Disappointment at ABC News: 'Politicians and Gun Control: Why Aren’t They Outraged?'

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

ABC's Good Morning America and World News on Friday displayed disappointment that liberals and Democrats have not pursued gun control in the wake of the mass murders at Virginia Tech. GMA's on-screen graphic for a 7am half hour story demanded, “Politicians and Gun Control: Why Aren’t They Outraged?” Co-host Robin Roberts rued: “After every major shooting in the U.S., without fail, there has been a heated debate about gun control on Capitol Hill. But not this time. In fact, most politicians have been running away from the debate on guns. So, why is this happening?” Reporter Jake Tapper echoed the theme: “It was the worst school shooting in American history, and yet what some liberals are referring to as a deafening silence from Democrats on Capitol Hill. After reciting how Democrats fear the electoral impact of the agenda, Tapper concluded by relaying how “in the rest of the world, of course, gun rights in the United States are viewed somewhat oddly.”

Just over 12 hours later, World News anchor Charles Gibson recalled how “when I spoke to President Bush at Virginia Tech, he told me he thought the killings at that college would spark new debate on gun laws. So far, it hasn't. The discussion, in fact, has been surprisingly muted.” (Naturally, Gibson had prompted that answer: “After Columbine, there was ignited a national debate on guns. Do you think this is going to rekindle the national debate?”) In Friday's story, Tapper highlighted how “for gun control activists...the Democrats' silence was deafening.” He went on to explain that “many Democratic strategists think Al Gore's liberal gun control stance cost him key states like West Virginia and Tennessee in the 2000 election” and “Democrats recaptured the Congress last November partly because of pro-gun Democrats.” Tapper showcased how “this weekend a TV ad campaign begins airing that faults the Democratic Congress for not backing a gun control measure.”

[UPDATE: PBS's Gwen Ifill: “Have the Virginia tech shootings changed the debate” about gun control? "Not so much. But why not?”]

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

So, in other words, House and Senate Democrats are to the right of ABC News which started its crusade for gun control on Monday afternoon, just hours after the tragedy. My April 17 NewsBusters item, “Nets Blame Virginia's 'Lax' Gun Laws, Gibson and Couric Press Bush on Gun Control,” recounted:

Without any regard to how school shootings in recent years have occurred in states and nations with stricter gun laws, including one last year at a college in Quebec, Canada, ABC and CBS on Tuesday night focused stories and questions on Virginia's “lax” gun laws. “How the gunman purchased the murder weapon,” ABC anchor Charles Gibson teased an upcoming story, “Virginia's controversial gun laws: How lax are they? Brian Ross investigates.” Ross confirmed that “Virginia's gun laws, indeed, are regarded by law enforcement officials as among the most lax in the country.” Ross relayed how “for gun control advocates, the ease with which Cho [Seung-Hui] was able to legally get his Glock and a box of ammunition reveals the problems with Virginia's gun laws.” Over undercover footage recorded by the New York City Police Department, Ross explained how it shows “it's possible to buy a handgun at a Virginia gun store with no waiting period and only what is called an instant background check.” Though Ross aired a condemnatory soundbite from NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly, he failed to note that Virginia has a lot fewer gun crimes per capita than does New York City.

As if the media have nothing to do with “igniting” a debate on guns (ABCNews.com on Monday posted the question: “Do you think this incident is a reason to pass stricter gun control legislation?”), Gibson asked President Bush: “After Columbine, there was ignited a national debate on guns. Do you think this is going to rekindle the national debate?”...

[UPDATE. Gwen Ifill opened Friday's Washington Week on PBS:

“The horrific killings at Virginia Tech this week riveted the nation. The questions came fast and furious. How? Why? Could anyone have seen it coming? In Washington, those questions turned to matters of policy -- gun control policy. Have the Virginia tech shootings changed the debate? Not so much. But why not? Jeanne?”

