Update (Ken Shepherd | April 25, 13:25 EDT): On Tuesday, Fox News's Brit Hume touched on this in the "Political Grapevine" segment.
ABC News polling chief Gary Langer, in a posting buried on ABCNews.com, revealed that a poll taken Sunday discovered that when “asked the primary cause of gun violence, far more Americans blamed the effects of popular culture (40 percent) or the way parents raise their children (35 percent) than the availability of guns (18 percent).” ABC's World News on Monday devoted nearly two minutes to results of ABC's survey, but didn't get to that finding which shows the public does not share the media assumption that gun availability is to blame for the murders at Virginia Tech.
Although George Stephanopoulos did point out how “a strong majority of Americans, 52 to 29, prefer enforcing existing laws to passing new laws,” anchor Charles Gibson led with a widely-held view, how “a new ABC News poll finds 83 percent of Americans say states should do more to report mentally ill people to the federal gun sales registry.” He went how to highlight that “61 percent of the people in this country say they favor stronger gun control laws, although people are split right down the middle as to whether stricter gun control laws would actually curb any kind of violence, 49 percent saying yes, 50 percent saying no.”
The full text of the question, as listed in the PDF of the poll results, a PDF linked at the end of Langer's summary report:
“7. Which of the following do you think is the primary cause of gun violence in America – (the availability of guns), (the way parents raise their children), or (the influence of popular culture such as movies, television, and the Internet)?”
You have to do some sleuthing, however, to even learn about how twice as many blame popular culture as gun availability and, when you add in poor parenting, four times as many blame something other than access to guns. To get to Langer's posting, headlined “Mental Health Measures Broadly Backed, but Culture Gets More Blame Than Guns,” which as of 8pm EDT was not on the ABCNews.com home page or the World News page, you must click on “Politics” on the sidebar and then scroll to the very bottom of the lengthy page to see the headline in the “Polling” box. The lead headline at the top of ABCNews.com? What ABC considers a controversy: “Limbaugh Says Virginia Tech Killer 'Had to Be a Liberal.'” That links to a blog posting by Jake Tapper.
ABC has been pushing for more gun control, well beyond toughening up standards on sharing mental health information, since hours after the Virginia Tech shooting. Previous NewsBusters postings:
April 23: “Despite Rise in Gun Crime in Britain, ABC News Trumpets UK's Handgun Ban”April 20: “Disappointment at ABC News: 'Politicians and Gun Control: Why Aren’t They Outraged?'”
April 17: “Nets Blame Virginia's 'Lax' Gun Laws, Gibson and Couric Press Bush on Gun Control.”
April 16: “ABCNews.com Jumps to Push Gun Control; On TV Tapper Notes Greater Access Option.” That item recounted how, just hours after the shooting, ABCNews.com posted this leading poll question: “Do you think this incident is a reason to pass stricter gun control legislation?”
The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the close-captioning against the video for the April 23 World News story. Anchor Charles Gibson reported:
"Well, the Virginia Tech shooting stunned the nation and seemed to shift public opinion on some topics. A new ABC News poll finds 83 percent of Americans say states should do more to report mentally ill people to the federal gun sales registry, something that might have prevented Seung-Hui Cho from purchasing a weapon. The poll was taken after the Virginia Tech killings, and it looked at guns and mental health in general. ABC's chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos joins me now. George, so people want more information given to the states on people who are mentally ill and perhaps shouldn't have guns. Will something happen because of this?"
George Stephanopoulos: "Very likely, Charlie. Even the National Rifle Association has supported measures like this in the past. And they're currently negotiating with members of Congress for a new law that would do this. The White House has no objection. So I would guess that something like this would pass, but no new laws beyond this."
Gibson: "That would probably be it because there's some other interesting numbers in the poll that I want to quote: 61 percent of the people in this country say they favor stronger gun control laws, although people are split right down the middle as to whether stricter gun control laws would actually curb any kind of violence, 49 percent saying yes, 50 percent saying no. Interesting thing, those numbers haven't changed really at all as a result of what happened in Virginia Tech."
Stephanopoulos: "Not at all, Charlie. And a strong majority of Americans, 52 to 29, prefer enforcing existing laws to passing new laws. The other thing going on here, those who are against new gun laws care a lot about it a lot more than people who are for new gun laws. And it's become conventional wisdom among Democrats that this gun issue cost them control of Congress in 1994, cost them the White House in 2000 and 2004. The majority in Congress right now has no appetite to make this a top priority."
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





"Well, the Virginia Tech shooting stunned the nation and seemed to shift public opinion on some topics. A new ABC News poll finds 83 percent of Americans say states should do more to report mentally ill people to the federal gun sales registry, something that might have prevented Seung-Hui Cho from purchasing a weapon. The poll was taken after the Virginia Tech killings, and it looked at guns and mental health in general. ABC's chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos joins me now. George, so people want more information given to the states on people who are mentally ill and perhaps shouldn't have guns. Will something happen because of this?"















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Public schools treat kids lik
April 23, 2007 - 20:38 ET byPublic schools treat kids like animals and they tell the kids that they are animals. The kids are herded together for 13 years and often treated with little or no respect, and no individuality. The kids are just a job; a job that many teachers are painfully clear is not liked.
