Senate Democrats Send Letter to WaPo Contesting Broder’s Column About Reid

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
By Noel Sheppard | April 28, 2007 - 10:22 ET

Better secure your computer from all combustibles, potables, and sharp objects, sports fans, for the Washington Post published a Letter to the Editor on Friday that is guaranteed to elicit uncontrollable fits of laughter.

Are you ready? Good.

In response to David Broder’s Thursday column about the horrible job Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is doing as Majority Leader – a sentiment likely an overwhelming majority of Americans share – Senate Democrats actually wrote the Post a complaint letter.

I kid you not.

As the Post didn’t feature this correspondence on the front page – instead including it with the other four “letters” published that day on page A22 – and since Broder wasn’t asked to make a correction or retraction, it doesn’t seem that this puff piece, hysterically titled “Sen. Reid’s Fine Leadership,” was taken very seriously (emphasis added throughout):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

We, the members of the Senate Democratic Caucus, contest the attack on Sen. Harry Reid's leadership by David S. Broder in his April 26 column, "The Democrats' Gonzales."

In contrast to Mr. Broder's insinuations, we believe Mr. Reid is an extraordinary leader who has effectively guided the new Democratic majority through these first few months with skill and aplomb.

Doesn’t it make you feel safe knowing that people who believe Harry Reid is “an extraordinary leader who has effectively guided the new Democratic majority through these first few months with skill and aplomb” are in charge of the Senate while our nation is at war?

Regardless of the answer, the letter humorously continued:

The Democratic caucus is diverse, and Mr. Reid has worked tirelessly to make sure that the views of each member are heard and represented. No one ideology dominates the caucus, so that a consensus can be reached and unity achieved. It is hard to imagine a better model for leadership.

There’s only one conclusion that can possibly be reached from that last sentence: these folks lack imagination.

Because Mr. Reid has the support of members of the caucus, is a good listener and has an amazing ability to synthesize views and bring people together, the Senate has accomplished a great deal during his time as majority leader. Armed with his years of service in the Senate and with a mastery of procedure, Mr. Reid has led the chamber with a slim majority and a minority that is, at times, determined to stop legislation with which it disagrees.

Yes, that’s what extraordinary Congressional leaders do, especially ones whose Party is currently the majority: they block legislation.

How truly sad for our nation that one of the two major Parties actually believes this absurdity so much so they would put it in writing and send it to a leading newspaper so that it can be published for posterity.

Of course, this is another example of the extraordinary hypocrisy that exists today between the left and the media that supports them.

After all, David Broder is an outspoken member of the left who rarely has anything good to say about the right. Unfortunately, when he deigns to write something that actually challenges someone in "the club," he will be hounded by those normally applauding his every word.

The message to liberal media members from Paul Begala's attack on Thursday, as well as this letter from the Senate Democrats Friday, is very clear: Your membership can be revoked at any time without warning. As such, you better keep all opinions about fellow members that don't fit our agenda to yourself.

Dontcha love it?

*****Update: Glenn Reynolds has a great suggestion for Broder: "I'd respond with a column on Harry Reid's land deals." Yes, that would be great.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What nincompoops!

These are without a doubt the biggest bunch of idiots in the world...and they run the U.S. Senate! It's not like Broder was lying or slandering Dingy Harry; he is a worthy successor to the Concerned One, Tom Daschle. Neither has/had a vision for leadership other than trying to play to their fringe base, while actually doing little for them. They like to talk the talk, but rarely walk the walk.

It is funny to see a bunch of U.S. Senators writing a letter to the editor because someone said something bad about them. If they want to be in charge, they better thicken up that skin a bit. It's hard out there for a p*mp...uh, I mean a Dem! How they manage to deal with the constant negative media barrage, I will never know!

Typical democrats, They can d

Typical democrats, They can dish it out but they can't take it.

http://us.st11.yimg.com/us.st.yimg.com/I/victorystore00_1944_28036794

LMAO!! Someone send the De

LMAO!! Someone send the Democrat Caucus a wheel of cheese to go with their whine!!

Broder and the WaPo better w

Broder and the WaPo better watch out.  Next, the Democrats will be charging them with "hate speech."

That is not a joke, by the way.

Cowboy, that pic is now fly

Cowboy, that pic is now flying across the internet to everyone I know.

Thanks!


A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.

