More Good Stem Cell News That Old Media Has No Use For (You Know Why)

Photo of Tom Blumer.

It becomes more evident as time goes by that if a stem-cell development isn't based on embryonic research, it probably won't get the attention of the Formerly Mainstream Media.

The announcement early last week by Cellerant Therapeutics appears to involve a company more interested in advancing human health than in generating unsupported hype. Because it represents real progress, Cellerant's announcement (of course) involves adult stem cells (link to dictionary definition of "hematopoietic" added by me):

April 23, 2007 10:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Cellerant Therapeutics Reversed Autoimmune Disease in Lupus Mice with Transplant of Purified Donor Blood Stem Cells

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

SAN CARLOS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cellerant Therapeutics today announced the publication of data suggesting that established autoimmune disease can be reversed or stabilized by the transplantation of purified allogeneic (donated) hematopoietic (blood forming) stem cells (HSC) in a mouse study of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Subjects that underwent this procedure exhibited improved overall survival and decreased lupus symptoms. The research, led by Dr. Julie Christensen with colleagues from Cellerant and Stanford University, was published on April 13, 2007 as a First Edition Paper in the online version of the American Society of Hematology’s journal, BLOOD (Smith-Berdan et. al., DOI 10.1182/BLOOD-2007-03-081497).

“The demonstration of successful reversal of the disease using purified stem cells with non-myeloablative conditioning offers a novel strategy to treat autoimmune diseases such as lupus with decreased morbidity,” said Ramkumar Mandalam, Ph.D., Vice President of Pharmaceutical Operations. “This study also provides further support for our belief that purified stem cells may make it possible to use un-matched donors, such as a parent or non-identical sibling, for a variety of HSC treatment procedures.”

“The publication of this preclinical data further validate Cellerant’s unique use of pure hematopoietic stem cells for a wide range of therapeutic applications, including lupus and other autoimmune disorders, as well as for cancer and blood disorders,” commented Bruce Cohen, Cellerant’s President and CEO. “This finding is consistent with recent reports on successful use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and merits evaluation of pure stem cells in treating such diseases.”

Cellerant researchers worked with specialized mice that are prone to an autoimmune condition that closely resembles human SLE. The study evaluated both non-ablative conditioning, which leaves the subject’s immune system intact, and fully myeloablative conditioning, which eradicates the subject’s immune system, prior to purified HSC treatment. Traditionally, full, and potentially lethal, myeloablative treatment was considered critical for engraftment success. The researchers found that non-ablative conditioning prior to HSC treatment was not only sufficient to ensure engraftment, but the procedure resulted in improved overall survival. The recipient subjects developed durable mixed chimerism, where the resulting immune system was a mixture of donor and recipient cells. Subjects with established autoimmune disease experienced a reversal of symptoms, including decreased appearance of proteinuria, of circulating immune complexes and of auto-antibodies to nuclear antigens.

The donors and recipients in this study were haplo-mismatched, yet successful engraftment was achieved and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was avoided. These results suggest that using a HCT treatment that has been purified of all or most host T cells and NK cells may eliminate the need for complete donor/patient stem cell matching. T-cells were not found to be necessary for engraftment in the procedures performed.

About HSC

Cellerant's highly purified hematopoietic (blood-forming) adult stem cells are isolated from donors or patients undergoing stem cell transplants. This process is designed to provide an improved outcome when used for stem cell transplant indications where a high level of purity is desired or required. After purification, this material contains only stem and progenitor cells, with no detectable contaminating cells such as tumor cells or the T-cells which cause graft-versus-host disease in donor-to-patient transplants. Cellerant is developing hematopoietic stem cells for cancer, genetic blood disorders and autoimmune disease.

In August of last year, Advanced Cell Technology's alleged embryonic stem-cell research breakthrough (that wasn't one) that supposedly "did not harm embryos" received blanket Old Media coverage. Yet, despite real news to report, Old Media is paying no attention to Cellerant's announcement. A few different placements of Cellerant's press release from five days ago will be the only things you'll see in a Google News search.

All of this could be viewed as just a PR war, but for one thing: Companies that get favorable press coverage will tend to be more successful in obtaining funding to continue their efforts. Advanced Cell, for example, was able to get over $13.5 million in additional private financing that was directly related to its "breakthrough" announcement. Post-hype objections usually don't achieve the visibility of the original hype. Though the complaints about Advanced Cell's claims got wider coverage than usual, that coverage was dwarfed by the saturation reporting on the company's original announcement.

Since Cellerant is a private, venture-backed company, it's not possible to quickly determine what kind of financial shape the company is in. But in general, to the extent that companies like Cellerant don't get the funding that they need to continue their progress at the rate they would like because overhyped, no-results-to-date embryonic research companies and organizations are getting the attention and the capital, progress in fighting disease and advancing human health may be held back.

An exaggeration? Jennifer Clark of the Center for Arizona Policy summed up the current status of stem cell research very succinctly for Life News two weeks ago:

We know this much about embryonic stem cell research — besides the ethical concerns, not one human has received a successful treatment with them. People are being cured and treated every day with adult stem cells. It seems pretty obvious where the funding should go.

