CNN: Bush 'Cuts' Threaten Effort to Fight Obesity in Poor


Update at bottom of post.

On Saturday afternoon, CNN Newsroom ran a report by Dr. Sanjay Gupta in which the CNN medical correspondent plugged a proposal for the WIC (Women, Infants and Children) program to begin supplying vouchers for fruits and vegetables to its recipients to combat obesity in the poor, and fretted that budget cuts by President Bush could "threaten" a proposed plan to do so. Recounting that the problem for WIC recipients when the program was created 30 ago was "malnutrition, not obesity," Gupta relayed plans by the Agriculture Department to supply vouchers for fruits and vegetables. But Gupta cautioned that because Bush is planning to put WIC on the "chopping block," the plan may be endangered. Gupta: "But some say that might not happen because WIC is on the chopping block, slated for a $145 million cut in President Bush's 2008 budget. ... Nutritionists say that's not good because the WIC produce vouchers could help control obesity." (Transcript follows)

At about 5:43 p.m., the report began with Gupta introducing a mother who receives food vouchers from WIC who "needs help when it comes to feeding and taking care of her year-old baby." He then informed viewers that because at the time of the program's creation malnutrition was the major problem, there are plans to reform the program now that obesity has become the major problem. Gupta: "Since WIC was founded over 30 years ago, thoughts on nutrition have changed. You see, the problem then was malnutrition, not obesity. So most WIC vouchers are for cereal, breads, crackers, milk products. Checks for fresh fruits and vegetables don't exist. So last August, the U.S. Department of Agriculture decided to add produce to the voucher system to give clients a more balanced diet."

The CNN correspondent then warned viewers that President Bush's proposed cuts could hold up the proposed changes for WIC, and played a soundbite of Reverend Douglas Greenaway of the National WIC Association, who warned that Bush's proposal to make budget cuts "threatens the availability of fresh frozen fruits and vegetables" that could reduce obesity in the poor.

Gupta: "They're expected to be available next year, but some say that might not happen because WIC is on the chopping block, slated for a $145 million cut in President Bush's 2008 budget."

Reverend Douglas Greenaway, National WIC Association: "It really threatens the availability of fresh frozen fruits and vegetables, the culturally diverse foods, the changes that are needed to reduce the incidence of obesity and overweight that we're finding amongst WIC mothers and children."

Gupta: "Nutritionists say that's not good because the WIC produce vouchers could help control obesity."

After a soundbite of a nutritionist informing viewers of the potential health benefits of reforming the program, Gupta concluded that until Congress decides how to fund the proposed changes, "mothers like Corina Alvarez will have to continue waiting for produce checks to become available."

Below is a complete transcript of Gupta's story from the Saturday April 28 CNN Newsroom, which ran about 5:43 p.m.:

Sanjay Gupta: "Although her husband works, Corina Alvarez still needs help when it comes to feeding and taking care of her year-old baby."

Corina Alvarez, WIC recipient: "I like for them to give me ideas and I'm a new mom."

Gupta: "So every month Alvarez receives checks for food from WIC. Now, this is a federal grant program, and it's designed to improve the health of low-income women and their children by providing food and counseling on good eating and health care."

Reverend Douglas Greenaway, National WIC Association: "The foods that WIC provides are really the tools that reinforce that nutrition education message that's delivered in 10,000 WIC clinics around the country."

Gupta: "Since WIC was founded over 30 years ago, thoughts on nutrition have changed. You see, the problem then was malnutrition, not obesity. So most WIC vouchers are for cereal, breads, crackers, milk products. Checks for fresh fruits and vegetables don't exist. So last August, the U.S. Department of Agriculture decided to add produce to the voucher system to give clients a more balanced diet. They're expected to be available next year, but some say that might not happen because WIC is on the chopping block, slated for a $145 million cut in President Bush's 2008 budget."

Greenaway: "It really threatens the availability of fresh frozen fruits and vegetables, the culturally diverse foods, the changes that are needed to reduce the incidence of obesity and overweight that we're finding amongst WIC mothers and children."

Gupta: "Nutritionists say that's not good because the WIC produce vouchers could help control obesity."

Katherine Tallmadge, American Dietetic Association: "Studies have shown that women and children and infants who participate in the program have improved nutrition, mothers give birth to fewer low-birthweight babies, which saves medical costs."

Gupta: "Congress is now debating the finances for WIC. The final decision will likely come in the fall. Until then, mothers like Corina Alvarez will have to continue waiting for produce checks to become available. Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN, reporting."