The Washington Post

One has to wonder if the Washington Post is having an epiphany of some sort.  I don't believe I've ever seen this much criticism of Democrats, from the Post, in many years. 

The media has been having a field day with Republicans having to defend the President and now the Democrats are being forced to defend their leadership,  what a pleasure it is to watch this all unfold.  How long can the Democrats get away with this folly they call governing?  Watching the Post question their madness, gives me hope.

Never argue with an idiot.  They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

...the horrible job Sen. Harr

...the horrible job Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is doing as Majority Leader – a sentiment likely an overwhelming majority of Americans share...

"likely" being the operative word here, let's do a little real-life replacement:

...the horrible job <President Bush> is doing as <President> – a sentiment <certainly> an overwhelming majority of Americans share...

Save a polar bear- castrate a conservative! 

As usual, you're being illogi

You're being illogical.  If "likely" is the "operative"  word when commenting on Harry Reid's clumsy leadership, then using a different word makes your rewritten sentence a pointless exercise....simply a weak excuse for changing the subject into an attack on the President.

Save Polar Bears from starvation, encourage liberals to befriend them. 

MobiusStrip

MS,

No, let's not do a real life replacement. After all, the favorability rating of Democrats in Congress is just as bad as the President's: http://www.pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm.

Furthermore, the last time a majority of Americans didn't have an unfavorable view of Congressional Democrats was back in 2002 when Daschle was Majority Leader.

As such, put that in your pipe and smoke it!   :-)     ns

Bush all time low

You are correct Noel. It looks like the public that does approve very much of the congress, but Bush's ratings are now even more of an all low. I got this article from as conservative of a website as you can get.

http://www.newsmax.c...

Bush Approval Hits New Low at 28 Percent

President George W. Bush's job performance is currently viewed
positively by only 28 percent of U.S. adults, the lowest since he took
office, according to the latest Harris Interactive poll.

Seven in ten adults view his job performance in a negative light,
including almost half (48 percent) who say his job performance is poor.
Since February, the president has dropped from one-third (32 percent)
who viewed his job positively and 67 percent who gave him negative
marks.

The results are from the latest Harris Poll of 1,001 U.S. adults
surveyed by telephone between April 20 and 23, 2007 by Harris
Interactive.

Vice President Dick Cheney is also at his lowest job approval - just
one-quarter of adults view him in a positive light while over
two-thirds (68 percent) view his job performance negatively. This is
down from February, which was his previous low, when 29 percent saw his
job performance positively and 67 percent saw it in a negative way.

Democratic leaders may have gotten past their first 100 days, but the
people are not giving the leaders of the House and the Senate glowing
reviews either.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has fallen from a 38 percent positive rating
in February to 30 percent positive now. Well over half (56 percent) of
adults currently view her job performance in a negative light, compared
to just 45 percent who did so in February.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has also dropped. In February, 23
percent viewed him positively while 47 percent viewed his job
performance negatively. Currently, over half (52 percent) see his job
performance in a negative light while just 22 percent gives it positive
ratings.

Shawn

Shawn,

Forgive me, but you're actually proving my point, and refuting MobiusStrip's.

I wrote that likely a majority of Americans believe that Reid is doing a bad job as Majority Leader, and you provided a poll showing that 52 percent indeed see his job performance in a negative light. How does that disprove my point?

Furthermore, as only 22 percent in the poll you cited view Reid's performance positively, and Bush's number is 28, what is your point?   ns

Noel

Noel, I am not defending Morbius Strip in anyway. I'm just saying I believe the American people are disgusted with government all around. Democrats and Republicans alike

Shawn

Shawn,

Understood.   ns

I like this thread- it's civi

I like this thread- it's civil. I am not happy with Harry Reid and think Pelosi would make a better schoolmarm than a national leader. I agree with Shawn: we don't have much leadership at any level.

Noel, can you remark on the change in congressional approval ratings between this time '06 and now?

MobiusStrip

MS,

Sure. Back then, since the Congress was controlled by Republicans, every media report about the House or the Senate was extremely hostile. Now that the Dems are in control, such is not the case, and public opinion of Congress has improved.

