire
May 11, 2007 - 19:29 ET by amberI have no problem with retired generals spouting their political views as long as they lose their pension and lose their rank. Officers are officers for life, unless they are removed or resign their commission. Therefor, if a general wants to criticize his boss, whether he is an active general or not does not matter, then he should resign his commission, forgo using his previous rank, and lose all retirment benefits. I get so sick and tired of these ex generals spouting their political beleifs, hiding behind freedom of speach, and forgoing their military duty to build up the troops and support them with encouraging words about their mission. ARGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!
Prez AWOL says he listens to
May 11, 2007 - 19:51 ET by joe conservativePrez AWOL says he listens to the commanders on the ground, but General Batiste has been saying, "Mr. President, you don't listen to the commanders in the field. You've put our Army and our Marine Corps in peril." .
look Joe, you are not fooling
May 11, 2007 - 20:17 ET by amberlook Joe, you are not fooling anyone. Quite a few people here have served, yup, me too. After the vietnam comment, I knew for sure you never did serve. You were found out, just leave gracefully.
Human Shield Amber?
May 11, 2007 - 20:23 ET by acumenSounds to me like Joe could have served..........as a human shield in Hanoi.
"joeconservative" is a liar
May 12, 2007 - 09:05 ET by RJ"joeconservative", you're a liar. Add my name to the list of vets who say that you're just another anti-American who NEVER served in the military. Prove me wrong. What branch of the service? What unit? Where did you serve? Come on, liar, prove me wrong.
P.S. I'd take President Bush at my side in a battle any day before either you or that draft dodger, Bill Clinton.
What?
May 11, 2007 - 20:27 ET by Mr. BishopOne liberal (note, I said liberal, not Republican) general says Bush doesn't listen to his commanders in the field, when the commanders IN the field say they are the ones running the show in Iraq -- and you think that we have to listen to Batiste? Batiste is a nobody -- he is one general, who has connections to a failure of an Army Chief named Eric Shinseki -- and you think that I need to place stock in what he says? No...
Now return to the original questions asked of you -- evidence. You show evidence... not news stories that have been debunked in the past -- irrefutable evidence to back your claims.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
President AWOL is clinton, ri
May 12, 2007 - 07:19 ET by Andrew H.President AWOL is clinton, right? Selective outrage of leftist who see nothing good and bad--confused, no foundations other than the foundation of ripping the brick and mortar of others, of tradition, of faith... screw you, clown.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
joes selective memory syndrome
May 12, 2007 - 07:38 ET by Sua Sponte 75While you're using "Google" to "find" stuff that GW didn't say or do, you may want to use the same tool to read what the dear general had to say prior to his "retirement". Guess you missed all the times that he didn't say a damn thing during his tenure. You hacks find three (3) generals who are disgruntled, didn't say a word, in fact supported everything up until after they "retired", yet shrug off the 100x more generals and service members who are getting what they are asking for and running ops on the ground. We're tired of you types thinking that you speak in any form for us in the uniformed services. As far as putting us in peril, once again you have selective memory syndrome and a loose grasp of reality or history (flashback 90's). What I've needed, I've recieved, what I've requested, I've recieved, that is unless we leave it up to you hacks who want to cut our funding. Take your dkos talking points and way off view of history and pound sand, 'cause you don't speak for us.
"You're either part of the solution or part of the problem"