Anyone whose remote control wandered past an ABC, CBS, or NBC morning "news" show on May 5 probably found the "news" hounds barking enthusiastically over this supposed "news" scoop: Paris Hilton was sentenced to Los Angeles County jail for 45 days. She violated parole after repeated episodes of reckless driving. This was news of national concern.
The morning anchors interviewed legal experts and professional Hollywood celebrity-stalkers to lament this heiress being brought low, complete with bad jokes about the jail being a "one-star Hilton." But they all wondered out loud: Who is to blame for this human train wreck?
Paris, being the thoughtless egotist that she is, blamed her publicist for telling her she could drive to work. That’s baloney. You don’t assign the "help" to read your legal documents for you.
Some blame the mother for botching the upbringing. No one’s denying that Mama Hilton is a disgraceful figure in her own right, but that’s still baloney. Paris is 26 years old, and perfectly capable of messing up her own life.
Obviously, Paris ought to take responsibility for her own actions and stop living up to every cartoonish notion of clueless celebrity life. But there’s a problem. Being a cartoonish notion of cluelessness is exactly what made her a household name, courtesy of the voyeuristic press. The media’s celebrity exploitation machine needs to be denounced, both for its promotion of the raunchy underbelly of American pop culture and its hypocrisy for feigning concern over the damage Paris Hilton is doing to it.
Who is Paris Hilton? What is her claim to fame? She is utterly unaccomplished. She has done nothing but be rich, pretty, blonde, wild, and very, very stupid. She first surfaced in an unauthorized sex tape. ABC says it became "one of the best-selling porn videos of all time." From there, it was the surreal world of "reality" TV, and Fox’s "The Simple Life," where Paris and her friend Nicole Richie made themselves famous as amoral nitwits.
Then everyone got involved: the ever-hungry Hollywood celebrity media, the cable and broadcast news channels, and finally the advertisers (remember the infamous slutty Carl’s Jr./Hardee’s hamburger commercials?). The irony is that most of the "news" coverage came attached with a superiority complex, judging and mocking Paris as a negative role model for young girls. That she certainly is. But how cynical can our national media get?
Just see the gleeful reaction of Janice Min of Us Weekly when asked to assess troubled Miss Hilton for USA Today: "She had been out of the headlines for a few months, which in her world is an eternity. Headlines are her oxygen...She knows no shame, and that's why we keep watching. People like to watch people they don't like even more than watching people they do like." An Us Weekly poll of readers showed 80 percent of them wanted Paris in the slammer. Then they’ll demand every inglorious detail, which Us Weekly will gladly provide.
Back in January, ABC’s "20/20" acted shocked when man-on-the-street interviews revealed that nobody knew who cured polio, but many could name Nicole Richie’s best friend. Earth to ABC: did you ever think this could be your fault? This was the first time Jonas Salk had been mentioned on ABC... in the 21st century.
In the meantime, Paris Hilton has been mentioned in thousands of stories. She is so famous and omnipresent in the celebrity media that she’s become a rich-brat pop-culture reference point. Paris Hilton was the number one "Google News" search of 2006.
Why can’t the celebrity-obsessed media turn it off? If they can’t just say no, then they should stop judging her, lest they be judged. There should be a national conversation about the media’s role, and they should be convicted in the court of public opinion for enabling decadence. They are not really scolds and moralists. They are guttersnipes, feeding their audience a constant diet of "news" designed to build that rooting interest in the next perverse pratfall.
Look no further than a publicist named Ken Sunshine on NBC: "I think we want her to be more outrageous. We want her to get into more trouble. We want her to flaunt everything all the way. So, if anything, we want more Paris, not less Paris."
But the celebrity-exploiters raised her up to the pinnacle of fame. Without the spotlight, she might still be rich, pretty, blonde, wild, and very, very stupid. But once this cartoon character has been created, there is an expectation that this is what she’s been put on Earth to accomplish. She needs to implode so the rest of us can wallow in her misfortune.
The media won’t stop, and neither will Paris Hilton. Just watch. She’ll want to play this sordid game until she’s the next Anna Nicole Smith.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Tabloid Cable coverage of this idiot
May 11, 2007 - 11:59 ET by RJThe Tabloid Cable coverage (including Fox News) of this idiot and other so-called celebs is a big part of the reason I cut my cable TV a few months ago....and I haven't missed it a bit......
Paris is a whore
May 11, 2007 - 12:02 ET by Six String SpiffFunny how you or I would have been in jail a long time ago if we violated parole over DRUNK DRIVING.
Secondly: Who feels anything for this cross-eyed, flat chested, STD ridden, anorexic, skank? nasty. Woo hoo hoo ho not 45 days! I say we give her a 1000 hours a community service. Pampered ho
Islam should have it's religious status revoked until it can prove it's not a hate group.
