Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Soon-to-be-Dr. Al Gore is training people to give his global warming slide presentation at places like “schools, Rotary clubs and nursing homes” around the country.
I kid you not.
As reported by USA Today (emphasis added throughout):
Meet, no, not Al Gore, but Gary Dunham, 71, a grandfather from Texas who was the first of 1,000 Americans Gore trained to deliver his Oscar-winning An Inconvenient Truth slide show to schools, Rotary clubs and nursing homes around the nation.
Scared yet? Well, brace yourselves, for it’s much worse than you can imagine:
Two weeks ago, the last 150 of this hand-picked crew arrived here — paying their own way for everything but food — to go through a two-day seminar starring Gore but effectively led by Dunham and a few other graduates of the former vice president's global-warming boot camp.
To date, The Climate Project has drawn everyone from Wal-Mart workers to Cameron Diaz. And though the 1,000 mark has been reached, "we keep hearing whispers that (Gore) might do more," project director Jenny Clad says. "I wouldn't call this final."
Scary stuff. Though seemingly a new revelation, Time magazine reported on this in January:
Now through the Climate Project — an initiative to spread awareness and challenge citizens and governments to take action against the effects of global warming — Gore has trained nearly 1,000 of his foot soldiers to give the same presentation that he delivers in the movie. His disciples, who are required to give at least 10 talks a year, are not just scientists but volunteers from all walks of life including teachers, housewives and even celebrities like Cameron Diaz.
Yet, there appears an inherent danger in this strategy:
Gore's "cavalry," as he calls them, can also do something else the movie can't: talk back to the audience. "I can answer questions better than Gore can in the film," said Ken Mankoff, by night a soldier for Gore and by day a computer programmer who develops models at Columbia University.
Hmmm. So now, regular citizens with no formal training in climatology or meteorology, after twelve hours with a man who also has no such training, are going around the country disseminating information from a film that even the New York Times admitted had many flaws.
Marvelous. Fortunately, USA Today addressed this: “‘I'm very uncomfortable with 1,000 people who aren't technically trained in a field as complex and important as this proselytizing for one extreme point of view,’ says Pat Michaels, senior fellow with the conservative Cato Institute.”
So should everyone, Pat. After all, what this means is that Gore and his sycophant cadre can now spread this message to folks not interested in paying to see his film, and, maybe worse, in schools where our impressionable children are.
Once again, be afraid.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Nursing homes? People have be
April 25, 2007 - 09:38 ET by QueenMumNursing homes? People have been brought up on charges for cruelty to nursing home residents. Methinks it's a plot. Those poor older folks will die laughing if they're not scared to death. Is this another one of Gore's solutions for ridding the planet of excess carbon emissions? Think about it.
This IS truly scary... This
April 25, 2007 - 09:42 ET by rx4musicThis IS truly scary... This has all the earmarks of a cult (remember Jonestown?). Does anyone else see it this way? The bottom line is (and anybody who has ever been in sales knows this...) that 1 out of 10 people will absolutely buy this crap; hook, line and sinker. 2 more of the 10 will be 50% inclined to buy into this and the remainder can go either way. Only 1 out of the 10 will refuse to believe any of it...
Unbelievable... AND scary.
"I used to be disgusted, but now, I try to be amused..."- E. Costello
rx, You beat me to the punch
April 25, 2007 - 09:59 ET by Sick-n-Tiredrx,
You beat me to the punch with the Jonestown analogy---however in my minds eye I likened this to David Koresh (Al Gore) and the Branch Davidians (AGW followers). The scary part is this is a cult that has millions if not billions of people mesmorized...
Cult of Global Warming
April 25, 2007 - 10:35 ET by RiharYou're right rx4music! Just last night I was doing an online search for "definition cult" and when I cut-and-pasted it to a .doc file I started to fill in the blanks. It was sad and alarming how I was able to apply a quote or a news article to coincide with almost every part of the cult definition.
(a) The group will have an ELITIST view of itself in relation toothers, and a UNIQUE CAUSE. e.i. THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES RIGHT -everyone else is wrong. THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES DOING GOD'S WILL -
everyone else is in apostasy.
