Time Magazine’s ‘Top 100’ Most Influential List Snubs President George W. Bush

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
By Noel Sheppard | May 3, 2007 - 10:46 ET

Is there any better indication of how biased a publication is than who it perceives to be the most influential people in the world?

If such is indeed the case, Time magazine has given us quite a glimpse into its predilections with its annual “100 People Who Shape Our World” list.

Most notably, although he is the most powerful man on the planet, and his nation is in the middle of a war on terror that could end up having profound international effects for decades nay centuries, President George W. Bush was conspicuously absent.

Isn't that special?

*****Update follows with a little history of this list.

Yet, the following “Leaders and Revolutionaries” were honored:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓
  • Beijing Communist Party Leader Liu Qi
  • Fidel Castro’s brother Raul
  • Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-New York)
  • China’s President Hu Jintao
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California)
  • Sen. Barack Obama (D-Illinois)
  • NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg (R)
  • Ayatullah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader
  • German Chancellor Angela Merkel
  • Osama bin Laden

And, in the “Heroes and Pioneers” section:

  • Oprah Winfrey
  • Elizabeth Edwards
  • Tyra Banks
  • George Clooney
  • Michael J. Fox
  • Yankee pitcher Chien-Ming Wang

Yet, what you really have to love is the person Time placed first on the “Scientists and Thinkers’ list: soon-to-be-Dr. Al Gore.

I kid you not.

Try to read the opening sentence of the article about Gore without getting nauseous (emphasis added): “Al Gore understands the science of global warming better than anyone else in the world of politics.”

Unbelievable.

Of course, the “Artists and Entertainers” section was quite a hoot, with folks like Tina Fey, Justin Timberlake, Sacha Baron Cohen, Leonardo DiCaprio, Rosie O’Donnell, Brad Pitt, and Brian Williams prominently featured.

Of course, it goes without saying that precious few conservatives made this list. Color me unsurprised.

*****Update: Some interesting information about this list from Wikipedia:

The list was first published in 1999, when Time magazine named the 100 most influential people of the 20th century. Based on the popularity of the installment, in 2004 Time magazine decided to make it an annual feature.

Of further interest should be the fact that this is the first time since this became an annual event that President Bush was snubbed. However, to be fair, this is also the first time former President Bill Clinton didn't make the list as well. Coincidence?

Also of note is Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's fourth annual appearance on the list making her the only person with such an honor.   

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I was just getting ready to m

I was just getting ready to make a post in regard to the cover of this issue.  Notice who is placed front and center with 'mini-me' right below him.

How Gore and Leo get a free ride, I will never understand?!  Do you think any big movie companies would pick up and distribute "The Great Global Warming Swindle"?  Yeah, right.

Gore

“Al Gore understands the science of global warming better than anyone else in the world of politics.”

Shouldn't that be: “Al Gore understands the politics of global warming better than anyone in the world of science.” ?

Time

I wrote to Time about this. These immature haters purport to be so sophisticated and intelligent, while in fact they are nothing but petulent, small- minded adolescents. Weep for our nation as you watch the media's attempts to bring it to its knees. But don't ever give up the fight against the enemy within. Time Magazine is a disgusting arm of the lef-wing propaganda machine. Integrity is anathema to the liberals at this rag.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

What about Castro's brother,

What about Castro's brother, Dennis?

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!´´
--Patrick Henry

And Zeppo ... always the forg

And Zeppo ... always the forgotten one.

The kindest thing I can think

The kindest thing I can think to say of Time Magazine is: "They are tiny brained wipers of other people's bottoms".  (Thank you, Monte Python, for the wording :o) 

The worst part of this all is

The worst part of this all is that readers were allowed to vote, and President Bush was clearly in the top 20 the entire time.

As is usually the case, the g

As is usually the case, the glaring omissions display the bias.

Besides the President, for Pete's sake!, where's Billy Graham, Condi Rice, Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Clarence Thomas, Jerry Falwell, Roger Ailes, the ordinary soldier...?

Any of you trolls who can look at this and still refuse to concede the fact of Liberal Media Bias have absolutely NO credibility at all.