After Jeanne Cummings of The Politico outlined the power of the NRA on Capitol Hill and how Democrats fear losing seats if they pursue gun control, ABC News correspondent Pierre Thomas propounded:

“So Jeanne, is where we are, given the fact that I've seen estimates that there are in excess of 200 million firearms already on the street, have we essentially said it's okay to have the level of violence that we have in this country.”

Cummings: “Well, I don't think that anybody in Washington would say that they said that...”]

The MRC’s Scott Whitlock provided this transcript of the ABC story aired at 7:05am on the April 20 Good Morning America. Robin Roberts set it up:

“Also a part of this story, the gun debate, or more precisely what gun debate? After every major shooting in the U.S., without fail, there has been a heated debate about gun control on Capitol Hill. But not this time. In fact, most politicians have been running away from the debate on guns. So, why is this happening? ABC’s senior political correspondent Jake Tapper with some answers on Capitol Hill for us this morning, Jake.”

The on-screen graphic throughout: “Politicians and Gun Control: Why Aren’t They Outraged?”

Jake Tapper reported:

“Good morning, Robin. Well, it was the worst school shooting in American history, and yet what some liberals are referring to as a deafening silence from Democrats on Capitol Hill. After a killer with an AK-47 killed five kids in a Stockton, California schoolyard in 1989, Democrats pushed for a ban on assault weapons. After the Columbine tragedy in 1999, Democrats pushed for more gun control. But this week, when directly asked about Congress' mood to pass gun control, liberal House Speaker Nancy Pelosi acted as if she'd never even heard the term.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: “I would say the mood in Congress is one of mourning, sadness and the inadequacy of our words or our actions to console the families.”

Tapper: “Old-school liberals like New York Congressman Charlie Rangel, seen on C-SPAN, do not seem to understand why Democrats are being quiet on the subject.”

Rep. Charlie Rangel, at press conference: “It's some type of a cult, don't touch, don't take the gun from my dead, cold hands, and I don't understand it.”

Tapper: “But the reason for the sound of silence? Democrats are back in power because of newly elected freshmen with more conservative views on the right to bear arms. The Democratic presidential candidates have all supported gun control in the past but have been quiet this week about it. Though on the Steve Harvey radio show, Senator Barack Obama took a quick stab at how to prevent future Seung Chos.”

Senator Barack Obama: “If we know that he got mental health services, then there should be prevent be somebody like that from buying any kind of weapons.”

Tapper: “In fact, it's a Republican behind new TV ads launching this weekend slamming the Democratic Congress for not being pro-gun control enough.”

[brief clip of Bloomberg ad]

Tapper: “Ads being funded by the billionaire mayor of New York, Mike Bloomberg, who said the Virginia Tech massacre should move Congress to act.”

Tapper: “In the rest of the world, of course, gun rights in the United States are viewed somewhat oddly. The Prime Minister of Australia this week referred to a massacre that took place in his country about 11 years ago and said, quote, ‘W e took action to limit the availability of guns and showed a national resolve that the gun culture that is such a negative in the United States would never become a negative in our country.’ Now, that is a sentiment that is foreign in every sense of the word. You could not imagine any major U.S. political figure saying anything like that. Diane?”

The MRC’s Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video for the April 20 World News version. Charles Gibson introduced the story:

"Returning now to the Virginia Tech shooting and the outrage that despite the fact Cho has been deemed psychologically unstable, he had no trouble buying guns. When I spoke to President Bush at Virginia Tech, he told me he thought the killings at that college would spark new debate on gun laws. So far, it hasn't. The discussion, in fact, has been surprisingly muted. Here's our senior national correspondent, Jake Tapper."

Jake Tapper began:

"While past shooting massacres were met with major Democratic pushes for stricter gun control, today's Democratic leaders say this time it's not going to happen."

Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader: "I hope there's not a rush to do anything."

Nancy Pelosi, House Speaker: "The mood in Congress is one of mourning, sadness and the inadequacy of our words. That's all we're focusing on right now."

Tapper: "For gun control activists, like Terry Hartnett, the Democrats' silence was deafening."

Terry Hartnett, Million Mom March: "A lot of Democrats, not all of them, but a lot of them are afraid to talk about this issue."