The above is from the section "Identifying a cult" and it's only the tip of the iceberg. Just replace "God" with "Mother Earth". Just for fun I also searched "Groupthink" and those pieces fell into place with the media's complicity.
When a liberal speaks, the truth is busy elsewhere.
Malinowski noted that as the
April 25, 2007 - 11:29 ET by danboMalinowski noted that as the Trobriand islanders ventured outside their lagoon to explore distant oceans, superstition increased and the use of magic.
If you study nativistic and revivalistic cults you will notice the appearance of an eden before the evil appeared. For the ghost dance, the time before the europeans arrived.
The warmers have their eden the time before the industrial revolution. The americas were eden before Columbus. No war. Peace. Except for tribes at war with each other and all those human sacrifices. But we can ignore those.
The world is changing fast. Thy're afraid of what the future brings. They want to rid the world of man's "sin". CO2. And return to eden. When people were lucky to live long enough to see their 1st birthday. A time where yellow fever and malaria were a common part of life.
Cult concepts fit quite well.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
Hmm...that text applies to Ne
April 26, 2007 - 07:20 ET byHmm...that text applies to Newsbusters as well...deprogram today!
I may be going against the gr
April 25, 2007 - 10:53 ET by danboI may be going against the grain. But there are a nuimber of skeptics around. Quite a few. Most have a good knowledge. As the post points out, the person presenting can do something the movie can't. Answer question.
But something can happen that can't in the movie. People asking questions and bringing up facts they can't respond to.
Warmers have a terrible track record in debates. That's why they want to silence debate.
This has a good chance to backfire on them.
If I go somewhere expecting to meet friends. And they subject me to a warmer lecture. I for one will not be happy; and be pointing out the problems. Including the hypocracy of warmers.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
Yes, it is a cult. You can
April 25, 2007 - 11:17 ET by dscottYes, it is a cult. You can always tell when the leader does not follow his own teachings and they demand people to sacrifice while the leader does not. Dr. Al Gore's lifestyle is completely at odds with his teachings, following his teachings makes you poor, under his power and makes him rich (carbon credits).
The fact that he feels he needs people to go from school to school convincing children, indicates he realizes the public at large is not buying his story and so he preys on the easily influenced and misled.
The only way to deal with a cult is to isolate the leader from his followers by pointing out the inconsistencies of his lifestyle. You can counter and expose his lies all you want, but until you deal with the leader in the follower's eyes, the follower will believe anything the leader says, even 2 + 2 = 5. This is not about logic and reason, this is about faith and belonging to something greater than yourself to achieve a world wide impact.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
Slide shows for schools-wow
April 25, 2007 - 09:46 ET by terrigSlide shows for schools-wow more indoctrination by the left.
side shows
April 25, 2007 - 12:29 ET by m1xramDid you say "side shows"? That would be great, the kids love the wavy mirrors but the bearded lady might scare them. Maybe Gore could set up some rides and have a whole carnival. Subliminal Global Warming messages could be played continually while tracts are handed out with free ride tickets.
m1xram
This is a logical progression
April 25, 2007 - 09:50 ET by GalvanicThis is a logical progression from Gore's earlier indoctrination attempts, such as providing free DVDs of his "An Inconvenient Truth" to public schools (In the UK, the governing school body directed that all elementary school students view it --- a directive that is being challenged by some brave British parents.)
The best weapon to use against Gore's eco-jesuits is facts. Wherever they emerge --- town halls, nursing homes, public schools, houses of worship, shopping malls --- challenge them with the facts; Lindzen, Ball, and Lomborg are good sources. If these messengers from Gore-Hell are anything like Gore himself, they'll melt under the challenge.
Blind leading the blind
April 25, 2007 - 09:56 ET by Wonder95The phrase "the blind leading the blind" comes to mind here...
I getting really tired of bei
April 25, 2007 - 10:03 ET by GordoI getting really tired of being preached to by these people, especially when I keep my two story home at 64 degrees in the winter and drive a Toyota RAV4. When is Gore going to preach to the Airline Industry or the Trucking Indistry. His Global Warming campaign is text book fear tactics geared towards the citizens of this country, yet the problem is industry in this country.