I as said following it was ev

I as said following it was evident that this was a blatant political statement and I would urge all other advertisers who feel the same way to pull their schedules from Time Inc. I am also very annoyed with Rciahdr Parsons the comapny Chairman and Republican to have endorsed this charade.  

Condi is on the list.

Condi is on the list.

Her picture should be on the

Her picture should be on the cover...that's what I was referring to. 

I have already asked my agenc

I have already asked my agencies to not include advertising in Time, Inc. magazines. 

I made what I consider an objective list and compared it to what Time has and it is evident that this was an overall political statement against Bush and conservatives.

The very idea of leaving off the President of the United States and having Tina Fey is abhorrent. Time's Managing Editor is a left wing ideologue and not a professional journalist to have published this trash. 

No matter who is president, 

No matter who is president, he is the most influential person worldwide, and it has been that way for a long time. To leave Bush off the list not only reeks so much of political bias, but destroys the credibility of your list. It's sad but hardly unexpected that Time has become so biased that it's willing to make itself a laughingstock to make some sort of vapid political point.

*****

"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello

AMEN to the Al Gore article.

AMEN to the Al Gore article. I was eating luch when I read it. Had to stop reading. It was making me sick.

A bonafided and certified member of the beer guzzling, NASCAR watching middle class.

So many people on this list s

So many people on this list shouldn't be there.  I have to laugh at Katie Couric's butt-kissing of Mayor Michael Bloomberg. 

She says he "rebuilt New York City as only a nonpolitician could".  I have to tell you Katie that I'm really loving that new tower at Ground Zero.  When I go up in that new tower, the view takes my breath away.  So many companies have moved back to NYC and taken space in that tower.  Yes Katie, he really has "rebuilt" NYC.  (/sarc off)

what's wrong with no Bush in the top 100?

Given the kind of company he would find himself with, I think it is to Bush's credit that he was left out of Time's top 100 influential people. Clearly these are people who influence the thinking of the small-minded Time's editorial staff, not the world. Just look at how politically correct the selections are...do you really think a white, male, republican could make the cut (barring Roberts).

Time is nothing more than a t

Time is now nothing more than a third-rate tabloid gossip rag that appears to be targeting the Peggy Bundy/brainless twit crowd who sit around in waiting rooms reading People magazine while awaiting their turn with the tattoo artist.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

great description Dave R -

great description Dave R - lol! I should be crying though because it's really true and sad who the average liberal looks up to.

Dee,Actually, I started to sa

Dee,

Actually, I started to say blue hairs riding dryer chairs in a beauty parlor but thought better of it.

Sad that Time has descended even further into the intellectual abyss. Then again, they did name Adolf Hitler as Man of the Year in '38.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

Time magazine is still in p

Time magazine is still in print? Who knew?
WhatAMaroon

Time is to doctors' offices a

Time is to doctors' offices as CNN is to airports - the only places we get exposed to them.

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

After being named "Perso

After being named "Person of the Year," I'm shocked that I was also left off the list.

Sublight

Sub,

Very nice. Chuckle of the week. Give the boy (or girl!) a cigar!  :-)   ns

What about the list by the

What about the list by the people? I found it interesting that President Bush, who wasn't even mentioned on their list, was one of the top vote getters. People who were on their list were already in People's minds and more likely to be thought of for their lists. President Bush was in the Top 15 vote getters despite Time's exclusion of him.

You know, George Clooney is n

You know, George Clooney is not only one of the most influential, he is also, according to the great folks at People Magazine, one of the 100 most beautiful people in the world.  If there was a list of the 100 smartest people in the world, I am sure he would be on that list too.  How can the rest of us schlubs ever hope to be able to compete with someone as great and beautiful as George Clooney?  George Clooney bless us all.

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!´´
--Patrick Henry

Come on, Noel, just becau

Come on, Noel, just because your name doesn't appear on the list, you can't can't get all sore about it.

My name isn't on the list either, and I was angry about it, but I got over it

What has he done to deserve to be on the list?