Public schools also treat kids as dispensable, by teaching that abortion is a way for dealing with an unwanted child.
Public schools tell kids to do whatever sexually 'turns them on,' that sexual urges are uncontrollable, by handing out condoms and having homosexual groups.
Public schools tell kids that the state is over God, and that there is no hope, that there is nothing more than this life.
I blame public schools for the school shootings and for many rapes, as well as many student suicides. And colleges only continue the teachings that man is just a dispensable animal, with uncontrollable sexual urges, with nothing more than this life.
Debra...
www.InformingChristians.com
Ms Smith there are times I wo
April 24, 2007 - 04:38 ET by ltcolusmcretMs Smith there are times I wonder about you. After retiring from the Marine Corps in '95 (I am somewhat to the right of Attila in my politics) I taught in a so-called "public school" for two years. None of what you spout above took place there. You and Boortz need to take your meds and calm down when it comes to so-called "public schools".
LtCol, I don't know where M
April 24, 2007 - 07:33 ET by WolfremLtCol, I don't know where Ms Smith resides, however she has described the schools in our neck of the woods to a tee.
"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." - George Santayana
Thank you, Wolfrem. I live in
April 24, 2007 - 15:54 ET byThank you, Wolfrem. I live in upstate New York, where I graduated from public schools, which were awful. I opted to home school my daughters.
Debra...
Ps... I love that quote that you posted.
"Mr" Itcolusmcret,
April 24, 2007 - 15:44 ET by"Mr" Itcolusmcret, I always find it amazing how people will defend the public schools, despite all the wickedness that is known to go on in them. Do people like you think if they defend public schools often enough, that people like me will just dismiss that which we know for a fact to be true, and poke our heads in the sand too?
Sorry, I am too smart for that.
Debra...
I too am retired military and
April 24, 2007 - 15:58 ET by BuffNBoneI too am retired military and did a two year stint as a substitute teacher. Your generalizations are way above the pale compared to my experience.
The reliance on the textbooks as gospel was eye opening. But there were many opportunities to share hard facts and actually the real Gospel. Usually it took the form of a well-thought/well-timed question.
Wrestling with Romans 13 on what the answer is. My personal bottomline, "If we don't get the public schools right, we're all in trouble."
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
BuffNBone,Why should you have
April 24, 2007 - 17:46 ET byBuffNBone,
Why should what you say about the Gospel, be brought down to the fine art of sneaking? Why shouldn't you be able to walk your walk in Christ, for the entire world to see, wherever you work, even in a school?
There is to be no law made that prohibits the free expression of your faith-beliefs.
Sadly, many Christians have conformed to living in a closet, when it comes to their faith beliefs and only peeking their heads out to say something, when it is ‘safe.’
Is this America?
Eph 6:19 And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel,
Eph 6:20 For which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.
Debra...
Please don't get me wrong, we are not to cast our pearls to swine, nor are we to give that which is Holy to dogs. --However, such is speaking about people who do not want to hear about God. If you are working in a school and you are with children who do want to hear about God, you should be able to tell them. It truly is time for all elective classes in public schools, to choose teachers of familys' own faith-beliefs.
Not sure what in my original
April 24, 2007 - 21:46 ET by BuffNBoneNot sure what in my original comment led you to believe I was "sneaking" anything.
I try to not bludgeon people over the head with my beliefs. While Christ is in all things, the expectation was we would do the lesson plan provided. So my goal in conversations was to reveal Him or get them to think about seeking Him.
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
I have to disagree with you.
April 24, 2007 - 16:14 ET by JRI have to disagree with you. I'm not a fan of public schools, but the "treat kids like animals" statement is off-base. I would argue that the schools are coddling students too much. We seem to be raising self-centered, egotistical children who demand instant gratification. The term "narcissistic praise-junkies" (found in the following link) seems to fit these kids well.
http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/the-most-praised-generation-goes-to-work/n20070420101309990016
There should be regulations o
April 23, 2007 - 21:28 ET by Conservative in the ArtsThere should be regulations on alcohol. We would have less drunk driving if we just had alcohol laws. heck, we could save lots of lives by just banning alcohol all together. Cars don't kill people, drunk people in cars don't kill people, whisky kills people.
I totally agree.
April 23, 2007 - 21:37 ET byI totally agree.
Debra, if I didn't know bette
April 24, 2007 - 00:26 ET by tracheostomyDebra, if I didn't know better. . .I think something went right over your head.
Conservative in the Arts may have been making a sarcastic comparison between banning guns and prohibition. And if you recall your history with the latter, you'll know it totally failed.
Or just because a govt. program fails, does this mean we can try again and again until we "get it right?"
Do you believe we can legislate the sin out of people? Would you advocate some form of new and improved "social gospel," hmm?
-PJ
corn
April 24, 2007 - 12:30 ET by tejanodiablothis could be an enviromental issue .. with the prohibition of satin's syrup, more people might run their hot-rod-lincolns on ol' debil rum at high speed thru the backroads ..
never look a gift skunk in the tail ..
Another perfect example of ho
April 23, 2007 - 23:51 ET by mattmAnother perfect example of how the MSM's bias is revealed in what they emphasize and what they downplay. Way to go NB!