'Early Show' Host Harry Smith Pounds Tony Snow With Pullout 'Majority' -- Or Is There?

Photo of Justin McCarthy.

Harry Smith, who has a habit of double standards when conducting interviews, hammered returning White House press secretary Tony Snow on April 30's edition of The Early Show. After discussing Snow’s cancer treatment, Smith said "let’s go to work." Snow stated what many believe, that incorporated timetables are a stunt. An astonished Harry Smith interrupted and harshly inquired: "So the White House regards this, their, their insistence on troop withdrawals as a stunt?"

Snow, who previously accused Harry Smith of sounding like a partisan, immediately backpedaled, but pointed out that the current bill is "something [the Democrats] knew was never going to get passed." After Snow mentioned that Democrats "exhausted nearly three months doing this," Smith retorted "with the support of the American people by the way." Although it is true that, according to CBS’s own poll, 64 percent of Americans do support a timetable for withdrawal, they also found when they asked if Congress should allow continued troop funding without a timetable if it comes to that, 56 percent said yes. Harry never mentioned that polling result.

Tony Snow responded to Smith's "majority" poke:

SNOW: Well, you know, I think if you ask the American people, do you want to bind the hands of our troops, do you want to put in a timetable that military advisers think is inadvisable --

SMITH: The question was asked, do we want -- do the American people want troops out of Iraq? And they basically said by two-thirds majority, yes.

But Smith left out the following CBS poll question:

"The Democrats in Congress have proposed to fund the Iraq war only if the U.S. sets a timetable for troop withdrawal, too. George W. Bush has stated he will veto that proposal. If George W. Bush does veto it, what should the Democrats in Congress do next: should they try to withhold funding for the war until George W. Bush accepts a timetable for troop withdrawal, or should they allow funding for the war, even if there is no timetable?"

In this response, by a margin of 56 to 36 the American people say "allow funding." The relevant portion of the transcript is below.

HARRY SMITH: The president's chief spokesman, Tony Snow, goes back to work today as White House press secretary after a month of cancer treatment. He joins us now. Good morning, Mr. Snow.

TONY SNOW: Good morning, Harry.

SMITH: You've had your surgery. You're about to embark on a series of chemotherapy treatments. How are you feeling?

SNOW: Feeling great. Basically, I've spent the last four weeks healing up from surgery as you pointed out. We'll start chemo on Friday, we'll probably do about four months of chemo and then what we're really trying to do Harry is knock this cancer into remission for good. That means I'll probably be doing follow-up chemo for quite a while. But, feeling great and happy to be back at work.

SMITH: We tend to dwell on business matters here. This is quite personal. Why are you insistent on going back to work?

SNOW: I'm not insistent. I love my job and I feel good. You got to keep in mind, I've been through this before. I had cancer treatment a couple years ago, went through six months of chemo and worked through that as well. Harry, I think what happens a lot of times with cancer is that people get so scared when they hear the term that they think somehow your life ends. It doesn't. As a matter of fact, we live in an age of medical miracles. I've got some of the best medical treatment on the face of the earth. We think we're going to be fine through all this. And if I didn't think I was able to serve the president fully, I wouldn't be here. But I do feel that I can do my job and I'm glad to be back at it.

SMITH: What does the president say?

SNOW: Well, the president and I talked a bit earlier. He said, look, you stay out as long as you need to, you get healthy, and you come back. He said we could be phone buddies. But I figured he's been pretty busy, so I haven't tried burden him too much for his time.

SMITH: Alright, let's go to work work, then. The president has this troop funding bill on his desk. He promises-- or soon to anyway-- promises to veto it. But he says let's all get together at the White House on Wednesday. Does that mean there's wiggle room?

SNOW: Well, it's going to be interesting. Look, the ball's in the Democrats' court right now. They have known for nearly three months that you can't put in timetables, you can't be trying to tell the president or the troops how to run the war. What you have to do is have to support the forces. They have known this and, nevertheless, they proceeded with what amounts to a stunt. Okay, they've had their way. They got the bill passed in House and Senate. The veto --

SMITH: Hang on. So the White House regards this, their, their insistence on troop withdrawals as a stunt?

SNOW: Well, let me put it this way. That was my word. Let me be a little more temperate. It's my first day back so here's what I think it is: It is something that they knew was never going to get passed. It was never going to get passed. They knew the veto was going to be sustained, but they decided that they would go forward with it anyway. They've exhausted nearly three months doing this.

SMITH: With the support of the American people, by the way.

SNOW: Well, you know, I think if you ask the American people, do you want to bind the hands of our troops, do you want to put in a timetable that military advisers think is inadvisable --

SMITH: The question was asked, do we want -- do the American people want troops out of Iraq? And they basically said by two-thirds majority, yes.

SNOW: Yes, but you know what, Harry? If you also ask, do you want to bind the general's hands, they say the same thing. It's interesting, you can ask a question and get any answer you want. The reason I was trying to give you a fuller answer is, if you ask the American people, do you to want to handcuffs our troops, do you want to do something that our generals think is inadvisable, that the enemy---that our allies think is inadvisable, that regional powers think is inadvisable, that the Iraqi people think is inadvisable, they'd probably say, wow, that doesn't sound very good. If you say, do you want to support the troops? The answer is yes. Do you want the troops home? Yeah, of course we do.