Please tell me what Bush has done to make this list? I can't come up with anything as hard as I may try.

He is the one single man th

He is the one single man that is keeping the U.S. in Iraq. You cannot deny that. Sounds pretty "influential" to me.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

You say that like it is a goo

You say that like it is a good thing? What he needs to do ,and not only him but the dems also, is figure out a reasonable exit stratagy to get our men and women out of Iraq. Our occupation has to end sometime, it is just a matter of when. We don't need to be there for the next 10 years.

"We don't need to be t

"We don't need to be there for the next 10 years."

Unless, of course, it turns out; that we really need to be there for the next 10 years.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

We have been in Germany, Japa

We have been in Germany, Japan and South Korea for much longer.

Why not get out of those countries first?

 "You can lead a man to Congress, but you can't make him think." - Milton Berle

That is not a very intelligen

That is not a very intelligent statement sir, Our soldiers are not getting blown up in those countries, they are not in grave danger everytime they walk the streets, how can you compare our people being there and in Iraq ?  That is like comparing Brentwood to South central L.A.

Valid

And the expectation is that the military in Iraq will not be in grave danger either.  Once the government is established and takes root, it will be a less hostile environment.  Our military will still be needed, as in Germany, Japan, and Korea.  The comment was valid.

Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"

You can't establish a governm

You can't establish a government that will be effective if those you have in the government are working against it. Before the Iraqi Governemt is going to be able to take root the members Have to function as a single unit not as opposing religions. As long as we are in Iraq we will continue to face danger, there will always be those who do not want American troops in the country and will do whatever it takes to make the point clear. We will always be intruders in that country. I think a couple of more years at most will be needed to get their military up to speed and their Government up to speed and we need to get out and let them experience their growing pains without our people getting killed in the process.

I see bin laden is on the lis

I see bin laden is on the list...

So who's worse in your opinion...bin laden or President Bush...?

They are both sending people

They are both sending people to fight and die for what they believe is right. I will say atleast Bush has a better moralistic quality to it but does it make either man right? Bin Laden is a dirty terrorist coward to myself and most people in the world, How do you think he and his people think about the President?

So we should not have sent me

So we should not have sent men to fight Germany and die in WWII, I mean it was the Japanese who attacked us ... not the Germans.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.

Ah.. but Germany declared war

Ah.. but Germany declared war on the United States. Unlike al Kayda in Iraq.

Oh hang on a second. al Kayda has declared war on the United States.

SEDITION THE MISSION
Harold Reid (D-Feat)

"How do you think he a

"How do you think he and his people think about the President?"

They are probably scared sh*tless of our President. They way I like it. Maybe the next group of facists will think twice before attacking us peace loving Americans.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

"Our soldiers are not

"Our soldiers are not getting blown up in those countries,"

They were the first few years they were there. There are insurgancies in all newly occupied countries.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

...funny that "realistic

...funny that "realistic view" should mention California:

http://victorhanson.com/articles/hanson041206.html

Excellent link TM! "T

Excellent link TM!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Interesting.

Interesting.

You claim:  "There are

You claim:  "There are insurgencies in all newly occupied countries."

How many US service men and women were killed in occupied Japan - say, 1945 to 1950?  Let's not count the poor folks who died from radiation poisoning - I'm talking about shot, blown up, etc.

How many US service men and women were killed in occupied Germany - say, 1945 to 1950?

How many were killed in 194

How many were killed in 1942? The fourth year of the war? What about 1943,1944 and 1945?

If you are really intereste

If you are really interested read this frank.

You're probably right though frank, there were no insurgents in Japan or Germany. Maybe thats why the Allies shipped all their guns and bullets home? What's that frank?, the allies didn't ship their guns and bullets home? I wonder why? After all there was a pacified and peaceful population. Man you REALLY can make a stretch.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

So troops should only be depl

So troops should only be deployed in countries where they will not see action. Interesting concept.

SEDITION THE MISSION
Harold Reid (D-Feat)

Question for realistic_view

RV,

If we pull out of Iraq before the Iraqis are able to go it alone, hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis will most likely die in the resulting chaos.