I think all these Global Warming preachers are worried that if they rally against the airline industry, they won't get flown all over the planet to preach their paid for messages. If they rally against the trucking industry, they won't get their musical equipment, lights and roadies driven all over the country so they can preach through their musical concerts. (Does a colored spotlight leave less of a carbon footprint than my offices' incandescent? I don't think so Cheryl Crow!)
When will someone step up and speak about ideas and hope rather than blame and fear?
I'll start....
How about we offer $.01 for every plastic shopping bag returned to a store, in the same vein as recycled cans? You pay the charge in the exact same way too, you pay for it when items are purchased and they get a refund when you return them later on.
I'm sure if $.01 was offered, there would be less of them flying around as trash and getting stuck in trees! (although there will be less "Beautiful" moments caught on video)
How come with all recent complaints about these plastic bags (San Fran/Glenn Beck) no one has come up with this idea yet?
"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." --John Milton
Just use paper bags. Trees ar
April 25, 2007 - 10:15 ET by florida_chadJust use paper bags. Trees are a renewable resource. I have those plastic bags.
There's no reason to rally ag
April 25, 2007 - 10:40 ET by mattmThere's no reason to rally against airlines or any other industry. The whole idea of a "carbon footprint" is bunk. The eruption of Mt. Pinatubo put more pollutants into the atmosphere in one day than the entire industrial revolution did in half a century... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4499562022478442170&q=global+warming+swindle&hl=en
Trucking industry has already been hit
April 25, 2007 - 22:35 ET by Wonder95When is Gore going to preach to the Airline Industry or the Trucking Indistry.
He doesn't have to preach to the trucking industry, because it's already been hit hard enough. I work for a large company that makes trucks, and because of the EPA 07 requirements, we've already taken a huge hit and had to lay off thousands of workers. Because of the emission requirements, the engines had to be modified quite a bit, and the end result was engines that cost a lot more with no added benefits for the buyers. And it's going to get even worse with the last phase in 2010. This is a classic case of destroying the economy because of environmental regulations that aren't going to do a damn bit of good. Meanwhile, the airlines haven't been touched at all.
Here is a question for you, w
April 26, 2007 - 08:51 ET by dscottHere is a question for you, why can't the diesel engine manufacturers simply specify the type of fuel to put in their engines to achieve the desired EPA standard as do the car companies (premium vs regular)? We know that using biodiesel, or french fry oil, produces less pollutants, why not specify using biodiesel instead of straight diesel and thus not make any modifications at all?
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
Meet, no, not Al Gore, bu
April 25, 2007 - 10:18 ET by MilesDMeet, no, not Al Gore, but Gary Dunham, 71, a grandfather from Texas who was the first of 1,000 Americans Gore trained to deliver ...
Hey there, grampaw, you oughtn't be out there on the rubber chicken circuit spoutin' off about stuff you really don't know nothin' about
I've had it, reached my limit, all I can take. No more.
I've got to get out there, ask for equal time as a speaker with some of these people (ones with science backgrounds, not people like Gary here), and, in a nice way, friendly approach, explain to people why they have nothing to fear ... at all ... not about the climate anyway. There is no one who can take me down in public, because the global warming argument from carbon dioxide is wrong, and people are getting saturated with this crap, long enough.
Maybe I'll get shot, but just I can't take it any more.
I'm sure Algore has a plan t
April 25, 2007 - 10:20 ET by bigtimerI'm sure Algore has a plan to distribute this globally via the same type of means after he sees how this does.
Only problem is, people do have some brains and can look outside and see what the weather is, like today...snowing like heck in Colorado...hehehee..they can spin things anyway they want...the weather outside are just the facts, simple as that.
You can only fool some of the people some of the time.
AL Gore is blind, leading the
April 25, 2007 - 10:34 ET by MivvisAL Gore is blind, leading the blind.
