It's Nitpicking Tuesday. In the Washington Post Style section, the weekday ad for the "Live Online" chats at washingtonpost.com caught my eye. Today's 1 pm session with a black Post columnist is promoted with this language:
Opinion: Columnist Eugene Robinson discusses the diversity of the Democratic presidential candidates -- and the Country Club look of the first GOP debate.
Is that their best way to say "all white, all male"? As if the Post found any "diversity" worth mentioning when the candidates were female (Elizabeth Dole) or minorities (Alan Keyes)?
UPDATE: It turns out the loaded promotional language comes from Eugene's loaded column.
UPDATE 2: On his chat, Robinson was pressed on his lingo, and he replied:
For the record, I didn't say "all white, all male," although that's what I meant. I would expect all the members of the Congressional Black Caucus to be black. The Republican Party has gone to great lengths to convince the nation that it's not effectively a white caucus. The image of those ten candidates didn't help that effort.
Comments Policy
No Doubt About It
May 8, 2007 - 09:16 ET by allanfAt first one might think he is kidding . But there is no doubt about it. Rush Limbaugh is truly correct. The real racists in America are the Democrats. They see it all through a racial prism. They will not let people forget what they are.
They conveniently forget that
May 8, 2007 - 10:30 ET by Gat New YorkThey conveniently forget that the U.S. foreign policy has been run by an African American for the past six years including a woman.
Whom the the Left has called
May 8, 2007 - 13:32 ET by mattmWhom the the Left has called a "house marm" (or whatever it was) and "Aunt Jemima" etc....
Libs are the racists! If the GOP puts forth a black candidate or other non-white-male candidate, it will be because of his or her QUALIFICATIONS... The GOP should never have stopped pushing the "colorblind" idea...
alanf,The last thing the libs
May 8, 2007 - 15:31 ET by Dave Ralanf,
The last thing the libs want are minorities that are independent and can take care of themselves. Look at how they treat blacks who stray from the liberal plantation. To the libs, a successful black person who is not a flaming liberal is an escaped slave. Why do you think the dems oppose school choice even though most black parents support it?
If the politicians manage to get some sort of amnesty for the illegals in this country, watch carefully as the dems will do whatever they can to destroy their work ethic.
As for the libs trying to gain some mileage by pointing their fingers at the rich white country club guys in the Republican Party, then how do they explain John Kerry, John Edwards and the Hildebeast?
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
The term "Country Club
May 8, 2007 - 09:20 ET by Dee BunkThe term "Country Club" makes me think of elitist snobs not race or gender. The Democrats running are much more elitist than the Republicans running.
They don't like to mention the fact that Bush has a very diverse Cabinet and more minorities in higher places than any other administration.
Of course Post holds up polit
May 8, 2007 - 09:23 ET by ForeverOnTheRightOf course Post holds up political correctness in this liberal diversity dogma and forgets that the Dems where too cowardly to debate at a Fox News sponsored debate. But when their was "diversity" with Elizabeth Dole and Alan Keyes it's not worth mentioning because they can't say anything negative. But what REALLY is more important than diversity is character, integrity and the ability to govern as President. They focus on the superficial and not on substance.
Actually, the Post probably d
May 8, 2007 - 09:40 ET by GalvanicActually, the Post probably didn't see any diversity in Dole and Keyes, because the former wasn't a screaming feminist, and the latter wasn't a Jackson-Sharpton race-baiting activist.
Well Galvanic, you've touch o
May 8, 2007 - 10:24 ET by ForeverOnTheRightWell Galvanic, you've touch on an additional point that's important to the moonbats of the far left. I was also going to say that they talk about this diversity crap as if it's a moral requirement for all of us to uphold. I am against discrimination but one should not be required to have a representative from each group all the time. A valid candidate may not be available at the time. Sheeesh!
The Left and particularly the
May 8, 2007 - 13:18 ET by GalvanicThe Left and particularly the Dems love to tout diversity, but when you peel away the store-front examples, you find decisons being mad by white guy insiders. Bill Clinton is a great example.
