ABC's '20/20' Getting Cold Feet About Hot Sex in DC?

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

Jeff Dufour and Patrick Gavin at the Washington Examiner's gossip page report that ABC is dialing back its D.C. prostitution scoop, and reporter Brian Ross is an unhappy camper:

Yeas & Nays hears that, as of this writing, the segment will reveal only two new names and is currently slotted for a mere seven minutes at the end of the hour-long broadcast (you'll recall that Palfrey turned over nearly 15,000 phone numbers to ABC News back in March).

Interviews with both Palfrey and former deputy secretary of state Randall Tobias (who left the State Department last week after being interviewed by ABC News for the "20/20" piece) are currently scheduled, leaving precious little time remaining for much else (and for all of those salacious details you¹ve been waiting for). Sources tell Yeas & Nays that Ross, who had anticipated a far juicier piece, is none too happy with the final results, especially after he and the network promoted this story for weeks.

"This isn't going to blow the lid off Washington," says one ABC employee who asked not to be named. "If they had any big fish, we'd know it by now. There's no way this lives up to the hype."


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Or will we see the two name

Or will we see the two names that get unveiled be the most conservative or most highly-connected Republicans who happen to be on the list while Dem staffers or liberal activists who may also be clients don't get published until when this story is old news and ABC just dumps the list on its Web site?

Ken, maybe there are only t

Ken, maybe there are only two conservatives and 14,998 democrats? It's possible.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Given the source is ABC, I

Given the source is ABC, I think we should imagine how the left might have reacted -- probably with similar-sounding suspicions -- had it instead been Fox News. Regardless of the network chosen, it will indeed be interesting to see what goes into the name-choosing process and who gets to do it. All of this argues for either a mass-dump to the website of all names at the same time or else not a peep, because whatever in-between process or person that gets chosen won't satisfy anyone nearly as well.
JMR

...what was the left-wing man

...what was the left-wing mantra again during monicagate? Oh yeah:

"...does their sex life really have anything to do with how they do their jobs? Isn't this a private matter between adults? Yada yada yada..."

Now I remember...

And the right, sadly, obses

And the right, sadly, obsessively-focused on the Oval Office BJs at a time when their speaker (who they're now considering for the Presidency, anyway, in a desperate attempt to avoid fiscally-responsible candidates getting airtime) was busy humping an aide instead of paying attention to the stuff America cares about involving China-not-sex and Slick. And people still feel compelled to ask why I'm not a Democrat or Republican...
JMR

I have to believe that there

I have to believe that there has been enormous political pressure from both sides threatening each other to give up each other. My guess is that it will be two innocuous individuals - maybe corporate or government relations.

I recall that when Heidi Fleiss finally wrote her book she did not name names but gave vivid descriptions and when I read it I realized that one of them was the President of my company. But that before the Internet. It just takes one person who has access and then everyone will know and I am certain that every name in her book we will ultimately know.

Does anyone know if those o

Does anyone know if those on the list have ANY legal recourse, should their name be released? I mean if a judge can sue a laundry $65 million for a lost pair of pants, you would think...

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

horny hankerings

I don't believe that there is any confidentiality, real or implied, in the conducting of monkey business with escort services. Personal embarrassment caused by horny hankerings don't really get a lot of sympathy from the public or the press.

If I were Palfrey, I'd be popping those names up, oh, say 100 a day on my website... To heck with ABC. They're not going to 'out' a bunch of dems!

But you know if it was Republicans, they'd be erecting the scaffold and measuring the rope!

You don't believe there's any

You don't believe there's any implied confidentiality when conduct monkey business with an escort service???  Are you serious?  Do you really think that a john is calling an escort service and thinking "gee... I can't wait until news of this gets out!"  Escort services are all about being discreet, private, confidential, etc.

There are NO names. Only ph

There are NO names. Only phone numbers.

Hey, maybe your phone number found its way on to her alleged list?

SEDITION THE MISSION

Harold Reid (D-Feat)

"There are NO names. O

"There are NO names. Only phone numbers"

OMG!! When I was in DC about two years ago I made a call... and got a WRONG number!

I was intrigued and talked for a while, but I swear--- no happy ending!!

*cowering in corner shaking*

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

You got me cracking up laughi

You got me cracking up laughing as usual Mighty!

Still always the rogue....

Be brave, come out of your corner now, no one is gonna tell.

Oh sure MM... I believe you

Oh sure MM... I believe you.

SEDITION THE MISSION

Harold Reid (D-Feat)

leverage - fear of exposure

Probably a.) no really big bombshells and b.) if they've got anything relevant, they'll save it (what little they might have) for a circumstance that will maximize any distructive effect on the Republican Party and minimize any negative effect on the Democrats/Liberals.   They might work to corroborate evidence against Republicans and do the smear jobs during the '08 election cycle, saying that any evidence against Democrats/Liberals is unsubstantial.  Thus, they can possibly chip away at the big fish by associating them with any dirty little fish (all during the election cycle), hitting only Republicans (but they might even throw in an irrelevant Dem/Lib or Centrist just to help cover their behinds w/ groups like Newsbusters).  The blackmailer loses his/her power once the information is out.  The leverage is the targets' fear of exposure.

It’s the same old same old.