Update/Related Posts:

CNN's Gupta Prescribes Democratic Talking Point (Michael M. Bates, NewsBusters)

CNN Doc: We Need More Handouts for the Obese (Julia Seymour, BMI)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I saw a good analysis the o

I saw a good analysis the other day that this was only a cut of the administrative overhead related to the program and passing it down the line along with a real funding increase to the program.

It in no way affected the end user/client of the program.

Selective word dynamics at the least.

But still bringing out the usual suspects to get face time on the cameras.

Here we go again. The prop

Here we go again. The proposed "cut" probably means that instead of the 2 billion dollars proposed increase, there will only be 1.97 billion increase. This is like saying if I ask for a 5% raise and only get 3%, that my pay has been "cut."

And I'm sorry, but why should anyone need "vouchers" for produce? Is it forbidden to spend food stamps on fruit and vegetables? How many of us have stood in line behind people using food stamps to buy steak, frozen chicken nuggets instead of fresh chicken (which is cheap in comparison), and plenty of pre-processed foods? For the price of a couple of boxes of one-meal scalloped potatoes mix, you can buy 5 lbs. of potatoes and make potatoes for half dozen meals, if not more. And maybe fresh fruits and vegetables are expensive, but canned and frozen are very reasonable, especially with store brands. Yet it seems that every time someone suggests educating food stamp recipients about good nutrition on a budget, the idea goes nowhere.

It's so much easier to say "give them more 'free' stuff."

Are we the only country in th

Are we the only country in the world whose "poor" eat enough to become obese?

They're not getting obese off of the milk, bread, and crackers they're getting through WIC. They can obviously afford plenty of other food to sustain their obesity, so what are they doing begging the taxpayers for milk for their babies? One less drive-thru at McDonald's per week and they could buy that gallon of milk. And we want to give them MORE free food? Eating a banana or some carrots won't undo that entire bag of Doritos, I'm thinkin'.

I'm not saying the life of poor Americans is easy, but I wonder how they'd do after just a week of living like the genuinely poor people of other countries do.

I once saw a quote from a n

I once saw a quote from a news report from a third world country where the locals wanted to come to America because even the most poor amoung us were fat.

This was while they had a famine and were dropping like flies.

It is not that we looked away, we sent massive amounts of food aid to work the issue , but rebels in the country prevented the distribution.

It just rotted in the storage areas waiting to be sent out.

Yes, it was shocking to learn

Yes, it was shocking to learn many years ago that the problem with addressing famine around the world is not availability of food but stymied distribution.

WIC

Sanjay Gupta: "Although her husband works, Corina Alvarez still needs
help when it comes to feeding and taking care of her year-old baby."

Hey Corina, how about not having a baby that you can't afford to feed?

Gordo

Melmac

Let's see:The poor get fat

Let's see:

The poor get fat because the government gives them money for food, they are too stupid to buy healthy foods, so we are supposed to give them even more government money so they can get fit (and have more babies they can't raise properly).

Right.

The poor.

With cell phones, high definition TV's with cable, computers, cars.

No wonder everyone hates/envies us.

D


A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.

I have acquaintances through

I have acquaintances through my kid's friends who are among the "poor" who qualify for all kinds of government assistance. They do seem poor compared to the middle-class neighborhood around them. But they have a car (one between them and it's old and ugly, but they have a car). Both have cell phones. I've seen the father with a laptop. He's very overweight. They live in a nice, albeit small, duplex in a very nice neighborhood with a great school. I know from hearing the kids talk that they have cable.

I think the grandparents are helping them out--like, perhaps the laptop was a hand-me-down or a gift. But, still, how is that the definition of poverty? They're definitely struggling compared to their neighbors, but they're not doing without many modern luxuries when it comes down to it.

Taxpayer support for people who are in genuine danger of starvation or homelessness is one thing, but we're subsidizing socialized middle-classness here!

As long as financial status

As long as financial status is broken down by percentiles, the lowest 10 or 20% will be called "the poor" or "in poverty." That is only relevant to the other percentiles, though, and what that means in the US is interesting indeed.

Some time ago I read a statistical report, taken from the US Census that said many of those classified as "poor" own their home, have a car (some more than one), their houses have air conditioning, a microwave, a dishwasher, and more than one color TV. Now I would be interested to see how many of them have cell phones....

It's just like the "statistics" on "hunger"...they would have you think that millions of children are crying themselves to sleep every night because they are hungry, when in reality they are counting people that have missed a meal for any reason whatsover...be it work, no time, or just not being hungry in any given week.

ah yes, I feel for the "

ah yes, I feel for the "poor" when I stand in a checkout line, the women in front of me has a baby in one hand and the latest digital cell phone thingy in the other and can't find her food stamp credit card. Then, after a scene, she saunters out to her late model SUV, loads up, goes home to her new condo, and gets ready to go to a town hearing where she will complain that the local's don't do eneough for the "poor". She is one side of the "poor" in our town. How exactly do we give more to these ungreatful, users of the system?