Last I knew was we live in a
May 8, 2007 - 09:30 ET by vrwc13Last I knew was we live in a free country. Free for anyone to run for office in any party of their choosing. Have the Republicans "filtered" their candidates? Must be Karl Rove doings.
face piles of trials with smiles
The media sure have filtere
May 8, 2007 - 09:45 ET by sarcasmoThe media sure have filtered in favor of RINOs, but those same RINOs are currently busy removing a certain Texas sized boot from their butts...Let's hope they get some clues about actually-smaller government during the removal process, which I'm finding hilarious, natch...
JMR
Got to remember too, it's awf
May 8, 2007 - 10:00 ET by vrwc13Got to remember too, it's awfully early and maybe not all candidates are in. Anyway, how would their philosophy line up with measuring the Democratic House and Senate population?
face piles of trials with smiles
My thought exactly, vrwc13!
May 8, 2007 - 15:54 ET by motherbeltMy thought exactly, vrwc13!
Neither party gets to say who will run for the nomination. What was the Republican Party supposed to do, tell 3 of the guys they can't run, there are already too many white guys???
And everyone knows that if any black person runs as a Republican, he/she will be called house slave, Oreo cookie, Uncle Tom, and designated as not "really" black. Nice little Catch 22, huh?
The Republicans at least have diversity of opinion. The Democrats' idea of diversity is a group composed of different
shades of skin and ethnicity, with the same Liberal viewpoint.
Besides asking just how many
May 8, 2007 - 10:07 ET by ucBesides asking just how many nationalities were actually on the spot at Reagan Library I did feel compelled to point out that there were ten (count it, ten) different GOP haircuts, all for under $400, as well on the proverbial political "hotseat."
Obama
May 8, 2007 - 10:31 ET by PawpawNIsn't it the DIMS that state that Obama may not be "black enough" or that Shillary can't get the "female vote". You are totally correct, it's the Libs who are racist, biggots, elite, not keeping their carbon down, etc.
....and Romney isn't "Christi
May 8, 2007 - 11:59 ET by fendertele....and Romney isn't "Christian" enough, Giluliani not "man" enough, Grampa McCain is obviously "teched" from his time being tortured, Duncan Hunter wanted to remove all our reporters from Iraq because he couldn't take the bad news. Then there are the ones who when asked who didn't believe in evolution each one looking at one another as if to say "I'll raise my hand if you do" proving that a sizable faction of the party just plain doesn't believe in science!
Too bad your party doesn't have anyone mainstream enough to represent them.
Huh!
May 8, 2007 - 12:00 ET by PawpawNHuh!!
Then there are the ones who w
May 8, 2007 - 14:55 ET by InsufficientContextThen there are the ones who when asked who didn't believe in evolution each one looking at one another as if to say "I'll raise my hand if you do" proving that a sizable faction of the party just plain doesn't believe in science!
The hesitation could have been based on whether the question was being asked about 'evolution' or strict Darwinian Evolution. Simple 'evolution' leaves the door open for some form of divine guidance, while strict Darwinian Evolution denies God any responsibility for the creation of mankind. Mike Huckabee being a Baptist minister would almost certainly be aware of this distinction. And you do realize that in a recent poll only 15% of the American population believes in Darwinian Evolution, right? Might wanna step down from your ivory tower and talk to some of the commoners before outright mocking people.
www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main965223.shtml
Too bad your party doesn't have anyone mainstream enough to represent them.
I would love for all of the Democrats to go on the record as saying that they believe in strict Darwinian Evolution. It'd be political suicide.
Tim, the Huffington Post actually did just that.
May 8, 2007 - 12:00 ET by Gary HallTim, the Huffington Post actually did just that.