Is that a price you liberals are willing to pay simply to bring a defeat to a president you hate?

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

Sacrifice our people to save

Sacrifice our people to save theirs? How many should we let die before it is enough to realize that Iraq has bigger issues most that we created. I am not a liberal it is called self preservation. I am glad that Saddam is out and dead, but are their lives any better now than they were before? Democracy doesn't always improve quality of life.

That's a short-sighted view, realistic_view.

That's a blindered and short-sighted view, realistic_view.   Apply, for example, what you said to our Civil War.  It took generations for what was set in motion then to begin to change for the better the lives of many black Americans.  In fact, the change created by that war is still ongoing today.

Further, the level of violence against blacks increased and stayed high for some time after the war....led by the Democtats, I might add.

realistic: You do sound like

realistic: You do sound like a leftie. Liberals are all about self-preservation - usually at the expense of others.

And for my own education, could you expand on the statement that "Democracy doesn't always improve quality of life." Please include your own interpretation of "democracy" and "quality of life".

How about a robust economy? H

How about a robust economy? How about his tax cuts that created so many jobs that the unemployment rate is the lowest ever?

How about his actions in the war on terror (how many attacks have we suffered since 9/11?)

 

"You can lead a man to Congress, but you can't make him think." - Milton Berle

It won't be this year, or n

It won't be this year, or next, but in about three years, you, and others, will understand, what it was he did, or better yet, what he didn't, that was influential

By the same token, please jus

By the same token, please justify why some of the other "less obvious" political choices DID make the list. The President of the United States, by definition, if THE most influential political figure IN THE WORLD, regardless how stupid, out-of-touch, or idealogically-opposite from you he may be.

Bush's decisions, good or bad, create ripple effects that reach every part of the globe. With your statement, one can only assume:

A. You voted for John Kerry in 2004

B. You are not very astute 

C. Both

 

I chose not to vote in 04 as

I chose not to vote in 04 as a matter of fact because I didn't like either person that had a chance of being president. And since my 1 little vote would not have mattered either way I opted out. As for being astute, I don't look at thing in liberal or conservitive don't care about party sides, I look at issues, facts and make a logical choice from there.

Foolish

Anyone who does not vote because "their 1 little vote would not count” is foolish.

Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"

RV,Good. Let's hope that, for

RV,

Good. Let's hope that, for the future success of this republic that you reach a similar conclusion in '08.   :-)

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

Ahh, so your answer is "

Ahh, so your answer is "B".

Roger, you are astute! Tha

Roger, you are astute!

That's right, Roger, I am B.

Good for you, guy, and keep up the good work!

Hey bud, I don't think roge

Hey bud, I don't think roger was talking to you. It's easy to get the wrong message in this medium.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Rog,Sorry, pal, but I have to

Rog,

Sorry, pal, but I have to disagree on one point, as I am fairly certain that RV here was a (gasp!) staunch Nader suporter.   :-)

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

Actually I was hoping Colin P

Actually I was hoping Colin Powell was going to run but I was not so fortunate.

Colin Powell? LOL. Why? Bec

Colin Powell? LOL. Why? Because he's black?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

No race is not an issue for m

No race is not an issue for me, He would have been the best person to fix the government instead we have just gotten worse.

You probably would have lik

You probably would have liked the: more abortion, more gun control, more affirmative action and more gay "rights" that Powell would have "fixed" the government with. Am I close?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

realistic: This issue purport

realistic: This issue purports to name the "Most Influential". If you can get your liberal head out of your arse for a moment, you would have to consider that whether you agree with Pres. Bush's policies or not, he's influential. It seems you fall quite well into the demographic for which this article was published - those who think they're so much smarter than the average conservative, but don't understand a simple concept like "influence".

...furthermore bin laden is o

...furthermore bin laden is on the list - and he seems quite fine with that...hmmm...very telling...

How can President Bush's na

How can President Bush's name NOT be on the list? It makes no sense, so it must be a purely subjective and biased list. If Time had any marketing brains, they would have opened a web site so we could all vote for those on the list.