I will do anything for a poor person who is down, to help them get back on their feet again, but, when i see generations of "poor" doing nothing to get back on their feet again, because they are better off "poor", i do not have any compassion left for them. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be coming to an end anytime soon.

Talk about "generation

Talk about "generations of 'poor'".....I saw a TV program some time ago on welfare, which had an unwed mother with an teen-aged daughter who was also an unwed mother. The "grandmother" wanted the daughter to move out and get an apartment , because, she said,  "it's time she got a check of her own."

I know an older couple who ha

I know an older couple who have four grown children. They put them all through college and looked forward to a relaxing retirement. Three of their kids went off and started making a good living. The fourth has forced the parents out of retirement by being a completely useless mooch. She had three kids she couldn't afford, divorced the loser father, and proceeded to live off government checks, along with her parents' and new boyfriend's generosity. The government doesn't know the grandparents feed and clothe the kids and the boyfriend gives her a car and a place to live, so she uses her government checks to get her hair highlighted and buy designer shoes. She has a college degree, but she doesn't bother to get a job. Why should she?

And yes, the older couple is aware they should not enable their daughter by giving her kids food, clothing, etc. But they firmly believe that if they stop supporting the grandkids, the daughter will still use her government handouts to buy designer shoes and let the kids go hungry. How they managed to raise three winners and this one big loser, I'll never know. But she's exactly the kind of person who turns us taxpayers bitter and resentful about the welfare system.

And yes, the older couple is

And yes, the older couple is aware they should not enable their daughter by giving her kids food, clothing, etc. But they firmly believe that if they stop supporting the grandkids, the daughter will still use her government handouts to buy designer shoes and let the kids go hungry.

Yeap, the typical hostage situation created by irresponsible people, enabled by a failed government policy of feminism and micromanagement, reinforced by it's incompetence.  The kids always get screwed, every time.  One day, when everyone is fed up with the victimization rants of feminists and privleges they demand, maybe someone will actually start paying attention to the human rights of children.  You might think the guy was a loser, but there is one thing that sobers a male up real fast, that's responsibility for their kids when they have to prepare the kid's breakfast and send them off to school -  you know, being a parent.  You can wonder why the daughter became a loser, I don't, it's called feminism, the epitomy of selfishness, entitlement, and no responsibility.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

the usual stuff from the 'we

the usual stuff from the 'we are smarter than everybody and need to save them' crowd.  a recurring theme where they enable poor behavior.  How about this, the government is not responsible for people being fat the people eating too much and not exercising is responsible for people being fat.  "Oh, but we need programs to teach them this" do you see how stupid they (the saviors) think the public is?  And the claim that its the fruits and veggies that are cut?  Why?  I am sure the people complaining have the input into where the cuts may occur.

I work in Oregon, just move

I work in Oregon, just moved into a house across the Columbia River in Washington ... My wife has been watching a current debacle involving the Governor of Oregon and how food stamp's $3 per person per day allowance "isn't enough to eat on". Never mind that food stamps are supposed to be a supplement, not the entire food budget. Anyway she has decided (with my agreement) that we will eat for the month of May on $3 each per day, and eat well, and send a full report to the Oregonian (NYT of Portland) and to talk radio host Lars Larson.

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington

The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain

Lee, scroll down on the mai

Lee, scroll down on the main page of NB to the item by Tom Blumer about Oregon's governor, (Food Stamp Follies) and how the $21 a week is a bogus figure. Long story short....a family of four with NO added resources gets $518 a month in food stamps, coming out to $30 a week per person. The lowest amount in the table, for a family of 8 comes to $26 per person, per week. So where the Governor got an "average" of $21 per week per person is dinsingenuous, to say the least.

(sarc) You know, it's so sad that the Governor couldn't buy his Progresso Soup.....I guess Campbell's or the store brand is beneath him. So why should we expect food stamp recipients to eat store brands? That's for families trying to get by without those benefits.

And I STILL say everyone who receives food stamps should have to take a class on how to economize, and how to prepare nutritious meals on a budget.