"Ten Middle Age White Men"
It's good for the Republicans
May 8, 2007 - 12:08 ET by LeonIt's good for the Republicans that they don't have single worthwhile candidate running for President in 2008. This way, they can drag the war out until the election without any attempt to adapt or to win or developing goals, and pass the buck to the Dems. Then 2012, they can blame the entire war on the Democrats, much like they've done with the current situation and Clinton.
This scenario fits perfectly with the Republican standard operating procedure. Make a mess, fail to clean it up, let someone else handle it, and then blame them for the original mess further down the road. So all you Republican NBs should be thankful that a magic underwear sporting, ex-liberal, mormon missionary is your strongest candidate, because really, he doesn't have a prayer at the presidency.
Poor Leon
May 8, 2007 - 12:13 ET by JimboBoy, are you going to be disappointed after the next election. I only wish I could be there to see the expression on your face when a Republican gets elected to the White House…again.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Put your chips on the table.
May 8, 2007 - 12:19 ET by LeonPut your chips on the table. If you're so confident, who do you think is going to win? Which candidate? And then we'll see how right you are next year.
There is literally not one strong candidate on the right. The desperate desire for pro-choice Thompson is a painful sign of this lack of talent.
Leon is frustrated
May 8, 2007 - 12:27 ET by JimboWe’ll ignore the fact that the Democrats will need to choose whether to put up a woman or a minority as their best candidate. We’ll also ignore the fact that neither one is even remotely electable in a national election.
Your post is a sign of your realization of that fact.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
This isn't about me. It's a
May 8, 2007 - 12:33 ET by LeonThis isn't about me. It's about the Republican candidates. Seriously, name me one strong contender. Just one that isn't suffering from sort of debilitating past.
Obama, Hillary, and even Edwards are most certainly contenders and, furthermore, none of them have blatant inconsistencies with the major voting groups on their side, unlike the republican candidates, or should I say those that aren't actually liberals in Elephant costumes.
Leon...leon
May 8, 2007 - 12:40 ET by JimboRudy, Thompson and Romney are all strong candidates. How do you call into question their checkered pasts and follow up with a glowing review of Hillary? Are you kidding me??
Are you that blind that you don’t see how ridiculous you sound?
By the way – Rudy is beating Hillary at the polls. Fool.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Exactly Jimbo... I am going t
May 8, 2007 - 12:50 ET by bigtimerExactly Jimbo...
I am going to throw in Hunter too.
I have listened to Thompson/Hunter/Tancredo on their respective floors for years with their speeches and what they believe, watched their votes... I doubt if Leon ever has taken the time to even know what he is really posting, sounds just like Soros group talking points...whom own the dem's just about...
Every time he posts here.
The Democrats are still rac
May 8, 2007 - 12:54 ET by wiwfThe Democrats are still racist. They're hyping up candidates' race and gender to somehow say that they're better. I'm sorry, but isn't that like the backbone of racism? They're making a big deal about racism, whereas the GOP isn't. So who's the racist one?
I'm sorry, but weren't Condi and Colin both black? Where's the racism? sorry
For a party that seems to be very much opposed to racism, they sure talk about it a lot, and promote their quality over other people.
Cite the poll. With Bush at
May 8, 2007 - 12:56 ET by fenderteleCite the poll. With Bush at a 28% approval rating you're saying the people want another leader like him?! I doubt it. Post a link to the poll and make sure it is a national poll done by a well known pollster and not some backwoods freeper who makes things up as they go along like most conservatives.
Even if that poll is correct,
May 8, 2007 - 13:01 ET by bigtimerEven if that poll is correct, which I doubt....
President Bush is NOT running again...
When are leftists going to get that through your thick empty heads?
28% is hilarious...A Newsweek
May 8, 2007 - 15:20 ET by TruthMonger28% is hilarious...
A Newsweek "poll." Now there's a source - the same rag that pledged to get Kerry elected?
There's absolutely NO FREAKING WAY Bush is at 28% with our roaring economy and terrorists scurrying like cockroaches...