—Justin McCarthy is a news analyst at Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Twisted Media Logic

So what kind of Citizen wouldn't want the troops to come home from Iraq?  Now if you ask them do you want them to leave regradless of the consequences, you won't get such a resounding yes.  Ask how many would love to be millionaires, I bet all of them.  Ask them if they want to be millionaires if they have to kill someone for it and maybe you get a different answer from most of them.  Tony Snow was right, you can get any answer you want, if you phrase the question correctly.  As usual, the MSM is playing it loose with the truth of the question they ask and the answers they receive on this issue.

I have three words for good o

I have three words for good ole' Harry: ASK THE TROOPS!!!

Ask the troops who are in harm's way if they want to leave before they complete their mission. Ask the troops who are far from home and family if a precipitous or even scheduled withdrawal is warranted. Ask the troops if they feel a sense of accomplishment, or if they too feel the "war is lost". Ask the troops how the normal Iraqi citizen feels about them being there. Ask the troops how they feel about the rhetoric being bandied about by the Dems and the press. Ask the troops who they feel is truly supporting them.

ASK THE TROOPS Harry, ASK THE TROOPS...

The Closed Mind Builds Strong Barriers

WELCOME BACK TONY!You are the

WELCOME BACK TONY!

You are the best thing, other than the President, in this administration.

The Lord has answered our prayers!

While I am glad for Tony's

While I am glad for Tony's return to better health, I am not glad for any Republicans being in office at the moment. As far as I am concerned, they all must go. They are all worthless. Unless the speak out against the traitors Pelosi and Reid, they are worthless. Tony almost had it, then turned yellow and took the cowards road.

There are no republicans, save for maybe... just maybe, Giuliani, who have the guts to call Pelosi and Reid the gutless traitors they are. Who has the guts to stand up to the idiotic politicians in Washington? Certainly no republican so far has proven they could.

Worthless.... just worthless.

____________________________________________________

"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine

Yes, Mr Snow hit it right on

Yes, Mr Snow hit it right on in the polling farce: it's how one frames the question.
Actually, Goldberg's last  column, "The will of the uninformed," was a hoot on the nonsensical issue of polls.  Read it if a good laugh is needed, and too bad Tony didnt quote it today.

Numbers schmumbers. The fello

Numbers schmumbers.

The fellow on this link isn't a lefty from CBS:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWZjMDBlZDg2MDlmMDM4MmE1MGFmNjlkOTE5OWVkOTc=

His conservative bona fides are pretty solid.

Will Tony Snow/Bush be as cr

Will Tony Snow/Bush be as critical of the Iraqi Parliment taking a two month vacation while the troops have their tours extended to 15 months?

Non-sequitur Ding.   The Pr

Non-sequitur Ding.  

The President is trying to work for the good of the American people and all you do is harp and help the terrorists.

RJ -  Tell this mother tha

RJ -  Tell this mother that she is helping the terrorists.

Our soldiers are shedding their blood to help a country that is a shambles, and their politicians are taking a two-month vacation! This is a slap in the face to the soldiers and their families, not to mention to the citizens of Iraq.

No, she is justifiably complaining, while you help the terrorist

No, she is justifiably complaining about the Iraqi politicans.  That does not directly help the terrorists.

You, on the other hand, directly encourage the terrorists by blaming President Bush for everything that goes wrong.  You try to turn everything you see (even that woman's letter) into an anti-Bush rant.

I read a story today about how the terrorists are becoming more and more sophisticated at using our anti-war media to their advantage.  You can be certain that they are just as good at using 5th column people like you to their advantage, too.

RJ - Bush has said 'As Iraqis

RJ - Bush has said 'As Iraqis Stand Up, We Will Stand Down".    When will Tony Snow criticize the Iraqi parliment for taking a two month vacation instead standing up?

Non sequitur, Ding.The Presid

Non sequitur, Ding.

The President is trying to work for the good of the American people and all you can do is harp and encourage the terrorists, like the good little 5th columnist you are. 

RJ,When will ding let go of h

RJ,

When will ding let go of his dong?

RJ:It seems our friend Ding i

RJ:

It seems our friend Ding is suffering from the same pathology of self-hatred that J Frank Wilson suffers from.  And just like J Frank, he transposes this self hatred onto his nation, attempting to belittle even its most noble efforts.

1.)  Bring up the fact that we have freed millions of Afghans from religious tyranny, he will complain that we were not able to catch Bin Ladin before he fled to Pakistan.

2.)  Bring up the fact that Iraqi's are finally free from a repressive ruler and that democracy is slowly but surely being constructed, he will bitch about a vacation.

You just gotta wonder what this pathology of self hatred is all about....

Harry Smith is no "reporter"

History contains numerous examples of personalities who achieved standing within their social circles only to be forgotten once their generation is gone. The banality of Mr. Smith's "interviews" indicate that he'll be forgotten soon enough.