Update: Video, audio links for interview below the jump.
It is rare for a mainstream media journalist to openly criticize the media’s coverage of a particular issue. But that is exactly what CNN’s Lou Dobbs did on Tuesday’s "American Morning." In an interview with co-host Kiran Chetry, Dobbs blasted the media’s coverage of illegal immigration, saying "They're selling an agenda. And they're not applying critical judgment. And critical judgment and skepticism is our job as journalists. We're talking about comprehensive immigration legislation as reform. We're using the word 'reform' as if it were true. There's no skepticism."
Dobbs’s interview was part of "American Morning’s" coverage of pro-illegal immigration rallies on May Day, the traditional socialist workers’ holiday. When asked if any progress had been made in the past year concerning illegal immigration, Dobbs said that "we're making, at the margin, progress, but it's at the margin, " and that there was some better enforcement at the border. He then criticized one of the Congressional immigration reform proposals, the Flake-Gutierrez immigration bill, calling it "an absurdity."
Dobbs also answered a couple of questions that were sent in by viewers. Dobbs continued his criticism of the mainstream media in his answer to the first question, which dealt with illegal immigrants’ impact on the economy. "Has anybody on this broadcast, any news organization in the country, said, wait a minute, why in the world are we worrying about illegal immigration into this country and their -- and their situation, before we're worrying about how long it takes to become a lawful immigrant in to this country and what we're doing with people who are playing by the rules? This is upside down. It's wrongheaded. And it is simply, to me, a travesty that mainstream media journalists are not focusing on the facts."
Kiran Chetry also interviewed Eddie Sotelo, a talk show host on a Spanish-language radio station in Los Angeles, on the subject of illegal immigration. Sotelo helped promote last year’s May Day rallies for illegal immigration.
Video (6:30): Real (4.77 MB), or Windows (3.98 MB), plus MP3 (2.97 MB)
Key excerpts from Lou Dobbs's interview:
CHETRY: What progress have we made, if any, from last year?
DOBBS: Well, I think that there is some better enforcement at the border, but the fact is we still have a million apprehensions at the border. And that means, according to the Border Patrol's rough yardstick, somewhere between two to three times those caught. And let's call it a number of about a million getting in illegally each year. And whether the number is a half million or a million, the fact is the government doesn't know. We're making, at the margin, progress, but it's at the margin....
CHETRY: The president's proposal -- and I want to get your thoughts on this -- is the three-year work visa. They pay money for it. They have to return to their home country, apply for residency, pay a fine, and can come back. Now, no one likes that. The immigrant groups don't like it either.
DOBBS: It's idiotic. And the fact that the president of the United States, the fact that the Congress of the United States, and the Democratic leadership, particularly in the Senate, could put this legislation before the American people -- the Flake-Gutierrez bill, 700 pages of utter nonsense that, frankly, no one in Congress has read. But it's an absurdity. It's amnesty. It would cost this country a fortune. And for what? The issue is secure borders. The issue is not 12 to 20 million illegal aliens in this country. The issue is enforcing the law.
You know, it's fascinating to me to look down at that lower third. You see that, Kiran? It says 'Immigration Nation.' What in the devil does that mean?
CHETRY: Well, we put it there because it rhymes, I think. It rhymes.
DOBBS: OK. I mean, but everyone should ask themselves, what is the mainstream media in this country doing? They're selling an agenda. And they're not applying critical judgment. And critical judgment and skepticism is our job as journalists. We're talking about comprehensive immigration legislation as reform. We're using the word 'reform' as if it were true. There's no skepticism.
Everyone, every journalist has the responsibility to look at what's happening. And instead, I listen to Chris Lawrence and Alina Cho, standing before the Statue of Liberty, talking about the heartbreaking, the horrible experiences of many illegal immigrants coming into this country. All of which is true, but not on point, because the fact is that four industries in which illegal aliens are the predominant employee -- that is landscaping, that is leisure and hospitality, and now construction -- wages in all four of those industries have declined over the last five years.
Where is the shortage of labor? If there was a shortage, those wages would moving higher. This is propaganda, and it's got to stop. And the mainstream media has a responsibility to challenge this nonsense....
CHETRY: One person, William from New York, asked, 'How can we deport people when our economy depends on them?' You spoke to this issue just a moment ago.
DOBBS: Sure.
CHETRY: Don't we need illegal immigrants here?
DOBBS: You do not need illegal immigrants at any time in this country. This is -- I wish it would say instead of 'Immigration Nation,' it said 'Nation of Laws.'
We need immigrants in this country. That's why we bring in more than two million. Has anybody over the past hour on this broadcast or this network reported, or any other network, reported that we bring in more than two million immigrants into this country lawfully each and every year? Has anybody on this broadcast, any news organization in the country, said, wait a minute, why in the world are we worrying about illegal immigration into this country and their -- and their situation, before we're worrying about how long it takes to become a lawful immigrant in to this country and what we're doing with people who are playing by the rules? This is upside down. It's wrongheaded. And it is simply, to me, a travesty that mainstream media journalists are not focusing on the facts.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
They're selling an agenda
May 1, 2007 - 16:31 ET by NoMoreClintonsThey're selling an agenda
Wake up, Lou. It's not the only agenda they're selling.
Kiran was showing some seriou
May 1, 2007 - 16:32 ET by Prester JohnKiran was showing some serious leg this morning.
Not that I'm complaining.
CHETRY: Don't we need illegal
May 1, 2007 - 16:33 ET by NoMoreClintonsCHETRY: Don't we need illegal immigrants here?