Here's the poll On the bri
May 8, 2007 - 15:28 ET by MightyMouthHere's the poll
On the brighter side GWB now is tied with Jimmy Carter (28%) but still ahead of Truman (22%). The MSM job of misinformation is working well!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I got yer poll right here...
May 8, 2007 - 15:39 ET by TruthMongerCarter...double-digit inflation, gas lines, Iran hostage crisis...just like it is today!
Carter was probably at about 14% and they beefed it way up, Bush is probably around 60% and they've halfed it...
I hear ya TM. Just thought
May 8, 2007 - 15:45 ET by MightyMouthI hear ya TM. Just thought folks should see the actual poll. I don't believe these damn things either. Last two presidential polls were really accurate weren't they?
Also I noticed they polled 100 more registerd democrats than republicans. The intent of this "poll" is quite obvious.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
...they polled Republicans...
May 8, 2007 - 15:56 ET by TruthMonger...they polled Republicans...?! You mean midtown manhatten "republicans...?"
LOL, yeah probably! "
May 8, 2007 - 15:58 ET by MightyMouthLOL, yeah probably!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Don’t cite the great econom
May 8, 2007 - 15:45 ET by JimboDon’t cite the great economy – the stock market is about to crash. Don’t cite the lack of additional terrorist attacks – The war on terror is founded on Bush’s lies. /sarc off/
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
TM...Plus the majority of rep
May 8, 2007 - 15:37 ET by bigtimerTM...
Plus the majority of repub's still support him.
I saw msnbc come out with this poll as soon as they got it...it has been non-stop ever since.
What is hilarious is it is NEWSWEAK!
Says it all, and I never took it serious, nor do I care anyway what polls say.
History will judge this President...real history with real time given to do just that.
He has been a steadfast leader in this respect, and gets nothing but mine when it comes to this.
IMO there will be a lot uncovered that cannot be at the moment about this war, the terrorists, Al Qaeda ect....WMD's and Russia connection...on and on...including the enemy within this country betraying us and deterring our effort every step of the way.
...right on BT, Dylan doesn't
May 8, 2007 - 15:42 ET by TruthMonger...right on BT, Dylan doesn't call it "snoozeweek" for nothin...
What logic do you use to come
May 8, 2007 - 13:02 ET by JimboWhat logic do you use to come to the conclusion that voting for one of the candidates I mentioned is a vote for “someone like [Bush]”?
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Glad to see you're over the d
May 8, 2007 - 13:06 ET by fenderteleGlad to see you're over the denial phase of your republican leadership. If I was a republican, I wouldn't want to be associated with Bush either.
So who is the one candidate you support?
Nice change of direction from
May 8, 2007 - 13:09 ET by JimboNice change of direction from your earlier post.
To answer your question, I haven’t decided. I need to learn more about each of them.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
John Bolton
May 8, 2007 - 13:10 ET by bigtimerJohn Bolton
You're talking about the megl
May 8, 2007 - 13:23 ET by fenderteleYou're talking about the meglomaniac Ambassador to the U.N.? And what, in your wildest dreams makes you think he could win a bid for the White House? Wait a minute...I get it...IT'S A JOKE! Almost had me there!
John Bolton
May 8, 2007 - 13:31 ET by bigtimerJohn Bolton
Bring him on!
May 8, 2007 - 13:47 ET by fenderteleBring him on!
LOL...Wished I had the money
May 8, 2007 - 13:51 ET by bigtimerLOL...
Wished I had the money and power to do just that.
Just curious, what do you h
May 8, 2007 - 13:54 ET by MightyMouthJust curious, what do you have against John Bolton? Other than rubbing a few people the wrong way, he seemed to have the United States best interests at heart. And I think "meglomanic" is a little too strong a word.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
“He seemed to have the Unit
May 8, 2007 - 14:02 ET by Jimbo“He seemed to have the United States best interests at heart”
You seemed to have answered your own question!
