While covering media mogul Rupert Murdoch's offer to buy The Wall Street Journal from, New York Times reporter Richard Perez-Pena uncovered a news organization with a political slant: Fox News Channel.
On the front of Monday's Business section ("Ottaways Deplore Bid By Murdoch"), Perez-Pena reported:
"Two members of the Ottaway family, a minority partner in Dow Jones & Company, released scathing statements yesterday saying that a takeover by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation would ruin Dow Jones and its crown jewel, The Wall Street Journal.
"The controlling Bancroft family said last week that family members representing 52 percent of shareholder votes opposed Mr. Murdoch’s $60-a-share bid, a steep premium for a stock that had recently traded around $36. But their statement was vague, leaving it unclear whether family members objected to the price, to Mr. Murdoch or to a sale on any terms.
"The Ottaways' statements left no such ambiguity, questioning the journalism and the ethics of Mr. Murdoch and of News Corporation properties like the Fox News Channel and The New York Post, known for their right-wing political bent and racy tone."
Strange how the Times never cops to its own undeniable liberal bias, yet doesn't hesitate to label Fox News as right-wing or conservative (sometimes in unhinged fashion, as former Executive Editor Howell Raines did in his 2006 autobiography).
For more New York Times bias, visit Times Watch.


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Doncha know? There is no such
May 9, 2007 - 13:03 ET by BeowulfDoncha know? There is no such thing as "left-wing" or "liberal". It's all either "right-wing" (bad), "conservative" (bad), or "mainstream" (good). And the truth usually falls into the two former categories.
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
This is normal. The MSM and m
May 9, 2007 - 13:04 ET by florida_chadThis is normal. The MSM and most lefty D's think they are in the middle. It shows how out of touch they are.
Oh man. I just don't get th
May 9, 2007 - 13:24 ET by whatajoyOh man. I just don't get this. Fox News and the New York Post give fair time and space to BOTH sides on every issue and event out there. They don't allow more verbiage from one side moreso than the other. However, the other news networks and papers do. How can people not see this? It's like they don't want the conservative side to have a voice out there. And the moment a conservative says something uninteruppted, that channel/news source is biased. Please.
-------------------------------
Oh, um, it's Thursday, but Dwight thinks it's Friday. So...keep that going.
~ From "The Office"
It's a concerted effort
May 9, 2007 - 13:43 ET by c5thenThe Times and the Demon-crats and their liberal opperatives are not stupid. They know damn well that they are left-wing. It is a concerted effort to try and poison as many of the general public against any type of conservative thinking as possible.
FOXNews is NOT right-wing. It is moderate, as it always presents both sides in a political or idealogical story.
The goal here from the left-wing radicals is to paint even moderates with the "conservative" or "right-wing" epithet in an attempt to deride any point of view that dares be different than theirs.
So let me get this straight:
May 9, 2007 - 14:23 ET by Airforce_5_OSo let me get this straight:
The NYT is just now discovering Fox News is part of the Murdoch Empire?
These boys couldn’t find whale turds in a shot glass.
"Life's tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid."
-John Wayne