It’s the same old same old. What makes it news is that it’s REPUBLICANS in a sex scandal if it were Democrats it’s no big deal. That is why we are not hearing about the scandal about Feinstein! Hey what’s a “billion” among family, huh? Something about, the most honest congress in history?? Yea, got it.

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagn- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

I can understand the madam's

I can understand the madam's intent, which is she wants all her customers testifying that no sex occured, thus destroying the pimp daddy charges, and I can agree with her statement about how whenever a robbery occurs you call witnesses who can state what happened.  But at it's core, what she was doing was running a business for people she accepted money from, and I think "best practice" for any business is to never disclose customer identity data unless required to by court order.  Where I really disagree with this woman is her giving confidential customer information to a media outlet just to save her own hide.

Ohhhh puhleeeeze, I have been

Ohhhh puhleeeeze, I have beens saying from day one there are only going to be conservatives mentioned that they can find, they may leave a few others to put forward when it is convenient politically, say around the election or such, but there will be no names released that have a 'D' behind them, that is if only ABC has control (also heard there are members of the media we would all know in this too, let's remember that too)...let's remember those numbers can be released mysteriously again...especially by Palfrey if she is played with more than she has been....this is too rich.

As an aside....Doncha' just love how the Justice Dept. has only been going after conservatives?

Something wrong with this picture by now to others?

Gonzales had better come up with something good real soon...yeah right, when pigs fly.

Reid, DiFi, Jefferson, Mullholland or whatever his name is, Mendendez, Schumer, Hillary(of course that is an endless saga with her) others too, just can't think of them, zilch was done with Murtha...no nothing is done about these people...and won't be.

Here's an interesting take

Here's an interesting take on ABC and the list of the Madam's phone numbers (no names, just numbers)...

It struck me that in order to glean any information from these 14000 phone numbers, ABC and Brian Ross have to indulge in what is known as "data mining."

That is: going on a fishing expedition to matching raw collected data to actual people.

So, what is the stance of ABC and Brian Ross when it comes to data mining being used by the government to identify people who are actually putting American lives at risk?

Why... it would seem they are agin it, because it affects them.

Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling
May 15, 2006 10:33 AM

A senior federal law enforcement official tells ABC News the government is tracking the phone numbers we (Brian Ross and Richard Esposito) call in an effort to root out confidential sources.

"It's time for you to get some new cell phones, quick," the source told us in an in-person conversation.

Other sources have told us that phone calls and contacts by reporters for ABC News, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, are being examined as part of a widespread CIA leak investigation.

A pattern of phone calls from a reporter, however, could provide valuable clues for leak investigators.

SEDITION THE MISSION

Harold Reid (D-Feat)

Jack...OMG!I remember that no

Jack...

OMG!

I remember that now....well isn't that just special.

No wonder this is getting down-played now by the networks and talkin' heads, it has been noticeable for me that is for sure for the last couple of days.

This is gonna be very interesting and a long bumpy ride...and fun toooooo!

Just maybe there has been a method to their madness in places like the Justice Dept and other venues, it would be hard to prosecute some of these folks and their places of employment let alone some of the institutions they work for...my oh my...I know I mentioned in a post somewhere today that their were names in the media too on this list....

I am LMAO!

BT -- sure, privacy is sacr

BT -- sure, privacy is sacrosanct when it's a reporter trying to hide the name of someone breaking the law leaking highly classified information that helps terrorists...

But it's of vital national interest to check the phones numbers of pathetic men stupid enough to phone an escort service.

I ain't defending the slimey dopes -- but many of those numbers have to be hotels, untraceabale cell phones, work places, old numbers.

SEDITION THE MISSION

Harold Reid (D-Feat)

Sorry to be dumb.  I read th

Sorry to be dumb.  I read the link and I still don't get this.  Who leaked something and what is the CIA investigating and did they step in as part of this case or a separate, unrelated investigation and are they threatening ABC in some way? 

dahlia -- the cases are tot

dahlia -- the cases are totally unrelated.

I was just trying to draw a comparison.

Last year ABC and Brian Ross last year were all bent out of shape at the government allegedly using data mining techniques that could identify their sources for leaking highly classified CIA material that could actually harm the US in combating terrorists.

However this year, the same Ross and ABC is using exactly the same data mining to link a list of phone numbers to people, and then drawing conclusions about those people.

Somewhat hypocrtical to my mind.

SEDITION THE MISSION

Harold Reid (D-Feat)

OH!  Obviously, our prioriti

OH! 

Obviously, our priorities are wrong.  It's not acceptable to data mine for national security but it's fine to do so for ratings. 

... which is what you said ab

... which is what you said above.  Thanks, Jack.

(By the way, the lightbulb that went off over my head was an Al Gore approved, environmentally friendly compact fluorescent.)

This DC sex scandal reminds

This DC sex scandal reminds me of Enron. I remember how the Democrat Party and their MSM grape-peelers were going to use this to nail the Republican Party to the wall. Only problem was, every time they kicked over a rock, they kept finding prominent dems. Eventually, other than the Ken Lay prosecution, the rest of the story just faded away.

I think we may be seeing something similar here, as that black book probably contains some damning evidence on more than a few dems.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-
Neal Boortz.