Tapper: "What do Democrats have to fear? Losing elections."

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY): "There is a story that a member was asked, 'How many people in your district support gun control?' 'Say, about 80, 85 percent.' He said, 'Well, why is it that you always vote against it?' He said, 'Oh, the other 15 percent are organized.'"

Tapper: "Many Democratic strategists think Al Gore's liberal gun control stance cost him key states like West Virginia and Tennessee in the 2000 election. At a seminar after that election, a major Democratic operative was asked what should Democrats do about gun control. His response: Quote, 'Shut the hell up.' In fact, Democrats recaptured the Congress last November partly because of pro-gun Democrats. One of them, Senator Jim Webb, even got into trouble last month when an aide was arrested in the Capitol carrying one of the Senator's loaded guns for him."

Senator Jim Webb (D-VA): "I believe that wherever you see laws that allow people to carry, generally the violence goes down."

Tapper: "This weekend, a TV ad campaign begins airing that faults the Democratic Congress for not backing a gun control measure."

Clip of police officer in ad: "We're fighting criminals and illegal guns. Why is Congress fighting us?"

Tapper: "It's being funded by billionaire Mike Bloomberg, the Mayor of New York, and a Republican. Jake Tapper, ABC News, Capitol Hill."

Of course, the very liberal Bloomberg is a Republican in name only, having become a Republican to avoid the Democratic primary and go direct to the final election ballot.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Oh No.

I guess they will recruit Michael Moore to make a movie, "Bowling for Blacksburg" where he makes up all kinds of things to try and make it look like "W" was responsible for okaying the sale of the guns to Cho.

What about the Mayor of Nagasaki, Japan who was shot and killed the other day? No one is allowed to own any fire arm in Japan. Oh, yeah, it was a Yakuuza member. How about the guy who shot up a daycare center in Scotland a few years ago? Brittain has extremely harsh gun control laws.

Damn! It just seems that criminals don't like to obey the law.

In answer to the title of t

In answer to the title of this thread: It's political suicide because it alienates and angers over 1/3 of the population, many of whom are voters.

"When life gives you lemons, make lemonade, and then toss it in the face of the person who gave you the lemons until they give you the oranges you asked for in the first place!" --Bill McNeal, NewsRadio episode 3.17

Gun Control Doesn't Work

Even the libs have figured out that strict gun control doesn't reduce crime. Look at Washington, D.C. Some of the strictest gun control laws in the United States, and still it's the 4th most dangerous city to live in. And, unless you're Senator Webb, getting caught with a gun inside city limits is a very serious offense.

This is a good article, and the website at the bottom of it is informative also:

http://seattlepi.nws...

Undoubtedly, the Dems knew th

Undoubtedly, the Dems knew they had a problem when it was revealed that the shooter chose a confirmed mouthpiece of the DNC (aka NBC News) to send his bizarre rants to.

If he had sent them to Fox News instead, I'm sure Harry Reid and company would be playing a totally different tune, even if Fox never aired them.

How easy is it to purchase an

How easy is it to purchase an ounce of cocaine in a store?

Of course they don’t sell cocaine in a store. But I can score an ounce of cocaine on the street if I chose to much more easily that I could purchase a handgun even in Virginia.

The point is that ABC should research how effective government controls are for guns, for alcohol, for drugs or anything else.

The price we pay for living in a free and open society is that whenever we try to control something there will always be people who will find ways to circumvent the laws or even break them.

The VT killer would have gotten a gun even if he had to get it illegally. And if he could not get a gun he was so determined to commit this crime that he would have created an incendiary device or even a bomb.

ABC misses the issue entirely while Fox News was addressing it. That issue is how can we better deal with mental illness.

GATyou're making too much sen

GAT

you're making too much sense, the answer is always a government program.  How can the Dems continue to have a voter base if they don't have people dependant on their programs?  Never mind that it costs twice as much and you get less.  Of course as to Fox news there's national health care.

