Why would anyone want someone back in the White House who never could garner even 50% of the vote? Why doesn't Matthews admit that Clinton was never as popular as he and his liberal cronies believe; that his policies endangered America; that he has the moral compass of a billy goat; and that he is a person you could never, ever trust?

OK, Chris, ask the Dems at the next debate how they would feel about Bush Senior back in the White House...

Mitt's "You have got to be kidding" was the correct answer.....

"You can lead a man to Congress, but you can't make him think." - Milton Berle

Why did Romney continue after, "You have to be kidding."

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

I am actually glad Matthews brought this up. IMHO, Hillary Clintons' run for president violates the "spirit" of the presidental term limit. Anyone agree?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Someone should have asked Matthews if he's ever sought counselling for his obsessive lust of the ex-president.

Well, here was the response. All you have to do is quote a media favorite - a  popular progressive economist, Dean Baker (CEPR). Baker in describing the Clinton administration's economic bubble [stock market bubble] of the late 90's said:

"The level of negligence of the nation's political leaders in ignoring the stock bubble exceeds anything since the days of Herbert Hoover."

He went on to say: "The decision by the Federal Reserve Board and the Clinton Administration not to take any actions to try to limit the run-up of the stock bubble was a mistake that the nation will suffer from for many years to come."

And: "Furthermore, it was an enormous failure of public policy, not to warn people about the stock market bubble that created this situation. At a macro level, it will be difficult to again pump up the economy in the wake of the collapsing bubble. At the individual level, millions of households now find themselves with insufficient savings to pay for their retirement or their children's education."

"The stock market bubble created a huge amount of unpredicted wealth, which has quickly dissipated. Millions of families have been hurt as a result."

Romney could have added to his, "youv'e got to be kidding" comment by adding, "Why in the world would we want to subject the American people to such financial suffering again?"

I think most of you know where I stand on 22 Amendment >>  MM nice to see someone else on point.

Question is Hardball politics at its best since this field of Republicans should be running against Clinton (Bill) years and having Hillary as a candidate makes it near impossible for MSM to call such unfair.  Just a Matthews shot across the Clinton bow.  Someone please point this out to Chris Matthews.

What an unconscionable Presidency it was.   Naming this guy "Ambassador to the World" after his eight years just partying on while real issues called?  Is this the type of people we want all americans judged by an associated with?

This isn't Bush's war but maybe it is Clinton's.   37% eh?

Time to dig up the old post 9/11 red and blue news articles and magazine show spots. >>  Time to show how MSM almost never (I mean almost never and am still just trying to remember a single case otherwise) allowed any blame to be put on Clinton policies.   MSM stuck to "it happened on Bush's watch" so we don't have to cover anything about Clinton and his people other than their backsides.  And, so almost always Clinton folks and even Stephanopoulous got to ride down easy street and let the public opinion turn against Bush - so what.   Really don't think GS didn't get to put out unnews.

The night before, on his own show, Matthews asked a Republican this (paraphrasing): You said that you don't think Republicans are always right and Democrats are always wrong. Give me an example of when Republicans have been wrong.

This man LONG AGO gave up his credibility as an even remotely even-handed journalist.