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
fender,John Bolton would mop
May 8, 2007 - 14:22 ET by Dave Rfender,
John Bolton would mop the floor with both Barak Hussein Obama and that Marxist/Leninist euro-socialist fraud Mrs. Hillary Clinton (yeah, right!) at the same time. Together they aren't fit to carry Bolton's breifcase.
As for Johnny Edwards, he has less testosterone than does the Hildebeast.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
Hey fender...
May 8, 2007 - 14:54 ET by JimboSeen pictures, have ya?
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
...can't believe I'm getting
May 8, 2007 - 15:07 ET by InsufficientContext...can't believe I'm getting involved in this conversation... bush only refers to the pubic hair and not any portion or the actual sexual organs. What are you 14? Dick and fart jokes are one thing, but bad dick and fart jokes....
IC...Thanks...I wasn't going
May 8, 2007 - 15:11 ET by bigtimerIC...
Thanks...I wasn't going to bother, glad you did though.
Do not think poor ol' fender is gonna last as long as he is predicting if he keeps that up...seems reminiscent of someone...
LOL!
IC,Fourteen? How generous of
May 8, 2007 - 15:19 ET by Dave RIC,
Fourteen? How generous of you. I was thinking twelvish myself.
Of course, at the rate our government schools are dumbing down, run by the members of his favorite political party, you may be closer to his real age than I am.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
Fender, you are such a commodian.
May 8, 2007 - 15:13 ET by Dave Rfender,
My guess is that you haven't had any since it had you. :-)
--And if you require an explanation of the above, I just wasted about 47 key strokes.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
You give new dimension--
May 8, 2007 - 15:20 ET by misterbillYou give new dimension--to the word "twit".
fender
May 8, 2007 - 15:26 ET by misterbillA halfwit with tag name of fender
Jumped into the Newsbuster blender
His attempt at debate
Met a harsh fate
And he's left with an a** that is tender
ROFLMAO!This republic will no
May 8, 2007 - 15:34 ET by Dave RROFLMAO!
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
Misterbill,This is harder tha
May 8, 2007 - 19:00 ET by BlondeMisterbill,
This is harder than it looks...
Hey sounds pretty good to me
May 8, 2007 - 19:20 ET by misterbillHey sounds pretty good to me
I'd rather hear from you than from he
This guy is no Cupid
In fact he sounds stupid
As much as anyone can be
Jimbo,Those are your three be
May 8, 2007 - 16:53 ET by LeonJimbo,
Those are your three best?
1) Rudy - anti-gun, pro-gays, pro-choice, multiple divorce liberal from NYC? Sorry don't see it happening. (So you say he's leading in the polls? I thought polls didn't matter...or do they only matter when they support your position? I'll keep this in mind next time you say polls don't matter - ps polls in May of 2007 don't actually matter there tiger)
2) Thompson - the guy nobody's ever heard of except for his anti-semetic and anti-gay comments recently. This one doesn't even require an explanation.
3) Romney? Staunch supporter of gay marriage & Mormon? A mormon doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell. You must be kidding? This guy believes that Joseph Smith found some gold plates in the desert from God. Correct me if I'm wrong but Mormonism is a direct AFFRONT to Christianity, and the followers of Mormonism are essentially going to hell for worshipping/following a false prophet (Joseph Smith). Not sure that many strong Christians are going to get out the vote for a liberal, New Englander that believes some guy saw an Angel named Moroni 180 years ago. Dubious.
Listen, these guys all stand against the Republican's base in Fundamental ways. If Republicans actually stick to their core principles, than none of these guys should have a chance. It's a weak field and you know it. No matter how much you deny. If Rudy is your horse, then you're in serious trouble.
Leon...You really are in La-L
May 8, 2007 - 17:00 ET by bigtimerLeon...
You really are in La-La Land.
Period.
You're funny Leon. Really.
May 8, 2007 - 17:39 ET by JimboYou're funny Leon. Really. I actually laugh when I read your posts.
Your latest rant sounds alot like the crap you libs were throwing around before the lat presidential election. You know... when President Bush won....again.