But it largely ISN'T where the funding, especially the public funding, is going.

Five or ten years from now, will we be asking ourselves how many lives that could have been saved or improved by adult and other non-embryonic stem cell research efforts were instead sacrificed because of money diverted to the black hole of embryonic stem cell research?

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

advantages of stem cells http

advantages of stem cells http://www.stemcellresearch.org/facts/treatments.htm
advantages of cord blood stem cells http://www.cordpartners.com/diseases/

The only reason this is not

The only reason this is not advertised in the news media is because they want our tax dollars to be spent the way they want them spent.

Same concept for stem cells a

Same concept for stem cells as Anthropogenic Global Warming.....FOLLOW THE MONEY

coverage

The reason this doesn't get covered is that it's in mice.  There have been countless cures in mice that simply don't translate to humans.  It's not news until it happens with humans.

I've said before that Holly

I've said before that Hollywood makes the kind of movies they want to make, not necessarily the kind the public wants to see. One has to wonder why so many liberals want to see more money spent on embryonic stem cell research. Could it possibly have anything to do with trying to find an upside to abortion?

The thought of that really freaks me out.....

Umbilical Cord Blood(from LIV

Umbilical Cord Blood
(from LIVE babies)

exerpt from: http://www.marchofdimes.com/professionals/14332_1160.asp

Stem cells can be used to treat various genetic disorders that affect the blood and immune system, leukemia and certain cancers, and some inherited disorders of body chemistry. To date, more than 70 disorders have been treated with stem cells from cord blood (1, 2).

Parents can now choose to store their newborn baby’s cord blood at a private cord-blood bank in case their baby or a family member ever needs it. Or parents can donate the cord blood to a public cord-blood bank so that any genetically matched individual needing treatment has access to it. Prospective parents who are considering these options should have as much information as possible to make an informed decision.

Adult Stem Cells Rock

I've come to the conclusion that this whole issue of embryonic stem cell research is nothing more than welfare for scientists. Private industry has decided that it is too expensive for regular patients, hasn't yielded good results, and runs into moral issues of cloning and the destruction of human life. If you bypass cloning you run into auto immune problems where the recipient rejects the "donations" from the embryo.

Adult stem cells on the other hand are cheap to acquire. Frequently they can be harvested from the patient's own body (like the nose) which eliminates auto immune problems. Because adult stem cells have shown so much more promise, private industry has been working with it for over a decade now. Embryonic stem cell research is a decade behind. I'm confident that we will be able to accomplish everything promised from embryonic stem cell research via adult stem cells and much sooner.

Conclusion: embryonic stem cell research died in the private sector because it was determined to be unviable (no pun intended). These scientists have now turned to the government for welfare funding.

If the companys doing the res

If the companys doing the research thought the embryonic cells had promise they would be falling over each other to get private funding to keep ALL THE PROFITS!!

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  my litmous test for President.      BT(adapted)

botg,During the past election

botg,

During the past election, Missouri had a stem cell initiative on their ballot (the one which Michael J. Fox did the commercial for, which Rush kind of fell over).

I did a bit of research on it at the time, and for the life of me can't find it.

A Kansas City couple (Stowers) funded the ballot initiative to the the tune of $30M, to ensure that embryonic stem cell research was forever decriminalized.  They did it through their private foundation.  This couple made all of their money through 20th Century Growth Fund (later American Century...I remember this becase I owned a bit of this mutual fund in the 80's and made a very tidy return).

Their private foundation funded the ballot initiative (which won), providing a huge boon in state funding for their privately funded foundation hospital....which, oh, BTW, is not quite a wholly owned subsidiary of their for profit medical research foundation....which owns the rights to all of the medical breakthroughs made by the non-profit foundation.  All tax free, of course!

Interesting how that works, isn't it?  I wish I could find the links I had at the time, I did quite a bit of research, but if you look up "Stowers", "American Growth", "20th Century Growth", and something like "Missouri Stem Cell Initiative" you should be on your merry way.

Blonde,Yup, the money goes fr

Blonde,

Yup, the money goes from the taxpayers to the non-proit, which then gives paychecks and "benefits" to the pushers.  My point was that they would have self-funded the research and kept ALL the money not just a small siphon.  There was a ballot init here in CA for big bucks for embryonic stem cells.  Why not for umbilical cells or adult cells where the results are making money?  Because they have private funding.  

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  my litmous test for President.      BT(adapted)

Bruce,Why be "self-funde

Bruce,

Why be "self-funded" if you can get the taxpayers to foot the bill?

All of these self-interested groups, with the good sense and enough money to pay lobbyists, own the pols.

That is our problem in a nutshell.

If we could legally ban all forms of lobbyists, these idiot politicians might actually work for their constituencies, instead of for their own (and their spouse's, children's, friend's, lover's) pocketbooks.

BTW, your troll forum worked out rather nicely.

Follow the moneyBTW, your tro

Follow the money

BTW, your troll forum worked out rather nicely.

Thanks, did you see the Monty training film?

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  my litmous test for President.      BT(adapted)