I'll spin this "news&quo
May 11, 2007 - 12:10 ET by Senior ChiefI'll spin this "news" in a different direction:
Paris Hilton, American citizen: 3 DUI conviction & driving under supended lincense. Sentenced to 45 days in the slammer.
Vs.
3 of 6 Fort Dix terrorists, Illegal aliens: 54 combined DUI convictions and driving under suspended licenses. Sentenced to Zero (0), Zip, nada, jail time.
What justice? Figure that out. The tale of an American moron and the plight of 3 illegal alien-terrorists. This could be a good movie, don't you think? Sound off...
I caught this contrast to
May 11, 2007 - 12:35 ET by MindwerkzI caught this contrast too. Now I do think she should
be in jail, and honestly 45 days is a very light sentence for a 3rd
offence. However the other 6 should have been as well. I just can
understand how that could happen. I once got a wreak less driving for
driving over 100 and I was terrified I was going to go to jail. No
priors, nothing, just some punk trying to make it to morning PT. Just
where has our legal system gone wrong when you see stats like this?
Give me a break already...Nob
May 11, 2007 - 12:24 ET by bigtimerGive me a break already...
Nobody is to blame but Paris herself.
I am so sick and tired of the msm.
She is a nobody, they always manage to something out of a nobody, that nobody cares about in the first place except them.
Anna Nicole was nobody, until her death.
Now if we could put the msm in that same category.
Now all this girl need is a g
May 11, 2007 - 12:51 ET by Airforce_5_ONow all this girl need is a good spanking and to be put to bed….wait, they got that on tape.
My fault.
"Life's tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid."
-John Wayne
Air, are you alluding to some
May 11, 2007 - 13:00 ET by Senior ChiefAir, are you alluding to something? You're fired for vulgarity and using explicit words, therefore you need Sharpton and Jackson to rescue you...or her. Hmmm
Hoorah Senior Chief!!!!I'll d
May 11, 2007 - 13:04 ET by Airforce_5_OHoorah Senior Chief!!!!
I'll drop and give you fifty (as soon as I put down my remote control). ;)
"Life's tough, it's even
May 11, 2007 - 16:09 ET by Prester John"Life's tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid."
One of THE great quotes of all time.
As I was surfing through the cable channels I found myself realizing that I am totally sick of hearing about and or seeing:
Paris, Nickie, Rosie, Sean and all the other Hollywood dimwits
Excercise machine ads that try to make people believe they can undo 30 years of stupid living with 30 minutes of exercise a day, 3 days a week.
Nutritional supplement ads that try to make people believe they can undo 30 years of stupid living with a pill.
Moronic consumer affairs reporters telling us how to protect ourselves from the danger de jour when anyone with half a mind should be able to figure it out.
Inane reporting on spoiled brat professional atheletes and trying to make it sound like what they do is actually important.
The degenerate music videos on BET, VH1 and MTV.
Political spokeshacks defending their party to the death with no thought of admitting that maybe, just maybe, their people might be wrong on an issue.
Live reporting during a normal snow storm or thunderstorm and stating the obvious as if we don't know it's cold and/or wet outside.
Shopping channels
(catching my breath)
Brent Bozell - That’s balon
May 11, 2007 - 13:07 ET by ding7777Brent Bozell - That’s baloney. You don’t assign the "help" to read your legal documents for you.
Are saying President Bush reads every bill he sign/vetos? I believe the "help" does it for him (the same goes for Senators and Congresscritters).
DING DONG - Again
May 11, 2007 - 13:12 ET by JimboAre you comparing the volume and complexity of legal documents that Paris Hilton needs to sign with that of the President of the United States?? You see that as an apples to apples comparison?
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Jimbo - It's Brent who made
May 11, 2007 - 13:22 ET by ding7777Jimbo - It's Brent who made the blanket "You don’t assign the "help" to read your legal documents for you" statement. Ask him if he wants to qualify it.
And you are the one who drew
May 11, 2007 - 13:26 ET by JimboAnd you are the one who drew the comparison to President Bush. So answer the question.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Jimbo - I don't know if Hil
May 11, 2007 - 13:51 ET by ding7777Jimbo - I don't know if Hilton is intelligent enough to read a legal document nor do I know if Hilton's publisist is also her lawyer. Either condition would render Brent's "baloney" for assign the "help" inoperative as it pertains to Hilton.
Whatever Ding Dong
May 11, 2007 - 14:38 ET by JimboWhatever Ding. Bottom line is, your attempt to compare the need for a President to delegate the need read documents during and pertaining to a time of war to Hilton's need to understand that she can't drive while her license is suspended is a stretch even for you.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Good call, Jimbo. Attempting to compare disparate identies
May 11, 2007 - 14:53 ET by RJGood call, Jimbo. Attempting to compare disparate identities or circumstances is a standard leftist practice. It also shows up in their belief in moral relatitivty. I hammered Leon for doing the same thing yesterday....made him go ballistic and start throwing out the lies. ;^>
Jimbo - What does this mean?