People don't want to treat me

People don't want to treat mental illness as they do any other illness. They are also concerned about violating people's privacy rights and the ACLU coming down on them. This guy's case could have and should have been addressed more vigorously by the doctors, the police, and the college together with his parents to get him whatever help he needed and make sure he was not a danger to the rest of society. None of that was done. We don't need government programs - just a lot more common sense.

GATi spent 5 years working in

GAT

i spent 5 years working in a residential treatment center for children 5-13 years old.  Some of the children were rather violent and we had PART training every other year in order to keep them from hurting themselves or others.  Some of the children had AIDS but we were not allowed to know which ones.  Their right to privacy trumped our right to life.

BOTGIt makes no sense. We are

BOTG

It makes no sense. We are supposed to have the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But you don’t get the last two unless you are ensured of the first.

As the background on Cho come out it is evident that his family knew he had problems; individual professors in his college knew he had serious problems; the police knew he had serious problems as did the courts. But everyone was afraid to overtly address it because of Cho’s right to privacy and potential exposure to liability on the part of the university. Now look at their exposure.

Yup all backwards, there is a

Yup all backwards, there is a real concern as to how free can we be and still have a safe society.   It's a balancing act that has gotten tottally out of balance due to the moral equivalency and redefined tolerance.

"...the answer is always

"...the answer is always a government program"  I'll add to that:  And when it fails, the answer is always another government program.

We have gun control in this country.  It doesn't solve the violence problem because guns aren't the cause of violence.

Liberal "solutions" fail because libs are wrong about the causes of problems or even what the real problem is in any given case. 

And what's worse is that when flawed "solutions" are implemented we get more problems.

And when the answer is anothe

And when the answer is another govt. program it is sure to fail ensuring more programs.

Also, check out this wonderful example of gun control

http://apnews.myway.com//article/20070421/D8OKNTMG2.html

seems she had complete control

The dem's that are up for re-

The dem's that are up for re-election are not going to bring up anymore laws on gun control.

Period.

They want to win.

Geesh.

BT – that’s what a ration

BT – that’s what a rational person would do, but the Dems are acting irrationally and just cannot help themselves. From Pelosi conducting her own foreign policy to Reid raising the white flag to the massive witch hunts they are conducting, to increasing spending, they are doing everything they can to make sure they lose the next election. So why not throw in more gun controls? Give it time. They’re not done yet.

Pelosi & Reid are from

Pelosi & Reid are from "Safe" districts/states.

Safe for their re-election no matter what they do.

Free,I agree about Pelosi, Re

Free,

I agree about Pelosi, Reid is another matter, I know he has a lot of the people in his pocket from press to councilmen, Unions ect...but there is really a lot a person could use against him, pound him to the core if they got somebody clean in there to run against him that pulled no punches, you got his land-deal, his family connections all inter-twined...the boxing tickets, on and on...

Nevada isn't quite a complete blue state yet, they have a good toe hold though...

Reid and his SearchLight are getable....if a strong person with constant speeches and ads especially about this war, with his defeatist, wave the white flag attitude, he is very susceptible.

Well, you can count on the

Well, you can count on the GOP to run a weak RINO against him guaranteeing a loss, or worse, we get a West Coast version of Chafee

Free,Well, let a gal hope!I k

Free,

Well, let a gal hope!

I know you may be right,I also know how rough and tumble and outright lying that is done to try and smear a conservative can be...look what happened to Gov.Gilmore  in Nevada, he was one of my favorite congressmen in the House...what a battle he fought....and won.

Gun control

Reid isn't from a "safe" district. He represents Nevada, and I imagine he'll go the way of Tom Daschle in the next senatorial election. Pelosi, who represents San Francisco, is probably safe, unless she's too conservative for the voters there.

I agree with Reid. This last

I agree with Reid. This last white flag episode will take him down. Pelosi is safe but not as Speaker. I don't see how Dems will keep a majority given their lack of performance, obvious witch hunts, and bad foreign policy gaffs.

Evening Gat..I thought of all

Evening Gat..