Yet, what is fascinating is that according to Harris, Congressional Dems' favorability has dropped six points in the past two months, and is actually below where it was right after the election. What does that tell you?   ns

How do you guys feel about th

How do you guys feel about the candidate spread, Republican and Democratic? I think McCain is already toast, Guiliani won't get there, and Romney is too unable to build a consensus. I don't like Clinton- not presidential material- and Obama is greatly charismatic but too new. The only guy in the Demo camp with enough experience and credentials as a statesman is Richardson. What do you guys think of him?

Mob,Richardson doesn't stand

Mob,

Richardson doesn't stand a chance.Did you listen to him this morning in his bid for Prez at the SC convention on C-Span...he ought to be a comedian.

He said he is going to save the planet!

Save the Planet!

Roaring with laughter!

BT, I'm saying there are no c

BT, I'm saying there are no candidates for me that stand out on either side. Don't like Edwards either, whom I didn't mention. I remark on Richardson because he has credentials as a Governor and mission ambassador- but he doesn't have my endorsement. Who do you back in the Republican camp, and why? 

Also, I'd like to add that I'm not comfortable with all branches in control by the same party. Either one. So I may vote for a Republican next time around, if the right guy is fielded.

Mob,Hunter, Tancredo and Thom

Mob,

Hunter, Tancredo and Thompson if he enters, Romney so far if he doesn't.

Border protection and protection of this country including war against the Islamic Jihadists world-wide, plus the SC Judges are a must for me with a candidate.

There is going to be a debate with all ten republican candidates this Thursday on msnbc with the drooler Chrissie Matthews from Simi Valley...why they agreed to him or the network is beyond me...nevertheless, it will be a good time for Tancredo and Hunter to get some attention to who they are.

Border protection and protect

Border protection and protection of this country including war against the Islamic Jihadists world-wide, plus the SC Judges are a must for me with a candidate.

indeed!

Being in Colorado, and knowin

Being in Colorado, and knowing Tancredo, I wouldn't think of him. He's a one trick pony and not presidential material in any way. Scratch him, for me. I'll check out the other two- I wish Thompson would lay down some planks and make his bid, don't know enough about Hunter.

BT 4 prez

wishing all the repubs and rinos would join him in this

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070427-114313-4538r.htm

Unfortunately, they probabl

Unfortunately, they probably won't. :-(

"Pulver? Nah. He doesn't have the guts." --Captain Morton (Mister Roberts)

Hey bot, thanks so much for t

Hey bot, thanks so much for that information and link.

Like I said, Hunter for President!

I have watched him for years on the House floor....I hope he gets some good air time Thursday.

The best result would be as V

The best result would be as VP first then president.

Thompson/Hunter...all the way

Thompson/Hunter...all the way!

also known to us here in SD:

also known to us here in SD:  Duncan's son, Duncan Hunter is running to take his dad's place in the House.  For now he is running in-abstentia because he is serving in Iraq

Exactly bot, I know about tha

Exactly bot, I know about that too, Hunter's son and him running and serving.

I am so glad there are some great rep's in my home state left!

May he stay safe...and God bless him.

I'm afraid you're right about Romney

I'm afraid you're right about Romney not being able to build a consensus.  That's too bad.  IMO, he's got the best credentials from either party to lead the country.  

(I'm outta here - time for a little outdoors fun)

MobiusStrip

MS,

I think Rudy will eventually prevail for the Reps. And, though I agree with your view of Richardson -- the only candidate on your side that I would let babysit my kids! -- I  don't think he can beat Obama or Clinton.  ns

Candidate

Believer
Go Fred!

That poll might be what polls

That poll might be what pollsters call a "statistical anomaly". All the other polls taken recently have Bush at 32 to 38 percent, and were taken in the past 7 days.

http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

Has Bush done anything in the past week that would make his job approval take such a plunge?

What is that old saying...&qu

What is that old saying..."if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen"! They can sure dish it out. They don't have a problem with saying all kinds of hateful things about President Bush, but no, don't say a word about them. What a joke they all have become.

Isn't &quot;seeking consens

Isn't "seeking consensus" the exact opposite of "leadership"?

The &quot;L&quot; in Democrat

The "L" in Democrat stands for leadership.

Two for two, Giuliani and B

Two for two, Giuliani and Broder.

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

I get the impression that the

I get the impression that the Democratic reaction to Broder's column about Reid was less about slamming Broder and more about firing a warning shot at the Washington Post and its columnists, that criticism of its "leaders" will not be tolerated.

