Foul Shot: Sports Illustrated Compares NBA Teams to Democrat Contenders

Photo of Tim Graham.

Sports Illustrated has this annoying tendency to serve up its sports coverage with a side dish of liberal politics. On its website, basketball writer Jack McCallum wrote of deciding to compare Democratic presidential candidates to NBA playoff teams after watching the Democrats debate on C-SPAN in the middle of the night after some spicy quesadillas.

He began by lauding Mike Gravel's routine of poking Barack Obama about which country America should "nuke" next. "So there you are -- Gravel is the Golden State Warriors. A feisty, combative, in-your-face underdog who loves the public stage." Later, McCallum added to the comparison: "Unorthodox and even a little scary, both are trying to overcome the odds with offense." Here are the other comparisons, enough to ruin the day of a conservative fan of any of these teams:

Chicago Bulls = Dennis Kucinich: Undersized but confident and intelligent. Neither team nor candidate will go away even if some say they have no chance of advancing any farther.

Cleveland Cavaliers = Joe Biden: The Cavs, like the candidate, seem awfully confident and even haughty. But they make critical mistakes and haven't shown they can close.

Dallas Mavericks = Hillary Clinton: The target everyone was gunning for from the beginning. No-nonsense and business-like, both candidate and team have a strong male figure behind the throne, one named Bill, one named Mark. As with Hillary, it was the Mavs' to lose ... and they just might lose it.

Phoenix Suns = John Edwards: Neat, clean, fun and articulate, with a strong chance of proving they are not third best.

Detroit Pistons = Barack Obama: Both team and candidate are poised almost to the point of smugness and both are a strong favorite to make the Final Two. But get either of them in a tight spot and they know how to mix it up, and, possibly, even self-destruct.

San Antonio Spurs = Bill Richardson: A strong resume and an understated way of getting things done. In many respects, in fact, the best in the field. But both team and candidate are often overlooked and undervalued.

Houston Rockets (or Utah Jazz or New Jersey Nets) = Christopher Dodd: All three teams have a track record, they're kind of hanging around and, like the veteran senator from Connecticut, their face is familiar. But no one is quite sure if they're really in the race.

I'm sure it's safe for McCallum to call Edwards "clean" and "articulate," but it might be more politically troublesome (a la Biden) to use those adjectives for the Suns.

(Hat tip: NewsBusters reader Johnny Du)

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It boils down to 2 simple ver

It boils down to 2 simple verses ...

Proverbs 26:7

The legs of the lame are not equal: so is a parable in the mouth of fools.

Proverbs 26:9

As a thorn goeth up into the hand of a drunkard, so is a parable in the mouth of fools.

Sports reporting is too often lame enough without injecting politics into it.

And the there are fools aple

And the there are fools aplenty, eh Stanley? 

In tabloid sports journalism

In tabloid sports journalism and on the left side of the political spectrum, you bet.

Shocked I am!  Shocked and a

Shocked I am!  Shocked and appalled that the Rockets would be compared to a Democrat, much less Chris Dodd.  Sure, Les Alexander (the owner) is kind of slap happy and his wife is the one who didn't want McDonalds as a sponsor at one time because they use *gasp* meat in their hamburgers.  That has "Democrat" written all over it.  But just because the boss is a little loopy doesn't mean the employees are (see: Dilbert).  However reporters are almost always off the deep end and we've seen what happens when they get into politics (K.O.). Eeeuww, I feel dirty just writing his initials.

When a liberal speaks, the truth is busy elsewhere.

I can't agree or disagree wit

I don't agree with politics in a sports magazine, and I can't agree or disagree with the comparisons, because I'm not a sports fan. But actually I thought they were kind of imaginative and funny.

He stroked and flattered the

He stroked and flattered the impenitent liberals in the bunch and knocked the Dems best candidate ... Obama.

Daniel 11:32

And such as do wickedly against the covenant shall he corrupt by flatteries: but the people that do know their God shall be strong, and do exploits.

I haven't read a Sports Illus

I haven't read a Sports Illustrated (or any other sports periodical) for years, and one of the major reasons is writing like this.  I long for the days when sports writers and sportscasters gave us the straight story without meandering all over the cultural landscape searching for irrelevent analogies.  It's particularly bad when they wander into "sport is a metaphor for life" terrirtory, and vice versa.

Where did it start?  Howard Cosell?  Vin Scully?  Maybe it naturally evolved when writers and sportscasters began commanding salaries higher than the athletes they were covering, and began to assume that we all wanted to know more about them and their philosophies.

But few things on television irritate me more than when sportscasters start talking about some movie, or personality, or whatever, while ignoring the action on the playing field/court/ice.  Hey, I don't care their favorite restaurant in Milwaukee, or what they thought of some political debate, or man's quest for relevance in an infinite, cold universe.  Call the game, or write about the sport in striaght forward terms, and spare us the useless, idiotic prose. 

I know, it drives me crazy

I know, it drives me crazy when my husband is watching sports. I say "Can't they shut up for just 10 seconds?????" And the answer, of course, is No. They are not allowed to have any dead air time. And let's face it, there is only so much one can say about the game going on. So they fill in the time with chatter and nonsense that would be called idiotic "girl talk" if it were coming from women.