I thought of all that, but basically I guess I am just burnt out on this all in a way, the dems running will not make gun control an issue, nor abortion...they have lost too many times to these issues, the others that you mention they think are winners now....

Time will tell, but if the Republicans do not use sound-bites from all these defeatists when the election comes...well, they will get what they deserve, so far the majority of them all put together fighting back as a team numerous times, on numerous issues, wouldn't or couldn't complete just one spine. 

BT – I was very disappointe

BT – I was very disappointed by the lack of response to Reid by Bush. It was the same weak White House responses to the constant body slams handed out by Dems. This has been the problem for the last 6 years. You get better retorts from the Presidential candidates than you get from the President himself.

I do believe that Pelosi’s violation of the Logan Act, Reid’s surrender, and even Schumer’s admission on Imus that he had not visited a VA hospital since before the Iraq War began after railing the President on that issue will all be on nationwide TV during the ’08 election. While polls show American people think we are losing the war, they don’t want to lose. It’s a small point Dems seem to overlook.

Oh Gat...I could not agree mo

Oh Gat...I could not agree more!

Here I was today listening to his speech only Fox carrying it, he was talking about the war and Iraq, they cut in with some damned news from the Bahamas about Anna Nicole crap, and I thought I may of really heard some ballsy reply I was missing...

Yeah, sure, right.... when pigs fly.

Nothing new here, I am sick of the disappointment.

This is what happens when a p

This is what happens when a politician's 'stands' on issues are just to get votes. When he finds out that it loses him votes, he stops taking such stands. In other words, this is what happens when someone who is no better than a prostitute (one who will do whatever you want, as long as he gets paid), holds an office --Democracy, the next closest step to Socialism.

We are a Republic form of government. It is in our Constitution. Most do not know this. Most in office do not know this. Can you believe it? Well, believe it.

I myself believe that there is a middle of the line answer on the gun issue in America, but that decent people have a right to own guns.

Vote Republican, but not just any Republican. Vote a true Conservative Republican. Vote Tom Tancredo 2008.

Debra...

As I was keeping an eye on th

As I was keeping an eye on the other side, the Huffington post, on one side of the page is: DeLay Has the Solution to Gun Violence: More Guns! On the other side of the page is: Armed Miss America 1944 stops Intruder!!
Hey you cant make this stuff up!!!
www.huffingtonpost.c...

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagn- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

i posted a link to the Miss A

i posted a link to the Miss American story above before seeing your post.

A link to "Miss USA 1944

A link to "Miss USA 1944" and her snub-nosed .38

Know the best thing about tha

Know the best thing about that story? No mass killings. No 24/7 news event. No talking heads analyses. Simply one person standing up for her rights and getting the bad guys arrested!

Who says beauty pagent contestants are simply for show? In this case, Miss USA didn't miss. Just call her "dead-eye". Blam-Blam, thank you Miss.

This simply and elegantly dem

This simply and elegantly demonstrates how out of touch the Main Stream Media actually is with the Mainstream of the US. The PEOPLE don't want more BS, feel-good gun laws that do NOTHING to reduce crime. Perhaps this reason alone is why the Dems are running for cover whenever the issue comes up. It is a well researched and easily obtainable fact that areas with strict gun control suffer from vastly increased violence, much stemming from the ILLEGAL use of guns. VT was a "gun-free zone". Every major city with highly restrictive gun laws also suffers from extremely high gun violence. England and Austrailia, who have enacted virtual bans on guns now have some of the highest violent crime rates of all industrialized nations. And these increasing violent crime rates are directly related to restrictive gun laws. As LEGAL gun ownership drops, violent crime increases. The math is simple, but apparently for the supposed MSM, they're too simple minded even for such simple concepts... "So typical of the Left - shut up and be quiet. We don't want to hear your opinion. We'll tell you what's best for you..."

The Closed Mind Builds Strong Barriers

Beowulf, You are right. L

Beowulf,

You are right. Liberal and MSM logic on gun control is the same as the mindset that points out that we have a rising number of inmates in prison, even though the crime rate is dropping.

There ain't no cure for stupid. -- Ron White