You and the MSM tried to paint his as a studdering fool. And you still couldn't beat him! That's gotta be eating at you.
Like I said.. you are funny Leon!
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
So are you going to actually
May 9, 2007 - 08:25 ET by LeonSo are you going to actually address any of my points Jimbo or are you simply going to make a personal attack on me?
You said Rudy was the man. I find it hard to believe that a guy that believes in the exact opposite of a majority of those that vote Republican has a chance to win. Again, pro-choice, anti-gun, pro-gay, NYC Liberal. Tell me again how he is going to win. How will he overcome this blatant hypocrisies?
Okay
May 8, 2007 - 17:51 ET by Mr. BishopI will correct you for being wrong.
No -- "Mormonism" is not a direct affront to Christianity. It is impossible to be so, if you believe in Christ, and worship accordingly. Any other attempts on this subject, will be just indicative to a losing position on your side. It is also amazing, that every single "Christian" religion seems to spout going to hell if you don't follow their religion -- yet the LDS church does not do that. "Hell", or pergatory as they call it, is reserved only for those who have known the lord, and turned their back on the lord -- like Able. In addition, no -- nowhere has any Mormon ever said the gold plates were "found in the desert". Found on a hillside, yes -- desert, no. And finally, I find it truly amazing, that people can call themselves Christians, believe in His (Christ's) miracles, yet believe it is impossible for Joseph Smith to have been called by the Lord, to do His work.
"Christians" vote for whomever they are going to vote for. Whether or not it's for a Mormon, or someone who is not, is irrelevant to the fact that factless, fearful people, are going to go out and smear the LDS church for the purpose of attempting to discredit a man, not based upon his political ideals, but based upon his religion. Amazingly, I seem to recall the First Amendment saying that a person can freely excercise his religion -- apparently, that doesn't actually mean that a president, or a man running for president, has that right.
In closing, for you, or anyone, to bring up a man's religion as the only reason to disqualify him from being president, that kind of says a little bit about you -- not them. I, personally, would have rather Romney not ran for president because this is the exact thing I was worried about when he announced: ignorant hate-filled people, smearing the religion because of lack of information on their part.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
Mormons...they don't even rea
May 8, 2007 - 19:05 ET by fenderteleMormons...they don't even read the real Bible do they? Wasn't their "Bible" dictated by Joseph Smith from behind a screen from some phoney baloney gold tablets given to him by an angel?
Wow, quite the little bigot, ain't ya?
May 8, 2007 - 19:07 ET by RJWow. Quite the little bigot, ain't ya?
Fascist?
May 8, 2007 - 19:20 ET by acumenWouldn't that mean our confused friend fit's the definition of a...gasp....fascist?
ft,In the immortal words of D
May 8, 2007 - 19:07 ET by Blondeft,
In the immortal words of Dan Ackroyd....
"Fender, you magnficently ignorant slut".
Try again. That comment was trollish beyond description.
Mormons believe and read the
May 8, 2007 - 19:11 ET by Conservative VoiceMormons believe and read the Bible and the Book of Mormon.
Okay... Am here now
May 9, 2007 - 17:24 ET by Mr. Bishop"Real Bible"? Yes, we read the "real Bible". Anyone who says otherwise, really has never researched the church, let alone visited and have authority to make such a comment. No -- our "Bible" was not dictated by anyone named Joseph Smith. Our "Bible" is the King James Version of the Bible. The Boook of Mormon, which is read in addition to the Bible, as a companion to the Bible, was translated, not dictated, from Gold Plates (not honey baloney) he found under a rock, on a hill, after being shown the way.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
Mr. Bishop,Thanks for the lon
May 9, 2007 - 08:23 ET by LeonMr. Bishop,
Thanks for the long disjointed rant. Unfortunately, you're speaking to the wrong person. I'm not religious nor do i care what religions other people choose to pursue. Mormonism is not a disqualifier for me, it's a disqualifier for many that vote Republican - die hard Christians. My point was that Romney doesn't have a chance becuase many on the right are not accepting of people in power that follow other religions than Christianity, i.e. Keith Ellison.
