GOP Presidential Primary Debate Thread

Photo of Matthew Sheffield.

Anti-Americanism at its finest in the first GOPer presidential debate. Video at this NewsBusters node.

20:58. Chris Matthews seems to be ignorant of the term "altered nuclear transfer" in stem-cell debate. Appears confused when Mitt Romney brings it up.

21:20. Matthews continues his obsession with Scooter Libby. Asks the insignificant question of whether he should be pardoned. C'mon.

21:24. More Matthews genius: "Do you think it would be a good thing to have Bill Clinton in the White House again?"

21:29. Unrelated but I wanted everyone to see that Andrew Sullivan recently fell for a hoax about a "kids version of '24.'"

21:32. The debate ends, MSNBC cuts to objectivity from its resident left-wing oaf, Keith Olbermann.

23:15. Video of Politico reporter Jim Vandehei's outrageous question is here.

23:22. Glenn Reynolds has a good roundup of blog, media reactions.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

My answer: the liberals livin

My answer: the liberals living in it.

Sorry to duplicate your post

Sorry to duplicate your post zf. However, that was my first thought as well (before reading your post), and yes, if I were running for president I'd say the same to the masses.

"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."

No problem, it gave me a bit

No problem, it gave me a bit of a laugh. <g>

&quot;Double-Standards!&quo

"Double-Standards!" The jack asses back out of FOX, but the elephants stand strong debating on the ultra-liberal MSNBC. Imagine the double-standard if the oppositte occurred

"Before I refuse to take your questions...I have a statement.." Ronald Reagan

&quot;What Do You Dislike Mos

"What Do You Dislike Most About America?"

In a word...get ready for it...Liberals!

"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."

No comment. &lt;g&gt;

No comment. <g>

GOP unwilling to address th

GOP unwilling to address the faults of our dems.

Soros has gained control of their party. Five seperate organizations funded by him feed Media Matters which in turn supplies the news media.

Unwilling to provide a better solution for any problem, Soros out of total hate attempts to use money to control. He has supported terrorism.

Recently he 'donated' $5 million to IU and as a result a study turns up on Media Matters concerning O'Reilly. Rosie made a big deal out of it, she had the exact numbers, and NBC did as well. The remainder of news media ignored it.

Soros has the power to pay off colleges, major networks, internet sites, candidates, and influence general public.

What do the conservativeshave to lose by exposing more of him?

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

I hate Soros, but he has not

I hate Soros, but he has not "bought" anything that wasen't already for sale and sympatico since the Democrats came into being.

zf,Interestingly enough, I le

zf,

Interestingly enough, I learned today that Soros totally trashed the company I now work for in the late 90's.

I knew there'd been a huge debacle, but I just gained some insight into it today.

A raider, and a euro-trash convict.

ZMoveonTides FoundationDem

Z

  • Moveon
  • Tides Foundation
  • Dem Alliance
  • Open Society Inst
  • Center for American Progress
  • Media Matters... ?

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

Thanks for putting this threa

Thanks for putting this thread in Matthew.

I posted on open thread about what I had heard so far...

Catch you all soon...

Like I  said before John Harris from Politico needs to sit the eff down.

Thompson/Hunter..or Hunter/Thompson!

MSLSD didn't disapoint

EVERY question came from left field, Matthews slobbering all over himself and demanding "Yes" or "No" answers to standard template liberal talking points, that twit John from Politico whatever tripping all over himself to run up with the next dumb question....But I liked the way most of the canadates, even the ones I never heard of, handled themselves. Mitt Romney did better than I thought he would.

And yes, "What do you dislike about America" was one of the WORST questions to pose in the RONALD REAGAN LIBRARY of all places!!! Somewhere the Gipper is sadly shaking his head at that one

Matthews obsession just stopp

Matthews obsession just stopped at the edge of Cheney. He is disgusting, I hope the republicans do not so this again, with the exception of Giuliani and McCain...just my opinion.

The response with the open question to all about the the return of Bill Clinton to the WH..... Romney said right off with a laugh..."You've got to be kidding...The Gang of three...Hillary, Reid and Pelosi!

It was great.

Hunter was great in my opinion...wish of course he had more time, only because I have been listening and watching for years on the House floor, I love Gilmore too.

I hope they never, ever have anything to do with Politico again...that was disgraceful, along with Matthews, and for him to try to justify his BS for years with Rove, Cheney, Libby and next President Bush.... but I expected that...I was hoping that he had a little more class than that...but noooooooo

Most of the candidates did well to shove it down Matthews throat in my opinion. 

Picking Matthews for this w

Picking Matthews for this was a mistake. He's a left-wing Dem who only complains about Dems when they aren't liberal enough.