The Republicans love Harry Reid.  He is the very epitome of the Dem stereotype the characterization the GOP has molded over years.  Broder's column should've stimulated some debate within the DP regarding Reid's future --- and that debate may in fact be happening  even as they rally to defend him --- because Broder is a liberal who's telling them how Reid comes across to the public. 

At least for now, it would seem that Reid's majority leader job is safe until at least November '08.

Harry &quot;the body&quot; Re

Harry "the body" Reid looks sad. I have NEVER seen this man laugh. What misery he must be in all of the time. Poor Harry.

divide America with diversity

Good old democrat surrender-monkeys. Let's examine some of the buzzwords in this letter.

Diverse = use every issue to divide America, and especially to 'keep the black man down'

Consensus = we decide, you agree (or else)

Accomplished = bogged down the whole system

Unity = obey us or be investigated

D


A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.

Dem Letter

I didn't know the Democrats could write. Did you know that the Democrats could write?

Evidently, their coloring books got filled so they  thought they'd try something different for a change.

Well isn't this precious, the

Well isn't this precious, the dem's are upset just a little bit because their fearless leader got criticized by their own leftist paper...boo-hoo.

Here is a link that has some dem's walking the fence when it comes to the fearless leaders statement about the war is lost....

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0407/3681.html

Too funny...Edwards stating it depends on what the definition of 'lost' is...typical eh?

Where have we heard that before?

These people are the enemy within...and we must defeat them in '08.

BT- the war is not lost. It n

BT- the war is not lost. It never was. We won the war, hands down. The occupation is a losing proposal.  Occupations always are- if done without a plan. There was no plan. Marshall had a plan and it worked. Bush and Rumsfeld had no plan- by design. That is why we are there still, into our fifth year.  

Mobius,We still have Troo

Mobius,

We still have Troops in Germany, nearly 62 years after WW2 ended.

Now, what was that you were saying about The Marshal Plan?

Germany hosts us as an ally a

Germany hosts us as an ally and we have mutually strategic interests in being there. There is no equivalent to NATO in the mideast- nor are there any verified reports of GI's being killed by German insurgents in the early years of the occupation. We rebuilt, under the Marshall Plan, the shattered German economy  and industrial infrastructure- precisely because we had a plan and an interest to do so. While we should have done this in Iraq, we didn't. Germany in 1950 was off it's knees and starting to stand on it's own. Five years after we won in Iraq, it's a total mess- despite the fact that it could be otherwise. The management of the occupation is a disaster- because there was no plan. Political hacks with no experience were put in under Bremer instead of seasoned and capable leaders and functionaries. There is no equivalency between the two situations. This administration absolutely failed in bringing a stable democrocy to a relatively stable secular people. And if you want use the argument that they could never handle western style democracy anyway- then why the hell have we spent blood and treasure in trying?

Germany hosts us as an ally

Germany hosts us as an ally and we have mutually strategic interests in being there.

The Bush administration would say the same thing about Iraq. And as I understand, we are rebuilding in Iraq. The MSM doesn't talk about it much, you have to *work* to find the info, but it's out there.

Five years after we won in Iraq, it's a total mess

Not even close. The Kurdish north is just fine, and many parts of the south are good too. Such as the town the British pulled out of recently because the Iraqis had verything in hand.

This administration absolutely failed in bringing a stable democrocy to a relatively stable secular people

I disagree on both counts. The Democrats in Congress kept trying to put off or delay the elections for the Iraqi constitution, and the interem govt., and now they have a working government.

Are things there perfect? Not even close. Could we do better? Yes.

I also have the impression that you don't care about any of this except that you see a chance to criticise President Bush.

If you want to do that, why don't you criticise him for things he deserves it for?

  • Failing to secure our Borders
  • Not controlling spending better (say, with a veto or two)
  • Not pushing for more oil refineries to help drop the price of gas
  • Blocking off shore Oil drilling around Florida

You make some fine points. 

You make some fine points.  The Kurds are doing well as they are united tribally and culturally and the south is doing better precisely because it is almost all Shiite. These are the natural re-coagulations of peoples that were held together under force since 1920, when Churchill created the artificial amalgam we call Iraq.

However, Baghdad is the core of the apple, and it is a total, rotten mess. We must face the fact that we opened up Pandora's box- and can't close it up. Nor should we have believed or assumed that it would be easy. "Showered with flowers" was pure BS- some of us bought it. Showered with IED's for four years is the result of that ignorant assumption.