From the '60s Cultural Marxist handbook
April 25, 2007 - 11:26 ET by Ten7sThey were probably trained to perform the "Delphi Technique" aka the "Alinsky Method". This is from and article, "The Delphi Technique: How To Achieve A Workable Consensus Within Time Limits - by Lynn Stuter""
This kind of thing is right out of the '60s Cultural Marxist handbook. So Noel is right to warn us to beware, as the bloodthirsty Marxists are on the prowl. The "Sheryl Crow toilet paper" crap, Harry Reid's traitorous remarks, virtually all of the craziness (not coming from the Muslims) that we see every day is also right from the '60s era (by that I mean roughly '64 to '74). Remember those whacko leftist nutjobs who wanted to bring down 'the Establishment'; now they are 'the Establishment'.
Finally, an American "Ar
April 25, 2007 - 11:27 ET by jdhawkFinally, an American "Army" the left likes!
Noel, I dont want to be a pai
April 25, 2007 - 11:32 ET by bassndudeNoel, I dont want to be a pain, but could you rephrase the "Soon to be Dr..." to "Needs a Dr. soon..." Al Gore?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Gore looks "Nutrisystem&
April 25, 2007 - 11:40 ET by MightyMouthGore looks "Nutrisystem" thin in that pic. Real or Photoshop?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
worried when chanting
April 25, 2007 - 12:35 ET by m1xramI'm not worried yet, Al Gore just wants to bankrupt the country while seeking an unobtainable goal. If Gore gets school kids chanting and hands out AK47s at recess then I'll be worried.
m1xram
He's halfway there, they are
April 25, 2007 - 12:50 ET by dscottHe's halfway there, they are showing the Inconvenient Truth propaganda DVDs in school and doing question and answer stuff led by teachers. Be worried.
The cultural revolution is coming next, the great Mao has shown the way, bands of school children will be traveling about pointing out those incandescent light bulbs and chant, energy waster! Of course, it's only a matter of time that evil Repubs will be denounced publicly for opposing the consensus and not agreeing to support being green by accepting AGW. Look forward to your children confessing at school your use of incandescent light bulbs or using the air conditioner. This has all happened before and it will all happen again. Let a thousand flowers blossom!
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
You better be worried. Add
April 25, 2007 - 13:11 ET by jiminjerseyYou better be worried. Add global warming to another losing battle by the Republicans. The Democrats mantra of settled science has taken root, even within the Republican Party (Newt and McCain). The Democrats final below will be the indoctrination of our children.
NJ Governor Corzine signed an Executive Order to fight manmade global warming. An executive order is scarier than legislation. We all know all this will do is expand government and expedite NJ's fiscal demise. But he isn't the only one. Schwarzandsocialist is leading the charge. Bloomberg isn't far behind.
Oh I agree. They probably wil
April 25, 2007 - 19:03 ET by danboOh I agree. They probably will force their way on this. However. When the cycle changes and the real problems of their fixing it hit us...
They avoided the problem over DDT because malaria was pretty much a thing of the pass in developed countries. It's 3rd world countries and developing countries that are paying the price. We won't be so lucky over "Global Warming".
When the economy of the west is transferred to India and China. And people realize AGW is BS. The chickens will come home to roost for the UN, the Democratic Party, and Hollyweed. There will be hell to pay.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
When the economy of the west
April 25, 2007 - 19:08 ET byWhen the economy of the west is transferred to India and China. And people realize AGW is BS. - - - - - the media will remind us that this occured during the Bush administration
They will probably say that.
April 25, 2007 - 19:22 ET by danboThey will probably say that. But the face of Al Gore is the face of AGW. Barbara Bozer is the one pushing it. there are faces. As well as ABC, NBC, CBS, etc. There are faces with this insanity. Faces that looked us in the eye and wagged their fingers at us.
It will be interesting when people loose half their wealth, their jobs, and are paying 5-6 dollars a gallon for gas. And people in Africa are dying of starvation. Yet Al Gore, and the Hollyweeds ride in private jets.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
Let me see if understand this
April 25, 2007 - 12:40 ET by paperheadLet me see if understand this correctly, we are not allowed to have prayer in public schools but at the same time a representative of Al Gore can preach the evils of global warming, a debate that is still ongoing? If this ever happens at my daughter's school, I'm taking them to court and to the Supreme Court if I have to.
paper,Good for you, I hope yo
April 25, 2007 - 12:49 ET by bigtimerpaper,
Good for you, I hope you do, too bad a group of parents could not get together and do this as a unit of sorts.