Here's a nice article concerning Romney's Evangelical problem (link)
No -- I was responding to y
May 9, 2007 - 17:26 ET by Mr. BishopNo -- I was responding to your post, to your "disqualifying" of Romney for being Mormon. Whether you are trying to claim that "Christians" will not vote for him, or not, you are disqualifying him because you do not speak for any "Christian" group. In addition, you asked someone to correct you if you are wrong... I did so. I would suggest you start READING what you actually write, before you reply to anyone, and claim you never said anything.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
Dude... lighten up..
Gee Leon, just like you libs and the Vietnam War
May 8, 2007 - 14:08 ET by SportPoliticsGee Leon, just like you libs and the Vietnam War, and John Kerry telling me that Nixon was lying and invading and war mongering in December before he was even in office, and not a single mention of JFK or Lyndon B Johnson concerning the Vietnam War.
Aperson unfamiliar with the Vietnam War would assume by the demcorats tutelage that Richard Nixon ran the entire war, and you libs are DOING THAT TO THIS VERY DAY, AND WITH YOUR LATEST PICK FOR PRESIDENT - FLOWING FROM HIS OWN LIPS DURING HIS CAMPAIGN OF LIES.
Now, since you probably are mentally retardedly aware of you and your demolobidiot party's current lie pointed out above, you shriek a shrill fantasy for the future about republicans at some distant fantasy date of yours trying to pull of the same slimey crap you know and practice so well.
You libs are a cauldron of projection of your own corruption,and since you DO NOT have an example in HISTORY - MEANING IT HAS NEVER BEEN DONE BY REPUBLICANS - you conveniently forget YOUR OWN CURRENT DARK SIN THAT EXACTLY FITS THE CASE you dreamed up for a non-existent future scenario.
YOU SIR, ARE BUSTED, SLIME INCARNATE.
Race card
May 8, 2007 - 13:13 ET by cruiserIt's obvious, the Democrats place race first. The Republicans place ideas first. It doesn't matter who you are or where you're from, it's your ideas that count. The racial diversity in Bush's major appointments puts Clinton's to shame. However, these appointments were not made with race as the primary reason. The Democrats will continue to play the race card, as long as non-informed people continue to listen to sound bites.
Just wanted to take the time
May 8, 2007 - 15:45 ET by fenderteleJust wanted to take the time to say you got a real nice little girl's club going here. Not a lot of posters...not as many as Huffington, Air America or Crooks and Liars, but a nice, tight little group. Think I'll just hang out awhile and make myself at home. Kick my feet up and try to keep you girls informed. Ain't gonna be easy since your brains have soaked up so much propaganda over the years but I'll see what I can do. You can thank me later.
Looking forward to it little
May 8, 2007 - 15:48 ET by JimboLooking forward to it little boy. I’ll give you a week before you run and hide.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Aaaaah, another agent provocateur--
May 8, 2007 - 15:52 ET by misterbillAaaaah, another agent provocateur--sent over to us by the Libs. Why do they send low IQ babies to us??? Wait! I know--because these boobs do not recognize when they have lost an argument and just keep at it. It's so easy even a Lib can do it!!!!! Fender will be here for a couple of weeks and when we get tired of playing with him, he will disappear. (Back to huff or someplace like that.)
Oh no problem with the thanks
May 8, 2007 - 15:53 ET by bigtimerOh no problem with the thanks later part fender-bender.
You will be getting some I am sure.
"little girls club&quo
May 8, 2007 - 16:01 ET by Dee Bunk"little girls club" Typical sexist comment from a liberal.
Hater, I see you managed to g
May 8, 2007 - 16:04 ET by JABHater, I see you managed to get another screen name...only a matter of time before you get the boot, again.
"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
Oh my - the blessings are ne
May 8, 2007 - 16:50 ET by RackieOh my - the blessings are never ending.