I would add to your points about other Bush failures Katrina and the treatment of our veterans.

If you can ever demonstrate

If you can ever demonstrate to me that Bush was the Mayor of New Orleans, or the Governor of Louisiana, then I will agree. Mississipi is doing pretty well and they got hit just about as hard.

And a quick look at www.navy.mil will give you info on the war ships the U.S. deployed to help in New Orleans. Bush should get the least of the blame. At least FEMA, the USCG, and the US Navy were doing something. Ask our Floridians about Huricaine prep & evacuation . . .

Back to Iraq. I still don't feel you really care about it except as a means to criticise The President.

Free,As for Katrina...how doe

Free,

As for Katrina...how does it become the President's fault that everyone in New Orleans, including the Mayor, refused to take any preparatory action whatsoever?  They refused to believe the danger they faced, until it was entirely too late to do anything other than cower in the Super Dome.

Forgive me for being callous, but the key to survival in a hurricane zone is total preparedness.  These whiners and Katrina apologists (and Bush blamers) are just full of shiite.  Typical children, whining that President Bush was a Bad Daddy in Chief.  The blame lays soley at their own feet, for not having secured their property, nor for having a decent hurricane plan, nor adequate supplies, not an evacuation plan, etc.

Iraq.  This isn't a civil war we're trying to put down.  The terror IED campaign is  the desperate attempt by Al-Quaeda to change the outcome.  The dem's insistence on a timetable works perfectly into their hands...if they can just hold out until the cut and run is implemented...they win. 

The Saudis catching 172 Al-Q influenced terrorists doesn't fit in too neatly with Mobi's "civil war" take on the war in Iraq, does it?  Nor does the specific targeting of Prince Harry if he's allowed to deploy to Iraq.  Oops...back to the drawing board on that. 

He only gets blame for FEMA

He only gets blame for FEMA's less than stellar response, which doesn't let Nagin off the hook for those unused buses (and his other blunders), and is a minor footnote to the whole N.O. mess, despite the efforts of the MSM

Forgive me for being callous

Not calllous, you know what it is like to live in the path of a hurricane. :-)

LOL. It wasn't Bush's respons

LOL. It wasn't Bush's responsibility to be first on the scene after Katrina. It was the responsibility of the (Democrat) local and state Governments. FEMA has ALWAYS told folks that they can't be expected to be there until a minimum of 72 hours later. When both groups of local and state Democrats totally dropped the ball, they asked their national DNC masters to press the Democrat-controlled media to make it seem like it was all Bush's fault.

Remember, Bush had already declared a State of Emergency before the storm had even hit, and then asked the Governor of Louisiana to deploy her National Guard. She balked. And is not even going to try and run for re-election.

In fact, in the first 48 hours after the mess in the Big Easy started, the US Coast Guard (which Bush IS the Commander in Chief of, by the way) had already rescued some ten thousand people. He never took credit for it. I'm sure your heroes Clinton and Reid would have, though.

&quot;Nor should we have be

"Nor should we have believed or assumed that it would be easy. "Showered with flowers" was pure BS- some of us bought it."

No one assumed that it would be easy, or stated that it would be. And for the record, we were "showered with flowers". I guess you were too busy constructing one of your anti-Bush diatribes to catch it.

"I would add to your points about other Bush failures Katrina and the treatment of our veterans."

Ah, yes, the Katrina failures, first and foremost of which was GWB's greatest sin: he looked down at the destruction while flying over. OHHHHH, THE HORROR!!!!

&quot;We rebuilt, under the

"We rebuilt, under the Marshall Plan, the shattered German economy and industrial infrastructure- precisely because we had a plan and an interest to do so. While we should have done this in Iraq, we didn't."

Total BS. We are doing everything we can to rebuild the economy and infrastructure in that country, and have made tremendous progress doing so. Hard to believe, but it does take time to rebuild an entire country that suffered for 30 years with little or no maintenance to it's infrastructure

The problems in Iraq are to be blamed on one thing: Iraqis. You can plan until the cows come home, but it won't matter much when a significant portion of the population is intent on blowing up one another.

"There is no equivalency between the two situations."