Where are all the ACLU and trial-lawyers?
...never-mind, just kidding anyway, they will be the one's you have to fight!
You won't know about it until
April 25, 2007 - 12:54 ET by dscottYou won't know about it until after the DVD is shown. Like anything else the schools do, it's without the express permission of the parents, because as far as the libs are concerned, IT TAKES A VILLAGE, and therefore those kids BELONG to the community/society, not the parents. Remember the problems with sex ed teaching promiscuity? No different here.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
paperhead
April 25, 2007 - 12:57 ET by misterbillYou may want to go to this site.
misterb...That is a great sit
April 25, 2007 - 13:08 ET by bigtimermisterb...
That is a great site, I bookmarked it, you never know when you may need it.
I have seen it before and forgot about it...thanks.
Great way to keep informed on the left too.
Put them in private school.
April 25, 2007 - 12:59 ET by florida_chadPut them in private school.
Or home school them...it cont
April 25, 2007 - 13:42 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveOr home school them...it continues to look more and more appealing and viable.
"Yeah, right! Who's the only one here that knows illegal ninja moves from the government?!" --Napoleon Dynamite
About 2 years ago the blogs i
April 25, 2007 - 15:44 ET by NiftySwellAbout 2 years ago the blogs in the sci community were pretty hot on this issue and then Mr. Gore went on a limb and spelled out specifically how high the ocean would rise, how much the temp would rise, and the specific effects of global warming for the short term.
This caused the skeptics to step back and say okay- prove it.
Why? Because many believe the only way their models work to show a rise in temperature is by putting in a mathematical constant to influence the desired result. This would explain why these models don't work on predicting past results where the data is clearer than the future projection data set is. Example: Human output of gases, effect of gases on temperature, geothermal output, solar activity, earth tilt/wobble/orbit, cloud cover, are all pretty well know for past projections and they cannot fit the model to predict the result. So how can they possibly project future temps? Extrapolating data is much harder than interpolating data and they cannot even interpolate the data with the knowns! This is almost never presented to the public. Next model they bring out please ask them to predict 1959 to 1972 with their model and compare the results to the true totals.
they have only a few short years before they are proven as frauds by the data collection to pass their taxes, reform our economy, and suppress the first world countries to favor the third world countries.
In the meantime, the new media is missing an opportunity. They need to find every supporter of the global cooling craze who is now a global warming enthusiast and ask why were they so wrong. This might be a shot across the bow of people not expecting to be held accountable years from now when it is proven how much this action hurt the poor and needy of this world.
Exactly, Nifty. One of the
April 25, 2007 - 21:16 ET by dahliatraversExactly, Nifty. One of the many major problems with the theory of AGW that is not so far widely known is that the computer models which it is based upon COULD NOT EVEN "PREDICT" PRIOR DOCUMENTED WEATHER. And all the models do not agree with each other, right, Nifty? How how how can we be making significant, long range, intrusive decisions on the basis of such a flawed methodology?
Because many believe the only
April 26, 2007 - 07:30 ET byMany people believe the moon landing was faked.
You are wrong on this--and in your assertion that climate models do not model the past well. Look up models and hindcasting nad you'll see how well they model the cliamte.
I choose my statements care
April 26, 2007 - 16:22 ET by NiftySwellI choose my statements carefully. I have seen the models. Please provide me with a link to a model that works from 1959 to 1972 a period where population rose dramatically but temperature declined. Then show me how that same model predicts an increase from 1995 to present.
When I attended Colorado State University there was a professor there whose wife worked as a professor in the atmospheric sciences department. This was a mass and energy balance class so these problems were ideal for these problems. He often talked about the issues with modeling climate and what the term assumption meant, the assumptions made in these models leave an error analysis that is greater than the projected change in temperature. That is like projecting a winner in a political contest by 2 percent with a margin of error of +/- 12 percent.
