So have those evil liberals infiltrated U.S. News & World Report?

It is the conundrum of our modern times:   Media sources at record lows for viewers/subscribers telling us--repeatedly--how disliked President   Bush is in America.  I still haven't  seen a single war protestor in our metro area in 4 years!Yet, Bush smashed all-time voting records in 2004 by garnering 62 million votes.Meanwhile, Couric, NY Times, LA Times, cable and and network TV teeter at record lows  for viewers.Our Mpls Startribune newsrag just announced massive layoffs, round 2, yesterday.Who is really in the bubble/the Shakespearen tragedy, the MSM or Bush?    Please help me understand.........

Well, so much for U.S. News right of center reputation compared to Time and Newsweek (like the perky one's gig, its a distant third to the other two).  Of course, their editorial reputation is more like right of moveon.org than the other two.  Of course, all bets are off when it comes to the topic of Israel. Zuckerman, the owner and editor-in-chief of the U.S. News is gaga over Israel.  Which makes this article that much the courorsier.  Since Bush has been a staunch supporter of Israel, some would say to the detriment of his presidency, With this article and others since Bush's presidency, Zuckerman may be helping the Hil dog get elected - no friend of Israel - except when its time to get the Jewish vote in NY. 

If you think Zuckerman is some sort of holder of the holy grail, get a load of this well . . . "load:"  "In 2005, before the Jewish settlers' pullout from Gaza, at James Wolfensohn's request, Zuckerman made a private plea to his friends including Bill Gates, and Leonard Stern and raised $14 million within two days for a private advocacy group the Aspen Institute which bought greenhouses in Gaza and transferred it to Palestinians as gifts.[6] Greenhouses set aside for them were damaged by looters after the handover, with Palestinians stipping their gifts bare and walking off with irrigation hoses, water pumps and plastic sheeting." Mideast Outlook: Palestinians can't compromise on minor issue. Bruce S.Ticker. Crisisisrael.com (August 27, 2005).

This is a desperate act of wishful thinking on the part of U.S. News. They know putting something controversial like this on the cover sells copies of their magazine. Both supporters and detractors of the President will buy the magazine since the cover story sparks an emotion in everyone.  It's the same philosophy that Olbermann and Rosie have when they target the President.  They don't need supporting facts in their allegations because they don't care if they're right or wrong. They just try to get people stirred up so their ratings will go up.

<Howard Dean: "This is delusional – comparing yourself to two of our greatest presidents!">

Well if that isn't the pot calling the kettle black, the wolf calling the rabbit a vicious predator, the snake calling the mouse a venomous threat, the pit bull calling the mailman a deadly menace ... the Geico caveman calling the therapist a neurotic thumb-twiddler.

The U.S. News and Worldly Retort article is a case study in attempted evisceration by accusation and defamation.

Last time I checked George Bush was a PRESIDENT, he was the commander-in-chief during A WAR, and he was facing THE SAME DECISIONS LINCOLN AND TRUMAN FACED.

This DNC vendetta against Bush hearkens to John Chapter 10 ...

John 10:19-21

(19) There was a division therefore again among the Jews for these sayings [the words of Jesus Christ].

(20) And many of them said, "He hath a devil, and is mad; why hear ye him?"

(21) Others said, "These are not the words of him that hath a devil. Can a devil open the eyes of the blind?"

Whenever you take a stand on the Truth the naysayers, mockers, murmurers, complainers, and denigrators come out of the woodwork.

Bush’s greatest weakness is his refusal to confront his domestic enemies. Bush believed he could win them over, but he badly “misunderestimated” them. They’re out for blood, and they don’t play by any rules. They deny that the nation is in any real danger; therefore, they see no need to restrain their narrow agenda for the sake of a greater good.

Reagan had no problem attacking his opponents, forcefully, but we remember Reagan for his affability. Paradoxically, Bush refuses to attack his opponents, yet they call him “one of the most polarizing leaders in American history.” That makes Bushies carp about unfair treatment, but instead they should learn why it works like this. In game theory terms, Bush is willing to reward, but he’s unwilling to retaliate. Therefore, he enacts no penalty for non-cooperation. His opponents frustrate him consistently, and Bush never makes them pay. In game theory, you can’t do that. You have to punish non-cooperation as much as you reward cooperation. Harry Reid said the war was lost and Bush’s surge was a waste, but Bush barely released a statement. Reagan would have gone medieval over Reid. Bush did nothing. That’s not a virtue.

Bush’s enemies call him delusional, and yet liberal candidates propose pulling troops out of Iraq … but “keeping them nearby” to return if genocide happens. Of the two plans, which is the more delusional? But unless Bush confronts that idiocy directly, and forcefully, the idiots will (endlessly) tell the public that Bush is the delusional one.

Bush is trying to play chess without capturing any pieces. That’s a losing strategy.

Thank heaven we unsubscribed years ago. How any company makes money when they go radical is beyond me.

With every new attack of Bush from the MSM we strengthen the enemy.  With every projection of the American public as being dissillusioned with the WOT and supposedly blaming Bush for it all, we bolster the insurgency's resolve.  With every new spouting from celebrity pie-wholes directed at the gullible pop-culture fed masses, we cheapen our character as a free people. 

 Walsh began by noting Bush has compared his trials to those of Abraham Lincoln and Harry Truman, and the diagnosis that Bush is mentally ill emerges from DNC chairman Dr. Howard Dean: "This is delusional – comparing yourself to two of our greatest presidents!"

   Bush is delusional? 

 The media during the terms of Lincoln and Truman was brutal on both men.  Now the media says these were two of our greatest Presidents.

  Keep in mind, all some media writers have attained is a journalism degree.  They don't have an education and have never had a real job.