What a brainwashed ditz.
May 1, 2007 - 16:34 ET by NoMoreClintons
It's the only way this airhead will get any viewers.
(should have been reply to PJ)
"You do not need illegal immi
May 1, 2007 - 16:43 ET by happyuscitizen"You do not need illegal immigrants at any time in this country. This is -- I wish it would say instead of 'Immigration Nation,' it said 'Nation of Laws.'"
Enough said the argument can't be made any clearer than that.
As far as families being broken up, then the onus falls upon the illegal parents. If they are really concerned about families being displaced, now should be the time for the parents whom have put their children in such a precarious situation, migrate back to whence they came.
"I'm just a big fat hairy American Winning Machine!" - Ricky Bobby
Congratualtions to Lou Dobbs
May 1, 2007 - 17:03 ET by GalvanicCongratualtions to Lou Dobbs for getting something right.
Lou Dobbs has been fantastic
May 1, 2007 - 22:00 ET by dahliatraversLou Dobbs has been fantastic on this issue from the beginning. Good for him for criticizing the msm for their erroneous, biased coverage of illegal immigration.
Well, all reporters can't be
May 1, 2007 - 17:08 ET by SMGalbraithWell, all reporters can't be as professional and objective as you, Mr. Dobbs.
Right.
His point has merit; but he's not exactly the source one wants to hear it from (does anyone think Dobbs doesn't use his show to promote an agenda?).
SMG
'Immigrant' Song 2007
May 1, 2007 - 19:14 ET by Six String SpiffAh, ah,
We come from the lands Fox (Vicente) and Co.
From the broken fence where the Rio flows
The floating wood, will carry our kin.
To fight the citizens, singing and crying: El Presidente (Bush), I am coming!
On we sweep through the widening door, Our only goal will be to make you poor..
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of Fox and Co.
From the broken fence where the Rio flows.
How fast we steal your green, your laws that we ignore
Of how we started the alien war. We are your overlords.
On we sweep through the widening door, Our only goal will be to make you poor.
So now if you're a cop, your job you will be losing
Pull us over and sensitivity trainin' is all you'll be doin..
Copyright (C) 2007 Six String Spiff
Islam should have it's religious status revoked until it can prove it's not a hate group.
And it is simply, to me, a
May 1, 2007 - 22:56 ET by JDWAnd it is simply, to me, a travesty that mainstream media journalists are not focusing on the facts.
He is absolutely correct yet the news media realizes exactly what they are doing. These ardillas from down south, if granted 'free amnesty', would probably have more rights than us - they would! As Mejicanos they would be considered minorities, as a result of affirmative action... they'd have all kinds of 'first choices' in education, lower rates, and lower taxes...
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
Everyone seems to declare t
May 1, 2007 - 23:06 ET by happyuscitizenEveryone seems to declare that children of illegal immigrants that are born in the United States are automatically citizens under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States but here is a little history lesson out there for those who are concerned about the families.
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
"Following the Civil War, Congress submitted to the states three amendments as part of its Reconstruction program to guarantee equal civil and legal rights to black citizens. The major provision of the 14th amendment was to grant citizenship to All persons born or naturalized in the United States, thereby granting citizenship to former slaves. Another equally important provision was the statement that nor shall any state deprive any person of live, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The right to due process of law and equal protection of the law now applied to both the Federal and state governments. On June 16, 1866, the House Joint Resolution proposing the 14th amendment to the was submitted to the states. On July 28, 1868, the 14th amendment was declared, in a certificate of the Secretary of State, ratified by the necessary 28 of the 37 States, and became part of the supreme law of the land." http://www.historicaldocuments.com/14thAmendment.htm
Now with all of that said and done I contend that it was justified in extending the rights of citizenship to freed slaves due to the simple fact that Americans had brought them or their ancestors against their will and even if they were to return to Africa it would be a difficult assimilation process back to Africa much like was encountered when Liberia was founded and populated with former slaves.
Ironic that I would have the gall to mention assimilation. I have all confidence that aforementioned freed slaves returning to Africa would in fact attempt wholeheartedly in assimilating to life in Africa, embracing the lanuguage of the land, its culture, traditions, and LOCAL LAWS!
This amendment needs to be interpreted as it was intended. If those whom are in our country in a legal status then and only then should the priviledge of US Citizenship be extended to their offspring. Legal visas = Legal Citizens.
These people have no vested interest in our country, and do not desire to assimilate at all.
I was on the train today and saw these three of these illegals with their tri-color flags with the chicken and the worm on it, being worn like El Superman capes, on the way to the "Day Without A (Insert the ethnicity of your favorite illegal alien), Part Deux". Needless to say I noticed the glare of contempt of my fellow passengers on these folks and it was not unnoticed by the three bandidos.
It was so uncomfortable for them, that they felt less than invincible after a older women with a Caribbean accent chastised them for not respecting the laws and waiting to come to this country like she and her family did. After being called out for their act of hubris they promptly removed and folded their capes and sat there deflated.
I was proud to be an American today and of all places in an East coast city in Libtard territory!
"I'm just a big fat hairy American Winning Machine!" - Ricky Bobby
Great point, happy.
May 5, 2007 - 15:20 ET by dahliatraversGreat point, happy.
"Give me your tired, you
May 2, 2007 - 00:25 ET by gordon"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. The wretched refuse of your teeming shore."
And so the wretched refuse of Mexico came, like hungry mosquitos, to the yellow porchlight of America.
Good on ya, Lou! He calls 'em like he sees 'em.