You're absolutely right. The Germans weren't hell-bent on killing one another; many of the Iraqis are. Comparing the relative ease of success of one to the other is like comparing the invasion of Grenada to that of Iraq and concluding that because Grenada was such a simple operation, then Iraq should likewise be as simple. Sorry, doesn't work like that.

Mob,This war would of been ov

Mob,

This war would of been over if it weren't for the enemy within, especially including congress critters....the leftist media in all forms have blood on their hands.

Their pure hatred for President Bush, Cheney, Rove....on and on...and their grasp for power is despicable and treasonous, they have done this at the cost of others blood, which they could give a rats rear about...they are defeatists intentionally and the treasonous enemies within.

I do believe that the Republi

I do believe that the Republicans had total control of war budgets, deployment strategies, management of the Services and the awarding of contracts in Iraq until a few months ago. Did this mess start in November '06? And you blame the media! Brilliant!

MSyou are smarter than that,

MS

you are smarter than that, you know the emboldening(enemy)/dividing(US) implications of the political power grag by trashing the president.  I've read your other posts and you can not claim ignorance here cuz you are not.

I've got to get out in the su

I've got to get out in the sun, so one last post:

Deal with the fact that this Republican-designed, managed and heretofore disastrous war and occupation can only be blamed on those who designed, managed and continue to carry it out. Republicans. Not the universally evil, incompetent and foolish liberals.

Republican administration. Republican controlled Congress. And their mouthpieces in the media.

Blame yourselves, or take credit for it, or do whatever. It's in your ballcourt.  

MSyou are smarter than that,

MS

you are smarter than that, you know the emboldening(enemy)/dividing(US) implications of the political power grag by trashing the president.  I've read your other posts and you can not claim ignorance here cuz you are not.

Mobius

MS,

And the more than 50 percent of Democrat members of Congress who voted for the war resolution in October 2002? Are they innocent in your eyes, or just as responsible for us being in Iraq?    ns

Mob,Sit and Spin...that is al

Mob,

Sit and Spin...that is all you have ever done since you have been here, you are good at that in some people's eyes, not mine, you are obvious to me and cute by half.

In my opinion you are a troll, have been since day one...and I am not wasting my time with you this afternoon.

I know for a fact of the links I sent you two different times, that you did not read, or better yet, pretended you didn't.

Hi BT, Well it depends on whe

Hi BT,

Well it depends on whether it's 'the' war or 'this' war

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/25/AR2007042502407.html

this was link in a previous blog

Harry Reid is an embarrassmen

Harry Reid is an embarrassment. I’m now ashamed to be living in Nevada. I did e-mail him with congratulations however on his recent audition to be the new Al Qaeda “Minister of Propaganda”

Isn't Broder one of their guy

Isn't Broder one of their guys???

Silence the rebel

"Isn't Broder one of their guys???"

Yep.  That's why they immediately slapped him down.

Reid and Pelosi are the inspiration for my tag line, which says...

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

So they actually expect journ

So they actually expect journalists to be dishonest. You are so right about a circus.

I thought these people were s

I thought these people were supposed to tolerate other points of view. But of course, they also supported Stalin and Mao...

This is exactly why we are

This is exactly why we are having problems right now.

The majority party is more interested in appearances than in actual accomplishments because of the upcoming Presidential election.

We have the Speaker of the House acting as if she were the Secretary of State, the senate majority leader pronouncing "we lost" much to the delight of the enemy terrorists and congress in general wanting to act like generals or the Commander in Chief to direct the troops to do what they want, rather than what is needed.

And the amazing thing is that the president and the republicans are not calling them on it at all. instead they are keeping a low profile as if they have nothing to worry about.

Boy! Do we need a viable 3rd party to wake all these bozo's up!!!!

American Gothic Harry

Those of you who have Photoshop, don't you think this picture of Harry's hound-dog mug would work nicely superimposed on the farmer from the classic "American Gothic" painting? Harry'd look natural as a farmer with a pitchfork in his hand.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

I keep telling people that th

I keep telling people that the Dems, under their current far-left "leadership" is more of a threat to our nation than terrorists. We can defeat terrorists on any ground they choose, but we can't fight this cancer from within that is the new, improved Democratic party. I'll take a war-mongering, profiteering, bribe-taking Republican any day over what the Dems are offering. We can recover from such antics, but not from the irreparable damage these morons will cause.

The Closed Mind Builds Strong Barriers