I concede the moonlanding was more likely faked based on the evidence than buy the projected increases in temperature, ocean depth, polar melting, draught, famine, or disease as maintained by the alarmist.
CH
I'd recommend against this. O
April 26, 2007 - 07:39 ET byI'd recommend against this. Once the science is presented you'll be laughed out of court, just like the IDers in Dover.
Dose Al Bore think he and his
April 25, 2007 - 13:26 ET by squarehead67Dose Al Bore think he and his minions can stop Continental Drift? The Planet from wobbling on its axis? The Sun’s warming cycles?
All Rational people understand the planet goes through warming and cooling cycles…..so why all the fuss now?
Oh I know….Democrats can’t get elected unless they get the “little” people all whipped up with fear. This will be a big part of the next Presidential election debate….they could not win with the anti war vote alone last time……
Any real self respecting journalist could ripe this nonsense to shreds……where are they????
Because this is not about rat
April 25, 2007 - 14:41 ET by dscottBecause this is not about rational understanding, this is a cult that is offering people the idea they can make a difference in the world by doing things by personal sacrifice. The idea of ultimate control is believing something you do or not do either saves or condemns the world at large. Dr. Al Gore is offering a false sense of power to those who bought into his fear campaign that the world as they know it is coming to an end. It's heady psychological stuff. All the while, Dr. Al Gore, the puppet master, pulls the strings telling people what to do and has control of their emotions (fear) through impending doom. For people looking for a cause, saving the planet one light bulb at a time is their connection to the greater world and control over it. This harkens back to WWII when people were told to collect steel cans for the war effort to make tanks and guns, most of the collected cans were buried by the government because they got too much but didn't have the heart to tell people to stop.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
heady psychological stuffThat
April 25, 2007 - 21:27 ET by dahliatraversheady psychological stuff
That's right, dscott. Part of the mindset is that they truly want to do something for the greater good and that's admirable. The problem is, they have latched onto something too quickly, before it was fully vetted.
And the truth is, with their energy and talent, they really could make a difference. But there needs to be a little more discernment in choosing a cause.
The more you hear about 'lord
April 25, 2007 - 15:01 ET by SnowWhiteThe more you hear about 'lordgore', the more despicable he becomes. Did he sell his soul to the devil? Scaring children & old people? What a hero!
Anyone who can evoke such fea
April 25, 2007 - 15:32 ET by dscottAnyone who can evoke such fear and mass hysteria is far more dangerous than we realize. True leadership does not evoke fear but respect and loyalty through consistent transparent example. Contrast Gore's leadership to that of Bush. A leader does not ask his followers to do anything that he himself is not willing or ready to do. Dr. Al Gore does not believe in AGW, he instead is a profiteer who makes money on speeches, carbon credits and his shares in Occidental Petroleum which engages in energy marketing just like Enron.
If he actually believed in AGW, the first thing Dr. Al Gore would have done years ago is to get his four mansions off the electric grid with solar electric panels and small wind turbines all which are available on the market. That's called a sustainable lifestyle which Dr. Al Gore does not exhibit, nor has he made any effort to do so. If one has electric bills to the tune of a $1000/month and similar natural gas bills, then he clearly has the financial means to afford them, because after all, we don't expect a rich person to live in a cardboard box? Now do we? So the biggest question here is why would Dr. Al Gore not live sustainably, what stops him if he believes mankind can and should control the environment by his actions?
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
I found the link to this piec
April 25, 2007 - 18:44 ET by SumricaI found the link to this piece over at JunkScience.com. A few days old, I still wanted to pass it along since I thought it was a good read.
What do you mean, money is
April 26, 2007 - 10:10 ET by MilesDWhat do you mean, money is "partly" to blame?
Gore is training a crowd of nincompoops to go out and sell this outrageous fraud, for free.
The Scientologists and other lunatics must wonder, how they can imitate peddling their scam. And have the media help them sell it.
Why isn't the Congress helping to protect the American people from falling prey to this fraud? Why has the administration abandoned the people too???