I'm just glad they don't have the "100 least Influential people" list, because my name would be right at the top! :-)

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

It must be because they all k

It must be because they all know President Bush's Iraq Policies are not the biggest foreign policy blunder in our history.  >>> They must all be seeing the writing on the wall that it is indeed Clinton's failure to go into Iraq that is indeed our greatest foreign policy blunder.  

How much longer will we just be cleaning up Clinton's mistakes?

I am still having difficulty coming up with a single positive thing during Clinton years that was actually by Clinton and not just inspite of Clinton and just a natural economic occurance post Persian Gulf War and end of Cold War economy.  ???  I am looking in the world of art as well in such thinking.

How many rights of Iraqies was he regularly willing to compromise away? 

Not making this list is probably good news for President Bush.

"I am still having diffi

"I am still having difficulty coming up with a single positive thing during Clinton years that was actually by Clinton"

He signed the Defense of Marriage Act.  (It's the only correct decision he made in eight years).

How bout

How ‘bout record high stock market and low unemployment?  Wait a second….why does that sound familiar…..

Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"

How dare TM forget to mention

How dare TM forget to mention the First Lady of Cuba! ! !

Hugo Chavez

Noel, your list is not cor

Noel, your list is not correct. You left off some of the party affiliations...

  • Beijing Communist Party Leader Liu Qi (D - China)
  • Fidel Castro’s brother Raul (D - Cuba)
  • China’s President Hu Jintao (D - China)
  • Ayatullah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader (D - Iran)
  • German Chancellor Angela Merkel (D - Germany)
  • Osama bin Laden (D - Al Qaeda)

When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

Time

So who are these folks influencing?  And what is their influence?   As for the lefties on the list, I find they almost without fail have the wrong answer to whatever the question is.  How influential is that?

Jerry

Jerry,

Excellent. Bravo. You are correct. However, if I added such designations, one could make the case that I was being as biased as Time, correct?  :-)     ns

"one could make the

"one could make the case that I was being as biased as Time, correct?"

Whoa.. that's a stretch. Time has attained the Black Belt of Bias. Your transgression would only place you at the Draw String level.

You are right of course, in that you must remain above the fray while unbiasedly reporting liberal bias - keep up the good work.

When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

This is the best news of the

This is the best news of the year!!

Finally, after years of pretending otherwise, PRESIDENT BUSH IS NOT TO BLAME for all those things he is daily blamed for. How could be be blamed, now, for anything, by anyone? HE'S NOT INFLUENTIAL ENOUGH to cause any concern, according to Time.

I'd like to see how they spin their way out of this one.

Time

Who what a surprise...a liberal rag...Time mag.....naming liberals as most influential......Maybe they mean "most flatulence"?? Whatever, their full of gas......

Time

Who what a surprise...a liberal rag...Time mag.....naming liberals as most influential......Maybe they mean "most flatulence"?? Whatever, their full of gas......

If I were Bush I would be gla

If I were Bush I would be glad NOT to be included in a list of crazy people.

Osama? Didn't he kill Americans for kicks?

Brian Willaims?

Chris Hanson was waaay more influential at NBC than Brian Williams. Just think of all the predators he put in jail! We should sent him to Afganistan and tell Osama "Why don't you take a seat overthere......"

This whole list is a joke. Its like a 100-point piece of evidence proving their bias. Yet, when they get called on it, they will say "we included Condi, so this shows we are objective and balanced."

Were there any conservative

Were there any conservative news figures named to the list? Did O'Reilly make the list? With Fox News often taking in more viewers than the other cable shows combined I would think a nod would be appropriate to their influence. If not then it is a blatant attempt to try make themselves more relevant by voting themselves as 'best in show'.

If you take Condi out and present this list to the public without the Title and what would the average American label it? maybe...

Time Magazines list of Americas's most influential liberals.

nifty -- good point.Given tha

nifty -- good point.

Given that lib***ls are OBSESSED to the point of unhinged with the alleged influence of Fox News in general, and O'Reilly in particular, it is odd that neither made the list.