May 11, 2007 - 16:49 ET by ding7777Jimbo - What does this mean?
Does it mean that a "loyal Bushie" like you believes Bush read each Bill himself before 9/11 when there wasn't a war?
ding-- lets try and put this
May 11, 2007 - 19:05 ET by thefirststrikeding-- lets try and put this in a way that even the most simple minded person can understand. Assuming that Paris Hilton is AT LEAST of average intelligence, and based on the fact that she KNEW that her license was suspended, she should have known that regardless of what her publicist said, she is NOT ALLOWED TO DRIVE!! That is what having a SUSPENDED LICENSE means!! YOU CAN'T DRIVE!! And since when does taking the advice of friends/coworkers/ associates etc. equal getting sound legal advice from a credible source...a source like, oh I don't know, just throwing out possibilities here...maybe the FREAKIN' DMV!! She could have and should have called the DMV or the court and ASKED!! That is what responsibile, law abiding adults do...they find out for themselves from a credible source what the answer to their particular legal question is. They don't "ask a friend" and then blame THEM for the whole thing when it turns out that the friend was wrong!! "Jailhouse lawyers" will steer you wrong EVERY TIME!!
Why am I so mad about this? Because this culture of blame we have in this society, where our young people (and even many older people) are constantly shucking the responsibility for their problems and looking to blame someone else for their f---ups, is getting so far out of hand it is ridiculous!! Paris, and everyone else, GROW UP!! Take responsibility for your own actions and the consequences of those actions, and stop blaming someone else for not holding your damn hand every step of the way!!
Jeez...how difficult is this?
Mr Bozell was referring speci
May 11, 2007 - 13:39 ET by ArchConservativeMr Bozell was referring specifically to Paris Hilton. You can try to make blanket statements if you choose but it won't fly. You're just another one who tries to make things somebody else's fault. If you don't think this way, do you think that Paris is indeed responsible for her actions or not. Simple yes or simple no.
"Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."
- President George W Bush September 2001 speech to a joint session of Congress.
Dennis Miller put it best in
May 11, 2007 - 14:47 ET by IgnatzJFahrquarDennis Miller put it best in describing Hilton's upcoming sentence as "Shawskank Redemption"
"All generalizations are false, including this one.” Mark Twain
It's a symbiotic relationsh
May 11, 2007 - 15:06 ET by balboaIt's a symbiotic relationship: there are celebrities who feed off attention from celebrity news, and the celebrity news feeds off the antics of celebrities.
The best thing to come out of this is that most people seem to be glad Paris is getting punished for being a moron.
But for the want of any scien
May 11, 2007 - 16:15 ET by bulletproofBut for the want of any scientific control group, television would conceivably be required to carry a warning label.
Brent, you get +1 respect fro
May 11, 2007 - 17:35 ET by ferrarimanf355Brent, you get +1 respect from me about this. I'm of the opinion that jailtime for Paris will be good for her, yes, but the media coverage of this is so frequent it's dissapointing. I can name, off of the top of my head, at least ten thousand things that are more important than this. Frankly, whatever respect I had for the newsmedia dissapeared when Anna Nicole Smith died. I want to know more about what's going on in the Middle East, not who's the daddy of her baby! Thank Jebus for alternative media...
Uzumaki/Ayanami '08. Because a ninja and an Eva pilot can govern the nation better that what we have now...
Paris who? "Not for
May 11, 2007 - 19:03 ET by awffp1890Paris who?
"Not for fame or reward, not for place or rank, not lured by ambition or goaded by necessity. But in simple obedience to duty." - From the barracks at Ft. Benning
I say she skips.
May 11, 2007 - 19:32 ET by RackieI say she skips.
Hilton
May 11, 2007 - 20:19 ET by pocomoco“The media won’t stop, and neither will Paris Hilton. Just watch. She’ll want to play this sordid game until she’s the next Anna Nicole Smith.”
It’s only a question, now, of where she wants to be buried.
I would have her clean up l
May 11, 2007 - 21:47 ET by Night WatchmanI would have her clean up litter for 45 days, same with most of the other non violent offenders.
Have a bus pick them up at their house and charge them $200 a week to
pay for it, 20 to a bus and the driver is the guard, too. If they screw
up, off to the slammer. It's not like they'd be taking jobs away from
someone else.
A comment
May 12, 2007 - 08:15 ET by goldenthroatThere is one slight problem with that, Night Watchman - not that it isn't a good idea but can't you see the media swarming all over her along a highway as she primps for them while picking up trash?
All she would do is blubber and boo-hoo as to how "unfair" she is being treated and it would do nothing but continue to feed that enormous ego of hers.
Now THAT would be a media circus!