I agree Matthew. Btw...I have

I agree Matthew.

Btw...I have been listening to the show afterwards and was sitting there thinking I better go change that part in my post above about me saying I thought Matthews would have a little more class than that part...my fingers were walking to fast there, even I know better than that...I guess I was hoping that his advisers would advise him to not go there and make the arse of himself he does nightly...nationally, well, world-wide...

I am going to be furious if they do this ever again.

...and the dem's boycott Fox...what a joke. 

I just want to add in...I hope some people here got to really listen to Hunter, he did well, he is what he is tonight as he is on the floor of the House.

I would love him to make it to the top...Hunter/Thompson or vice verse.

<edit>

Btw...just my opinion..but McCain is done...stick a fork in 'em.

I respect the man for his service to this country but I am glad his performance was so bad tonight, along with some of his answers...he helped me get rid of a head-ache, I don;t care what polls say, he is done.

Gilmore did great too...I have nothing but admiration for him and wish he was our President too...I have liked him for years and years.

I was very encouraged by the

I was very encouraged by the performance of all of the candidates, particularly after watching the Democrats. I found it interesting that they used Brian Williams for the Democrats and Matthews for the GOP.

I thought that Guiliani, Romney and McCain came out very strong and had some powerful statements. What was most encouraging was thinking back to the Dem love-in I could not imagine Obama and Edwards competing with any of the GOP candidates on that stage. The GOP is finally getting its voice back and I am now confident that they will be able to counter the avalanche of attacks by the left over many months.

Some of those questions were downright ignorant. The Scooter Libby one backfired on Matthews as they went after the prosecutor as they should. The Clinton question was ignorant and the what don't you like about America? should have been answered with: "dumba$$ questions like that from left wing loons like you." 

There is a long list of peopl

There is a long list of people across the political spectrum who make good debate moderators.  Chris Matthews is not on it.

To paraphrase William F. Buck

To paraphrase William F. Buckley, the first five people listed in the phonebook would have made a better moderator.

IMO the best possible moder

IMO the best possible moderator would have been Brian Lamb from C-Span, but the best possible format would have been Brian as dealer in a poker game between the candidates. I'd also love to see chess games between individual candidates. This would be even less likely than the poker, but even more revealing WRT grasp of basic military strategy principles, just as poker would reveal psychological & negotiating skills/weaknesses a scripted and time-limited "debate" cannot...People don't know any history, so they don't know basic stuff like how long Lincoln debated Douglass in un-airconditioned tents during hot weather, so they tend to think these moderator-focused made for TV sound-bite memory contests are real debates. They're not.
JMR

I still think Alex Trebek sho

I still think Alex Trebek should moderate these things. Keep the questions coming fast, and don't worry if the camera is on the contestants all the time. And the Jeopardy format makes more sense. Have six categories, and let the candidates compete over them. "Expensive Democrat Haircuts for $400, Alex!"

Last night I caught a coupl

Last night I caught a couple of minutes of Matthews interviewing I think a Republican strategist (name not up on screen). His question (paraphrasing)...

You said Republicans are not always right, and Democrats are not always wrong. Give me an example of when Republicans haven't been right.

Can anyone imagine, in their wildest dreams, his asking the same question of a Democrat?

The thought of msnbc being in

The thought of msnbc being in the Reagan Library is just wrong...then the guestions about embryonic stem cell research with Nancy Reagan setting there, what a cheap shot.

Matthews:  Do you think it w

Matthews:  Do you think it would be a good thing to have Bill Clinton in the White House again?

Isn't Hillary the candidate?  This was a remarkably juvenile and chauvinistic question by Matthews.

A good reply might've been: &

A good reply might've been: "But it wasn't a good thing the first time around."

*****

"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello

If you want a true Conservati

If you want a true Conservative Republican, vote Tancredo.

Debra...

Tancredo

Debra, I read your page about Tancredo. I am very impressed with his positions. I did not know much about him before but I like what I see. I did not see the entire debate but what I did see drew me to Tancredo, Brownback, and Huckabee. Unfortunately, these are not the "top tier" candidates thus far though there is time for them to improve their numbers.

All too often we get the government we deserve rather than the government we prefer. How I long for a president who will stand up to Congress by vetoing the pork-laden bills that have gone through unopposed for so many years; a president who will appoint more strict-constructionist judges and justices.; a president who cares more for the people who elected him than the unions and financiers; a president who isn't afraid of the Anti-Christian Litigation Unit; a president who actually is God-fearing and has a true moral base in Jesus Christ. I shall continue to pray for this great nation of ours, under God, with liberty and justice for all.

Evolutionists have heard of Darwin; Creationists understand Darwin.