On top of everything else t

On top of everything else the governor did wrong, he went shopping at Fred Meyer, which may not be the most expensive groceries around, but they are far from the least expensive. Anyway, the governor's point is the food stamp program should get more of our tax dollars because it "isn't enough", and our point is that even his WRONG numbers are enough.  Of course we won't be eating out, except to celebrate my birthday (and not expensively then).  We won't be eating much red meat (not a favorite with us anyway).  We'll be eating chicken probably most dinners (which we enjoy anyway).  We won't be eating much in the way of chips, candy or other junk, but we'll have coffee and soft drinks. 

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington

The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain

Lee,I find your project fasci

Lee,

I find your project fascinating.  Please keep us all posted...menus, grocery lists, and expenditures.

I suspect this is what is called "citizen journalisism". 

I know for a fact how cheaply I can feed myself.  After I got divorced, I think I managed on about ten bucks a week.  It's easy to do if you're fairly thrifty.

Good luck on your project....can't wait to see the results.

Visit the home of anyone wh

Visit the home of anyone who lived during the Depression and was old enough at the time to understand what was going on. Obviously those people are elderly today, but many of them pay very close attention to what they do with money. They eat, but they throw NOTHING away, short of spoiled food, and they monitor amounts properly so they do not become spoiled.

My grandmother had little for most of her childhood and carried that forward. You will never see her throw away any food that's good. If she doesn't eat the last few bites of something, it goes into the fridge and is eaten later. She's not poor, but it's ingrained in her that it makes no sense to waste, and I agree.

I don't go that far myself, but I really do think that the way she does the things she does is admirable. People today want want want, and if they can't have whatever they want, they're a victim of something.

This mindset carries into the political fodder today, where the libs talk about people having so little in savings. The politicians use this as a reason to push for more programs to "help people." But reality is, there are people who need help, but the low savings rate is due to the American mentality of want want want, and "I have to have," when the reality is, you do NOT HAVE TO HAVE EVERYTHING, and you CAN SAVE MONEY. But the general American mentality is killing our nation, slowly. Look at how much of the budget goes to Social Security and Medicare. The mentality is sickening. Taxes get cut, and do people save? No, they HAVE to spend that money, then bitch and moan about not being able to save anything. Really ticks me off, if you haven't noticed!

On the poor, freewill, and other items

So, the poor have zero freewill?  They can't decide NOT to be obese or to NOT be poor? 

I learn something new everyday.

Unrelated note: is it just me, or is it truly illustrative to se what the problem is when one looks out over some government-subsidized housing and see that more than half of the units have digital satellite dishes?

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

If you could look inside, I

If you could look inside, I'll bet you would find that many of them also have large and/or HDTVs to go along with them, and probably (strictly guessing here) 90% of the units have a game console to keep the kids entertained.

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington

The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain

lnthomp...I help out at Chris

lnthomp...

I help out at Christmas collecting then handing out food to the less fortunate and toys for children that would normally go without. A few years ago I delivered a large Turkey, 3 bags of groceries, and 4 large boxes full of clothes and toys (all brand spanking new) to a woman and her 3 kids. I was about to leave when she pulled in the drive in a brand new car. At first I did not think it was her because she was dressed in very expensive clothing, expensive jewelry, and her kids all had on $100 Nike sneaks with matching leather football jackets.

Once I was in her home I noticed the latest large TV that was on the market, some expensive stereo equipment, and high end furniture. I got mad and threw the stuff down and went back to headquarters and immediately told the head honcho to scratch that family off the list for the following year.

I got so mad because all day we had been delivering food and gifts to people that had no heat, no food, and barely enough clothing to keep them warm.

The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.

I saw part of it.....long e

I saw part of it.....long enough to hear this part:

Greenaway: "It really threatens the availability of fresh frozen fruits
and vegetables, the culturally diverse foods, the changes that are
needed to reduce the incidence of obesity and overweight that we're
finding amongst WIC mothers and children."

What does culturally diverse have to do with ANYTHING with regard to ample nutrition? NOTHING. More diversity BS planted in a discussion on providing correct nutrition.

Is he talking about Mexican f

Is he talking about Mexican food? Because Mexican food is really fattening! I should know--we have some fantastic Mexican restaurants where I live, and they serve super-high calorie stuff. Tons of cheese, refried beans, flour tortillas, corn chips, beef, pork, avocados, chorizo, queso, etc., etc. The only thing I can think of that is low-cal is the salsa! Yummy stuff, but it sure wouldn't help WIC fight the obesity problem!

Wouldn't a cut in government

Wouldn't a cut in government handouts be the best way to fight obesity among the poor?

Fat Americans

Why does CNN think it is the job of the federal government to snatch Big Macs out of the hands of low income Americans anyway?

This government as nanny nonsense is getting way, way out of control.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.