SEDITION THE MISSION
Harold Reid (D-Feat)

Nifty and Jack: Exactly. Well

Nifty and Jack: Exactly. Well said.

IMO, many on this list do not

IMO, many on this list do not qualify as influential. "Influential" suggests that the person has somehow made a difference. Not that said person received a lot of media attention. As I see it, Pres. Bush was not snubbed. Time magazine just doesn't understand the meaning of the word. If they did, Pres. Bush would be on the list - whether one agrees with his policies or not.

Well, at least the video game

Well, at least the video gamer in me is happy to see Shigrieu Myamoto make the list...

Uzumaki/Ayanami '08. Because a ninja and an Eva pilot can govern the nation better that what we have now...

Okay, let me get this strai

Okay, let me get this straight...

G.W. Bush = not influential

Tyra Banks = one of the 100 Most Influential People in the World

I guess that pretty much sums up the depth to which Time's credibility has sunk...

~~~
If Hillary is the answer, it must've been a stupid question...

Time belongs at the end of th

Time belongs at the end of the supermarket checkout right next to the Weekly World News. Or as my British friend calls them, the "Scandal Sheets".

Time ...a filthy filthy lefti

Time ...a filthy filthy leftist rag...and they have NewsWeek to follow up after them.

The ViewI can't believe that

The ViewI can't believe that Rosie made Time's influential list - were they high?  Rosie hasn't influenced anybody!  But that's not what I wanted to rant about on here.  When Barbara was telling the audience on The View that Rosie was listed on Time's list, she did it in a backhanded compliment kind of way.  She mentioned Rosie being listed and then she said that she had written to Time about Rosie, but then she changed it after Rosie made the announcement she wasn't going to be returning on The VIew - interesting.  Wonder what she changed.  Would love to see the first draft on that.

Then Barbara focuses the reset of her monologue on who didn't make it onto the list and listed herself first, then paused, then listed other journalists.  Rosie's reaction was like - sorry you didn't make it on the list, and Elisabeth stated it might be because Barbara and other journalists who didn't make it on the list can't give their true opinion on things - needing to be fair and balanced when reporting news, but that didn't seem to justify the reason Barbara wasn't added to Time's list.

I don't know.  It just seemed to me that Barbara is jealous of Rosie.  She mentions Rosie being listed like a good thing, but then focuses the rest of the segment on her not being listed.  Wah, wah, wah!  Poor wawa.  Kind of like when she wanted sympathy from the audience when she was held up from walking home because of the Presidential motorcade and she complained that Bush isn't King and that she should be allowed to walk home because she's journialistic royalty.

And  another thing on that episode a couple days ago, Elisabeth mentioned she was invited to the presidential state dinner.  Barbara had to intervene and tell her and everyone else that she's been to that before, how it's a big deal, an honor, and started to tell her how things are done there, policies, procedures, orders of events, dress codes, and how she should laminate the menu, etc.  It's like no one else at that table can have a good experience without Barbara raining on their parade acting like it's no big deal, she's been through it first, yadda, yadda, yadda.

I'm glad Rosie is leaving the View, but wa wa needs to go too.  She's not relatable, likable or respectable.  She's all holier than thou and she acts like her crap doesn't stink.  SHE should leave The View.

-----------------------
Oh, um, it's Thursday, but Dwight thinks it's Friday. So...keep that going.

Dont folks that  have done t

Dont folks that  have done the most damage to the world included in the most influential list.? If so,  I would always vote for Bush .

A free press is one of the first things to go in a totalitarian government. Montana Lyons

OMG - that line about Al Gore

OMG - that line about Al Gore knowing more about science than anyone else alive is a riot.  Kind of like Tom Cruise is the end-all-say-all of scientology.  What a bunch of idiots to reign him as king on that field.  Give me a break. 

Al Gore, Rosie O'Donnell, Tyra Banks, Castro's brother, China president, my gosh.  Was the panel stoned when making this list?  What a joke. 

----------------------------------------
Oh, um, it's Thursday, but Dwight thinks it's Friday. So...keep that going.

~ From "The Office"